「quality」の検索結果

Use when a task needs the judgment of a cytotechnologist — screening a gynecologic (Pap test) slide and applying Bethesda System criteria, assessing non-gynecologic specimen adequacy (FNA rapid on-site evaluation, body fluid, brushing) against the relevant reporting system, deciding whether a finding can be signed out independently or must be referred to a pathologist, or auditing screening quality metrics (ASC:SIL ratio, rescreen concordance, workload compliance). A reasoning aid, not a substitute for a certified cytotechnologist or pathologist signing out an actual case.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Cutting/Slicing Machine Operator — calculating a portion weight overweight margin from measured weight variability to minimize giveaway while staying compliant, verifying a thickness setting against a new product lot's actual density rather than reusing a prior lot's setting, diagnosing declining cut quality as a blade-condition issue rather than compensating with thickness/speed, or adapting cut pattern to irregular input to improve yield.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Data Entry Keyer — resolving an illegible or ambiguous source-document field before keying it, running key-verification (double-key) reconciliation on a batch, deciding whether a production-speed quota is compromising accuracy, or sampling a completed batch for a quality-control audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Biofuels Processing Technician — adjusting catalyst dosing for transesterification based on actual measured feedstock free fatty acid content rather than a standard fixed dose, verifying conversion completeness via actual glyceride content testing rather than visual inspection, actively monitoring fermentation temperature and pH throughout the process rather than checking only at the end, and managing byproduct quality as a distinct economic consideration alongside primary fuel yield.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Biofuels Production Manager — running a biofuel production facility (ethanol, biodiesel, renewable diesel), managing feedstock supply and quality variability, evaluating a yield or efficiency problem, or balancing production economics against commodity price swings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Biomass Power Plant Manager — running a biomass-fired power generation facility, managing fuel supply logistics and quality variability, evaluating combustion/efficiency problems, or balancing generation output against fuel cost and emissions constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for multi-experiment batch operations: QC screening, batch download, comparison, and report generation across many ENCODE experiments simultaneously. Use when users need to process 5+ experiments together, create experiment comparison tables, perform batch quality checks, or generate summary reports. Trigger on: batch analysis, multiple experiments, bulk processing, experiment comparison, batch QC, multi-sample, batch download, experiment table, summary report, collection analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct rigorous cross-study meta-analysis of scRNA-seq data from ENCODE, integrating multiple single-cell transcriptomic datasets for a tissue/cell type. Use when the user wants to answer "what cell types exist in my tissue and what genes define them?" by combining scRNA-seq data across donors, labs, and platforms. Follows the Mawla et al. 2019 framework for assessing cross-study reproducibility, TIN-based quality filtering, and detection-limit-aware interpretation. Handles batch correction (Harmony/Seurat), dropout awareness, cross-contamination artifacts, and platform-specific biases. Use this skill for ANY scRNA-seq integration task, cross-dataset comparison, cell atlas construction, or reproducibility assessment involving ENCODE single-cell data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and work with ENCODE single-cell genomics data including scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq. Use when the user asks about single-cell experiments, cell type resolution, clustering from ENCODE data, deconvolution of bulk signals using single-cell references, or comparing single-cell vs bulk profiles. Covers platform differences (10X Chromium, Smart-seq2, Drop-seq), quality limitations of single-cell data, multimodal integration (RNA+ATAC), and cross-study reproducibility concerns. Also use for cell type annotation, gene detection limits, dropout artifacts, and single-cell data structure in ENCODE.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive guide for visualizing ENCODE data including deeptools heatmaps, IGV screenshots, UCSC track hubs, and publication-quality plots. Use when users need to create visualizations of ChIP-seq signal, peak landscapes, genome browser views, or any visual representation of ENCODE data. Trigger on: heatmap, visualization, genome browser, track hub, IGV, deeptools, signal plot, peak visualization, profile plot, publication figure, bigWig visualization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build comprehensive chromatin contact maps by aggregating Hi-C loop calls (BEDPE) across multiple ENCODE experiments, donors, and labs. Use when the user wants to answer "what regions are in 3D contact in my tissue?" by creating a union catalog of chromatin loops. Handles resolution-aware anchor matching, cross-lab variation, and Hi-C-specific quality metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate plugin content quality before release. Run skill-validator across plugins, verify marketplace.json completeness, check plugin.json version consistency, and detect broken documentation cross-references. Use when preparing a release, before running release.sh, or when user mentions "release check", "pre-release", "plugin-release-checker", or "release validation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate skills against Anthropic best practices for frontmatter, structure, content, file organization, hooks, MCP, and security (62 rules in 8 categories). Use when creating new skills, updating existing skills, before publishing skills, reviewing skill quality, or when user mentions "validate skill", "check skill", "skill best practices", "skill review", or "lint skill".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent code review using the Pragmatic Quality framework. Orchestrates parallel review agents (CLAUDE.md compliance, bug scanning, git history, security) with independent confidence scoring to produce high-signal findings. Use when user runs /code-review, /review:code-review, requests a "code review", "review my changes", "PR review", or mentions "review diff", "review branch".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, review, and manage Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) with auto-numbering, template detection, quality review, and index maintenance. Use when user mentions "ADR", "architecture decision", "document this decision", "create ADR", "review ADR", editing ADR files (docs/adr/, doc/adr/, .adr/), or discussing architectural choices and tradeoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit markdown files for SEO before publishing. Checks heading structure, meta description, keyword density, content length, link quality, image alt text, and frontmatter completeness. Use when user says "markdown audit", "check my markdown", "SEO check markdown", or "audit this post".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep single-page SEO analysis covering on-page elements, content quality, technical meta tags, schema, images, and performance. Enhanced with live Ahrefs (page authority, referring domains) and GSC (search performance, top keywords) data when MCPs are available. Use when user says "analyze this page", "check page SEO", or provides a single URL for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diátaxis Documentation Expert. An expert technical writer specializing in creating high-quality software documentation, guided by the principles and structure of the Diátaxis technical documentation authoring framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create high-quality, secure, and performance-optimized Containerfiles (Dockerfiles) following best practices for multi-architecture builds, OpenShift/Kubernetes compatibility, and BuildKit cache optimization. Use when the user wants to: (1) create a new Containerfile or Dockerfile for any project (Python, Rust, Go, Node.js, .NET, or any language), (2) containerize an application with multi-stage builds, (3) optimize an existing Containerfile for security, performance, or image size, (4) review or improve container image build practices, (5) set up BuildKit cache mounts for package managers, (6) create OpenShift-compatible container images with non-root users and arbitrary UID support, (7) write a .dockerignore file, or (8) apply OCI LABEL standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Craft high-quality natural-language image prompts for any modern text-to-image or image-edit model that accepts flowing English. Trigger when the user wants help writing, rewriting, improving, or translating an English natural-language image prompt — including "write me an image prompt", "improve this image prompt", "describe this scene for an image model", or "convert these tags into a natural language prompt". Do NOT trigger for requests that are purely about dispatching to an image API, choosing samplers/schedulers, picking LoRAs, or setting up ControlNet — those belong to a runtime skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Language-specific guidelines for producing high-quality Traditional Chinese (zh-TW) content: script, full-width punctuation, spacing, forms of address, grammar constraints, and Taiwan terminology. Includes the no-calque rule against literal translations of English phrasal verbs such as 折入 for fold in. Use when writing any kind of Chinese content. Including blog posts, notes, technical articles, technical writing, chitchat, social media posts, etc., even when you are just sending a text message. Also use when reviewing or editing existing Chinese content for language and terminology compliance. Always apply `writing-style-guideline` alongside this skill for structure, tone, rhetorical constraints, and banned phrases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, simplicity, and common mistakes before declaring work complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a codebase against well-known software design principles: SOLID, DRY, YAGNI, KISS, Law of Demeter, Separation of Concerns, Composition over Inheritance, and the code-relevant 12-Factor subset. Scores findings by impact and effort, runs adversarial debate on contested violations, and generates a prioritized DESIGN_AUDIT.md. Use when reviewing code quality beyond what linters catch, assessing design health before a refactor, or onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase. Can be invoked standalone or delegated from tech-debt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。