342 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Stress-test a design decision with premortem/backcast analysis, then produce a risk-calibrated recommendation that maps to ADR fields. Use when: (1) Multiple competing architecture options, (2) Irreversible or high-risk design choices, (3) /discuss identifies a complex trade-off
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me". Run BEFORE /build when a feature idea is fuzzy and a PRD doesn't yet exist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan against the project's language and documented decisions. Run BEFORE /build on non-trivial features in repos that have (or should have) a CONTEXT.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan against the project's language and documented decisions. Run BEFORE /claude-setup:build on non-trivial features in repos that have (or should have) a CONTEXT.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me". Run BEFORE /claude-setup:build when a feature idea is fuzzy and a PRD doesn't yet exist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a premortem on any plan, launch, product, hire, strategy, or decision. Imagines it failed 6 months from now, works backward to find every reason why, then produces a revised plan. Triggers include "premortem this", "premortem my", "what could kill this", "stress test this plan", "find the blind spots", "poke holes in this", "where will this break", "am I missing anything", "what could go wrong", "future-proof this", "devil's advocate this".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when challenging a prevailing analytical judgment, the user asks "what is the opposing case?" / "argue the other side" / "play devil's advocate", or wants an assessment stress-tested before release. Takes the team's own lead judgment and builds the strongest case that it is wrong. A contrarian technique. It does not model what an adversary would do next, which is Red Team Analysis. Formerly /red-team-analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and audit PFC 5.0 asphalt dynamic loading and stress-wave studies with damping, timestep, rate, dispersion, source direction, boundary reflection, histories, and wheel-load handoff checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user asks for or clearly wants to be grilled, interviewed, or to stress-test a plan or design, including when they mention "grill me". Resolve material decisions one at a time until scope, success criteria, and resources are explicit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan before building, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 1 of the feature-pipeline suite — stress-test a CLI command, feature, flag, or module as a developer seeing it for the first time, then file GitHub issues for every distinct finding. Use when someone says "explore X", "test X", "find issues with X", "what's wrong with X", or after /feature-pipeline init. Also triggers standalone as /fp-explore <feature> when you want just the exploration phase without the full pipeline. Reads the target feature from .fp-state.json (or the argument if provided). Completes in one bounded turn and prints the M1 stop hook so the user decides whether to continue to /fp-plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent exploration-to-PR pipeline for safely exploring, fixing, and shipping a feature or CLI. Use when the user says: "explore X", "test and ship X", "run the pipeline on X", "run /feature-pipeline on X", "let's properly investigate X", "stress-test X and file issues", or "take X through the full pipeline." Also triggers on: "find what's broken in X", "test X end-to-end", "do a sandbox review of X", "file issues for X and fix them." Do NOT use for single-file bug fixes or one-off edits — the overhead is only justified when exploration, planning approval, and CI watching all matter. Manages state via scripts/state.sh (jq required). Five phases: LIGHTER explores → ORCHESTRATOR drafts PR → HEAVIER plans (user approves first) → ORCHESTRATOR commits → HEAVIER sandbox review → LIGHTER iterates CI → LIGHTER drift check + summary. Four mandatory stop hooks (M1–M4) gate each phase transition.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Economist — estimating a demand elasticity or causal treatment effect from observational or experimental data, building a cost-benefit or welfare analysis for a policy or pricing decision, forecasting a macro or market aggregate under stated assumptions, or stress-testing whether a "the data shows X" claim survives a confounding-variable check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a detective/criminal investigator — developing and stress-testing a case theory against alternate explanations, reconciling conflicting timestamps (DVR, cell tower, witness-reported) into a defensible timeline, structuring a suspect/witness interview using a non-accusatorial method, drafting a probable-cause affidavit, or evaluating whether a confession or eyewitness identification is being treated with the right level of certainty.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Credit Analyst — spreading financial statements and computing leverage/coverage ratios, writing a commercial credit memo, assigning or recommending an internal risk rating, structuring covenants on a term loan or revolver, or stress-testing a borrower's debt service under a downside case. Narrower than loan-officer (originates and manages the client relationship; the analyst underwrites the credit that officer brings in) and financial-risk-specialist (owns portfolio-level risk and concentration limits, not single-borrower underwriting).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a central bank governor — setting a policy rate decision against a dual mandate, deciding whether a distressed financial institution needs liquidity support or resolution, calibrating forward guidance language against credibility risk, weighing quantitative easing or tightening at the effective lower bound, or drafting the public communication that accompanies a policy decision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Animal Caretaker — triaging daily husbandry when kennel census exceeds staffing capacity, reading a Fear-Anxiety-Stress (FAS) score change or appetite/output drop against an escalation threshold, deciding brush-out vs. shave-down on a matted coat, or setting isolation and vaccination-lead-time protocol for a new intake or boarding admission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Aerospace Engineering and Operations Technologist/Technician — verifying an installed fastener's preload against a drawing's torque callout via the T=K·D·F relationship, reducing strain-gauge data from a structural proof-load test into stress and checking it against an FEA-predicted margin, selecting and executing an NDI method against a defect type and material, reducing a wind-tunnel test point's dynamic-pressure and Reynolds-number data, or ballooning and dispositioning an AS9102 first article inspection. Distinct from an aerospace-engineer (owns the design, structural analysis, and certification basis) — this role builds, instruments, tests, and inspects the hardware the engineer specified, closing the loop with measurement rather than deriving a new analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesises the current conversation context into a Product Requirements Document and publishes it to GitHub (as a comment on a referenced issue, or a new issue). Synthesises from context; does not interview. TRIGGER when: the conversation has produced enough understanding of a feature and the user wants it captured as a PRD. DO NOT TRIGGER when: a single small issue is enough → creating-issues; the idea has not been stress-tested yet → grilling-ideas first; bug reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the devil's advocate technique: structured critical thinking that stress-tests ideas, plans, and decisions. Use when you need honest critique before committing to something important.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。