1,280 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
After any AI-generated explanation, require the learner to identify one place it could be wrong, one thing to check, and one source to consult. Builds epistemic vigilance — treats AI output as a claim to evaluate, not truth to absorb.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Semi-automated fact-checking, source credibility evaluation, misinformation detection, prebunking, and evidence-ledger based claim verification. Use when a user asks to verify a claim, article, social post, screenshot, URL, quote, data point, compare sources, detect manipulation, evaluate source reliability, or generate an HTML fact-check card/share-safe correction. Supports text, URLs, screenshots/images, two-source comparison, and topic-level prebunking in Bulgarian, English, Russian, EU policy, health, science, and geopolitical contexts. Trigger phrases: "is this true?", "is this fake?", "fact check this", "compare these sources", "проверка на факти", "истина ли е", "дезинформация ли е", "сравни тези източници".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces structured, citation-backed summaries of U.S. insurance policies, endorsements, claims files, and coverage correspondence for coverage analysis and insurance litigation. Use when summarizing policies, declarations, claims files, reservation-of-rights letters, denial letters, or coverage disputes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level insurance systems, underwriting, claims processing, actuarial analysis, risk assessment, and insurtech solutions
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
HealthSim generates realistic synthetic healthcare data for testing EMR systems, claims processing, pharmacy benefits, and analytics. Use for ANY request involving: (1) synthetic patients, clinical data, or medical records, (2) healthcare claims, billing, or adjudication, (3) pharmacy prescriptions, formularies, or drug utilization, (4) HL7v2, FHIR, X12, or NCPDP formatted output, (5) healthcare testing scenarios or sample data generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
HealthSim generates realistic synthetic healthcare data for testing EMR systems, claims processing, pharmacy benefits, and analytics. Use for ANY request involving: (1) synthetic patients, clinical data, or medical records, (2) healthcare claims, billing, or adjudication, (3) pharmacy prescriptions, formularies, or drug utilization, (4) HL7v2, FHIR, X12, or NCPDP formatted output, (5) healthcare testing scenarios or sample data generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
HealthSim generates realistic synthetic healthcare data for testing EMR systems, claims processing, pharmacy benefits, and analytics. Use for ANY request involving: (1) synthetic patients, clinical data, or medical records, (2) healthcare claims, billing, or adjudication, (3) pharmacy prescriptions, formularies, or drug utilization, (4) HL7v2, FHIR, X12, or NCPDP formatted output, (5) healthcare testing scenarios or sample data generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Insurance policy analysis, claims evaluation, coverage assessment, and risk management for individuals and businesses
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
RxMemberSim generates realistic synthetic pharmacy data for testing PBM systems, claims adjudication, and drug utilization review. Use when user requests: (1) pharmacy claims or prescription data, (2) DUR alerts or drug interactions, (3) formulary or tier cohorts, (4) pharmacy prior authorization, (5) NCPDP formatted output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage construction contract administration from the field perspective. Covers AIA contract forms (A101, A201, A401), bond types and requirements, mechanics lien law, insurance verification, indemnification, dispute resolution, and subcontractor default procedures. Provides practical field guidance for notice requirements, lien waiver processing, COI verification, and claims documentation. Integrates with pay-application (lien waivers), change-order-tracker (constructive changes), delay-tracker (notice provisions), sub-performance (default triggers), and cost-tracking (back-charges). Triggers: "contract", "contract admin", "AIA", "A201", "A101", "bond", "performance bond", "payment bond", "lien", "lien waiver", "mechanics lien", "insurance", "COI", "certificate of insurance", "OCIP", "CCIP", "indemnification", "dispute", "mediation", "arbitration", "notice", "cure notice", "default", "sub default", "termination for cause", "claims", "ConsensusDocs", "EJCDC".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate Coverage and insurance resources with payer diversity including Medicare, Medicaid, commercial, Tricare, VA, and self-pay. Use when user mentions coverage, insurance, payer, Medicare, Medicaid, benefits, or coordination of benefits. For claims and EOB see the claims-eob skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当需要审核理赔材料、分类理赔请求、指导理赔流程时使用。触发场景：理赔材料审核、理赔流程指导、材料清单生成。当用户提到“理赔“、“保险赔付“、“claims“、“理赔材料“时应触发此技能。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Walidacja claims - co wolno a czego nie wolno mówić w copy
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify claims, quotes, timelines, and findings against supplied source files and return a source map with verified, conflicting, not found, and manual-review statuses. Use when the user asks to fact-check a memo, audit, timeline, executive summary, research packet, or project brief against PDFs, XML, HTML, notes, screenshots, exported chat logs, or other supplied files before sending, publishing, or relying on the result.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Despliega soluciones de IA para insurance claims automation con arquitectura modular, metricas auditables y decisiones alineadas al contexto del dominio.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Insurance Claims Processor
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claim the AI bounty on tDVV by delegating to the canonical repo SKILL and its branch docs; this public skill is AA/CA only and requires explicit write confirmation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the primary outcome is comparing documentation claims with implementation evidence, synchronizing docs from verified changes, or freshness review, including drift, missing coverage, stale claims, and post-change updates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rigorous self-assessment checklist before marking any task as complete. Use when about to claim task completion, before final commit, when user asks "is it done?", or when transitioning from implementation to reporting. Prevents premature completion claims by requiring evidence for every assertion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies claims in backlog items, skill documentation, or plugin content against primary sources using web lookups. Spawns parallel verification agents that must use WebFetch/WebSearch/gh — training data recall is explicitly rejected as evidence. Produces VERIFIED/REFUTED/INCONCLUSIVE verdicts with citations. Use when items are marked UNVERIFIED or when verifying tool API claims, CLI flags, or documented software behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Codified expertise for returns authorization, receipt and inspection, disposition decisions, refund processing, fraud detection, and warranty claims management. Informed by returns operations managers with 15+ years experience. Includes grading frameworks, disposition economics, fraud pattern recognition, and vendor recovery processes. Use when handling product returns, reverse logistics, refund decisions, return fraud detection, or warranty claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Codified expertise for handling freight exceptions, shipment delays, damages, losses, and carrier disputes. Informed by logistics professionals with 15+ years operational experience. Includes escalation protocols, carrier-specific behaviors, claims procedures, and judgment frameworks. Use when handling shipping exceptions, freight claims, delivery issues, or carrier disputes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Skeptical analysis and critique of claims, plans, and code without taking anyone at face value. Use when the user says "don't trust me", wants adversarial review, red-teaming, assumption checking, or verification that generated or proposed code is actually correct. Triggers on skepticism, critique everything, verify claims, challenge assumptions, red team, devil's advocate, prove it, smell test.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review user-facing docs, CLI reference text, examples, and scaffolds for truthfulness, prose quality, and RFC leakage. Use when a broad review needs a dedicated docs/claims pass or when the user asks for docs-truth review specifically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。