2,967 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Create, modify, or refactor application use cases into Laravel-native DDD Actions. Use for business operations such as placing or cancelling orders, extracting controller orchestration, and fixing use-case behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-reference project artifacts (WBS, meeting minutes, requirements docs) by date, participant, and action items. Extract commitments from meeting minutes and link to WBS tasks. Generate traceability reports showing which decisions were captured in which documents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mine Claude Code session logs for skill idea candidates. Use when running the skill generation pipeline to extract, score, and backlog new skill ideas from recent coding sessions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze email threads to extract current status, pending actions, timeline of events, and identify stale/outdated information. Use when asked to summarize email conversations, find outstanding action items in email chains, or detect when a thread summary is out of date.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Periodic inbox scan that categorizes new emails by project/client, identifies action-required items, and generates prioritized summary with FYI/requires-response/requires-action/blocked-waiting classifications. Use for inbox overview, project-based email grouping, or action item extraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 1-1（ステークホルダー抽出とTSV生成）を実行
하나의 긴 메서드를 grouping(Reorder/Chunk)·comment로 정돈해 책임을 드러낸 뒤 Arlo Belshee 6단계 네이밍(완전정직 이름 → Extract Method → Intent Revealing → Domain Abstraction)을 하나의 연속 흐름으로 관통하는 self-contained 워크플로우. "이 긴 메서드 이름이 하는 일을 안 드러낸다", "메서드 이름부터 정직하게 만들어서 쪼개줘", "이름 주도로 이 메서드 리팩토링" 요청 시 사용. 단, 여러 파일에 흩어진 개별 이름 스멜의 배치 교체는 /naming-process, 클래스 분리·도메인 이동 같은 대규모 구조 변경은 /system-wide-refactoring이 적합. /intent-revealing-names로 호출.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Arlo Belshee의 6단계 네이밍 프로세스와 Clean Code 네이밍 규칙을 적용해, 여러 파일에 흩어진 개별 이름 스멜(타입 반복·-er/-Utils·불용어·축약어 등)을 탐지하고 배치 교체하여 코드 가독성 향상. 단, 하나의 긴 메서드를 통째로 관통(grouping→extract→rename)하는 것은 /intent-revealing-names가 적합. /naming-process로 호출.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
임시 변수를 메서드 호출(query)로 치환하여 중복 제거·추출 용이성 확보. "임시 변수 메서드로", "temp 제거", "지역 변수를 쿼리로", "/replace-temp-with-query" 요청 시 사용. 단, 임시 변수가 서로 얽혀 치환 불가면 /extract-method-object가 적합. /replace-temp-with-query [commit-ref]로 호출.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze code for primitive obsession and plan value object extractions around domain concepts, validation, and grouped primitive fields. Use when the user says `/value-objects`, asks for value object refactoring, or runs `/refactor:value-objects`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor duplicated code by extracting helpers, shared abstractions, or clearer reusable structure. Use when asked to apply DRY, remove duplication, consolidate repeated logic, or run `/refactor:dry`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor a class toward the Single Responsibility Principle by identifying responsibilities, grouping cohesive behavior, and extracting focused classes. Use when the user says `/srp`, asks for SRP refactoring, or runs `/refactor:srp`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review whether a Clawix UI pattern, visual decision, copy change, or component extraction belongs in canon, debt, exception, or protected-surface scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load for authentication or authorization changes involving BFF cookies/tokens, JWT validation, claims/user ID extraction, policies, handler access checks, impersonation, or 401/403 bugs; not for UI affordance gating alone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chrome DevTools CLI for browser automation via shell commands. Use when interacting with web pages from the command line — navigating, clicking, filling forms, inspecting console/network, taking screenshots, or extracting page content. Triggers on: browse a page, automate Chrome, inspect console, check network requests, take a screenshot, fill a form, click a button.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scrape web pages using Scrapling with anti-bot bypass (like Cloudflare Turnstile), stealth headless browsing, spiders framework, adaptive scraping, and JavaScript rendering. Use when asked to scrape, crawl, or extract data from websites; web_fetch fails; the site has anti-bot protections; write Python code to scrape/crawl; or write spiders.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a study cheatsheet by extracting and synthesizing key concepts from lecture materials, homework, and past exams. Use this skill whenever a user asks for help making a cheatsheet, study sheet, formula sheet, exam reference sheet, or "one-pager" — especially when they upload lecture slides (PDF/PPTX/DOCX), problem sets, past exams, or scanned/handwritten notes. Trigger this even for casual phrasings like "help me prep for my final," "summarize my course materials into something I can bring to the exam," or "make me a study reference from these slides and homeworks." Tuned for math/science (formulas, proofs, theorems) and CS/engineering (code, algorithms). Processes one file at a time and persists intermediate summaries to disk to avoid blowing past the context window on large courses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the FAA Systems Engineering Manual (SEM) v1.0.1. Use for civil-agency systems engineering as the FAA practices it inside the Acquisition Management System (AMS) and the National Airspace System (NAS): the five-phase AMS lifecycle and its decision points; operational concept development and implementation-free functional analysis (ConOps, FFBD/N², CMLs); requirements analysis and architectural design synthesis (PRS→MRS, the PRD ratchet pPRD→iPRD→fPRD, RAM, ISEF/DoDAF views, CPRs); the seven technical management disciplines (Integrated Technical Management/SEMP, Interface Management/IRD-ICD, Risk-Issue-Opportunity, Configuration Management, SE Information Management, Decision Analysis, Verification & Validation); and the specialty disciplines (RMA via Service Threads/STLSC, Life Cycle Engineering, E3/Spectrum, Human Factors, Information Security via the NIST RMF, System Safety via the SMS, and Hazardous Materials/Environmental/EOSH). Scope limits: this is FAA-specific guidance, not policy — it is a tailorable menu that points outward to companion handbooks (FAA-HDBK-006A for RMA, the SMS Manual, the NIST 800-series) rather than restating generic SE theory; it is thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting/FAR law, software-development methodology, named anti-pattern catalogues, and any non-FAA or non-civil-aviation lifecycle. Source has no page numbers in the extracted text (~360 pp.).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares a DRAFT vendor risk screening brief from the material the user provides on one vendor (questionnaire answers, certificates, assurance reports, policies, contract extracts): per screening topic, what a document evidences with reference, date and scope, what is only asserted, what is missing or contradicted, certificate and report details as stated, and ready-to-send questions for the vendor and the internal owners. No web research, no risk rating, tier, score or recommendation. Use when the user asks to "screen this vendor", "review the vendor's questionnaire answers", "check what the vendor's certificate covers", "what is missing from this due diligence pack" or "draft the follow-up questions for the vendor". Do not use for answering a customer's questionnaire about your own organisation, use vendor-security-questionnaire-prefill instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares the trend update for a recurring emailed report: identifies report emails not yet processed, extracts the configured metrics from their spreadsheet, CSV or PDF attachments, returns new rows for an append-only trends sheet and writes a DRAFT summary with period-on-period deltas and flagged anomalies. Use when the user asks to "update the trends for the weekly report", "analyse the latest monthly report", "what changed in the latest report", "do the latest numbers look unusual" or "set up tracking for a report that arrives by email". Do not use for a single file with no trend state, use dataset-insight-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds an evidence map for one document, section or contested claim: every factual claim extracted verbatim and numbered, its supporting passage in the supplied sources or UNKNOWN, the strength of that support as evidenced, contradictions between sources, and the specific question or document that would close each gap, returned in the chat as Markdown tables for the author or reviewer. Use when the user asks to "check what this document actually proves", "map the evidence behind these claims", "which of these statements are supported", "build an evidence map", "what would we need to back this up" or "is this claim substantiated". Do not use for requesting evidence of security controls from control owners, use control-evidence-request-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns one meeting transcript, recording recap or set of raw notes into concise DRAFT minutes returned in the chat as a single Markdown document: header metadata, attendance and apologies, agenda items each with a short neutral summary and outcome, numbered decisions with an owner, numbered action items with owner and due date, open questions, carried-over actions and the next-meeting line, every entry backed by a short verbatim source fragment and every missing fact marked UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "write the minutes", "draft minutes from this transcript", "turn these notes into meeting minutes", "produce the minutes of meeting for today's call", "tidy my rough minutes into the standard format" or "prepare the minutes for circulation". Do not use for extracting action items, task lists or per-owner follow-up emails alone, use transcript-to-actions instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts one anonymised DRAFT case study (situation, approach, outcome as evidenced, optional lessons) from engagement notes, status reports, closing reports, emails and metrics extracts the user supplies, with a fact trace to the notes, an evidence grade on every result, quotes only where the user supplied them with speaker role and permission, an anonymisation log and a confidentiality checklist that must be completed before publication. Use when the user asks to "write a case study from these notes", "turn this engagement into a customer story", "draft a success story for the website", "anonymise this project write-up" or "prepare a reference case for the proposal". Do not use for redacting identifiers from an existing document, use document-deidentification-pass instead; for checking whether a document's claims are substantiated, use claims-evidence-map. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-checks one expense claim or travel plan, line by line, against the expense or travel policy the user supplies, and returns a DRAFT precheck sheet: the policy clause matched to each line, the limit quoted as the policy states it, whether the amount sits within, at or outside that limit, missing receipts, pre-approvals or justifications, and neutral questions for the approver and the claimant, with UNKNOWN wherever the policy or the claim is silent. Use when the user asks to "check this expense claim against policy", "pre-check my travel request", "is this claim within policy", "review these expenses before I submit them", "what receipts or approvals are missing" or "prepare the approver's questions for this claim". Do not use for a purchase order log or spend extract, use purchase-order-anomaly-review instead; do not use to compare a policy against a standard or regulation, use policy-gap-review instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。