2,985 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when asked to study any writer or author, imitate article style, directly mimic a living or historical writer's prose style when requested, revise an imitation draft, or adapt Chinese articles for WeChat or Xiaohongshu.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when editing Chinese web fiction, narrative prose, or story drafts that sound AI-generated, overly polished, formulaic, explanatory, or too symmetrical; use to detect AI-writing fingerprints and revise only wording while preserving plot, facts, characters, names, and intent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting, reviewing, or revising Xiaohongshu/Douyin/social-platform Chinese text so it has real internet-native judgment instead of README tone, technical-briefing tone, or mechanical meme-word stuffing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate the WeChat Official Account AI-application workflow for articles, weekly digests, rich formatting, draft-box updates, and local handoff. Use for Agents, MCP, Skills, tool calling, workflows, and open-source AI updates; exclude Xiaohongshu and Xianyu.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when splitting content work between a raw drafting model/window, an editor-in-chief, and the user's final taste review. It keeps prompts loose enough for judgment while preserving facts, account boundaries, and publish gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rules, conventions, and constraints for formatting git commit messages and committing at logical boundaries. Trigger when: - Drafting, revising, or validating git commit messages. - Pausing at commit boundaries under the CORE or CONTINUE workflows. - Evaluating whether a changeset should be split into multiple commits. - Prompt contains keywords: commit message, git commit, conventional commits, commit hygiene, commit guidelines, logical boundary, spaghetti diff, atomic commit, commit boundary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Normative sufficiency conditions for Initial Boundary Conditions (IBCs) and the SOP for the cheap-tier boundary refinement loop (/boundary). Trigger when: - Crafting, auditing, or refining a prompt/IBC destined for an expensive (architect-class) model or an autonomous worker dispatch. - Evaluating whether a task frame is sufficient to bound an agent walk. - Prompt contains: /boundary, IBC, initial boundary condition, boundary contract, sufficiency conditions, worker prompt, prompt refinement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Durable categorized record-keeping for any predicate-enabled walk. Trigger when: - Classifying a step's output for recording (decision, finding, debt, feedback). - Promoting a scratch artifact to the ledger, to repo/docs, or to a category home (.ledger/tech-debt/, .ledger/process-feedback/). - Auditing whether a draft is structurally ready for its destination. - Running a zero-context sensibility read before committing to promotion. - Recording a known limitation as a tech-debt entry (not prose in the log). - Recording a friction, miss, improvement, or process amendment. - Prompt contains: /record, record-keeping, promote, ledger note, zettelkasten, scratch-to-ledger, zero-context read, over-strip, classification trigger, tech-debt, process-feedback, amendment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Render a crouton collection schema (the field-definition JSON) into a human-readable field table + relationships sketch (HTML + PNG + a terse Markdown table), so a human can sign off on the DATA MODEL before any code is generated. Use when an agent drafts or changes a collection schema (before `crouton config` / `generate_collection`), or when asked to "review a schema", "show the data model", "check these fields".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Act on the queued items. Works through every pending item on the working todo list (the queue built with /list), actually doing each one, marking it in_progress then completed as you go. Use after stacking items with /list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing, editing, debugging, or reviewing dealer language code in btn, dlr, or script files. Provides the complete dealer DSL syntax reference for bridge hand generation constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process the batch of incoming Bridge Classroom feedback. Pull open `classroom-feedback` issues from the PBS repo, cluster them by defect class, verify each against the actual board, and fix at the right altitude — patch a single board, or (when a class recurs) build a gate, sweep the whole corpus, and regenerate/drop collectively. Engine bugs route to the Classroom repo; bridge-judgment calls go to Rick. Nothing leaves the machine without David's OK. Invoke as `/issue` (optionally with an issue number or scenario to restrict the run).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-of-session wrap-up. Save what was learned this session to auto-memory, verify the working tree is committed/pushed, and emit a brief resume prompt the user can paste next time. Invoke as /done to close a work session. Wrap-up is auto-memory ONLY — never writes a handoff.md or any handoff file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author a complete both-seats coaching lesson for a BBA-NATIVE bidding scenario and produce all served artifacts in one consistent pass: curate the pool → tokenized coaching-curated/<scn>.pbn → gated promote to served coaching/<scn>.pbn → resolve to South=student coaching-non-rotated/<scn>.pbn (bridge-classroom) → update both toc.json files. Invoke as `/coach-lesson <Scenario>` (e.g. `/coach-lesson Fourth_Suit_Forcing`). Use ONLY for conventions BBA bids natively (its bba/<scn>.pbn [Auction] is the answer key — Basics, New_Minor_Forcing, Fourth_Suit_Forcing). For conventions BBA CANNOT bid (Spiral Raises), use the py/spiral_auction.py substitution path instead — not this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Queue an item WITHOUT acting on it. Appends the provided text as a new pending item on the working todo list, then stops. Use /list <text> to stack up tasks or notes one at a time; act on them later with /go. Does not plan or start the work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, revise, and validate publication-ready academic paper figures and tables. Use for LaTeX tables, related-work comparison tables, result tables, notation/dataset/taxonomy tables, precise source-data-driven experiment plots from CSV/JSON/logs, generated conceptual figures such as system overviews/pipelines/architectures/threat models, captions, artifact specs, source-data traceability, and paper-ready PDF/SVG/PNG/LaTeX exports. Do not use for prose-only paper writing, self-review, reviewer response, rebuttal drafting, or external literature-management workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft and revise evidence-grounded academic manuscripts with adaptable author preferences. Use for section writing, implementing structural edits, claim calibration, citation-integrated prose, prose cleanup, standalone review excerpts, and LaTeX template migration. Use paper-review for critique or author responses, and paper-figures-tables for final visual artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review an author's manuscript, its argument and paragraph structure, analyze reviewer comments, draft rebuttals, and verify revisions. Use for self-review, structural edit plans, simulated reviewer objections, author responses, revision closure, and submission-readiness assessment. Formal assigned peer review is outside this skill; manuscript edits and final figures/tables use their owning skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolve, validate, and audit manuscript integrity and applicable requirements for academic manuscripts and paper artifacts. Use when Codex needs to determine active paper rules from manuscript state, paper type, venue, submission stage, or workflow mode; lint a LaTeX paper project; assess submission readiness; create or update a paper policy profile; explain why a rule is active; or validate the paper-policy registries. Do not use as the primary skill for prose drafting, peer review, rebuttal writing, citation discovery, or figure/table creation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing a repository for evidence-backed gaps between code, SPECs, architecture, and documentation — before a release, after a review, or when the user asks what is missing or divergent. Confirmed gaps become Draft SPECs via write-specs, a tracked GitHub Epic via create-issues, and orchestrated execution via orchestrator, with an explicit approval gate before any external action.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing UI code for interface-guideline compliance (accessibility, forms, animation, images, performance, UX copy) and/or validating a deployed page against Lighthouse 95+ targets. Produces evidence-based findings (file:line + Lighthouse JSON) and turns confirmed pendencies into Draft SPECs via write-specs. Do NOT use to design/build UI from scratch (use design) or to fix findings inline — fixes go through the SPEC pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assists users in crafting high-impact pitches, presentations, and sales communications using the "STRONG" method and Frame Control. Use when users want to pitch an idea to investors, sell a product to a client, or need to overcome objections and command attention in business meetings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quick one-shot lookup over Ahmad's OpenMark bookmark knowledge graph (15k+ items from Edge, LinkedIn, YouTube, Raindrop). Use whenever Ahmad asks "find my bookmarks on X", "what did I save about X", "anything in OpenMark about X", or any single-topic search where he wants results in under 10 seconds. NOT for newsletter drafting or deep research — for those use openmark-deep-research or openmark-newsletter. Triggers on "find my", "what did I save", "openmark", "my bookmarks", "search bookmarks".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Editing English prose that reads as machine-written. Use when reviewing or rewriting a draft for AI tells — a README, a changelog entry, a comment, a user-facing string, a review. French text is `humaniseur-fr`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。