「ses」の検索結果

Mid-conversation reflection skill that pauses execution and zooms out from detail-mode to honestly reassess direction, assumptions, and bias. Use when the user says 'reflect', 'take a step back', 'step back', 'zoom out', 'are we missing something', 'bigger picture', 'sanity check this', 'are we on track', 'are we overthinking this', 'forest for the trees', or any variation signaling intent to break out of detail-mode and reassess. Also trigger when the conversation has gone deep on implementation details without strategic check-in, or when the user shows signs of being stuck — that's often a signal the framing needs a reset, not more detail work. Intentionally low-intake: runs the 5-dimension analysis immediately when prior context is rich enough; asks one forcing clarifier only when invocation context is too thin to reassess from.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, run, and analyze structured test suites for Agentforce agents — functional AND security. TRIGGER when: user writes or modifies test spec YAML (AiEvaluationDefinition); runs sf agent test create, run, run-eval, or results commands; asks about test coverage strategy, metric selection, or custom evaluations; interprets test results or diagnoses test failures; asks about batch testing, regression suites, or CI/CD test integration; requests security testing, OWASP LLM Top 10, red-teaming, penetration testing, prompt-injection tests, a security grade, or a vulnerability assessment of an agent. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user creates, modifies, previews, or debugs .agent files (use agentforce-generate); deploys or publishes agents; writes Agent Script code; uses sf agent preview for development iteration; analyzes production session traces (use agentforce-observe); performs a static safety review of .agent file content (use agentforce-generate Section 15).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when a session's job is to DRIVE OPEN PRs TO MERGE rather than to write new code — "close out the open PRs", "review and fix the open PRs", "what's blocking our PRs", "which PRs are mergeable". It owns the In Review column: it reads each PR's gate status, verifies and fixes review findings on PRs OTHER sessions built, replies in-thread, and stops at the merge gate for the user's per-PR approval. Do NOT load it for building a feature and opening its PR — that is a build session (`genesis-development`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a soak test protocol for extended play sessions. Defines what to observe, measure, and log during long play sessions to surface slow leaks, fatigue effects, and edge cases that only appear after sustained play. Primarily used in Polish and Release phases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a single-point rubric with one criterion and open columns for evidence. Use for student self-assessment, peer feedback, teacher formative feedback, or pre-task planning. Works with any learning target, with or without a band system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design multi-informant assessment approaches for dispositional competencies like curiosity or resilience. Use when assessing character strengths or competencies that written tests cannot capture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a proposed assessment for construct validity, reliability, and alignment to learning objectives. Use when reviewing or quality-assuring assessments before deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve TikTok video URLs to return no-watermark/watermarked download addresses, playback addresses, and cover image addresses for saving promotional video assets or offline analysis. Trigger when users mention TikTok video download, TikTok watermark-free download, TikTok video save, download TikTok promotional video, TikTok no watermark video, TikTok video download, download TikTok video, no watermark TikTok video, save TikTok video, TikTok video link resolution. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "Nexscope", trigger this skill whenever their need involves extracting downloadable/playable video addresses from a TikTok video link.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments (FRIA) for high-risk AI systems as required by EU AI Act Article 27. Use when (1) deployers of high-risk AI systems (Annex III) need to assess fundamental rights impacts before first use, (2) public bodies or private entities providing public services are deploying AI systems, (3) credit scoring or insurance risk assessment AI systems are being deployed (Annex III 5b, 5c), (4) evaluating impact on natural persons' fundamental rights (dignity, liberty, privacy, data protection, non-discrimination, children's rights, etc.), or (5) creating EU AI Act Article 27 compliance documentation with market surveillance notification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a compromise assessment — hunting scope, methodology, and evidence collection. Use when asked "are we compromised", "run a compromise assessment", or "scope a threat hunt".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages the entire session lifecycle: from context loading (PRD, Tech Stack) at startup, to maintaining project memory during active sessions, and creating ultra-compact checkpoints for handoff. / Mengelola siklus hidup sesi: dari pemuatan konteks awal, pemeliharaan memori proyek, hingga pembuatan checkpoint ringkas untuk handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Causal reasoning in historical analysis. Covers distinguishing immediate from underlying causes, tracing chains of causation across time scales, identifying unintended consequences, and applying counterfactual reasoning to assess causal significance. Use when analyzing why historical events occurred, evaluating the relative weight of causes, or assessing whether outcomes were inevitable or contingent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assessing anthropogenic environmental impacts — pollution pathways, habitat destruction and fragmentation, land-use change, invasive species, overharvest, and extinction debt. Covers environmental impact assessment (EIA) methodology, exposure-effect relationships, population viability analysis, IPAT and ecological footprint frameworks, and strategic environmental assessment. Use when quantifying or forecasting human impacts on ecosystems, designing monitoring programs, or evaluating a proposed intervention against a baseline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project state awareness and session recovery for GSD-managed projects. Use this skill whenever: starting a new work session, resuming after a break, the user asks "where did we leave off" or "what's the current state", before making substantial code changes (to check for existing plans), the user seems disoriented about project status, or when something seems off and STATE.md might have relevant context. Also activates when the user references .planning/ files, milestones, phases, or project progress.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have captured session evidence — session-retro / session- observatory-live traces in .planning/patterns/, tool logs, correction records — and want to induce a reusable skill from it. Segments the traces into candidate skill units (an LLM judgment, not a deterministic parse) and decomposes each candidate into a four-part structured spec: workflow structure, execution semantics, and runtime attachments (verification, safety, rollback, state). It emits a spec object, NOT a finished SKILL.md, and hands that spec to skill-forge. It sits between skill-integration (upstream frequency detector) and skill-forge (downstream author). Backed by Agent-Trace-to-Skill Induction (arxiv 2606.06893v1). Triggers on inducing a skill from captured traces, turning a repeated pattern into a skill spec, and preparing evidence for skill-forge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Format and score completed plugin assessment findings without starting another assessment workflow. Use when a plugin assessment needs the standard report structure, scoring criteria, severity breakdown, or marketplace-readiness result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Look up prior Claude Code sessions when context is lost or forgotten. Use when asked what was done before, what happened in the last session, or any request to recall past conversation history, prior decisions, experiments, or outcomes. Indexes and searches raw JSONL transcripts from ~/.claude/projects/ via DuckDB. Returns verbatim user messages, summarizes AI actions and sub-agent outcomes, detects tool errors and user frustration signals, and reports tool usage statistics. Summaries cached at ~/.claude/kaizen/session-summaries/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans a research project as a decision map that persists across sessions, resolving one ticket per session until the design is defensible and pre-registerable. The map lives as Markdown in the repository, literature sweeps run as parallel research tickets, and the resolved map compiles into a pre-analysis plan. Use at project start, when a design has more open decisions than one conversation can hold, or when planning restarts each session. Not for executing analyses or writing the paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Browserbase when an agent needs hosted browser sessions, remote automation, session recording, and scalable browser infrastructure without managing Chromium fleets directly. This skill packages the Browserbase API and SDK into a concrete workflow for running, monitoring, and extracting results from cloud browser sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shell and session operations after an attack module already established command execution, a raw shell, webshell channel, container/runner shell, or remote session. This module does not own exploitation and should not pull SSH/WinRM/RDP authentication or vulnerability-to-shell chains out of Web/AD/Cloud/K8s/CI-CD/Service/Phishing. Use it to bootstrap a usable callback from existing command execution, stabilize Linux PTY, upgrade Windows sessions with ConPTY where applicable, manage listeners, recover fragile sessions, and exchange files for continued operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses GP track records for secondary pricing with fund-level attribution, unrealized portfolio assessment, and consistency analysis. Use when evaluating GP track records, analyzing fund performance consistency, or assessing manager quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses going-concern viability with 13-week cash flow models, liquidity runway, and critical vendor analysis. Use when evaluating liquidity crises, building 13-week models, or assessing near-term solvency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses scaling companies with product-market fit validation, unit economics maturity, and growth trajectory sustainability analysis. Use when evaluating growth-stage investments, analyzing scaling businesses, or assessing expansion readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses operational improvement opportunities with cost rationalization, revenue stabilization, and management changes for distressed businesses. Use when evaluating turnaround plans, identifying operational improvements, or assessing management capability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。