「depth」の検索結果

Performs security-focused differential review of code changes (PRs, commits, diffs). Adapts analysis depth to codebase size, uses git history for context, calculates blast radius, checks test coverage, and generates comprehensive markdown reports. Automatically detects and prevents security regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-page deep crawling - documentation sites, wikis, knowledge bases

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PR size-based review depth, performance review checklist, architecture conformance checks, and framework-specific review patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security-focused differential code review with blast radius analysis, risk-adaptive depth (DEEP/FOCUSED/SURGICAL), git history correlation, and structured finding format. Adapted from Trail of Bits. Use when reviewing PRs, commits, or code changes for security implications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta-skill for internal codebase exploration at varying depths (quick/deep/architecture)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reduces attack surface across OS, container, cloud, network, and database layers using CIS Benchmarks and zero-trust principles. Use when hardening production infrastructure, meeting compliance requirements, or implementing defense-in-depth security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure host-based firewalls (iptables, nftables, UFW) and cloud security groups (AWS, GCP, Azure) with practical rules for common scenarios like web servers, databases, and bastion hosts. Use when exposing services, hardening servers, or implementing network segmentation with defense-in-depth strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design comprehensive security architectures using defense-in-depth, zero trust principles, threat modeling (STRIDE, PASTA), and control frameworks (NIST CSF, CIS Controls, ISO 27001). Use when designing security for new systems, auditing existing architectures, or establishing security governance programs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct multi-round deep research on any GitHub Repo. Use when users request comprehensive analysis, timeline reconstruction, competitive analysis, or in-depth investigation of GitHub. Produces structured markdown reports with executive summaries, chronological timelines, metrics analysis, and Mermaid diagrams. Triggers on Github repository URL or open source projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Crawl websites and extract content from multiple pages via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill when the user wants to crawl a site, download documentation, extract an entire docs section, bulk-extract pages, save a site as local markdown files, or says "crawl", "get all the pages", "download the docs", "extract everything under /docs", "bulk extract", or needs content from many pages on the same domain. Supports depth/breadth control, path filtering, semantic instructions, and saving each page as a local markdown file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search the web with LLM-optimized results via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill when the user wants to search the web, find articles, look up information, get recent news, discover sources, or says "search for", "find me", "look up", "what's the latest on", "find articles about", or needs current information from the internet. Returns relevant results with content snippets, relevance scores, and metadata — optimized for LLM consumption. Supports domain filtering, time ranges, and multiple search depths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct comprehensive AI-powered research with citations via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill when the user wants deep research, a detailed report, a comparison, market analysis, literature review, or says "research", "investigate", "analyze in depth", "compare X vs Y", "what does the market look like for", or needs multi-source synthesis with explicit citations. Returns a structured report grounded in web sources. Takes 30-120 seconds. For quick fact-finding, use tavily-search instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze assertion quality, depth, variety, and false confidence in existing tests. ALWAYS USE when asked about weak, shallow, trivial, always-true, self-referential, assertion-free, presence/truthiness-only, or insufficiently diverse assertions, including MSTest, Jest, pytest, and Go. DO NOT USE for direct fixes: writing-mstest-tests owns supplied MSTest assertions; code-testing owns new cases. Use test-gap-analysis when asked whether tests would catch a production change, and test-anti-patterns for general severity-ranked audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

System hardening, detection engineering, security baseline monitoring, patch management, defense-in-depth architecture, and security posture improvement

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks for "deep research", "research team", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "investigate thoroughly", "compare X vs Y in depth", or needs synthesis across multiple sources with verification. It spawns a coordinated team of researcher agents across multiple rounds, with the lead triaging findings and creating targeted follow-up tasks. Scales from Focused (2 researchers, 1-2 rounds) to Comprehensive (4 researchers, 3-4 rounds with cross-verification). Do NOT use for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DEX liquidity depth assessment, slippage estimation, and pool composition analysis for Solana tokens

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execution cost estimation, slippage curve modeling, and optimal trade sizing based on AMM liquidity depth

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when invalid data causes failures deep in execution, requiring validation at multiple system layers - validates at every layer data passes through to make bugs structurally impossible

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apple's approach to interface design and fluid, physical motion, translated for the web. Use when building or reviewing gesture-driven UI, spring animations, drag/swipe/sheet interactions, momentum and interruptible transitions, translucent materials and depth, typography (optical sizing, tracking, leading), reduced-motion, or the design foundations (feedback, spatial consistency, restraint) behind Apple-style interfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explicit polish reference for concentric radius, optical alignment, surface depth, contextual icons, and hit areas. Use only after Core frontend rules and packages/ui. Do not restyle product apps from these examples.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CLI toolkit for SAM/BAM/CRAM: sort, index, convert, filter, QC alignments. Core commands: view, sort, index, flagstat, stats, depth, markdup, merge. Required between alignment and variant/peak calling. Use pysam for Python-native BAM access; deeptools for normalized coverage tracks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides AWS CloudFormation patterns for security infrastructure including KMS encryption, Secrets Manager, IAM security, VPC security, ACM certificates, parameter security, outputs, and secure cross-stack references. Use when implementing security best practices, encrypting data, managing secrets, applying least privilege IAM policies, securing VPC configurations, managing TLS/SSL certificates, and implementing defense in depth strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether to escalate models. Use when evaluating reasoning depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Same pixels, fewer tokens — for user-facing deliverables where visual polish is the spec. Use when building or editing a landing page, marketing site, hero, pricing/feature section, dashboard, or any HTML/CSS UI component. Keeps the full rendered design (layout depth, hierarchy, motion, responsive richness, a11y) and cuts tokens by expressing that design densely — CSS custom properties, shared classes, shorthand, fluid units — instead of by cutting the design. The honey core trims code and prose; this trims how the design is *written*, never how it looks. Reach for it whenever output is user-facing markup, even if the user never says "minimal".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。