「cap」の検索結果

Designs the contract for an API change inside one codebase — a component's props, a function surface, URL or query parameters, an event payload, or a module boundary — through a discovery pass, an options document with one recommendation, a question round, and an adversarial validation round, with every element of the contract justified from one stated goal. Use when you want to design, shape, decide, or nail down an interface, contract, signature, or API change for a capability you can already describe, sized for roughly one pull request. Produces a design document and changes no code. Does not specify what a feature should do — use plan-a-feature. Does not plan delivery or sequencing — use plan-implementation. Does not assess the architecture of existing code — use architectural-analysis. Does not write the code — use tdd. Does not restructure existing code — use refactor. Runs its rounds without pausing for review; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-based investigation of issues, bugs, API calls, integrations, and other aspects of software development that need a deep dive to find the root cause and solutions. Use when you need to debug, troubleshoot, diagnose, or figure out why something is broken. Does not review code for quality or style — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting review feedback to GitHub. Does not assess architectural health or structural risk — use architectural-analysis for architectural concerns. Does not research open-ended options, prior art, or how something works when nothing is broken — use research for that. Does not plan the structural change a root cause calls for — use plan-a-change. Does not map bounded contexts or domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a comprehensive code review on local source files. Use this skill when the user asks to review, audit, inspect, evaluate, or check code, even if they never use the word "review." Does not post comments to GitHub pull requests — use post-code-review-to-pr for that. Does not analyze architectural structure or module boundaries — use architectural-analysis for that. Does not explain code or a PR to build understanding before reviewing — use code-overview for a written overview, or code-walkthrough to be paced through it one step at a time. Does not map bounded contexts or domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis for that. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Splits a body of context into a sequence of vertical-slice build phases where each phase is independently demonstrable to a real user and each builds on the previous. Use when the user wants to plan, sequence, phase, slice, break down, or order the build of a feature, capability, system, or initiative, and produces a plain-language phased build outline. Does not produce implementation detail — use plan-implementation. Does not specify behavior that has not been decided — use plan-a-feature. Does not perform gap analysis between two artifacts — use gap-analysis. Does not break a plan into independently-grabbable work items — use plan-work-items.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps the US federal privacy landscape including sectoral laws (HIPAA, GLBA, FERPA, COPPA, FCRA, ECPA, VPPA), FTC Section 5 enforcement, proposed federal comprehensive legislation, and the interaction between federal and state privacy regimes. Keywords: federal privacy, HIPAA, GLBA, FERPA, COPPA, FCRA, FTC, sectoral, preemption.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auditing cookie lifetimes against regulatory recommendations and browser policies. Covers CNIL 13-month maximum recommendation, session vs persistent classification, third-party cookie phase-out impact, and Safari ITP duration caps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements BYOD privacy compliance frameworks for personal device use in the workplace. Covers personal vs corporate data separation, MDM capabilities and limitations, employee consent requirements, data wiping boundaries, and monitoring restrictions on personal devices. Keywords: BYOD, mobile device management, MDM, personal device, data separation, containerisation, remote wipe, employee privacy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and executes tabletop breach simulation exercises for testing organizational breach response capabilities. Covers scenario creation with realistic inject timelines, participant role assignment, communication testing across internal and external channels, decision-point evaluation, and after-action report generation. Keywords: tabletop exercise, breach simulation, incident response testing, scenario design, after-action report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages deletion requests for children's personal data. Covers parental-initiated versus child-initiated requests, age of capacity assessment, identity verification, scope determination, third-party notification obligations, and regulatory timelines under GDPR Art. 17, COPPA Section 312.6, and UK AADC Standard 15. Keywords: deletion, children, right to erasure, parental request, data deletion, COPPA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Framework for evaluating and selecting Consent Management Platforms (CMPs). Covers TCF v2.2 certification requirements, Global Privacy Control support, multi-regulation compliance (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD), A/B testing capabilities, API integration options, reporting features, and a structured vendor comparison methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements AI transparency requirements under EU AI Act Arts. 13-14 and GDPR Arts. 13-14. Covers user notification of AI interaction, system capability disclosure, limitation documentation, and meaningful information about automated logic. Keywords: AI transparency, EU AI Act, GDPR notification, explainability, automated decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements technical breach detection capabilities including SIEM integration, DLP alert configuration, anomaly detection rules, and insider threat monitoring. Provides a breach classification taxonomy across confidentiality, integrity, and availability dimensions. Covers detection tool selection, alert tuning, and integration with privacy incident response workflows. Keywords: breach detection, SIEM, DLP, anomaly detection, insider threat, classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture and retrieve durable YYLO Ledger artifact Records with intentional profiles, payload modes, provenance, retention, and secret-safe immutable evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review repository architecture using Ontoly Software Graph and MCP capabilities. Use when asked to explain architecture, module boundaries, package topology, service ownership, or architectural risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta-skill que orquestra todos os agentes do ecossistema. Scan automatico de skills, match por capacidades, coordenacao de workflows multi-skill e registry management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Claude's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when exposing Spring Boot 4 application capabilities through Model Context Protocol tools, resources, or prompts. Covers Spring AI 2.0 MCP annotations, transport selection, schemas, errors, security, and the standalone MCP Java SDK 2.x.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when exposing Spring Boot 3 application capabilities through Model Context Protocol tools, resources, or prompts. Covers Spring AI 1.x tool callback registration, transports, schemas, errors, security, and standalone MCP Java SDK compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Narrative-driven animation skill for explanatory content and visual storytelling. **Triggers when:** - User wants to explain a concept or process - Request involves step-by-step demonstrations - Content is educational or tutorial-like - User mentions "explain", "show how", "demonstrate", "walk through" **Capabilities:** - Breaking concepts into digestible visual steps - Progressive revelation of information - Highlighting cause-and-effect relationships - Building intuition through visual metaphors

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kinetic typography, logo animations, and stylized motion design skill. **Triggers when:** - User wants text animations or kinetic typography - Request involves logo reveals or title sequences - Content focuses on visual impact over education - User mentions "title", "intro", "logo", "text animation", "kinetic" **Capabilities:** - Kinetic typography with dynamic text effects - Logo reveals and brand animations - Particle effects and visual flourishes - Modern motion design patterns - Attention-grabbing title sequences

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。