「gap」の検索結果

指定したコミットやブランチなどを基準にコードの変更を確認し、開発規約への適合と仕様の実現を別々にレビューします。二つの観点の指摘を分けて報告するスキルです。

• ブランチやPRの変更レビュー
• 指定コミットやタグ以降の確認
• 文書化された開発規約との照合

Inventory and govern a project's test assets. Connect requirements, business rules, risks, bugs, and cross-boundary contracts to stable TEST-IDs and executable evidence in the repository's existing test registry or TESTS.md. Use for test inventory, test gap analysis, unit/integration/contract/E2E/smoke classification, bug-to-test regression protection, consumer/provider contract testing, test-necessity review, and pre-delivery evidence review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the ECC engineering process retroactively against an existing project slice. Audit current state, reconstruct past decisions, produce a four-axis gap register (thinking, coding practice, missing features, technology selection), then execute fixes forward through the plan-TDD-review pipeline. Use when adopting ECC mid-project, taking over an inherited codebase, or asking what was missed and what would have been built differently from day one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

複数のスキルに共通する行動原則を抽出し、既存ルールとの重複や不足を確認します。根拠と修正文案を示し、利用者の承認後にルールファイルへ反映するスキルです。

• スキル追加後のルール見直し
• 繰り返し現れる原則をまとめたいとき
• 既存ルールの不足や古い記述の確認

売上・返金・重複課金を請求データから整理し、チーム課金や利用権限の実装まで確認するスキル。料金表示と実際の動作を照合し、運営の判断材料をまとめます。

• 売上と契約状況を把握したいとき
• 重複課金や返金の原因調査
• チーム課金の実装を確認したいとき

顧客の契約・請求状況を調べ、重複購入や更新失敗を分類し、返金・解約・請求管理画面の復旧から、顧客への返信案と製品の改善点まで整理するスキル。

• 重複契約や意図しない請求の調査
• 更新失敗や支払い方法の問題への対応
• 請求管理や解約画面を復旧したいとき

競合のブランド表現やサービス、実績などを共通の基準で採点し、根拠付きの比較カードと戦略上の二軸図にまとめ、自社が狙う位置の競合を把握するスキル。

• 共通基準で競合を比較したいとき
• 根拠付きの競合カード作成
• 二つの戦略目標で競合を整理したいとき

指定した企業の製品発表、価格変更、資金調達などを定期的に追い、重要な新情報を一次情報のリンク付きでまとめるスキル。同じ出来事の重複や情報源の取得漏れも整理します。

• 競合の重要ニュースを毎週追いたいとき
• 製品発表や価格変更の継続確認
• 資金調達・提携・経営陣の動向確認

Use when an LLM Wiki operation issue asks a question. Answer from wiki pages and raw sources with citations, name gaps plainly, and offer to file durable synthesis when the answer should compound.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check a GitHub, GitLab, or Perforce PR/MR/CL for review comments, failing checks, and PR-body gaps. Use when asked to inspect, fix, or prepare a change for submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit cloned or reimplemented websites for fidelity gaps, tracking scripts, source-brand and language residue, placeholders, and risky external dependencies. Use before handoff or deployment, or when asked to review a website clone for cleanup and readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Elite UX/UI & Advanced GSAP Motion Engineer. Enforces Python-driven true randomization for layout variance, strict AIDA page structure, wide editorial typography (bans 6-line wraps), gapless bento grids, strict GSAP ScrollTriggers (pinning, stacking, scrubbing), inline micro-images, and massive section spacing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Elite UX/UI & Advanced GSAP Motion Engineer. Enforces Python-driven true randomization for layout variance, strict AIDA page structure, wide editorial typography (bans 6-line wraps), gapless bento grids, strict GSAP ScrollTriggers (pinning, stacking, scrubbing), inline micro-images, and massive section spacing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes your recent Claude Code chat history to identify coding patterns, development gaps, and areas for improvement, curates relevant learning resources from HackerNews, and automatically sends a personalized growth report to your Slack DMs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Side-by-side comparison of ruflo vs HAL vs other GAIA harnesses — capability gaps, design decisions, and improvement roadmap

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure RuVLLM local inference helpers: generate a config, and create and adapt in-process MicroLoRA and SONA instances from quality signals. Use when you need local, air-gapped inference tooling, not for fine-tuning hosted models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify witness chain integrity and detect provenance gaps

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to figure out which marketing actually drives conversions and revenue, choose or interpret an attribution model, or reconcile conflicting numbers across tools. Also use when the user mentions "attribution," "attribution model," "first-touch vs last-touch," "multi-touch," "which channel drives revenue," "what's my real CAC," "my dashboards disagree," "Google/Meta says X but GA says Y," "media mix model," "MMM," "incrementality," "geo lift," "holdout test," "how did you hear about us," "self-reported attribution," "dark social," or wants to instrument attribution themselves — "stitch my bookings to their source," "SavvyCal/Calendly attribution," "close the identify gap," "track conversions on a third-party domain," "first-party / self-hosted attribution." For event tracking setup and UTMs, see analytics. For ad-platform pixels/CAPI, see ads. For pipeline and CRM revenue reporting, see revops. For the AI-search attribution blind spot, see ai-seo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs one or more installed review lenses — adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, structure, prose — and reports triaged findings. Use when, and only when, the user asks you to review a diff, a pull request, or an artifact — code or documents, one or many — and actually says "review"; an explicit skill:bmad-review directive from another skill counts as that ask. A request to act on feedback from an earlier review is a change, not a review. Never invoke this uninvited, including on edits you just made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated Cherry Studio review for local branches, PRs, commits, files, architecture docs, and repository skills. Use for code or documentation reviews that need project-specific naming, main/renderer/shared placement and dependency rules, IpcApi and DataApi boundaries, lifecycle/service ownership, renderer hooks, React/UI conventions, and tests. Review depth adapts to diff size and runtime subagent capability (single-agent or multi-agent reviewer-verifier). Report-only by default; code fixes and GitHub submission each require explicit invocation-time authorization (`fix` / `submit`). Normal-review prompts and safe interruption behavior follow the interaction contract below. To diagnose gaps in the skill after a review session, run `/gh-pr-review diag`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs constraint-based metabolic modeling with COBRApy, including FBA, pFBA, FVA, gene knockouts, flux sampling, growth media, production envelopes, gap filling, and SBML model validation for systems biology and metabolic engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build comprehensive attack trees to visualize threat paths. Use when mapping attack scenarios, identifying defense gaps, or communicating security risks to stakeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tailors one resume to one specific job posting. Builds a must-have/nice-to-have requirement table, an evidence map, gap questions instead of invention, a tailored copy (headline, summary, bullet order, skills), honest ATS guidance, and an optional cover letter for that posting. Use when the user says "tailor my resume to this job", "customize my CV for this posting", "match my resume to this job description", "what keywords am I missing", "make my resume ATS-friendly for this role", "will this get past the ATS", "the job asks for X and I don't have it", or pastes a job ad with a resume. Works from pasted text; uses Reactive Resume MCP tools when connected. Not for bullets with no target job (resume-bullet-writer), what belongs on a resume or a general audit (resume-content-guide), tracking or follow-ups (job-application-manager), or interview prep and practice (interview-prep, mock-interview).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive Claude Code self-assessment and learning path advisor. Runs a multi-category quiz covering 10 feature areas, produces a detailed skill profile with per-topic scores, identifies specific gaps, and generates a personalized learning path with prioritized next steps. Use when asked to "assess my level", "take the quiz", "find my level", "where should I start", "what should I learn next", "check my skills", "skill check", or "level up".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。