「fix」の検索結果

Designs multiscale chunking for RAG by embedding small units for retrieval precision and returning larger context for synthesis. Use when fixed-size chunks either lose surrounding context or dilute relevance in long documents, manuals, filings, or codebases. Covers sentence-window and parent-child or auto-merging strategies, base chunk sizing, and evaluation. Do not use when a single chunk scale already meets retrieval and generation needs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes heterogeneous queries to the appropriate index, tool, or answering engine before retrieval. Use when one endpoint serves multiple handlers, such as summary, vector retrieval, text-to-SQL, or tools, and query types require different paths. Covers LLM, semantic, and rule-based routers, confidence thresholds, fallbacks, and framework mappings. Do not use when one handler serves all queries or branching is fixed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Symbol-level code context for LLM coder-agents: tree-sitter extracts symbols, PageRank ranks them over the cross-file reference graph, and the top class/function signatures are fed to the LLM as a token-budgeted read-only map (not RAG, no vector index, human-auditable). Use when an agent must locate the right files in a large/multi-file repo, when builds/refreshes/scopes a repo-map, or when "model edits the wrong file" needs fixing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract plain text from a document file - PDF, DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, RTF, or plain text/markdown/HTML. Use when a binary document needs to be turned into text, for example a contract PDF or an EHR DocumentReference attachment. Other skills (fhir) invoke scripts/extract.ts directly; the contracts MCP server bundles its own copy (servers/documents/src/extract.mjs) so its bundle stays self-contained — port fixes to both.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage a single security finding — from a scanner, audit, advisory, or report — to a defensible disposition with a mitigation plan, false-positive justification, or accepted-risk writeup. Use when the user mentions 'triage this finding,' 'is this a real vulnerability,' 'mitigation plan,' 'false positive,' 'accept this risk,' 'compensating controls,' 'risk justification,' 'security ticket,' 'CVSS this,' 'should we fix this,' 'disposition,' 'sign off on,' or has a single security finding and needs to decide what to do.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[STUB] Bond pricing, yield curves, duration and convexity analysis, and DeFi lending rate modeling

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trade sizing methods including fixed fractional, volatility-adjusted, Kelly criterion, and liquidity-constrained sizing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze task complexity and route to a mode by artifact: direct fix for clear-scope changes, or a plan file when the approach needs to be written down. Use when the user asks to "turboplan", "run turboplan", "plan this task", "turbo plan mode", "plan and implement", or "use turboplan instead of plan mode".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the code and documentation simplification passes together over one scope, launching every review agent concurrently before applying a single round of fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify all", "simplify everything", "simplify code and docs", "clean up code and docs", "run both simplify skills", or "simplify code and docs in parallel".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement evaluated findings: load code-style rules, apply the accepted fixes, then close out the change with full or quick QA. Use after $evaluate-findings has tagged findings and they need to be implemented, or when the user asks to "resolve findings", "apply evaluated findings", or "dispatch findings to implementation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a multi-agent review of changed files for scope, reuse, quality, efficiency, clarity, and altitude issues followed by fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes", or "run simplify".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the code and documentation simplification passes together over one scope, launching every review sub-agent concurrently before applying a single round of fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify all", "simplify everything", "simplify code and docs", "clean up code and docs", "run both simplify skills", or "simplify code and docs in parallel".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement evaluated findings: load code-style rules, apply the accepted fixes, then close out the change with full or quick QA. Use after /evaluate-findings has tagged findings and they need to be implemented, or when the user asks to "resolve findings", "apply evaluated findings", or "dispatch findings to implementation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate improvements from .turbo/improvements.md, recommend a working set tailored to what's in the backlog, and run one lane: direct fixes, investigation, or planned work. One lane per session. Use when the user asks to "implement improvements", "work on improvements", "address improvements", "process improvement backlog", "tackle improvements", or "implement noted improvements".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brings task.md, changelog.md, and files.md back in sync with what the code says shipped. Reads git history and the working tree, never memory, and refuses to log features it cannot see in source. Use when a feature or fix lands, when the user says "update the docs", "sync changelog", "update files.md", "@update", or when task.md and the code disagree.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production patterns for Convex apps and the rules the @convex-dev/eslint-plugin enforces: validators, indexes, idempotent mutations, avoiding OCC conflicts, thin function wrappers, error handling. Use when reviewing Convex code, asking whether a pattern is right, setting up ESLint, or fixing write conflicts and slow queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing Stripe webhook endpoints and getting 'Raw body not available' or signature verification errors - provides raw body parsing solutions and subscription period field fixes across frameworks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement comprehensive testing strategies using Jest, Vitest, and Testing Library for unit tests, integration tests, and end-to-end testing with mocking, fixtures, and test-driven development. Use when writing JavaScript/TypeScript tests, setting up test infrastructure, or implementing TDD/BDD workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when users need to debug, modify, or extend the code-forge application's CLI commands, argument parsing, or CLI behavior. This includes adding new commands, fixing CLI bugs, updating command options, or troubleshooting CLI-related issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage BAP (Bitcoin Attestation Protocol) identity files using bap-cli. This skill should be used when users need to create, decrypt, list, or extract BAP identity backups, work with .bep encrypted files, or generate test fixtures for Playwright tests involving BAP identities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliberate-choice procedure for a medium-to-high-stakes engineering fork — when the first plausible solution (the instinct, the default next-token pull) would be costly to get wrong. Fires AUTONOMOUSLY: invoke proactively whenever a fork fits, never wait to be asked — mechanical triggers include a fix failing for the 2nd-3rd time, adding a dependency, schema/migration design, deleting or deprecating things others depend on, changing a public API, choosing an architecture or stack. Refuse the premature collapse: hold real options open (urge · contrarian · synthesis · out-of-box · intuitive dots · precedent · first-principles), ground each branch in at least one fact from outside the model (codebase, docs, benchmark, spike), future-model consequences (blast radius, reversibility, maintenance, pre-mortem), collapse by deliberate choice, then try to refute the winner before acting. Log the decision and rejected branches in docs/decision_logs/. Not for routine calls — a decision worth more than one forward pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages shadcn components and projects — adding, searching, fixing, debugging, styling, and composing UI. Provides project context, component docs, and usage examples. Applies when working with shadcn/ui, component registries, presets, --preset codes, or any project with a components.json file. Also triggers for "shadcn init", "create an app with --preset", or "switch to --preset".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start a new OpenSpec change using the experimental artifact workflow. Use when the user wants to create a new feature, fix, or modification with a structured step-by-step approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。