「attack」の検索結果

Build a counter-narrative playbook for a competitor's rebrand, category claim or attack. "respond to their attack campaign"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial premortem for England & Wales civil litigation - builds the strongest version of a case, then attacks it from four angles to find where it loses before opposing counsel does. Runs an adversarial premortem on a UK litigation matter. Builds the strongest version of the case, then attacks it from four angles — procedural, substantive, evidentiary, strategic — to find where it actually loses. Returns a ranked stress-test brief: failure scenarios, evidence inconsistencies, blind spots, mitigations, and one brutal one-sentence verdict. Use before issue, before settlement negotiations, before a litigation-funder pitch, or before deciding whether to take a case.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge for Azure Sentinel development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, integrations & coding patterns, and deployment. Use when configuring data connectors, KQL analytics rules, Logic Apps playbooks, data lake jobs, or SAP integration, and other Azure Sentinel related development tasks. Not for Azure Defender For Cloud (use azure-defender-for-cloud), Azure Security (use azure-security), Azure Monitor (use azure-monitor), Azure External Attack Surface Management (use azure-external-attack-surface-management).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge for Azure Defender For Cloud development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, integrations & coding patterns, and deployment. Use when securing VMs/containers/SQL, managing secure score, CNAPP plans, JIT/FIM, or Defender for Cloud APIs, and other Azure Defender For Cloud related development tasks. Not for Azure Security (use azure-security), Azure Sentinel (use azure-sentinel), Azure DDoS Protection (use azure-ddos-protection), Azure External Attack Surface Management (use azure-external-attack-surface-management).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PTES-aligned penetration testing methodology for backend, frontend, and mobile. Provides attack taxonomy, exploit techniques per vulnerability class, and platform-specific test matrices. Use when executing pentest workflow, planning security assessments, mapping attack surfaces, or building threat models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collaborative purple-team operations — threat-informed adversary emulation planning (ATT&CK, CTID, Atomic Red Team, CALDERA), the detect-tune-validate loop, detection coverage measurement (DeTT&CT/Navigator), safe execution and deconfliction, and MTTD/coverage reporting

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to apply Java secure coding best practices — including validating untrusted inputs, defending against injection attacks with parameterized queries, minimizing attack surface via least privilege, applying strong cryptographic algorithms, handling exceptions securely without exposing sensitive data, managing secrets at runtime, avoiding unsafe deserialization, and encoding output to prevent XSS. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for secure coding; Find input validation risks in Java code; Review Java code for injection vulnerabilities; Improve secure error handling in Java services; Harden Java code against common security flaws. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform structured reconnaissance and attack surface enumeration for authorized penetration tests, CTF challenges, and bug bounty programs. Use when the user mentions 'recon,' 'reconnaissance,' 'enumerate,' 'attack surface,' 'subdomain enumeration,' 'port scan,' 'fingerprint,' 'asset discovery,' or needs to map a target's external footprint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured threat-modeling session for a new feature, system, or architecture — STRIDE, attack trees, data flow diagrams, abuse cases. Use when the user mentions 'threat model,' 'threat modeling,' 'STRIDE,' 'attack tree,' 'abuse case,' 'data flow diagram,' 'DFD,' 'security architecture review,' 'security review,' 'design review,' 'pre-implementation security,' 'shift left,' 'what could go wrong,' or needs strategic security thinking before code is written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when attacking a network or moving laterally — L2/L3 poisoning (LLMNR/mDNS, ARP/DHCP, mitm6), coercion + NTLM relay (CVE-2025-33073), TUN pivoting (Ligolo-ng/Chisel), MitM, network-service RCE (CVE-2024-38077), WPA2/WPA3 wireless

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when mapping a target's external attack surface or gathering OSINT — subdomain enumeration, attack-surface mapping (httpx/katana/JS secrets), subdomain takeover, multi-cloud/Azure tenant recon, GitHub secret dorking, breach/infostealer credential intel, CVE prioritization (EPSS/KEV)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the target has a non-Wi-Fi radio attack surface — Bluetooth/BLE (GATT, pairing, KNOB/BIAS/BleedingTooth), Zigbee/Thread/Matter & Z-Wave mesh (Touchlink, S0 downgrade), LoRaWAN/Sub-GHz LPWAN, SDR capture/replay/rolljam, smart locks/medical/IoT radios. For Wi-Fi/WPA/evil-twin see network-attack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wiki-first "what do I use" lookup - pick the automated TOOL (wiki/tools/), then the PAYLOAD/technique (wiki/payloads/ + wiki/cheatsheets/), for a surface/service/vuln-class BEFORE hand-rolling or working from memory. Use for "tool for <service>", "automated tools for web/<service>", "what should I run on <surface>", "which tool for <X>", "payloads for <X>", "payload arsenal", "cheatsheet for <X>", "how do I exploit <tech/class>", "exploit/attack chain for <X>", "arsenal", any SSRF/XSS/SQLi/SSTI/LFI/JWT/XXE/IDOR/NoSQL/deserialization/CSRF/CORS/CRLF/GraphQL/smuggling/web-cache/OAuth/SAML/MFA/crypto/LDAP/XPath/WebAuthn/file-upload/IMDS/prompt-injection/Modbus ask, plus "privesc arsenal", "CVE arsenal", "default creds", "nuclei templates", "sqlmap/hydra/nmap/bloodhound", "password attacks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authorized multi-stage attack-path planning and orchestration spanning reconnaissance, initial access, privilege escalation, lateral movement, and reporting. Entry point for full engagements and cross-phase operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits GitHub Actions workflows for security vulnerabilities in AI agent integrations including Claude Code Action, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex, and GitHub AI Inference. Detects attack vectors where attacker-controlled input reaches. AI agents running in CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assessment of pseudonymization techniques and re-identification risk. Covers tokenization, hashing, encryption-based pseudonymization, and hybrid approaches. Includes re-identification risk scoring using the motivated intruder test, quantitative metrics (marketer, journalist, prosecutor models), and linkage attack resilience evaluation. References ENISA 2019 pseudonymization report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kerberos-based Active Directory attacks driven by hand with standard tooling (Kerberoasting, AS-REP roasting, and delegation abuse: unconstrained, constrained/S4U, RBCD). Use when the target has SPN-bearing service accounts, accounts without pre-authentication, or delegation configured on computer/user objects, and you want the exact impacket/Rubeus/bloodyAD command, the hash format and hashcat mode, the Windows Event IDs that fire, and the remediation to write up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-agent self-inspection of your AI-agent stack. Audits skills, MCP servers, hooks, plugins, commands, credentials, and memory files across Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, and NanoClaw. Produces a structured inventory and narrative briefing with cross-ecosystem risk analysis. Use when the user asks to audit their own setup, check what they have installed, review their agent stack security posture, or understand cross-tool interactions. Use when a user has accumulated skills/plugins/MCP servers over time and wants visibility into their attack surface. Use after installing new skills or plugins. Do NOT use for vetting external code before install (that is repo-forensics). Do NOT use for incident response during active attacks. Do NOT use for fixing or patching vulnerabilities (forensify is read-only).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive expertise in decentralized autonomous organization governance systems, including Snapshot off-chain voting, OpenZeppelin Governor on-chain execution, treasury multi-sigs, proposal lifecycles, delegation, and governance attack prevention. Use when "DAO governance, on-chain voting, Snapshot, Governor contract, governance proposal, treasury management, multi-sig, token voting, delegation, quorum, timelock, governance attack, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in designing and implementing visceral, satisfying combat systems. Masters hitbox/hurtbox design, frame data, combo systems, enemy archetypes, damage feedback, and the invisible craft that makes players feel powerful. Draws from fighting games, character action games (DMC, Bayonetta), and Souls-like design to create combat that is readable, responsive, and endlessly replayable. Use when "combat system, combat design, hitbox, hurtbox, frame data, hitstop, screen shake, input buffer, coyote time, i-frames, invincibility frames, combo system, attack cancel, recovery frames, punishment window, souls-like combat, action game combat, fighting game, damage feedback, enemy design, boss design, attack telegraph, parry system, stamina system, poise system, weapon feel, game feel combat, melee combat, combat juice, combat, action-game, fighting-game, hitbox, frame-data, game-feel, souls-like, character-action, melee, enemy-design, boss-design, combo, parry, i-frames" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits GitHub Actions workflows for security vulnerabilities in AI agent integrations including Claude Code Action, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex, and GitHub AI Inference. Detects attack vectors where attacker-controlled input reaches AI agents running in CI/CD pipelines, including env var intermediary patterns, direct expression injection, dangerous sandbox configurations, and wildcard user allowlists. Use when reviewing workflow files that invoke AI coding agents, auditing CI/CD pipeline security for prompt injection risks, or evaluating agentic action configurations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the attack-path-analysis phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to trace a security finding from source to sink and calibrate severity. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HTTP/Web exploitation until a server shell or equivalent OS execution. Use after /web-recon has mapped the application. Covers injection, upload, LFI, SSRF/XXE, SSTI, deserialization, JWT/SAML, API logic, desync/cache/parser, and Web-controlled backend abuse. WAF stays here. Endpoint blocks after OS execution hand off to /edr-bypass then return. Direct non-HTTP service ports belong to /recon or /service-attack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HTTP/HTTPS application-layer reconnaissance after a web service is identified: fingerprinting, content/API discovery, JS/source maps, proxy/cache topology, WAF, CMS, and known CVE/PoC candidates. Recon only — do not exploit, write files, or obtain a shell. Hand CVE candidates and attack surface to the operator, who may select /web-attack. Non-HTTP ports belong to /recon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。