「outcome」の検索結果

Standardize PRD discovery and drafting for product scope, user outcomes, requirement IDs, and acceptance criteria. Use when creating PRD, product requirements, feature specification, or acceptance criteria plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standardize BRD and BRD-lite discovery for business goals, stakeholder impact, current-to-future state, and measurable value outcomes. Use when creating BRD, business case, project justification, ROI narrative, or AS-IS to TO-BE scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds an offer too good to refuse. Lists every problem the buyer hits on the way to the result they want, turns each into a solution, trims to what is cheap to deliver and valuable to the buyer, and stacks it with honest bonuses, a guarantee the CFO can afford, real urgency and a clear name. Scores it on the value equation (outcome, likelihood, time, effort) and re-tests it on a quick buyer panel. Use when the user says "make my offer better", "why won't people buy", "what should I include", "guarantee", "bonuses", "grand slam offer", or after the panel shows people passing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze skill effectiveness across sessions. Computes per-skill metrics (action rate, friction, outcomes), identifies degrading skills, and generates improvement recommendations. Requires session-scan data in metrics.jsonl.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes recent CI failures on pull requests to identify flaky tests, using retry outcomes (failed attempt → green re-run) and cross-PR recurrence as evidence, and maintains a local longitudinal ledger so flakiness can be tracked over time. TRIGGER when: the user wants to find flaky tests, correlate recent CI failures, check which tests fail across PRs or recover on retry, or refresh the flakiness trend report. DO NOT TRIGGER when: babysitting a single PR's CI until green → monitoring-pull-requests; diagnosing or fixing one specific failing test → the bug-analysis skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a flow-level summary of the current Claude Code session — executive summary, chronological timeline, and outcomes — written into the active feature directory next to spec.md / plan.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search places, resolve addresses, compare routes, inspect neighborhoods, and retrieve geographic or environmental facts through the standalone @cablate/mcp-google-map CLI. Use for concrete location questions; use the travel-planning or local-seo Skill for those specialized outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview you one question at a time, each with a recommendation, to settle a big outcome before agents work alone. Use when: selected by name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to generate Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) for a Java project through an interactive, conversational process that systematically gathers context, stakeholders, options, and outcomes to produce well-structured ADR documents. This should trigger for requests such as Generate ADR; Create Architecture Decision Record; Document architecture decision; Architecture Decision Record for Java. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a pricing model, packaging/tier structure and willingness-to-pay research plan, then grades your existing pricing page or plan. Use when you ask 'how much should we charge', 'what should our pricing model be', 'seat vs usage vs outcome pricing', 'good-better-best tiers', 'what goes in the free plan', 'should we raise prices', 'freemium vs free trial', or 'how do we price our AI product'. Draws on 199 insights from 79 Lenny's Podcast guests including Madhavan Ramanujam, Naomi Ionita and Patrick Campbell.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Jev request router: validates the requested outcome, then dispatches to the matched agent, skill, and pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FHIR API development guide for building healthcare endpoints. Use when: (1) Creating FHIR REST endpoints (Patient, Observation, Encounter, Condition, MedicationRequest), (2) Validating FHIR resources and returning proper HTTP status codes and error responses, (3) Implementing SMART on FHIR authorization and OAuth scopes, (4) Working with Bundles, transactions, batch operations, or search pagination. Covers FHIR R4 resource structures, required fields, value sets (status codes, gender, intent), coding systems (LOINC, SNOMED, RxNorm, ICD-10), and OperationOutcome error handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete Product Owner / Product Manager capability — a wiki-style knowledge map of product practice in active software development: the role and its boundaries, strategy cascade (vision → OKRs → roadmap → backlog), continuous discovery, backlog craft (epics, INVEST stories, acceptance criteria), prioritization frameworks (RICE, MoSCoW, Kano, WSJF), sprint delivery, metrics (North Star, AARRR), stakeholder management, and anti-patterns. The PO/PM owns what gets built, in what order, and why — including the end-to-end user flows and user journeys. Use when scoping a product or feature, decomposing an idea into outcomes/epics/stories, prioritizing a backlog, defining an MVP, mapping user journeys, measuring success, or saying no to a stakeholder. Pairs with super-ui-ux-design, which owns how each screen looks and behaves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-shot build pipeline for a complete surface from an outcome recipe — inputs (or defaults) → composition → theme → build order → acceptance bar. Use when the user asks for a whole surface ("build me a dashboard", "hazme un dashboard") and expects a shippable result, not component-level help. Invoke when the user asks for craft on their UI, or mentions 'craft' alongside design / UI / frontend work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building durable AI agents or agentic workflows with Inngest and AgentKit, including model calls, tool calls, multi-agent networks, human approval, realtime progress, provider rate limits, crash-safe execution, and Agent Evals handoff. Covers AgentKit, `step.ai`, `step.run`, `step.waitForEvent`, native realtime, and when to use lower-level Inngest primitives instead of an in-memory agent loop. Use `inngest-agent-evals` with this skill when the user wants scoring, sessions, experiments, deferred scorers, or outcome-based evaluation for the agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a proportionate work plan with outcomes, steps, dependencies and acceptance evidence. Use to plan substantial work or coordinate an approved team; a plan-only request does not authorize implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user needs to organize product initiatives into a prioritized, time-sequenced plan with outcomes and dependencies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when extracting first-party expertise from a subject-matter expert before writing content. Produces a knowledge document of contrarian takes, specific examples, and surprising outcomes that AI can't fabricate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You MUST use this before any data analysis or investigation - before exploring a dataset, loading or profiling data, running a model, computing a statistic, or testing an idea, and before any outcome data is touched

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before running any confirmatory analysis or looking at outcome data, when testing a hypothesis, computing a p-value, or about to claim an effect - locks predictions and decision rules before results are seen

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have an approved research question and need a concrete analysis plan, before touching outcome data or fitting any model

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forecast project outcomes using historical data: cost overruns, schedule delays, risk probabilities. Machine learning models for construction prediction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enhanced skill navigator that maps conversation history, recommends multi-skill chains, identifies patterns from past usage, and learns from session outcomes. Goes beyond basic scout with deep context analysis and workflow orchestration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when comparing an exposure-outcome association across countries with parallel national surveys (KNHANES, NHANES, CHNS). Harmonizes variables, runs parallel weighted analyses and builds comparison tables for 2-country (KR+US) or 3-country (KR+US+CN) designs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。