Pull the people who liked or commented on any LinkedIn post and segment them by ICP fit (peer / aspirational / prospect / other). Produces an engager roster, tier breakdown, and outbound action lists (follow back, comment-drop, DM-able with one-line openers). Powered by Apify, no LinkedIn login. Triggers on "who liked my post", "who engaged", "engagers report", "audience analytics". Not for tracking author replies to your comments (use linkedin-thread-monitor).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
sergebulaev/linkedin-skills☆ 4,8962026年10月15日 更新
从小说或短故事里拆出角色表、人物画像、形象提示词、音色提示词, 其中形象提示词含一张角色设定图的完整版面指令(左半身像 + 右全身三视图 + 细节条), 产出 JSON + Markdown + 可交互的 report.html。 报告语言可指定(--lang),默认中文,任意语言都支持;零依赖、零 API key、不出图。 Use when asked to 拆小说角色、分析人物、生成角色卡、character sheets from a novel。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
eternityspring/shuohao-skills☆ 4,7552026年10月15日 更新
Post-change checks before handing off. Works out which checks apply from the files changed (directory AGENTS.md Checks sections and matching .agents/rules), runs or verifies each, and reports pass/fail/skipped. Use before saying work is done, before pushing, or when asked to audit or verify a change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
macro-inc/macro☆ 4,7152026年10月18日 更新
Manage cost basis calculation in TRES Finance: check status, view/change strategy (FIFO, LIFO, AVG, MAX_GAINS, MAX_LOSSES, FIFO_IMPAIRMENT), trigger recalculation, review financial issues, manage reevaluations/impairments, set bulk fiat prices, configure spec-ID lot disposal rules, view per-asset cost basis results, and export cost basis reports. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks about cost basis, gains/losses, realized gains, unrealized gains, COGS, inventory lots, tax lots, cost basis strategy, reevaluation, impairment, fiat value override, spec-ID rules, financial issues (negative balance, missing fiat), or anything related to how their crypto assets are costed. Also trigger when the user says "calculate cost basis", "what is my cost basis strategy", "show me financial issues", "create a reevaluation", "run cost basis", "change strategy to LIFO", or similar.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
anthropics/claude-plugins-community☆ 4,6862026年10月18日 更新
Validate wallet balances in TRES Finance against DeBank and generate a discrepancy report. Use this skill whenever the user asks to validate, verify, cross-check, or audit their TRES balances against on-chain data or DeBank. Also trigger when the user asks if their balances are correct or wants to see discrepancies. Only EVM-compatible wallets are supported.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
anthropics/claude-plugins-community☆ 4,6862026年10月18日 更新
This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze skill quality", "evaluate this skill", "review skill quality", "check my skill", or "generate quality report". Evaluates local skills across description quality, content organization, writing style, and structural integrity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze experimental results", "run strict statistical analysis", "compare model performance", "generate scientific figures", "check significance", "do ablation analysis", or mentions interpreting experiment data with rigorous statistics and visualization. It focuses on strict analysis bundles, not Results-section prose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
Industrial AI literature research with mandatory intake questions, venue-aware source prioritization, structured report outputs, and survey draft generation. Use when the user needs up-to-date research on predictive maintenance, intelligent scheduling, industrial anomaly detection, smart manufacturing, cyber-physical systems, edge AI for automation, or crossover robotics-for-industry topics. Also trigger for adjacent terms: "digital twin", "industrial IoT", "Industry 4.0", "manufacturing AI", "factory automation", "process optimization", or "survey draft" in industrial contexts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
This skill should be used when the user asks to "apply skill improvements", "update skill from plan", "execute improvement plan", "fix skill issues", "implement skill recommendations", or mentions applying improvements from quality review reports. Reads improvement-plan-{name}.md files generated by skill-quality-reviewer and intelligently merges and executes the suggested changes to improve Claude Skills quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
This skill should be used when the user asks to "debug this", "fix this error", "investigate this bug", "troubleshoot this issue", "find the problem", "something is broken", "this isn't working", "why is this failing", or reports errors/exceptions/bugs. Provides systematic debugging workflow and common error patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
Publication Specialist - Writing, Review, Pre-registration & Quality Assurance Light VS applied: Avoids template-based writing + audience-specific message design Absorbed G3 (Peer Review Strategist), G4 (Pre-registration Composer), F1-F3 (Quality functions) capabilities Use when: writing abstracts, creating summaries, peer review response, pre-registration, reporting checklists, reproducibility Triggers: abstract, plain language, press release, summary, communication, peer review, revision, pre-registration, OSF, PRISMA, CONSORT, reproducibility
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
System diagnostics and health checks for Diverga plugin. OpenClaw-style Check-Report-Fix pattern with 5-layer diagnostics. Triggers: /diverga:doctor, diverga doctor, system check, diagnose, 진단
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
Review research code for reproducibility and quality, extract the paper's main empirical claims, compare paper to code, and write a constructive markdown report. Designed for social science / economics projects with LaTeX papers and Stata, R, or Python code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
Run the R code review protocol on R scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, and professional standards. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants their existing R code evaluated or audited — not when they want new analysis written. Triggers include: "review my R script", "check my R code", "is my code replication-ready", "audit this R file", "does this code follow conventions", "will this reproduce", "check my analysis script", "code review", "review-r", or when the user has an existing .R file and wants quality feedback rather than new code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
This skill covers academic journal submission, referee responses, and revision management. Use when the user is preparing a manuscript for submission, formatting for a specific journal, responding to referees, or managing revisions. Triggers on "submit", "referee", "revision", "R&R", "response letter", "journal", "formatting", "submission", "resubmit", "cover letter", "referee report", "revise and resubmit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
Assesses a research paper outline (.qmd file) against structured criteria from Kosuke Imai's empirical research guide. Evaluates the abstract and section outline for: research question clarity, stated contributions, hypotheses and testable implications, data description, planned results and inferential approach, and robustness checks. Detects causal papers from the abstract and conditionally assesses identification strategy only when causal framing is present. Produces a structured markdown report with PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL assessments and actionable suggestions. Use when asked to assess, evaluate, review, or check a paper outline, abstract-and-outline, or research plan in a .qmd file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
APSA style checker for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks numbers, capitalization, abbreviations, italics, in-text citations, titles of works, neutral and unbiased language, and APSA-specific terminology against the APSA Style Manual for Political Science (2018, updated 2023). Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to check APSA style, fix citations, review capitalization, check number formatting, or flag biased language in a .qmd document. For grammar, spelling, and punctuation, use the proofread skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
Run a 6-agent pre-submission referee report for an academic paper targeting a specified journal
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
Expert copy editor for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks grammar, spelling, punctuation, and academic writing quality. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to proofread, check grammar, fix typos, or review prose in a .qmd document. For APSA style rules (numbers, citations, capitalization, abbreviations, neutral language), use the apsa-style skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
Run the proofreading protocol on academic writing — papers or manuscripts. Checks grammar, typos, layout issues, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants surface-level writing errors found — not substantive academic critique. Triggers include: "proofread", "check for typos", "grammar check", "look for errors in my draft", "proofread all", "polish this", "check my writing", "are there any mistakes", "proofread before I send this", or when the user wants a clean-up pass rather than feedback on arguments or methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
Defamiliarization audit for empirical output. Systematically interrogates every feature of a figure, table, or set of results — not just the main finding. Named for Jason Fletcher, who asked about the spike at t=1 when everyone else was looking at t=2. Use when you have output and are about to interpret or report it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
Prose quality checker for Quarto (.qmd) files, grounded in William Zinsser's *On Writing Well* (30th Anniversary Edition). Checks for clutter, weak verbs, hollow qualifiers, clichés, inflated academic voice, poor leads and endings, pronoun and tense inconsistency, and unclear explanation. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to improve prose quality, tighten writing, reduce clutter, or apply Zinsser's writing principles to a draft. For grammar and punctuation, use the proofread skill. For APSA style rules, use the apsa-style skill. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
Deeply analyze any empirical economics PDF using the five-question framework (五问框架): research question, identification strategy, core estimand, robustness logic, and scholarly contribution. Converts the PDF to Markdown, dispatches 5 parallel sub-agents (one per question), then compiles a 2000–3000 Chinese-character report with a transferable methodology checklist. Optimized for empirical economics papers in top journals (AER, QJE, JPE, RFS, RoF, JFE, etc.). Use this skill whenever the user wants to: - systematically analyze an empirical economics paper - apply the 五问框架 (five-question framework) to a paper - extract transferable research design elements from a top-journal paper - understand a paper's identification strategy, estimand, or robustness logic - run /five-questions, /five-q, or /paper-five-q-analysis - "帮我做五问分析", "用五问框架分析这篇论文", "analyze this paper with the five-question framework"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新
Verify references in an academic paper: check whether each BibTeX entry is real, whether in-text citations match the cited paper's actual content, and produce a structured verification report. Use when user says "验证参考文献", "ref verify", "check references", "核实引用", "引用是否正确", or wants to audit citations in a LaTeX manuscript.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6672026年10月15日 更新