「dom」の検索結果

Domain knowledge for using PrintKK print-on-demand API tools effectively. PrintKK is a print-on-demand platform that lets sellers create custom products, manage designs, upload images, and fulfill orders via API. Use this skill whenever the user wants to interact with PrintKK — browsing products, creating designs, placing orders, managing images, or building integrations with the PrintKK API. Also trigger when the user mentions "PrintKK", "print on demand", "POD fulfillment", custom product design workflows, or wants to automate their PrintKK store operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare standardized metrics across multiple ego-benchmark-harness runs by recalculating them from tasks.jsonl and session JSONL, never from HTML reports. Covers overall aggregates (success rate/average score), Odysseys per-rubric pass rates, duration distributions (avg/p50/p90/max), turns/tools/cost, error and exception counts, per-task success matrices, helper distributions, and the share of DOM operations. Use whenever users ask to compare data or metrics across runs, calculate aggregate/Odysseys/duration/turn/error/helper metrics, inspect differences among runs, or compare multiple rwb/real-world-bench runs. Use pi-session-analyzer instead for deep forensic analysis of why an individual task was slow or failed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

대화형 System-wide Refactoring — 변경 파일에서 Extract Method·Domain Logic 이동·Pull Up 등 클래스 경계를 넘는 구조 변경 후보를 찾아 승인 후 기법별 커밋으로 적용. "구조 리팩토링", "도메인 로직 이동", "클래스 분리", "system-wide", "/system-wide-refactoring" 요청 시 사용. 단, 메서드 내부 정돈(guard clause·extract variable 등)은 /tdd-tidy가 적합. /system-wide-refactoring [commit-ref]로 호출.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

하나의 긴 메서드를 grouping(Reorder/Chunk)·comment로 정돈해 책임을 드러낸 뒤 Arlo Belshee 6단계 네이밍(완전정직 이름 → Extract Method → Intent Revealing → Domain Abstraction)을 하나의 연속 흐름으로 관통하는 self-contained 워크플로우. "이 긴 메서드 이름이 하는 일을 안 드러낸다", "메서드 이름부터 정직하게 만들어서 쪼개줘", "이름 주도로 이 메서드 리팩토링" 요청 시 사용. 단, 여러 파일에 흩어진 개별 이름 스멜의 배치 교체는 /naming-process, 클래스 분리·도메인 이동 같은 대규모 구조 변경은 /system-wide-refactoring이 적합. /intent-revealing-names로 호출.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze code for primitive obsession and plan value object extractions around domain concepts, validation, and grouped primitive fields. Use when the user says `/value-objects`, asks for value object refactoring, or runs `/refactor:value-objects`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a local codebase and infer the architecture it is actually using, including repo kind, best-fit dominant architecture, directly evidenced coexisting patterns, major subsystem exceptions, confidence, docs-vs-code drift, and repo-fit hints for downstream agents. Use when prompts ask what architecture a repo uses, whether it is really hexagonal or just layered, what subtle patterns shape a repo or slice, how a target slice fits a hybrid monorepo, whether documented architecture matches implementation, or when `/tw-tk` needs a repo-dialect preflight before making a minimal change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load for cross-layer refactors, record/class or value-object migrations, new services/interfaces/repositories, project references, dependency-direction failures, or deciding whether code belongs in Domain, Application, Persistence/Infrastructure, API, or Blazor; not for a local edit wholly inside an established layer pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load for reliable post-commit messaging, domain/integration event delivery, transactional outbox tables, dispatch workers, retries, idempotent consumers, duplicate delivery, or dual-write failure; not for synchronous in-process events with no external side effect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search the live web via Perplexity Search API. Use when you need current documentation, release notes, vendor pages, news, domain-constrained web search, or date/recency filtering. Not for local codebase search or stable docs already in context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Econometrics skill for panel data models. Activates when the user asks about: "panel data", "fixed effects", "random effects", "Hausman test", "within estimator", "between estimator", "two-way fixed effects", "clustered standard errors panel", "FE model", "RE model", "pooled OLS", "unobserved heterogeneity", "panel regression", "first difference estimator", "entity fixed effects", "time fixed effects", "面板数据", "固定效应", "随机效应", "豪斯曼检验", "双向固定效应", "面板回归", "个体效应", "时间效应", "一阶差分"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Econometrics skill for machine learning methods in causal inference. Activates when the user asks about: "causal forest", "generalized random forest", "GRF", "double machine learning", "DML", "debiased machine learning", "LASSO for variable selection", "post-LASSO", "heterogeneous treatment effects", "CATE", "conditional average treatment effect", "BLP analysis", "CLAN analysis", "causal tree", "honest estimation", "因果森林", "双重机器学习", "异质性处理效应", "条件平均处理效应", "LASSO变量选择", "机器学习因果推断", "去偏机器学习"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NIST Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems (SP 1500-201/202/203, v1.0, 2017). Use for engineering and analyzing cyber-physical systems (CPS) and IoT: the CPS Framework's aspect × facet grid (nine aspects of concern examined through conceptualization, realization, and assurance facets), cross-property trustworthiness risk management (safety/security/privacy/reliability/resilience together), data interoperability (syntactical/semantic/contextual, canonical models, identifiers, provenance), the timing aspect (time-interval classes, time domains, time-aware networking) and secure/resilient time (GNSS jamming/spoofing, PTP/NTP attacks, holdover, the clock-error model and Allan/MTIE metrics), plus the use-case requirements method. Bridges IT and OT under a clock. Scope limits: a 2017 living/draft document, thin on post-2017 standards and on detailed control catalogs; it names but does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 and 15288 process text or permission-licensed third-party figures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance on writing high-quality requirements: the requirement quality characteristics and the EARS (Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax) patterns — ubiquitous, event-driven, state-driven, optional-feature, unwanted-behaviour — for unambiguous, singular, verifiable requirements, plus defect/anti-pattern review and verification & traceability. Use when authoring or reviewing requirements. Original synthesis citing EARS (Mavin et al.) and NASA public-domain guidance; not a reproduction of ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148 or the EARS paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA System Safety Handbook Volume 2 (NASA/SP-2014-612). Use for risk-informed safety cases (RISC), integrated safety analysis (ISA), adequate safety concepts, safety objectives and requirements, acquirer/provider roles, graded safety analysis, claims-evidence-argument structure, SSMP development, and RISC evaluation. Does not cover nuclear or chemical safety domains, occupational health regulations, or NASA-specific programmatic requirements beyond system safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge pack from 'Towards Digital Engineering: The Advent of Digital Systems Engineering' (Huang et al., Old Dominion University, arXiv:2002.11672, 2020). Use when reasoning about digital engineering, the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy and its five goals, the Authoritative Source of Truth, digitalization vs. digitization, digital augmentation, digitalized models, provenance, unique identification, and the four-level (vision/strategy/action/foundation) DSE research framework. Covers the conceptual/vision layer of the field. SCOPE LIMITS: this is a single ~28-page vision paper, not a methods handbook — it is thin on step-by-step procedures, tooling, case studies, and quantitative evaluation, and it predates 2020 so it does not cover later digital-engineering standards or recent AI/LLM advances. Use the sebok pack for established SE canon and MBSE depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from MIL-STD-882E (DoD System Safety). Use for the system safety process, hazard analysis tasks (PHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA), the risk assessment matrix (severity x probability), software safety criticality, and risk acceptance. US-gov public domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA Risk Management Handbook (NASA/SP-2011-3422). Use for risk-informed decision making, continuous risk management, performance commitments, risk scenario diagrams, risk disposition types, risk burn-down schedules, objectives hierarchies, deliberation and alternative selection, risk driver identification, and RM planning for space and safety-critical programmes. Does not cover domain-specific PRA methods (fault trees, event trees) in procedural depth — see NASA PRA Procedures Guide for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA System Safety Handbook (Dec 30, 2000). Use for system safety as a specialty within systems engineering: the five-step safety risk management process (mandated by FAA Order 8040.4 and the AMS), the severity-by-likelihood risk matrix and acceptance bands, the Safety Order of Precedence, system-description models (5M, SHEL(L)), the hazard-analysis activities (PHL/PHA/RHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA/HHA), integrated system hazard analysis, the analysis techniques (FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Fault Hazard, Common Cause, Sneak Circuit, Energy Trace), closed-loop hazard tracking (Safety Action Record), and the specialty domains the handbook covers — acquisition-lifecycle safety and contracting (OSA/CSA/SSPP/ISSPP), software safety (control-capability ranking, SHCM, DO-178B), test & evaluation safety, facilities safety, commercial launch safety (AST licensing, expected casualty, MPL/DAMP), system safety training, and Operational Risk Management (ORM) with human/organizational factors. Scope limits: this is a year-2000 FAA how-to; it predates the modern FAA/ICAO Safety Management System (SMS) and Just Culture regulatory frameworks, and many cited orders, advisory circulars, and launch-licensing rules have since been restructured. It is FAA/NAS-centric, leans on MIL-STD-882C, and does not define the SE life-cycle processes themselves (use nasa-npr-7123 / dau-se-guidebook) or reproduce third-party standard text (MIL-STD-882, DO-178B, ISO/IEC/IEEE).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA-STD-7009B (Standard for Models and Simulations) with implementation depth from NASA-HDBK-7009B. Use for M&S criticality and programmatics, development evidence and capability assessment, verification/validation domains, uncertainty and sensitivity, use-phase results assessment, risk-informed decision reporting, and handbook life-cycle products. Covers STD-7009B (2024-03-05) + HDBK-7009B (2026-02-03) synthesized notes only; does not replace program-specific TA direction, NPR 7150.2 software requirements detail, or full PRA methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Human Factors Design Standard (HF-STD-001B, 2016) — the FAA's consolidated human-factors / human-systems-integration design criteria for systems it manages, operates, or maintains. Use for requirement-level design rules on: general human-factors design principles; automation and function allocation; designing equipment for maintenance; displays, controls, and visual indicators; alarms, audio, and voice communications; the computer-human interface (information presentation, coding, interaction styles, windows, dialogue); keyboards, input devices, and workstation/workplace ergonomics; system security, personnel safety, environment, anthropometry, and user documentation; plus intended-use and tailoring guidance. It is a quantified, source-attributed synthesis (heavily citing MIL-STD-1472G, MIL-HDBK-759C, DOD-HFDG-ATCCS, NUREG-0700, NASA-STD-3000, ANSI, OSHA, ISO 9241). Complements nasa-hsi as a parallel HSI tradition from the civil-aviation domain. Scope limits: it is design criteria, NOT an HSI lifecycle/process model (use nasa-hsi, nasa-npr-7123, or dau-se-guidebook for process); it does NOT reproduce the third-party standards it cites; it is FAA-acquisition-oriented (ATC, towers, TRACONs, airway facilities), not a general consumer-UX guide; and it is thin on modern touchscreen/mobile, web, and AI-driven interface patterns and on quantitative human-reliability analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from MIL-HDBK-516C (Airworthiness Certification Criteria). Use for DoD air-system airworthiness planning: tailoring a certification basis, systems engineering criteria, and domain clusters for structures, flight technology, propulsion/installation, avionics/electrical/E3/diagnostics, computer systems/software, and crew systems (including applicable UAS control-station elements). Qualitative guidance handbook — not raw contractual requirements. Does not replace service airworthiness authority policy, civil FAA certification rules as authorities, or detailed JSSG/MIL performance specs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Erstellt und verwendet einen anbieterneutralen semantischen Routing-Graphen aus Personas, koordinierenden Rollen, Experten und aktiven Skill-Endpunkten. Verwenden, wenn ein LLM eine Anfrage von einer Leitrolle über einen Experten zu einem Skill routen, aus einem vorhandenen Agentensystem einen portablen Persona-Router extrahieren, eine semantische Domänenkarte mit einer lexikalischen Skill-Registry kombinieren oder fehlende Verbindungen zwischen Rolle und Skill sichtbar machen soll, statt still auf einen Ersatz zurückzufallen. Auslöser sind unter anderem semantisches Persona-Routing, Persona-Umbrella, Rollen-Router, Boss-Agent-Experten-Skill-Routing, Agentenrollen-Export oder die Wiederverwendung von Personas über mehrere LLM-Anbieter hinweg.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ドメイン共通要求仕様書の新規作成・更新・レビューを支援する。AI駆動開発成果物フローのビジネス要求(D1)に位置する成果物で、プロダクト要求仕様書(PRD)が方針・概念を扱うのに対し、本書は **3 ドメイン以上で横断的に効く具体的な要求(水準・方針・原則)** を集約する文書。**ドメイン要求仕様書群(個別)とは並列の関係にあり、横断的な水準・方針・原則は本書が単独で責務を持つ(=厳密な MECE。個別ドメインで言い換えない)。** 機能要求・非機能要求・UI/UX 方針・セキュリティ要求・データアクセス要求・法務/コンプライアンス要求 の各節を持つ。PRD・アクター一覧・ドメイン定義書 を上流とし、PRD策定後、ドメイン要求仕様書群(個別)の作成前に呼び出す。

ドメイン定義書の新規作成・更新・レビューを支援する。AI駆動開発成果物フローのビジネス要求(D1)に位置する成果物で、本プロダクトを構成する業務領域(ドメイン)を網羅・分類する文書。問題空間(プロダクトが扱う業務領域)の整理であり、DDDにおけるBounded Context(解空間としての実装上の境界)とは別レイヤーで扱う。BRDの下流に位置する成果物。後続のプロダクト要求仕様書、ドメイン要求仕様書群(各ドメインごとに1つ)など、様々な成果物から参照される。BRD策定後、ドメイン整理の段階で呼び出す。