4,564 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Create MATLAB Course Designer MATLAB Exercise learning activities by wrapping the existing matlab-generate-grader-assessments skill, then validating generated solution.m, template.m, and tests.m files with MATLAB MCP Server tool calls. Use when the user asks to create a MATLAB Exercise, MATLAB course activity, Course Designer MATLAB activity, validated MATLAB solution file, or MATLAB Exercise component folder.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Make technology decisions for every product capability by discovering existing assets, evaluating vendor-aligned options, and categorizing as Reuse/Extend/Build/Buy/Integrate/Research during PRD v0.5 Red Team Review. Handles both greenfield and brownfield contexts. Triggers on "tech stack", "build or buy?", "what technologies?", "technical decisions", "what do we reuse?", "existing stack", "vendor constraint", "IBM-first", "what tools do we need?", "evaluate solutions", "select tech stack". Consumes FEA- (features), SCR- (screens), RISK- (constraints). Outputs TECH- entries with decisions, rationale, and cross-references. Feeds v0.6 Architecture Design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Greenfield project architecture + harness scaffolding for AI Agent productivity. Interview-driven decisions → requirements.md → execute. Produces: Code Structure (vertical slice exemplar), Test Infrastructure, Guard Rails, conditional extensions, AND Harness (CLAUDE.md with domain/team context, rules, skills, hooks). L2: architecture decisions, L3: harness setup, L4: requirements + harness decisions (tasks generated later by /execute into plan.json). Use when: "/scaffold", "scaffold", "new project", "set up project", "프로젝트 세팅", "초기 구조"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
侍酒师与葡萄酒 (侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。) Master OS — automated mastery of 侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「侍酒师」「sommelier」「葡萄酒」「wine」「盲品」
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes, triages, flags and rates a piece of text with a probability for every option: which department or queue a ticket goes to, which intent a message expresses, whether a yes/no condition holds (is this tool call grounded, should the agent ask first, is the customer angry), and how severe or urgent it is on a rubric, each with a calibrated confidence. Runs Claude Haiku in the request and response shapes of OpenAI's Decisions API, for when no purpose-built decision model is at hand. Use for "route this ticket", "triage these", "classify with a confidence", "give me a probability that", "rate the severity", "score against this rubric", guardrail checks before a tool call, or "a Decisions API without OpenAI".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Brainstorms and debates approaches, then drives toward an actionable decision. Use whenever someone needs a thinking partner for a decision they're facing: 'discuss', 'debate', 'brainstorm', 'weigh options', 'tradeoffs', 'should I do X or Y', 'help me decide', 'I'm torn between', 'sanity check my thinking', or 'what do you think about'. The user must be asking for help reasoning through a choice — not asking to build, fix, evaluate, plan, or modify something (even if the topic involves this skill itself). Picks the right decision lens, surfaces tradeoffs and blind spots, pushes back when reasoning is genuinely weak, and never implements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classify decisions as Hat/Haircut/Tattoo by reversibility. Use to calibrate how much analysis a decision deserves.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create structured records of decisions with expected outcomes, probabilities, and quit conditions. Use for important decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spawns the decision-scorer agent after architect proposes 2+ variants in an ADR. Produces a weighted scoring table and recommended choice saved to docs/decisions/.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) documenting a significant technical decision, its context, alternatives considered, and consequences. Every major technical choice should have an ADR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure a decision or design challenge through multiple perspectives before committing to action. Use as a synthesis step after scoping, mapping, and dilemma navigation when a group needs a wiser next step.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triggers for automatically invoking the decision-framework skill before irreversible or high-blast-radius operations. Use as a checkpoint: when a proposed action matches a trigger pattern, pause and run the appropriate framework (first-principles, inversion, decision matrix, second-order thinking) before proceeding. Prevents ad-hoc calls from becoming regret.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user says "lock it", "go with that", "approved", "that's the standard", or explicitly establishes a project-wide pattern like "from now on all forms should use this approach". Formalizes approved decisions into locked standards that the system enforces going forward. Not needed for story-scoped decisions — only for project-wide patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans a research project as a durable decision map, resolving one design decision per session until the design is defensible and pre-registerable. Use at project start, when a design has more open decisions than one conversation holds, or when planning keeps restarting. Not for running analyses or writing the paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing, debugging, or giving feedback on Go code in this repo (exercises/part2, website/tools, or any *.go file) or when asked for a "code review", "review this Go", "revisa este código Go", or "crítica de código". Reviews for correctness, idiomatic Go, error handling, resource cleanup, concurrency, performance, and security, and always ends with a test-thinking pass (what a test would catch). For exercises/part2, prefer the go-exercise-reviewer skill which knows the module-mode quirk; this skill covers general Go anywhere in the repo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and manage Architecture Decision Records (ADRs). Use when making architectural changes (refactoring, API versioning, new domain layers, schema changes), when reviewing recent commits for documentation needs, or when the user mentions ADR, architecture decisions, or documenting technical decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Excellence-first strategic decision support. This skill should be used when users need to choose between options, pressure-test a plan, evaluate risk, or make a specific decision — across security, product, growth, operations, org design, and finance. Use when there is a decision with tradeoffs to score and a recommendation to make. For pure research ("what does the best in the world do about X?"), use best-in-world-research instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates pro-rata and follow-on investment decisions with portfolio construction, signaling effects, and reserve management. Use when making follow-on decisions, managing reserves, or evaluating pro-rata rights.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates assumption, rejection, and assignment decisions for executory contracts and unexpired leases in bankruptcy. Use when analyzing contract decisions, evaluating lease rejections, or modeling cure cost exposure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decision framework for agents to determine WHEN and WHETHER to use Claude Code's native cron scheduler (CronCreate/CronList/CronDelete) vs OS cron, GitHub Actions, or simple Task() delegation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement pharmaceutical serialisation and track-and-trace systems compliant with EU FMD, US DSCSA, and other global regulations. Covers unique identifier generation, aggregation hierarchy, EPCIS data exchange, and verification endpoint integration. Use when implementing serialisation for a new product launch, integrating with the EMVS/NMVS, designing DSCSA-compliant transaction exchange, building an EPCIS event repository, or extending serialisation to additional markets (China, Brazil, Russia).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write effective Architecture Decision Records. Use when: (1) Creating a new ADR, (2) Recording a design decision, (3) User mentions ADR, decision, trade-off, or alternatives
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。