「architectural」の検索結果

Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-session shared memory for agents. Use at session start to load the persistent bias-log via `mcp__memex__recent_observations`, mid-session to search prior context with `mcp__memex__search`, and immediately when a bias surfaces to log a new `observation` via `mcp__memex__add`. The six-layer reconstruction trail (raw → embedded → indexed → graphed → curated → reflexive) means memex stores facts AND the agent's own reasoning patterns across sessions. Prefer querying memex before re-deriving prior architectural decisions; re-derivation is itself evidence that the trail is incomplete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up a Blender scene programmatically via Python (bpy) with objects, materials, lighting, camera, and environment configuration. Use when creating reproducible 3D visualization scenes, automating product or architectural rendering setup, generating multiple scene variations programmatically, building template scenes for batch rendering workflows, or integrating 3D visualization into data pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a tensegrity system by identifying compression struts and tension cables, classifying type (class 1/2, biological/architectural), computing prestress equilibrium, verifying stability via Maxwell's rigidity criterion, and mapping biological tensegrity (microtubules, actin, intermediate filaments). Use when evaluating tensegrity in architecture, robotics, cell biology, or any system with isolated compression in continuous tension.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute structural metamorphosis using strangler fig migration, chrysalis phases, and interface preservation. Covers transformation planning, parallel running, progressive cutover, rollback design, and post-metamorphosis stabilization for system architecture evolution. Use when assess-form has classified the system as READY for transformation, when migrating from monolith to microservices, when replacing a core subsystem while dependents continue operating, or when any architectural change must be gradual rather than big-bang.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master skill composing the 5-step synoptic cycle for panoramic synthesis across multiple domains. Orchestrates meditate, expand-awareness, observe, awareness, integrate-gestalt, and express-insight into a coherent process that produces unified understanding rather than sequential compromise. Use when a problem genuinely spans 3+ domains and the interactions between domains matter more than depth in any one, when sequential analysis feels like compromise rather than integration, or before major architectural decisions affecting multiple stakeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI situational awareness — internal threat detection for hallucination risk, scope creep, and context degradation. Maps Cooper color codes to reasoning states and OODA loop to real-time decisions. Use during any task where reasoning quality matters, when operating in unfamiliar territory, after detecting early warning signs such as an uncertain fact or suspicious tool result, or before high-stakes output like irreversible changes or architectural decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when making an architectural decision, changing a public API, shipping a feature, or recording a codebase term. Not for domain language: use domain-modeling. Not for docs: use docs-writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform triangulated cognitive research combining SQLite memory, GitHub 10k+ stars patterns, and ToT DAG benchmarking before critical architectural decisions. Automatically triggers subagent research escalation when confidence is low (<0.70). Keywords: research, benchmark, github, memory, triangulation, grounding, best-practices, escalation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assume the role of Galyarder CTO (Chief Technology Officer). Technical guardian. Enforce technical integrity, architectural determinism, self-healing formal verification, and planetary computational leverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design component architecture and module structure using established architectural patterns for clean, maintainable, and scalable systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following the Michael Nygard format. Captures context, options considered, decision rationale, and consequences. Use when making technology choices, framework selections, or any architectural decision that future developers need to understand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploit GraphQL API architectural features to execute highly efficient brute-force, Credential Stuffing, and Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. Utilize Query Batching and Alias injection to bypass rate limits by packing thousands of requests into a single HTTP POST request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production-grade TypeScript reference for React & Next.js frontend development. Covers type narrowing, component Props, generic hooks, discriminated unions, as const, satisfies, Zod validation, TanStack Query, server/client boundaries, forms, state management, performance, accessibility, debugging, and code review. Use when the user works with TypeScript in React or Next.js: type errors, Props design, generics, API typing, SSR/CSR boundaries, hydration issues, form validation, state management, performance, or code review. Also use for "how should I type this?", "why does this type error happen?", or any architectural decision involving TypeScript in a frontend context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep codebase exploration, architectural research, and solution discovery. Use when investigating problems, understanding complex flows, or evaluating technical approaches without jumping straight into code mutation or TDD.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proactive architecture review — explore codebase structure, generate a self-contained HTML report with Mermaid diagrams and candidate improvements, then grill the findings. Use when planning a large refactor, onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase, or before a major architectural change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When a GDD is revised, scans all ADRs and the traceability index to identify which architectural decisions are now potentially stale. Produces a change impact report and guides the user through resolution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate approved GDDs + architecture into epics — one epic per architectural module. Defines scope, governing ADRs, engine risk, and untraced requirements. Does NOT break into stories — run /create-stories [epic-slug] after each epic is created.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Architecture/Engineering firm or department manager — pricing a project fee (lump sum vs. hourly vs. % of construction cost), staffing a project against backlog, evaluating scope creep on a fixed-fee job, managing professional liability exposure, or deciding whether to pursue a project given current utilization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for Domain-Driven Design architecture and implementation. Use when designing complex business systems, defining bounded contexts, structuring domain models, choosing between modular monolith vs microservices, implementing aggregates/entities/value objects, or when users mention "DDD", "domain-driven design", "bounded context", "aggregate", "domain model", "ubiquitous language", "event storming", "context mapping", "domain events", "anemic domain model", strategic design, tactical patterns, or domain modeling. Helps make architectural decisions, identify subdomains, design aggregates, and avoid common DDD pitfalls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate structured thinking and multi-agent parallel execution for complex tasks. Use when tackling multi-step projects, planning parallel work, breaking down complex problems, coordinating specialist tasks, facing architectural decisions, or when user mentions "workflow", "orchestration", "multi-step", "coordinate", "parallel execution", "structured thinking", "break this down", "plan this out", "how should I approach", or needs help planning complex implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, review, and manage Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) with auto-numbering, template detection, quality review, and index maintenance. Use when user mentions "ADR", "architecture decision", "document this decision", "create ADR", "review ADR", editing ADR files (docs/adr/, doc/adr/, .adr/), or discussing architectural choices and tradeoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Invoke a Rubber Duck Reviewer subagent to independently critique plans and implementations before proceeding. Use when the agent is about to implement a non-trivial plan (multi-file changes, architectural decisions, security-sensitive logic, database schema changes), after completing a self-contained unit of work (module, endpoint, feature), when stuck or facing repeated failures (same test fails 2+ times, unexpected results), or when the agent wants independent validation of assumptions and design decisions. Triggers on any non-trivial implementation task where independent critique would catch blind spots before they become costly mistakes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。