「outcome」の検索結果

Bret Taylor 视角. Sierra 联合创始人 / CEO, OpenAI 董事会主席 (2024-), ex-Salesforce co-CEO, Google Maps 联合创造者. B2B SaaS enterprise 派代表 / outcome-based pricing 第一手提倡者 / brand-as-moat 在 agent 时代重新阐述者. 把 monetize-agents 语境从 "卖软件 access" 换成 "卖 outcome — 客户问题解决一次收一次费", 把 product 设计从 "feature breadth" 换成 "vertical depth + measurable outcome + procurement-grade trust". 用途: 当用户问 "agent 该怎么定价 / per-seat 还是 per-outcome / B2B agent 怎么 GTM / enterprise 0 到 1 / vertical 还是 horizontal / design partner 怎么搭 / 一开始要不要融大钱" 类问题时, 用 Bret Taylor 视角先把 "outcome 可不可测量 + vertical 是哪个 + 第一批 design partner 是谁" 盘清楚, 再给定价 / GTM / 融资判断. 当用户提到 "Bret Taylor" "Sierra" "outcome-based pricing" "deflection" "vertical agent" "design partner" "enterprise agent" "B2B agent GTM" "agent 定价" "agent procurement" 时使用. 即使用户只是说 "用 Sierra 思路看一下" 也应触发.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform an output-focused roadmap into an outcome-focused one that communicates strategic intent. Rewrites initiatives as outcome statements reflecting user and business impacts. Use when shifting to outcome roadmaps, making a roadmap more strategic, or rewriting feature lists as outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or assess an evidence-grounded, falsifiable outcome hypothesis: a testable prediction of what measurable business result will change, for whom, by when, and how leading and lagging indicators will prove or disprove it. Use when framing measurable outcomes, turning an MVP, POC, feature, or technical initiative into a beneficiary result, defining targets and indicators, or judging whether evidence is strong enough to invest. Also applies to business outcome hypotheses, value hypotheses, and outcome statements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 3 of building a Claude Managed Agent — the bounded grade→iterate loop. Define a CMA outcome (a required markdown rubric graded by an isolated grader), read each verdict, decide the next move (sharpen / re-run / promote to schedule), and once a version passes, run held-back eval cases in parallel. Use when the user says "grade my agent", "make it pass the rubric", "iterate until it's good", "is it good enough", or when the orchestrator routes phase=grade-iterate. outcome_builder.py builds the user.define_outcome payload (rubric required, max_iterations clamped 1..20 — never unbounded); verdict_reader.py reads the grader result and recommends the next move; eval_scaffold.py generates held-back cases + a parallel run plan (capped at the 25-thread CMA ceiling). Distinct from stage-launch (first launch) and run-without-you (scheduling).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Logs the outcome of a skill execution to observations/<skill-name>/runs.md. Trigger on: "log this run", "skill worked", "skill failed", "this didn't work", "log the outcome", "record this", "note that", or after any skill completes with a clear success, partial, or failure outcome. Creates the observations file if it does not exist, then appends an entry with date, task description, skill used, outcome, what worked, what failed, and any error messages observed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a roadmap or backlog to distinguish outcomes from outputs. Use when the user says "outcome vs output", "escaping the build trap", "are we building the right things", "roadmap review", "feature factory", "output-driven team", "we keep shipping but nothing changes", or wants to shift focus from shipping features to delivering value - even if they don't explicitly say "outcome vs output".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design guidance for program outcome measurement in Salesforce nonprofit orgs: logic model structure, indicator taxonomy, impact reporting design, and grant compliance reporting using NPSP Program Management Module (PMM) or Nonprofit Cloud (NPC) Outcome Management. NOT for configuring PMM programs, cohorts and service deliveries - use admin/npsp-program-management. NOT for setting up grant tracking, funding awards and disbursements - use admin/grant-management-setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-launch review of a shipped PRD against the brief's success metrics. Did we move the metric? What did the data actually show? Which assumptions held, which broke? Which accepted-gap decisions resolved (confirmed vs. invalidated)? What would we do differently? Triggers on "outcome review", "did it work", "post-launch review", "did we move the metric", "retro the feature", "was it worth it". Produces a Confluence outcome-review page and updates the brief + linked decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when replacing a seat's occupant (rebuild/handover/swap), reasoning about stable-seat-identity vs fluid-occupant-identity, choosing an old-occupant disposition (retire/advise/shadow), or recording provenance for an occupant change. Two independent outcomes (continuityOutcome + seatBindingOutcome) and the 5 failure modes that prevent silent dishonesty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Outcome KPI definition methodology - synthesizes Who Does What By How Much (Gothelf/Seiden), Running Lean (Maurya), and Measure What Matters (Doerr) into a practical framework for measurable outcome KPIs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform an output-focused roadmap (feature list) into an outcome-focused one. Rewrites initiatives as outcome statements reflecting user and business impact. Use when a roadmap lists features instead of results, when making a roadmap more strategic, or when communicating what success looks like vs what will be built.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects when a stated outcome names a specific instance — a mechanism-as-means or a single named product — where a category was meant, and returns a neutral fork for the lead to show the user, or nothing. Invoked by launch commands at outcome capture, in place of the verbatim echo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configuring or troubleshooting the Nonprofit Success Pack Program Management Module (PMM) - program delivery, cohort setup, service scheduling, service delivery recording, and attendance tracking for beneficiaries. Trigger keywords: program management module, PMM, Program__c, ProgramEngagement__c, ServiceDelivery__c, cohort setup, bulk service delivery, service schedule, service participant. NOT for designing which outcomes and indicators to measure - use admin/program-outcome-tracking-design. NOT for NPSP donor, household and giving-rollup data - use data/nonprofit-data-architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

For marketing and gtm work: bind launches, campaigns, events, and brand plans to growth and pipeline outcomes. Built around the core query "annual-marketing-plan", with GTM strategy lead judgment, buyer-ready proof, and this outcome: approve launch plan, campaign budget, or GTM motion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Close a matter — capture outcome, final exposure, and lessons, then archive it out of the active portfolio without deleting the record. Use when the user wants to close a matter, says "[matter] is done", or needs to record a settlement, dismissal, judgment, withdrawal, or consolidation outcome.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and verify a deterministic operational-value grader for any GitHub Agentic Workflow. Use when reasoning from workflow goals to measurable downstream outcomes, defining repository evidence, choosing outcome metrics, or creating an operational-value evaluator. Usage: /operational-value-designer OWNER/REPO WORKFLOW-NAME.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estimate causal effects between exposures and outcomes using genetic variants as instrumental variables with TwoSampleMR. Implements IVW, MR-Egger, weighted median, and MR-PRESSO methods for robust causal inference from GWAS summary statistics. Use when testing whether an exposure causally affects an outcome using genetic instruments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a Stockbee-style setup model book from momentum-burst screener candidates, then update 3-day and 5-day forward outcomes with MFE/MAE, stop-hit status, outcome tags, and cohort statistics. Use when the user wants to study Stockbee Momentum Burst examples, track failed candidates, build setup fluency, review A/B setup quality, or convert screener outputs into a learning loop rather than immediate trade signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "audit our launch plan", "are we ready to launch", or evaluate launch execution/outcomes; runs one typed RAMP preflight, execution, or outcome profile without mixing time horizons. Not for recording launch state — use launch-registry; not for running launch day — use launch-day-conductor. 发布就绪审计/RAMP分阶段评估/发布前放行

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A step-by-step problem-solving loop (classify the ask, define done, gather evidence, decide, act surgically, verify by observation, report outcome-first). Use when the user says "/fable-method", "use the fable method", or "approach this like Fable", or proactively when starting any multi-step task that no task-specific skill covers. Subcommands - plan (stop after the plan), audit (grade finished work against the loop), report (rewrite an answer outcome-first).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete bidirectional multi-phenotype Mendelian randomization research designs from a user-provided exposure family and outcome family. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a genome-wide causal-inference study based on publicly available GWAS summary statistics, especially when the article logic includes multiple exposures, multiple outcomes or subtypes, bidirectional MR, IV filtering, IVW as the main estimator, weighted median / MR-Egger / MR-PRESSO sensitivity analyses, leave-one-out testing, heterogeneity / pleiotropy checks, and multiple-testing control with FDR. Covers five study patterns (single-family bidirectional MR, multi-phenotype screening MR, subtype-resolved MR, phenome-style bidirectional causal map, mechanism-prioritized MR follow-up) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight outcome tagging for meetings — won, lost, stalled, great, or noise. Use whenever the user says "tag this meeting", "mark that as a win", "that one was a loss", "tag yesterday's call as stalled", "mark this great", "that meeting was noise", "label that meeting", or any time they describe a meeting outcome in passing. Tagging takes 5 seconds and unlocks /minutes-mirror correlation analysis — the more meetings get tagged, the smarter mirror gets at telling the user what behavior patterns lead to wins. Surface this skill any time the user mentions a meeting result, win, loss, or wasted time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a consulting proposal that wins the engagement — outcomes over hours. Use when asked to write a consulting proposal, a project proposal, a pitch for a client engagement, or to respond to an RFP. Produces a proposal — the client's problem in their words, your approach & deliverables, outcomes/value, timeline & phases, investment with options, and why-you — framed around results, not a task list. Ready to export as a designed PDF.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests associations between categorical variables in clinical data using chi-square, Fisher's exact, Boschloo, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, and modern McNemar variants with calibrated confidence intervals (Wilson, Newcombe, Miettinen-Nurminen). Use when analyzing categorical outcomes, paired binary endpoints, or testing treatment-outcome independence in confirmatory or exploratory clinical trials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。