「filing」の検索結果

SEC EDGAR filings retrieval and financial document analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DNA sequence profiling and genetic variant characterization

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performance profiling and analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performance profiling for Node.js, Python, and Go: CPU flamegraphs, memory leak detection, bundle analysis, query optimization, and k6 load testing. Use when diagnosing slow endpoints, memory growth, large bundles, or traffic spikes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Browser-based QA combining Chrome MCP control with Python analysis tools. Use when performing browser QA testing, visual regression tracking, WCAG accessibility auditing, performance profiling, or health-scoring web applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Signup and registration flow optimization covering SSO strategy, progressive profiling, field reduction, multi-step flow design, authentication UX, post-submit experience, and mobile registration patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

File Indian income tax returns for FY 2025-26 (AY 2026-27), or plan FY 2026-27 (Tax Year 2026-27), including current-year advance-tax estimates. Use when the user wants to file their ITR, compute or verify Indian income tax, compare the old vs new tax regime, read a Form 16, AIS, TIS or Form 26AS, reconcile TDS, handle capital gains from Zerodha/Groww/Upstox statements, check their tax refund, or asks about ITR-1/ITR-2/ITR-3/ITR-4, sections 80C/80D/87A/111A/112A, crypto tax, advance tax, or the income-tax e-filing portal - even if they just say "help me with my taxes" in an Indian context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to research, profile, or analyze competitors from their URLs. Also use when the user mentions 'competitor profile,' 'competitor research,' 'competitor analysis,' 'profile this competitor,' 'analyze competitor,' 'competitive intelligence,' 'competitor deep dive,' 'who are my competitors,' 'competitor landscape,' 'competitor dossier,' 'competitive audit,' or 'research these competitors.' Input is a list of competitor URLs. Output is structured competitor profile markdown files. For creating comparison/alternative pages from profiles, see competitors. For sales-specific battle cards, see sales-enablement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a lawyer for an adversarial proceeding the way Neal Katyal's "Harvey" prepared him for the SCOTUS tariffs argument: profile the tribunal from their prior opinions and questions, predict the specific questions you will face, map narrow "escape routes" each judge can walk through without abandoning prior commitments, and spar adversarially until only the strongest answers survive. The model is the sparring partner. The human still wins the case. Use when: preparing for oral argument, appellate argument, motion hearing, evidentiary hearing, deposition (taking or defending), arbitration, mediation, or any proceeding where a known decision-maker will fire questions at you in real time. Also useful for stress-testing a brief before filing. Proactively suggest when: the user mentions an upcoming hearing/argument with named judges or arbitrators, drafts a brief and wants it pressure-tested, asks "what will Justice X / Judge Y ask me," or talks about preparing for a specific bench.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research, drafting, and analysis involving the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute system). Enforces a verification-first methodology — every case-law, decision, filing, warrant, and statement citation is verified against an authoritative primary source (icc-cpi.int, legal-tools.org) in the current conversation before it appears in an output. Foundational texts (Rome Statute, Elements of Crimes, RPE, Regulations of the Court) may be cited from project knowledge when present. Use whenever the user is working with ICC case law, OTP statements, ASP documents, or ICC procedure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GDPR Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) — Guided assessment for Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR using the EDPB three-step test. Based on EDPB Guidelines 1/2024, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI models), the OSS Case Digest on Legitimate Interest (McIntyre 2026), CNIL AI guidance (June 2025), ICO guidance, and key CJEU case law. Use when: (1) user needs to assess whether legitimate interest is appropriate, (2) user asks about Art. 6(1)(f), "Interessenabwägung", "berechtigtes Interesse", "balancing test", or "LIA", (3) user wants to document a legitimate interest assessment, (4) user mentions the three-step test, (5) user evaluates necessity or proportionality under Art. 6(1)(f), (6) user discusses direct marketing, fraud prevention, IT security, employee monitoring, AI training, web scraping, or credit checks in context of legal basis, (7) user handles a right to object (Art. 21), (8) user asks about children's data, profiling, or cross-border data sharing under legitimate interest, (9) user compares legitimate interest against other legal bases. Do NOT use for: consent assessments (Art. 6(1)(a)), contract performance (Art. 6(1)(b)), DPIA workflows, or pure ePrivacy/cookie compliance questions — though the skill does address the ePrivacy/GDPR overlap where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when asked to review data protection or privacy compliance under Icelandic law and GDPR. Triggers on requests involving personal data processing, privacy policies, DPIA assessments, kennitala handling, Persónuvernd filings, or cross-border data transfers from Iceland.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GDPR Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) guidance under Article 35 GDPR, EDPB Guidelines WP 248 rev.01, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI), and national SA blacklists/whitelists. Triggers: "DPIA", "DSFA", "Datenschutz-Folgenabschätzung", "impact assessment", "Art. 35", "do I need a DPIA", descriptions of new high-risk processing (profiling, AI, biometrics, large-scale monitoring, special category data), Art. 36 prior consultation questions, national blacklist/whitelist queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Depth assessment of whether an AI system is high-risk under Art. 6 of the EU AI Act, grounded in the Commission's draft Art. 6(5) classification guidelines (general principles + Annex I + Annex III). Covers the Annex I product-safety route, all eight Annex III areas with worked examples, the Art. 6(3) exception and its profiling re-exception, and the Art. 25 quasi-provider trap. Outputs a structured decision block, a practitioner memo, and a JSON interchange artefact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude skill that turns Claude into a Connecticut-specific divorce planner — nine operating modes from pre-flight intake to post-judgment modification, modeled on Untangle.us's feature surface and grounded in C.G.S. Title 46b, Practice Book Chapter 25, and the 2026-08-01 CCSG schedule. Covers eligibility triage (nonadversarial under § 46b-44a vs standard), financial affidavit (JD-FM-6), child support (JD-FM-220 / CCSG-1 / 1A), alimony (§ 46b-82 fourteen factors), parenting plan (with GAL/AMC escalation under JD-FM-224), settlement agreement (JD-FM-172, TCJA-aware), filing packet (marshal 12-day rule, $360 + $50 fees, JD-FM-75 waiver), and post-judgment motion practice. Hard UPL gate: refuses non-CT, domestic violence (refers CTCADV 1-888-774-2900), hidden assets, courtroom advocacy. Heppner-aware: AI prompts are not privileged. First family-law skill in the Lawvable registry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master systematic debugging techniques, profiling tools, and root cause analysis to efficiently track down bugs across any codebase or technology stack. Use when investigating bugs, performance issues, or unexpected behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bevy ECS skill for logs and diagnostics. Keywords: Bevy, LogPlugin, DiagnosticsPlugin, FrameTimeDiagnosticsPlugin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Due diligence checklists for A-share investments and M&A transactions. Adapted from the original dd-checklist skill for Chinese market due diligence requirements, regulatory filings, and business practices. Triggers on "A股尽调清单", "尽调清单", "due diligence China", "DD checklist A-share", "尽调checklist [company]", or "due diligence questions [company]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build professional data packs for A-share investment banking deals — M&A due diligence, IC materials, company profiles. Adapted from the original datapack-builder skill for Chinese data sources (AkShare, 巨潮, exchange filings) and CAS accounting. Triggers on "A股数据包", "投行数据包", "datapack China", "due diligence pack A-share", or "IC data pack [company]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive performance analysis, bottleneck detection, and optimization recommendations for Claude Flow swarms

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

syntenet can be used to infer synteny networks from whole-genome protein sequences and analyze them. Anchor pairs are detected with the MCScanX algorithm, which was ported to this package with the Rcpp framework for R and C++ integration. Anchor pairs from synteny analyses are treated as an undirected unweighted graph (i.e., a synteny network), and users can perform: i. network clustering; ii. phylogenomic profiling (by identifying which species contain which clusters) and; iii. microsynteny-bas

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performance profiling and SwiftUI debugging skills — Instruments guidance, hangs, memory issues, slow launches, energy drain, unnecessary re-renders, and view identity problems. Use when an app is slow, janky, or resource-hungry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge for Azure Quotas development including limits & quotas. Use when requesting per-region Storage account quota increases, checking limits, or filing Azure support requests, and other Azure Quotas related development tasks. Not for Azure Cost Management (use azure-cost-management), Azure Monitor (use azure-monitor), Azure Policy (use azure-policy), Azure Resource Manager (use azure-resource-manager).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and maintain a Karpathy-style LLM knowledge base — a self-compiling Obsidian markdown wiki where an Agent ingests raw sources, compiles cross-linked concept/entity/summary pages, answers queries against the corpus, lints the graph for health, and audits in-context human feedback filed from Obsidian or the local web viewer. Use when (1) scaffolding a new knowledge base for any research topic, (2) ingesting articles/papers/PDFs/web pages into raw/, (3) compiling or restructuring wiki articles from existing raw material, (4) answering questions against the wiki and filing durable answers back, (5) running lint passes for dead links / orphan pages / coverage gaps / audit shape, (6) processing human feedback from the audit/ directory and applying corrections. Not for general note-taking, daily journals, or non-wiki Obsidian use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。