3,342 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Ingest OpenClaw session/history data into Obsidian as distilled knowledge. Use for importing or mining ~/.openclaw sessions, memory files, or logs; use wiki-agent for targeted topic-only cross-agent recall.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the Law of Continuity — the eye follows alignment and unbroken paths. Use when sequencing steps, aligning content, or designing carousels and timelines. For grouping rather than sequencing, use `law-of-proximity`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the Law of Common Region — a shared container, background, or border groups elements regardless of spacing. Use when grouping must survive a tight layout. For grouping by spacing alone, use `law-of-proximity`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply Miller's Law — chunk information into groups of about four to fit working memory. Use when grouping fields, menu items, or steps. For reducing the number of choices offered, use `hicks-law`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the Law of Similarity — shared colour, shape, or size signals that elements belong to one category. Use when signalling relationships across distance. For grouping by position, use `law-of-proximity`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the Law of Closure — the eye completes implied shapes from partial forms. Use when reducing visual weight by dropping borders or letting negative space suggest structure. For explicit containers, use `law-of-common-region`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply Tesler's Law — every process has irreducible complexity that someone must absorb. Use when deciding whether the product or the user carries it. For reducing apparent choice, use `hicks-law`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply Fitts's Law — target acquisition time depends on size and distance. Use when sizing and positioning controls, especially for touch. For how many controls to show at once, use `hicks-law`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply Hick's Law — decision time grows with the number of simultaneous choices. Use when a screen offers too many options at once. For how many items survive in memory afterwards, use `millers-law`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the OpenClaw Windows app's local MCP server and winnode CLI for development, debugging, proof, and automation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Uninstall or hard-clean OpenClaw Companion, Windows node, native Gateway/MXC, WSL Gateway, and managed llama.cpp/Local AI state for a clean retest. Choose the existing dev CLI uninstall or the reviewed hard-clean procedure, inventory exact targets, and obtain destructive confirmation before acting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate A2UI v0.8 surfaces for the OpenClaw Windows tray node, which renders A2UI natively in WinUI/XAML (not a WebView). Read this when pushing canvas.a2ui.push/canvas.a2ui.pushJSONL to a Windows node - covers the 18 supported components (Row, Column, List, Card, Tabs, Modal, Divider, Text, Image, Icon, Video, AudioPlayer, Button, CheckBox, TextField, DateTimeInput, MultipleChoice, Slider), the icon-name enum, the A2UIValue tagged union, JSONL envelope shapes, and action.context security / dataBinding rules. Catalog-strict: components outside this list render as the fallback Unknown placeholder.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Invoke and troubleshoot OpenClaw Windows-node commands through the local winnode CLI and MCP endpoint, including command argument schemas and A2UI JSONL calls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run complete OpenClaw Windows Node issue and PR triage, including landing queues, proof pools, ownership audits, and release planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Crabbox from macOS, Linux, or native Windows controllers to run OpenClaw Windows node builds, tests, and targeted proof on remote native Windows or WSL2 hosts, including Azure or brokered AWS leases and static SSH hosts. Use when remote Windows validation is needed or the user asks for Crabbox validation. Always report the actual provider, lease id, run URL, command, and result.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits, diffs, copies, and lists providers/models, adds models, and switches the default model in local openclaw.json configs; diagnoses gateway/plugin failures (down, parked, broken, or out of date after an upgrade). Use for 虾/龙虾 config audits. Not for model-error repair (use openclaw-model-switch).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Switches or repairs an OpenClaw instance's model config: changes the default model, adds model definitions, and fixes 401 "Invalid token", "No available channel / model not found", "Thinking level X is not supported", or a config edit that doesn't take effect. Use for 切换模型/换模型/升级模型 or 模型配的错了. Not for plain config audits (use openclaw).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Secure OpenClaw deployments with preflight hardening checks, CI/CD guardrails, container runtime restrictions, and post-deploy verification. Use when shipping OpenClaw with Docker, Kubernetes, or automated release pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Harden OpenClaw self-hosted environments with baseline host controls, auth tightening, secret handling, network segmentation, and safe update/rollback workflows. Use when deploying OpenClaw in home labs, startups, or production-like local AI infrastructure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert Vietnam Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) compliance advisor for Law No. 91/2025/QH15 and implementing Decree 356/2025/ND-CP (effective January 1, 2026). Use this skill for gap analysis against the Vietnam PDPL, data subject rights fulfilment workflows, cross-border data transfer impact assessments, privacy notices and internal policies, breach notification procedures, sector-specific obligations (finance, AI, cloud, blockchain), and DPO qualification reviews. Trigger whenever a user mentions Vietnam data privacy, VN-PDPL, Nghị định 356, Vietnamese personal data, or cross-border transfers involving Vietnamese citizens' data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic contract negotiation strategies for technology services agreements with German/EU law specificity. Provides three-position framework (provider-favorable, balanced, client-favorable), deal-size calibration (€100K to €10M+), five-tier objection handling with regulatory leverage (GDPR, DORA, NIS2, BGB), concession packaging, and position matrices for liability, IP, payment, SLA, data protection, and termination. Use when: (1) Developing negotiation strategies for SaaS, cloud, or managed services agreements, (2) Preparing position papers and fallback positions, (3) Responding to counterparty objections, (4) Structuring concession packages that protect core economics, (5) Calibrating tactics to deal size and leverage, or (6) Applying German contract law constraints (BGB §§ 305-310 AGB, § 309 Nr. 7 liability limits, § 288 statutory interest).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Critically assess and improve a legal scholarly thesis, article idea, student note, seminar-paper claim, or research agenda using Eugene Volokh's novelty, nonobviousness, utility, and soundness framework, connector-aware research, claim-specific tests, and a sustainable adversarial pass. Produces a self-contained green-, yellow-, or red-light report. Use when a law professor or law student asks whether a claim is viable, novel, publishable, preempted, useful, worth pursuing, or better than competing topics; or wants a thesis stress-tested, narrowed, repaired, or compared. No connector is required: use connected legal and scholarly research when available, public sources otherwise, and disclose any no-research fallback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
First-pass framework for reading, interpreting, and structuring statutory analysis of US federal, state, and local law. Produces draft analysis for attorney review — not legal advice. Use this skill whenever the user references a specific US statute, regulation, ordinance, or rule by citation, asks "what does [statute X] require," asks for compliance scoping, applicability thresholds, requirement extraction, exemption analysis, definitional analysis, federal preemption analysis, or multi-state comparison — even if they don't explicitly ask for "statutory analysis." Halts and asks for missing inputs rather than guessing. Out of scope for non-US law.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。