「iter」の検索結果

Delegate implementation to Codex, grok, or cursor-agent, then review the diff, send it back to iterate, gate on the full test suite, and ship it as a PR. Use this whenever the user wants Codex, the grok 后端, or cursor-agent to write code, mentions handing off / delegating implementation to one of those backends, asks to work through a plan or spec unit-by-unit with an implementation backend doing the coding, or wants a review-and-merge loop wrapped around delegated output — and also when resuming such a loop ("keep going", "next unit", "继续下一个"). It encodes constraints that are expensive to rediscover: the implementer runs in the real environment behind backend-specific git and publication boundaries, must not be pointed at a full test suite by default, and its self-report is a claim rather than evidence. This loop expects an approved plan or an equivalently precise spec; settle an unsolved high-level goal into a plan first, using the engineering-mode skill when it is installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate implementation work to a dedicated implementer subagent, then review its diff, send it back to iterate, gate on the full test suite, and ship it as a PR. Use this whenever the user wants a separate model to write code, mentions handing off / delegating implementation, asks to work through a plan or spec unit-by-unit with a subagent doing the coding, or wants a review-and-merge loop wrapped around delegated output — and also when resuming such a loop ("keep going", "next unit", "继续下一个"). It encodes constraints that are expensive to rediscover: the implementer self-reports success, must not run the full test suite by default, must not touch git, and its report is a claim rather than evidence. Cursor port of implementation-loop. This loop expects an approved plan or an equivalently precise spec; settle an unsolved high-level goal into a plan first, using the cursor-engineering-mode skill (it ships in this same plugin).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical blog post writing guide. rooftopsnow.tistory.com style — Korean formal technical prose, architecture diagrams, code blocks + design intent commentary, table comparisons, checklist wrap-up. Triggers on "blog", "포스팅", "블로그", "기술 글", "tech blog".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and repair a failed GEODE smoke workflow within the requested acceptance criteria. Preserve failed evidence, verify the shared root cause, and apply merge, rebuild, or live rerun stages only when authorized.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs the full implement-and-commit loop over a task list — selects the next incomplete sub-task, implements it, runs linters and tests, marks it done, commits, and repeats until the list is finished. Use when asked to work through a feature's task list at .ai/[feature]/tasks.md unattended, or to keep going until every sub-task is complete. For a single sub-task with no commit, use task-implementation; to stop for approval between each one, use iterative-development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements sub-tasks from a task list at .ai/[feature]/tasks.md strictly one at a time, stopping after each to ask the user before starting the next, and keeping the task list and Relevant Files section current. Use when the user wants to review or approve each sub-task before work continues, rather than letting the agent run the list unattended with task-orchestration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively define problem and solution shapes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prevents premature exit and infinite loops. Three mechanisms: Completion Promises, Scratchpads, Loop Detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts USMCA/NAFTA Certificates of Origin for preferential tariff treatment on US-Mexico-Canada goods. Verifies origin criteria, HS classifications, and regional value content. Use when preparing trade certificates, customs origin documentation, duty preference claims, or cross-border shipment certifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court under Rules 10, 13, 14, and 33. Enforces Rule 10 criteria (circuit splits, precedent conflicts, important federal questions), jurisdictional verification under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1254/1257, timeliness, document structure, and booklet formatting. Use when seeking discretionary Supreme Court review, filing a cert petition, or drafting a writ of certiorari.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces an attorney-ready memo from a corpus of legal documents supplied by the user. Use when a user shows up with a folder, zip, or vault of case documents and asks for a case summary, case evaluation, litigation package, intake memo, matter overview, or "can you summarize this case for me." The skill ingests the corpus into a searchable index, OCRs anything non-searchable, inventories and diagnoses the practice area, loads the appropriate practice-area playbook module(s) (PI/tort, commercial litigation, IP infringement, or user-authored extensions), iteratively searches the corpus across eight core dimensions plus any module-specific dimensions, defers specialized document clusters (depositions, medical records, discovery, liens) to dedicated sibling skills, and synthesizes a cited memo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

上传投标文件（可配套招标文件），AI 输出分级合规审查报告：高风险/待复核/提示三级清单，每条附招标依据与修改建议，支持多文件雷同检测。当用户想审查标书合规性、排查废标风险、做雷同检测时使用本 SKILL。需百炼®标书 App Key（新用户可零输入免费试用或手机号注册，均赠积分）；文件经百炼®标书云端处理。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

凭 App Key 调用百炼®标书开放 API，完成「招标文件智能解读 → 抽取分包 → 生成成品投标文件(.docx) → 可选合规审查」的端到端标书制作。当用户提供招标文件并希望生成投标文件/标书、对已生成标书做合规检查、或询问百炼®标书相关能力时使用。本 skill 是百炼®标书线上接口的轻客户端，不复刻其算法。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a combined Audit and Compensation Committee charter for U.S. boards, tailored for public or private companies with listing-standard compliance, independence criteria, and SOX readiness. Triggers when the user needs a board committee charter, audit committee charter, compensation committee charter, or governance mandate for SEC/NYSE/NASDAQ compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates structured 500-800 word summaries of legal articles distilling thesis, methodology, arguments, authorities, conclusions, and significance. Triggers when summarizing legal scholarship, reviewing law review articles, preparing literature reviews, or triaging articles for full reading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

欧盟 AI 法案知识引擎——以 70 份官方欧盟来源文件为基础的权威监管问答（包括 2026 年委员会关于 Art. 6 高风险分类的指南草稿——一般原则、附件 I、附件 III）。基于完整条例文本、委员会指南、EDPB/EDPS 意见、《实践守则》、协调标准、FRIA 指南、事件模板和行业特定指引，以条款级引用回答关于 AI 法案的任何问题。当用户询问"EU AI Act"、"AI Act regulation"、"Regulation 2024/1689"、"KI-Verordnung"、要求"explain an AI Act article"、"what does Article X say"、"AI Act requirements"、"AI Act penalties"、"AI Act timeline"、"GPAI obligations"、"high-risk AI"、"prohibited AI practices"、"AI Act and GDPR"、"fundamental rights impact assessment"、"AI Act standards"、"AI Act national implementation"、"AI literacy"、"serious incident reporting"、"Digital Omnibus"、"AI regulatory sandbox"，或任何关于欧盟人工智能监管的问题时，应使用本技能。德语术语同样触发："KI-Gesetz"、"KI-Verordnung"、"Hochrisiko-KI"、"KI-Kompetenz"、"Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung"、"GPAI-Verhaltenskodex"。对于产出分类决定而非知识答案的评估工作流，提议在会话内运行结构化风险等级分类。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Digital equity and trauma-informed design for marginalized populations. Activate on "accessibility", "offline-first", "trauma-informed", "reentry", "recovery population", "shared device", "unstable phone", "digital equity", "design justice", "low-literacy", "intermittent access". NOT for general UX, marketing optimization, or enterprise SaaS design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in developer tool documentation as a product. Activate on: docs site, getting started guide, API reference, developer documentation, Docusaurus, Mintlify, Nextra, ReadMe, migration guide, troubleshooting page, docs information architecture, documentation testing, llms.txt. NOT for: marketing copy (use seo-content-blogging), API design itself (use api-architect), general technical writing (use technical-writer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates agent outputs against expected schemas and quality criteria. Ensures outputs meet structural requirements and content standards. Activate on 'validate output', 'output validation', 'schema validation', 'check output', 'output quality'. NOT for confidence scoring (use dag-confidence-scorer) or hallucination detection (use dag-hallucination-detector).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Introduce people to AI, agentic AI, and AI skills with appropriate pedagogy for any audience. Covers LLM analogies, progressive complexity paths, aha-moment demos, audience-tailored explanations, workshop design, and overcoming emotional barriers to AI adoption. Activate on 'explain AI', 'introduce AI', 'AI workshop', 'AI demo', 'teach AI', 'AI literacy', 'onboard to AI', 'AI evangelism', 'explain agentic', 'explain skills to', 'AI training session', 'AI onboarding'. NOT for teaching ML engineering (use ai-engineer), not for building AI features (use ai-engineer), not for prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer), not for building training data pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates an approved plan across 8 dimensions before build — incomplete acceptance criteria, missing dependencies, unresolved risks. Use after Gate 1, before Test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate staged or parallel jobs across coding-agent runtimes and subagents: routes by capability/risk, isolates writers in worktrees, arbitrates results. NOT for a single-agent task (mk:cook).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps test coverage to plan acceptance criteria and flags requirements with no tests. Use during Test/Review phases. NOT for running tests (mk:testing); NOT for structural review (mk:review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Negotiates a file-based sprint contract between generator and evaluator before code is written: turns a spec into testable acceptance criteria with rubric tie-ins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。