3,371 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Load this skill when configuring or reviewing CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows, or automated testing setups. Ensures accessibility regressions are caught before code reaches production by enforcing quality gates, structured reporting, and layered automated + manual testing across all pages and user preferences.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when you need to prove fix correctness with adversarial code proof traces — a skeptic tries to DISPROVE the fix and trace all related paths first, with confidence scoring and stack-trace-style evidence chains, so confidence is earned by surviving attack, not by confirming it works.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when reviewing UI code for accessibility, responsiveness, performance, and UX best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when you need restructure code without changing behavior using extract method, extract class, rename, move, and inline patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when you need to combine /why-review + /fix in a recursive loop — each round runs /why-review to find validated findings then /fix to resolve them, then loops again over the CHANGED target until a fresh full /why-review produces zero findings (nothing left to fix).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use to validate a spec artifact's decisions with the user across three contexts — a freshly-authored Feature Spec (idea-to-spec), an existing canonical spec before PBI decomposition (spec-to-pbi), or a refined idea + §8 test-specs (idea-to-pbi deep mode). Detects the context, walks every applicable validation category, and runs an exhaustive but budget-bounded blocking clarification gate so every non-obvious or conflicting decision is confirmed before the artifact drives downstream work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when you need to perform a security review or audit on any scope — application code (OWASP Top 10 2025), secrets exposure, dependency/supply-chain malware, third-party repository vetting before install, infrastructure/config, CI/CD pipeline, AI-agent risks, and host/VPS compromise detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when reviewing service-layer and API changes for production readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Research] Use when you need to review knowledge artifacts for completeness, citation quality, confidence accuracy, and template compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Git] Use when generating developer KPI, performance, contribution value, story point, man-day, or code-quality reports from local git commit history.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when you need to run linters and fix issues for backend or frontend.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when the user asks to analyze package upgrades, check for outdated dependencies, plan npm/NuGet updates, or assess breaking changes in package updates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when you need an AI-assisted Dev BA PIC review of PBI drafts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when you need to validate a PBI against Definition of Ready before grooming.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when reviewing architecture compliance for layers, messaging, service boundaries, CQRS, repos, entity events, and data/consistency/tenancy boundaries. Universal architecture laws, coupling taxonomy and the anti-pattern catalog live in `.claude/docs/architecture-knowledge.md` (project docs always outrank it).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Architecture] Use when designing solution architecture across backend, frontend, data & consistency, integration & APIs, deployment, monitoring, testing, and code quality. Architecture laws, style-selection triggers, coupling taxonomy, trade-off tables and the anti-pattern catalog live in `.claude/docs/architecture-knowledge.md`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when you need to simplify and refine code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Architecture] Use when grading project architecture and scalability quality for greenfield init or brownfield audit: build/CI scalability, distributed-monolith risk, module isolation, dependency discipline, loose coupling, horizontal scaling, DRY, abstraction, clean architecture, observability, and delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when the user asks to enhance documentation, add code comments, create API docs, improve technical documentation, document code, or update README files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when you need to combine /changes-review + /fix in a recursive loop — each round runs /changes-review (report-only) to surface validated findings over a fixed diff scope, then /fix to resolve them, then loops again with a FRESH full /changes-review over the CHANGED diff until one complete pass produces zero validated findings (nothing left to fix).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing code before it merges, whether written by an agent or a human.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect anomalies in procurement data using Qdrant vector operations. Covers centroid-based outlier detection, near-duplicate finding via batch recommend, amount z-score analysis, and vendor variance scoring. Use when building anomaly detection, fraud detection, or data quality features.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintains repo-local action contracts and harness repositories where product CLI and MCP adapters stay thin over core libraries. Use when adopting or improving steward.yaml actions, capability-level adoption evidence, cold-start proof loops, probes, benchmarks, CLI/MCP/core parity, adapter refactors, packages/core boundaries, or sibling harness layout; use repo-quality-system-lifecycle first for general app/library/tool stewardship baselines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user needs to update, improve, audit, or maintain documentation in a project. Covers READMEs, changelogs, API docs, inline comments, missing docs, and overall documentation quality. Works well before releases or when documentation has fallen behind the code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。