3,734 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Analyze airline, airport, cruise, and tour operator systems for ground handling efficiency, aircraft turnaround optimization, disruption management, and GDS integration. Covers IATA/ICAO compliance, IROPS recovery, on-time performance tracking, embarkation logistics, transfer coordination, and NDC implementation for travel technology platforms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep codebase cleanup — kills dead code, fixes all lint/format warnings, removes orphaned files, cleans stale TODOs, strips security hazards, tightens TypeScript strict mode, and organizes imports. Triggers: clean up, dead code, unused imports, lint, technical debt cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive 2026 SEO audit covering classic technical SEO (crawl, render, index, Core Web Vitals with INP), on-page (titles, meta, headings, internal linking), content (topical authority, entity density).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous SEO + AI-search optimization agent for 2026. Audits and fixes technical SEO, on-page metadata, structured data, Core Web Vitals (LCP/INP/CLS), llms.txt, Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) for ChatGPT/Perplexity/AI Overviews, E-E-A-T author signals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit field service dispatch and workforce scheduling systems -- technician routing (VRP solvers, drive time modeling), skill-based job assignment, SLA priority scheduling, real-time re-dispatch on cancellations or emergencies, capacity planning, and travel time minimization..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit game narrative systems for technical quality -- branching dialogue trees, state/flag tracking, quest systems, choice-consequence mapping, localization pipelines, voice-over integration, and cinematic scripting..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit e-discovery and litigation document review systems -- data collection pipelines (PST, MBOX, SharePoint, Slack), document processing (OCR via Tesseract/ABBYY, metadata extraction, deduplication), Technology Assisted Review (TAR 1.0/2.0/CAL with recall/precision tracking).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze disability services software — IEP and ISP management, person-centered planning workflows, HCBS Settings Rule compliance, accommodation tracking, assistive technology integration, EVV (Electronic Visit Verification), caregiver and DSP scheduling, and outcome measurement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a concrete technical proposal with evidence and tradeoffs when a decision needs design. No implementation or automatic reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a velocity-based release roadmap with risk buffers. Use when the user says "release plan", "when will we ship", "plan the next release", "map sprints to milestones", "estimate our release date", "how many sprints until done", or wants to translate a backlog into a delivery timeline - even if they don't say "release planning". Based on "Agile Estimating and Planning" by Mike Cohn (velocity, story points, cone of uncertainty, risk buffers).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture learnings from a campaign, launch, sprint, or initiative using Five Whys (Taiichi Ohno, Toyota Production System) for root cause analysis and Start-Stop-Continue for action planning. Append reusable insights to knowledge/learnings.md so future runs of the OS get smarter. Use when the user asks for a retro, retrospective, post-mortem, "what did we learn", "campaign wrap-up", "lessons learned", or after a campaign or launch ends. Critical feedback loop that makes the OS compound over time. For the numbers review itself, see kpi-review. For planning the next campaign, see campaign-brief.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a concise feature spec for engineering handoff. Use when the user says "write a spec", "feature spec", "one-pager for eng", "spec this out", "write up this feature", "I need to hand this off to engineering", "shape this up", or wants a concise technical brief - even if they don't say "feature spec".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate A/B copy variants grounded in Eugene Schwartz's awareness and market-sophistication stages and John Caples' tested-headline discipline. Every variant declares its angle, the awareness stage it targets, and a falsifiable hypothesis, and the skill recommends which pair to test first and what delta counts as signal. Use when the user says "A/B test this", "write variants", "give me options", "test different angles", "copy variants", "ab copy", "test this headline", "multiple versions", "which version is better", or wants to test copy before publishing. For reviewing copy that already exists, see copy-review. For sample size and stopping rules, see growth-experiment. For diagnosing a page rather than its words, see page-cro. For full paid ad sets by platform, see ad-campaign-writer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Communicate data insights to non-technical stakeholders in a structured, persuasive format. Use when the user says "present these findings", "explain this analysis to leadership", "make a data presentation", "tell the story behind the data", "translate this into a business narrative", "make this insight actionable", "stakeholder readout", "executive summary of results", or needs to turn analysis output into a decision-ready document or slide deck.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform ideas, outlines, or documents into structured slide content with clear titles, bullet points, and speaker notes. Adapts to presentation type (pitch decks, business reviews, technical workshops, educational talks). Use when user says "create slides", "build a deck", "pitch deck", "presentation structure", "talk structure", "keynote", "slide deck", "conference talk", or needs slide content for any format. Also trigger when user has content they want to present to an audience - even if they don't explicitly say "presentation" or "slides".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze one supplied URL across on-page, content, technical metadata, schema, images, and performance. Use only for a single-page review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate page content for usefulness, E-E-A-T, readability, thinness, and AI citation readiness, plus last-mile draft cleanup (AI-typical phrasing and invisible Unicode watermark characters). Use for content-only analysis, not full-page technical checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enhance and improve existing AI prompts using professional techniques from a 2,500+ prompt database. Adds detail, fixes structure, optimizes for specific models, and applies proven patterns from top-performing prompts. Use when user says "enhance my prompt", "improve this prompt", "make this prompt better", "optimize prompt", "fix my prompt", or "upgrade this prompt".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Score one blog post (or a folder of posts) on a 5-category 100-point scale covering content quality, SEO, E-E-A-T, technical elements, and AI citation readiness. Runs the deterministic analyzer first, then adds judgment and prioritized Critical/High/Medium/Low fixes. Advisory style diagnostics never infer authorship or affect the score. Exports markdown, JSON or table; works with MDX, markdown, HTML or a URL. Use when the user asks to analyze, score, rate or check the quality of specific posts ("analyze blog", "blog score", "check blog quality", "rate this post"). For a site-wide health check (orphan pages, cannibalization, stale content, schema across all posts) use blog-audit instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only audit of a folder of existing multilingual blog posts: translation coverage, parity, hreflang and canonical consistency, meta-tag parity, and stale translations, with a prioritized report. Use when the user says "locale audit", "check translations", "multilingual audit", "hreflang check", "Uebersetzungen pruefen" about posts that already exist. Not for creating or fixing translations (blog-translate, blog-localize, blog-multilingual) or for a site-wide technical hreflang crawl (claude-seo seo-hreflang).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate Claude Ads contracts, scoring inputs, run bundles, capabilities, source freshness, safety, installation, uninstall, or release readiness. Use for ads validate, ads status, ads next, stale claims with missing tool access, maturity checks, ownership-manifest uninstall, preserving unrelated ads-* skills, checksum verification, preflight, QA, or release audits. Missing access must demote stale evidence for the run and block dependent release-current claims before recovery guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn an academic paper (PDF, LaTeX, pasted text, thesis chapter or technical disclosure) into a Chinese invention patent application draft — 说明书摘要、摘要附图、权利要求书、说明书、说明书附图 — delivered as DOCX/PDF with black-and-white patent drawings, plus a separate drafting-notes file covering novelty/disclosure risk, claim layout and claim-to-paper support. Use whenever the user wants to 论文转专利, 写专利/专利申请书/专利交底书, draft or review 权利要求书, write a 说明书, make 专利附图, or check a patent draft against its source paper, even if they only say "帮我把这篇论文写成专利".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when 用户想根据论文、科研文档、研究文本、图注、开题/答辩材料或具备读图条件的参考图生成可复制的 AI 科研绘图提示词；触发场景包括论文配图、科研绘图、图形摘要、Graphical Abstract、机制图、技术路线图、实验装置图、模型架构图、多面板对比图、汇报总览图、参考图风格迁移、未知领域母版生成，或上传/引用 PDF、Word、LaTeX、Markdown、摘要、方法段、图注、课题说明、研究方案、参考图片。Also use when the user asks for scientific figure prompts, research illustration prompts, graphical abstract prompts, mechanism diagrams, technical roadmaps, experimental setup diagrams, model architecture diagrams, multi-panel scientific figures, paper/conference figures, or AI image prompts based on papers, research documents, abstracts, methods sections, figure captions, proposals, reference images, PDFs, Word docs, LaTeX files, Markdown files, or research plans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。