本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

recon

Perform structured reconnaissance and attack surface enumeration for authorized penetration tests, CTF challenges, and bug bounty programs. Use when the user mentions 'recon,' 'reconnaissance,' 'enumerate,' 'attack surface,' 'subdomain enumeration,' 'port scan,' 'fingerprint,' 'asset discovery,' or needs to map a target's external footprint.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Recon — Penetration Testing Reconnaissance

Perform structured reconnaissance against an authorized target, organizing findings into an actionable attack surface map.

Cross-references: osint-recon for the deeper open-source-intelligence pass (people, organizations, historical data) — this skill is the active/passive target-mapping side, osint-recon is the broader investigative side; they pair naturally. web-pentest for the next stage once recon has produced an attack surface map and an authorized target list. owasp-audit for source-code review when you have access to the target's code.

Authorization Check

Before running any commands, confirm:

  1. The user has written authorization for the target (pentest engagement, bug bounty program, CTF/lab environment)
  2. The target is within the defined scope

If authorization is unclear, ask before proceeding. Never assume authorization.

Methodology

Phase 1: Passive Recon

Gather information without touching the target directly.

DNS enumeration:

  • Run dig any $ARGUMENTS for A, AAAA, MX, TXT, NS, CNAME records
  • Attempt zone transfer: dig axfr @ns-server $ARGUMENTS
  • Enumerate subdomains via certificate transparency:
    curl -s "https://crt.sh/?q=%25.$ARGUMENTS&output=json" | jq -r '.[].name_value' | sort -u
    

WHOIS and registration: Run whois $ARGUMENTS for registrant, nameserver, and creation date info.

Search engine dorking: Use targeted queries — site:, inurl:, filetype:, intitle: — to find exposed pages, documents, and admin panels.

Technology fingerprinting: Identify frameworks, CMS, server software, and JavaScript libraries from public-facing pages.

Public code repositories: Search GitHub/GitLab for the target's org name, domain, API keys, or internal paths.

Historical data: Check the Wayback Machine for old endpoints, removed pages, and configuration files.

Phase 2: Active Recon (explicit authorization only)

Port scanning:

nmap -sC -sV -oN scan-results.txt $ARGUMENTS

Start with top 1000 ports. Expand to full range (-p-) if needed. Use -Pn if the host appears down but is in scope.

Service enumeration: Based on open ports, probe for version info and default configurations.

Web content discovery:

  • Directory bruting with gobuster, feroxbuster, or dirsearch
  • Virtual host enumeration
  • API endpoint discovery (check /api/, /v1/, /graphql, /swagger.json)

SSL/TLS analysis: Run testssl.sh or sslyze to check for weak ciphers, expired certificates, and misconfigurations.

Phase 3: Analysis

Correlate all findings. Identify the most promising attack vectors and prioritize by:

  1. Severity of potential impact
  2. Likelihood of exploitation
  3. Exposure level (internet-facing vs. internal)

Output Format

Produce a structured recon report:

# Recon Report
## Target: [target]
## Scope: [confirmed scope]
## Date: [date]

### Passive Findings
| Finding | Details | Relevance |
|---------|---------|-----------|

### Subdomains Discovered
- [list]

### Technologies Detected
- [list with versions where identified]

### Active Findings
| Port | Service | Version | Notes |
|------|---------|---------|-------|

### Attack Surface Summary
[Prioritized list of interesting findings with risk assessment]

### Recommended Next Steps
[Ordered list of what to investigate further]

Boundaries

  • Stay within the defined scope — never scan adjacent or out-of-scope systems
  • Rate-limit aggressive scans to avoid disruption
  • Log all commands run for the engagement record
  • If you discover evidence of active compromise by a third party, alert the user immediately
  • Refuse requests targeting systems without explicit authorization
  • Refuse requests for mass scanning of unrelated targets

References

  • PTES (Penetration Testing Execution Standard)
  • OWASP Testing Guide
  • Bug Bounty Methodology (jhaddix/tbhm)

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the security slice). Use when the user mentions 'AI risk,' 'AI governance,' 'NIST AI RMF,' 'AI compliance,' 'ML governance,' 'model risk management,' 'AI fairness,' 'AI bias,' 'algorithmic accountability,' 'AI Bill of Rights,' 'EU AI Act,' 'AI transparency,' 'model card,' 'AI red team,' 'AI safety,' 'responsible AI,' 'model drift,' 'concept drift,' 'AI monitoring,' 'AI incident,' or needs to assess or govern an AI / ML system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4182026年5月27日 更新

api-audit

無料

Audit REST, GraphQL, and RPC APIs against the OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023). Use when the user mentions 'API security,' 'API audit,' 'BOLA,' 'broken object level authorization,' 'BFLA,' 'function-level authorization,' 'mass assignment,' 'API rate limiting,' 'GraphQL security,' 'REST security,' 'API authentication,' 'API authorization,' 'excessive data exposure,' or needs to review API endpoints for security weaknesses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4182026年5月27日 更新

Learn from public breach disclosures — extract the audit question each one implies and check your own stack. Capital One IMDS abuse, LastPass vault exfiltration, Okta Lapsus$, Snowflake credential reuse, MOVEit, SolarWinds, Equifax, Target POS, Codecov, Uber, Twilio — what would you check now if your boss said 'could that happen to us?' Use when the user mentions 'breach analysis,' 'lessons learned,' 'security postmortem,' 'breach patterns,' 'breach lessons,' 'has this happened to us,' 'apply breach lessons,' 'preempt breaches,' 'security retrospective,' 'real-world security incidents,' or wants to harden against known attacker playbooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4182026年5月27日 更新

Audit cloud infrastructure (AWS, GCP, Azure) for misconfigurations, excessive permissions, and security gaps. Use when the user mentions 'cloud security,' 'cloud audit,' 'AWS security,' 'GCP security,' 'Azure security,' 'IAM audit,' 'S3 bucket,' 'cloud misconfiguration,' 'cloud hardening,' or needs to review cloud infrastructure security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4182026年5月27日 更新

Audit container images, Dockerfiles, and Kubernetes manifests for misconfigurations, excessive privileges, exposed secrets, and runtime risks. Use when the user mentions 'container security,' 'Docker security,' 'Dockerfile audit,' 'Kubernetes security,' 'K8s security,' 'pod security,' 'container hardening,' 'kubectl audit,' 'image scanning,' 'distroless,' 'rootless containers,' 'pod security policy,' 'pod security standards,' 'PSS,' 'network policy,' 'OPA Gatekeeper,' 'Kyverno,' 'runtime security,' or needs to review container or orchestration security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4182026年5月27日 更新

Audit cryptography implementation — algorithm choice, key sizes, KDF parameters, IV/nonce handling, signature verification, randomness, TLS configuration, and key rotation. Deeper than owasp-audit A02. Use when the user mentions 'crypto review,' 'cryptography audit,' 'encryption review,' 'KDF,' 'PBKDF2,' 'Argon2,' 'bcrypt cost,' 'IV reuse,' 'nonce reuse,' 'AES mode,' 'AES-GCM,' 'AES-ECB,' 'signature verification,' 'TLS configuration,' 'cipher suites,' 'key rotation,' 'libsodium,' 'BoringSSL,' or 'is this crypto right.'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4182026年5月27日 更新

briiirussell のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する