「escalation」の検索結果

Implement incident management processes and escalation procedures. Configure on-call schedules and post-incident reviews. Use when managing production incidents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up alerting rules, configure on-call rotations, and manage incident response workflows. Integrate with PagerDuty, Opsgenie, or Grafana OnCall for alert routing and escalation. Use when implementing alerting strategies and on-call management for production systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prevents crashes due to problematic scope-related API misuse caused by agent escalation into internal scope framework objects. Use when configuring properties of scope-related Simulink blocks or MATLAB objects — constrains the agent to documented APIs and directs users to the scope UI when a property is not programmatically accessible.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent orchestrator for Claude Code. Use when user mentions gastown, gas town, gt commands, bd commands, convoys, polecats, crew, rigs, slinging work, multi-agent coordination, beads, hooks, molecules, workflows, the witness, the mayor, the refinery, the deacon, dogs, escalation, or wants to run multiple AI agents on projects simultaneously. Handles installation, workspace setup, work tracking, agent lifecycle, crash recovery, and all gt/bd CLI operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a reply to one customer review, voice-scored, with escalation flags. "reply to this 1-star review"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show autopilot status: health, auto-corrections, guardrails, escalations. "what did the autopilot change"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run fable-mode execution discipline on Claude Opus — the top of the escalation ladder. Trigger when the user explicitly asks for thorough/systematic/"deep work" handling on Opus ("fable on opus", "stage this on opus", "deep work mode, opus"). When a task exceeds Opus's ceiling, report that to the user rather than escalating further.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run fable-mode execution discipline on Claude Fable 5.1 — the top of the escalation ladder and the strongest staged run available. Routes the task to the @fable-orchestrator agent with its model overridden to Fable (`model: "fable"`), which stages the work, delegates artifact production to @fable-worker-sonnet / @fable-worker-haiku, and cold-checks deliverables with @fable-verifier. Trigger when the user explicitly asks for thorough/systematic/"deep work" handling on the strongest model ("fable on fable", "stage this on fable", "deep work mode, fable", "run this on 5.1"), or when a fable-opus run reports the task exceeds Opus's ceiling. Benchmarked 2026-09-02: zero correctness delta on Fable 5.1 at ~1.1× tokens, ~2× wall — a provenance runner, not an accuracy runner. Do NOT use for ordinary single-pass tasks — prefer fable-opus, fable-sonnet, or fable-haiku when the task doesn't need peak reasoning. Fable is plan-included; bulk work still routes down-tier.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft matter status reports from emails, call notes, and updates. Internal and client-facing formats, RAG logic, variance commentary, escalation flags. Use when asked to draft a status report, write a project update, summarise matter progress, prepare a client report, create a weekly or monthly update, convert emails into a status summary, or produce any kind of matter reporting. Also triggers when the user pastes email threads and asks what the status is, or needs to turn internal updates into client-facing reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adjudicates whether a hit generated by sanctions, PEP, or adverse-media screening is a true positive, false positive, or requires human escalation. Use whenever a user presents a screening alert, a name match against a watchlist (OFAC SDN, EU consolidated list, UK OFSI, UN list, PEP list, adverse media hit, etc.), or asks to clear a screening hit / reduce false positives / determine whether a flagged name is actually the listed party. Use even when the user describes the task casually — "is this person actually on the sanctions list", "did we get a real match", "clear this alert", "I have a hit on X" — these are all screening-adjudication tasks. Produces a deterministic determination with full audit trail (structured JSON + human-readable narrative). Designed for use by compliance analysts and screening systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end external local counsel lifecycle management for multi-jurisdiction legal matters. LC selection criteria and capability assessment, engagement setup and instruction design, performance monitoring and check-in cadence, scope enforcement, and relationship escalation. Use when selecting local counsel for a jurisdiction, designing LC instructions, managing the LC check-in rhythm, enforcing scope boundaries when LC signals overreach, or escalating a performance or relationship issue beyond the matter team. Trigger on: 'which LC should we use', 'LC instruction', 'brief the local counsel', 'LC hasn't responded', 'LC is going off scope', 'LC scope dispute', 'confirm scope with LC', 'LC check-in', 'LC is slow', 'monitor the LC network', 'LC engagement letter', 'LC selection', 'what should we tell the local counsel', 'LC onboarding', 'LC performance issue', 'LC relationship problem'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude skill that turns Claude into a Connecticut-specific divorce planner — nine operating modes from pre-flight intake to post-judgment modification, modeled on Untangle.us's feature surface and grounded in C.G.S. Title 46b, Practice Book Chapter 25, and the 2026-08-01 CCSG schedule. Covers eligibility triage (nonadversarial under § 46b-44a vs standard), financial affidavit (JD-FM-6), child support (JD-FM-220 / CCSG-1 / 1A), alimony (§ 46b-82 fourteen factors), parenting plan (with GAL/AMC escalation under JD-FM-224), settlement agreement (JD-FM-172, TCJA-aware), filing packet (marshal 12-day rule, $360 + $50 fees, JD-FM-75 waiver), and post-judgment motion practice. Hard UPL gate: refuses non-CT, domestic violence (refers CTCADV 1-888-774-2900), hidden assets, courtroom advocacy. Heppner-aware: AI prompts are not privileged. First family-law skill in the Lawvable registry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Approval cascade definition and tracking for multi-stakeholder document workflows. Internal review sequences, client approval workflows, regulatory review, overdue chasing with escalation logic, version control coordination, and cross-jurisdiction document dependencies. Use when defining who reviews a document and in what order, tracking where a document is stuck in the approval chain, chasing an overdue reviewer, preventing reviewers working on superseded drafts, or mapping dependencies between documents across jurisdictions. Trigger on: 'who needs to approve this', 'document approval', 'review sequence', 'stuck in review', 'overdue approval', 'who has the document', 'version control', 'wrong version', 'document dependency', 'NL SPA waiting on German opinion', 'approval cascade', 'review chain', 'document circulation', 'chasing the partner', 'client approval process', 'where is the document'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide graduated assistance from abstract conceptual nudge to concrete procedural step, with reflection required before each escalation. Teaches help-seeking as a skill and prevents direct-answer shortcuts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dung khi da co huong launch va can QUY TRINH chay cho khong vo tran — timeline T-30 den D+7, checklist tung bo phan content, design, ads, sales, CSKH; war-room ngay launch, escalation matrix va tieu chi roll-back. Kich hoat khi user nhac 'launch playbook', 'quy trinh launch', 'checklist launch', 'war room', 'sap launch ma so sot', 'ai lam gi trong ngay launch', 'SOP ra mat', 'lan truoc launch bi loan'. Khong dung cho — chon phan khuc va thong diep de ra thi truong thi dung skill 59-go-to-market; tong ket bai hoc sau khi launch xong thi dung skill 63-campaign-retrospective; su co truyen thong bung phat thi dung skill 66-crisis-playbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a brand faces a communications CRISIS or a campaign is failing in public — L1 to L5 severity classification, a first-four-hours process, response templates by type, an escalation matrix, a do-not-do list, holding statements, and a post-mortem. Trigger on 'PR crisis', 'crisis playbook', 'a complaint is going viral', 'bad reviews are spreading', 'our content caused backlash', 'we are getting attacked online'. Also use when the user forwards an angry thread and asks what to do right now. Not for — monitoring before anything blows up, see `15-social-listening-global`; diagnosing weak performance numbers, see `03-performance-eval-global`; the routine post-campaign review, see `63-campaign-retrospective-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a launch needs a repeatable EXECUTION playbook — a T-30 to D+7 timeline, per-function checklists for content, design, ads, sales, and engineering, a launch-day war room, an escalation matrix, and roll-back criteria. Trigger on 'launch playbook', 'launch checklist', 'launch day plan', 'launch SOP', 'war room', 'we launch in two weeks and nothing is organized'. Also use when a GTM strategy exists and nobody knows who does what on the day. Not for — the strategy and beachhead choice, see `59-go-to-market-global`; the campaign brief, see `02-campaign-brief-global`; the post-launch review, see `63-campaign-retrospective-global`; a live crisis, see `66-crisis-playbook-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for authorized Active Directory and Windows identity attacks including Kerberos, AD CS, BloodHound paths, NTLM relay, and domain privilege escalation research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews lyrics and prose for AI-written patterns (abstract noun stacking, over-explained metaphors, cliche escalation, missing idiosyncrasy, prose AI tells). Advisory Warning/Info severity — flags issues, does not block or rewrite. Use when reviewing lyrics for authenticity or before generation to catch AI-sounding language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent arasi iletisim sablonlari. Standard handoff, QA verdict (PASS/FAIL), escalation, bug report, security finding ve status update formatlari.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide incident response from detection to post-mortem using SRE principles, severity classification, on-call management, blameless culture, and communication protocols. Use when setting up incident processes, designing escalation policies, or conducting post-mortems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。