1,274 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when loading, listing, composing, or validating graded evaluation rubrics — PASS/WARN/FAIL grading with weighted criteria and balanced PASS/FAIL anchor examples. Triggers on /mk:rubric, "load rubric", "compose rubric preset", "validate rubric", or evaluator-style code review that needs anchor-grounded judgments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design randomized controlled trials for causal inference. Use when user mentions: randomized evaluation, RCT, field experiment, randomized experiment, treatment assignment, causal impact, experimental design, control group, intervention evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Holistic evaluation framework for language models measuring accuracy, calibration, robustness, and fairness
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when introducing a feature flag system, choosing between release flags / experiment flags / operational flags / kill switches / permission flags, designing percentage rollouts, building kill-switch + circuit-breaker patterns, structuring evaluation contexts (user IDs, plan tier, region), or building flag-cleanup discipline. Triggers: LaunchDarkly / GrowthBook / Unleash / Flagsmith / OpenFeature, percentage ramp, sticky bucketing, kill switch wired to alerting, "we still have flags from 2 years ago", flag debt, OpenFeature provider, evaluation context, default value on provider failure. NOT for A/B test statistical analysis (separate skill), traffic-split routing at the edge, build-time bundler defines, or environment-based config.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and adopt production AI agent infrastructure in 2026. Covers framework selection (LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen, MCP), orchestration patterns, evaluation, observability, memory systems, and tool use. Also covers the SOCIAL dimension: how to sell agent infrastructure internally, change management, measuring ROI, building trust in autonomous systems, and scaling adoption across teams. Activate on: "agent infrastructure", "agent framework comparison", "which agent framework", "sell AI tools internally", "agent adoption", "agent observability", "agent evaluation", "MCP architecture", "agentic mesh", "enterprise AI agents", "AI change management", "agent ROI". NOT for: building specific agents (use ai-engineer), designing agent behavior patterns (use agentic-patterns), prompt tuning (use prompt-engineer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operational skill hub for LLM system architecture, evaluation, deployment, and optimization (modern production standards). Links to specialized skills for prompts, RAG, agents, and safety. Integrates recent advances: PEFT/LoRA fine-tuning, hybrid RAG handoff (see dedicated skill), vLLM 24x throughput, multi-layered security (90%+ bypass for single-layer), automated drift detection (18-second response), and CI/CD-aligned evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill guides evaluation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk factors in Cushing's syndrome patients to prevent thrombotic complications. Use when assessing a CS patient for thrombotic risk, especially perioperatively; triggers include preoperative assessment, postoperative period (within 4-6 weeks), or presence of CS with additional risk factors such as prior VTE, immobilization, malignancy, or estrogen use.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill recommends computed tomography (CT) as the initial imaging modality for primary aldosteronism (PA) evaluation in Japan, citing its accessibility and comparable performance to MRI. It is triggered when a clinician orders imaging for suspected PA and asks 'What imaging should I start with?' or seeks a cost-effective initial evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill guides annual evaluation of patients with primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) for symptoms and signs of glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid over- or under-replacement. Use during annual follow-up when assessing for weight changes, blood pressure abnormalities, edema, or symptoms such as fatigue, insomnia, or salt craving.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous experiment loop that optimizes any file by a measurable metric. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. The agent edits a target file, runs a fixed evaluation, keeps improvements (git commit), discards failures (git reset), and loops indefinitely. Use when: user wants to optimize code speed, reduce bundle/image size, improve test pass rate, optimize prompts, improve content quality (headlines, copy, CTR), or run any measurable improvement loop. Requires: a target file, an evaluation command that outputs a metric, and a git repo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Avalia LLMs em mais de 60 benchmarks acadêmicos (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use quando benchmarking de qualidade de modelo, comparação de modelos, relatório de resultados acadêmicos ou rastreamento de progresso de treinamento. Padrão da indústria usado por EleutherAI, HuggingFace e laboratórios principais. Suporta HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
7 層構造プロンプトを生成・更新するとき、owner_agent 向けに Prompt Templates/Self-Evaluation を充填するときに使う。
6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
M&Aアドバイザリー支援スキル。デューデリジェンス（DD）実施、企業価値評価（バリュエーション）、 シナジー分析、PMI（Post Merger Integration）計画策定を包括的に支援。 Use when conducting M&A due diligence (Financial, Legal, IT, HR), company valuation (DCF, Comparable Companies, Precedent Transactions), synergy analysis, or post-merger integration planning. Triggers: "M&A", "デューデリジェンス", "DD", "バリュエーション", "企業価値評価", "DCF", "comparable", "類似企業", "先行取引", "PMI", "統合計画", "シナジー分析", "買収", "合併"
METAINFORMANT rules for directory src/metainformant/ml/evaluation. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the DoD Test & Evaluation Enterprise Guidebook (OUSD R&E, August 2022). Use for DoD test and evaluation (T&E) across the Adaptive Acquisition Framework — the four test communities (contractor testing, developmental DT&E, operational OT&E, live-fire LFT&E); the five operational events (Operational Demonstration, EOA, OA, IOT&E, FOT&E) and the OTRR gate; the T&E Strategy / TEMP and its IDSK, with the upstream documents that feed it and the test plans that decompose it; the T&E organizations and oversight roles (USD(R&E), DOT&E, TRMC, the Service Executives and OTAs, the T&E WIPT, CDT); and pathway-specific T&E for all six acquisition pathways (Urgent Capability, Middle Tier, Major Capability, Software, Defense Business Systems). Statutory anchors include 10 U.S.C. §4171 (IOT&E) and §4172 (LFT&E/FUSL). This is guidance, not policy: it points outward to DoDI 5000.89 and the DoDI 5000-series for binding detail, and is thin on detailed test statistics/design-of-experiments methodology, cost estimating, the Acquisition of Services pathway, and any CUI/CAC-gated companion guides.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads two or more supplier, bid or tender responses against a requirements list and returns a DRAFT comparison pack: a requirement-by-supplier matrix, gaps per supplier, clarification questions and neutral observations, for an evaluation panel. Never scores, weights, ranks or recommends a winner; the award stays with the panel. Use when the user asks to "compare these bids", "matrix the tender responses against our requirements", "collate the RFQ replies", "show me where each supplier falls short" or "draft clarification questions for the bidders". Do not use for scoring or weighting against agreed criteria, use supplier-evaluation-matrix instead, or for writing the requirements, use rfp-requirements-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs a pre-launch evaluation plan for a declarative agent from its instructions text, skills, capabilities, knowledge sources and sample requests: a behaviour contract of testable statements quoted from the text, test prompts by scenario family and tier with setup, expected behaviour, pass and fail criteria and red flags, a red-flag catalogue, a blank scoring sheet, a coverage table and a go or no-go checklist the owner completes and decides. Use when the user asks to "write test cases for my agent", "how do I evaluate this agent before launch", "build a test plan for the agent", "what should I check before publishing this agent" or "give me a go no-go checklist". Do not use for finding injection or leakage exposures in the instructions, use agent-instructions-red-team instead; do not use for reviewing one SKILL.md, use skill-file-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous AI agent benchmark evaluation register: task completion rates, planning accuracy, tool invocation precision, and cost benchmarks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when summarizing agent evaluations where autonomous, assisted, failed, timed-out, or invalid outcomes must remain distinct and comparable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Azure Policy Deep — azure Policy deep compliance and governance management. Covers policy definitions, initiatives, assignments, compliance evaluation, exemptions, remediation tasks, custom policies, and regulatory compliance. Use when managing Azure governance at scale, reviewing compliance states, creating custom policies, or troubleshooting policy evaluation results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
NVIDIA RAG Blueprint evaluation guidance for measuring retrieval and answer quality with stable datasets, baselines, and reproducible scoring workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。