「quality」の検索結果

Use when building or modifying SwiftUI views, settings windows, menu-bar UIs, or any surface for the KIKA app — or any calm, premium app you want to feel the same way. Encodes the KIKA Design System v2 (June 2026) — a calm, premium, modern dark UI with first-class light mode, inspired by Cursor, Linear, and high-quality dev tools — that you can adopt or adapt for your own app. Apply it to keep color, typography, spacing, and component styling consistent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

医学证据等级排序与编排层 skill。当用户请求"证据等级 / GRADE / 证据排序 / 医学证据评估 / evidence grading / quality of evidence / 系统评价排序 / 临床证据排序 / 证据金字塔"时触发。本 skill 不直接调用 NCBI/Europe PMC/ClinicalTrials API,而是编排 6 个底层原子 skill(pubmed-eutils / europepmc-search / clinical-trials-v2 / aact-bulk-trials / bioc-fulltext-fetch / pubtator-entity-search)的召回结果,按 ChatGPT 推荐的证据金字塔(指南 > Meta > RCT > Cohort > Case-Control > Case Report)做 GRADE 自动评级,自动剔除 editorial / letter / comment。优先使用 BioMCP MCP server 做 fan-out(genomoncology/biomcp),无 BioMCP 时走自建 slow-path 兜底。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

医学证据等级排序与编排层 skill - evidence grading orchestrator. 当用户请求"证据等级 / GRADE / 证据排序 / 医学证据评估 / 系统评价排序 / 临床证据排序 / 证据金字塔 / 给 PMID 打分 / Practice Guideline 优先 / Cochrane 优先 / 反向证据交叉验证 / evidence grading / quality of evidence / evidence pyramid / GRADE assessment / Cochrane review ranking / clinical evidence ranking"时,**调用本 skill 进行医学证据自动分级,自动选择最佳信息源**。本 skill 是编排层(L2)·不直接打 NCBI/Europe PMC/ClinicalTrials API,而是编排 6 个底层原子 skill(pubmed-eutils / europepmc-search / clinical-trials-v2 / aact-bulk-trials / bioc-fulltext-fetch / pubtator-entity-search)的召回结果,按证据金字塔(指南 > Meta > RCT > Cohort > Case-Control > Case Report)做 GRADE A/B/C/D 自动评级,自动剔除 editorial/letter/comment。优先使用 BioMCP MCP server 做 fan-out(genomoncology/biomcp);无 BioMCP 时走自建 slow-path 兜底。跨平台无锁(Claude Code / Codex / Gemini CLI)。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 4.5 hook by Phase-2-Quality-Fix sprint. 封装 mmdc/npx Mermaid CLI subprocess,把 LLM 输出的 `<div class="mermaid">...</div>` block 渲染为 PNG。Use AFTER cite-bound-content-generator (Phase 4 Turn 1) and BEFORE report-bundle-builder (Phase 5). Production smoke must fail closed if rendering fails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a pull request in the deepseek-harness repo — orients the reviewer to this codebase's standards (AGENTS.md conventions, defensive patterns, ADRs, quality gates) and the review-specific checks that code alone can't show

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Benchmark CodeGraph retrieval quality on a real codebase by comparing agent behavior with vs without CodeGraph. Use when the user runs /agent-eval or asks to test, benchmark, audit, or validate a codegraph version (the local dev build or a published npm version) against a language's repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add tree-sitter language support to codegraph end-to-end — wire the grammar + extractor, write tests, then benchmark extraction quality and retrieval value on 3 popular real-world repos. Use when the user runs /add-lang <language> or asks to add/support a new language (e.g. Lua, Elixir, Zig, OCaml) in codegraph.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Content quality and E-E-A-T assessment for AI citability — evaluate experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness, and content structure

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GEO-first SEO analysis tool. Optimizes websites for AI-powered search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews) while maintaining traditional SEO foundations. Performs full GEO audits, citability scoring, AI crawler analysis, llms.txt generation, brand mention scanning, platform-specific optimization, schema markup, technical SEO, content quality (E-E-A-T), and client-ready GEO report generation. Use when user says "geo", "seo", "audit", "AI search", "AI visibility", "optimize", "citability", "llms.txt", "schema", "brand mentions", "GEO report", or any URL for analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full website GEO+SEO audit with parallel agents first and skills fallback. Orchestrates a comprehensive Generative Engine Optimization audit across AI citability, platform analysis, technical infrastructure, content quality, and schema markup. Produces a composite GEO Score (0-100) with prioritized action plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Core technical, safety, and maintainability rules for codebase edits. Trigger when: - Writing code, refactoring, modifying files, or creating unit tests. - Proposing commits, reviewing git history, or auditing code quality. - Modifying files in any programming language (e.g. *.go, *.rs, *.py, *.ts, *.js, *.c, *.cpp). - Prompt contains keywords: refactor, build, compile, lint, test, git, commit, rule priority, type safety, error handling, defensive programming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing quality guidelines, formatting conventions, and styling constraints for documentation. Trigger when: - Writing, editing, or auditing documentation files, READMEs, markdown files, or guides. - Modifying files with suffixes like: *.md, *.qmd, *.txt, *.rst. - Prompt contains keywords: doc, documentation, spelling, grammar, headers, links, table alignment, Divio, tone, voice, clarity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit packages for documentation completeness, detect drift between code and docs, and maintain documentation quality across the monorepo. Use when checking package docs, running audits, or reviewing documentation health.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive code review for commits and pull requests. Covers security, TDD, code quality, and documentation standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatic quality check on significant outputs via isolated sub-agent. Spawns reflection-agent for objective evaluation without conversation context bias.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TDD methodology for production-quality tests. Write tests FIRST driven by PRD, Tech Spec, Implementation Plan. Covers minimal mocking, realistic test data, strong assertions, test independence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or change immutable business values with meaningful invariants, equality, or behavior, such as order numbers and money. Use when primitive values obscure domain rules; avoid wrapping every scalar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating a completed or in-progress project across scope, correctness, quality, testing, and learning outcomes using structured Praise-Critique-Grow feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the deliverable is authored or edited prose whose wording matters (docs, READMEs, release notes, public copy) or when the user asks to tighten, de-AI, or review writing. Not for chat answers, code review, or explanations of current work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Solves complex, open-ended problems using an evolutionary search mechanism inspired by genetic algorithms. Generates a diverse population of candidate answers, scores them against a rubric, then iteratively applies selection, crossover, and mutation to breed progressively better solutions. Use this skill whenever the user wants to explore a solution space deeply, asks for the "best" answer to a subjective or multi-dimensional problem, wants to evaluate competing approaches and distill the strongest, or uses any of these triggers: "evolutionary search", "genetic algorithm", "evolve an answer", "breed solutions", "population-based search", or phrases like "give me multiple approaches and refine the best one". Also trigger when the problem is complex, open-ended, or has no obvious single correct answer and the user wants a high-quality, well-explored result, not just a quick response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when work needs deeper thinking, less generic output, repo evidence, tradeoffs, monitoring signals, or stronger quality discipline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before completion, PR, deploy, handoff, or when verifying code changes. Runs advisory or blocking checks and reports evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after UI implementation for mechanical source checks and a rendered or fresh-eyes review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tones down visually aggressive or overstimulating designs, reducing intensity while preserving quality. Use when the user mentions too bold, too loud, overwhelming, aggressive, garish, or wants a calmer, more refined aesthetic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。