347 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Write a threat model document. Use when the user says "threat model", "threat modeling", "STRIDE analysis", "attack surface analysis", "security design review", "what are the threats to this system", "adversarial analysis", "identify threats", "security threat assessment", or needs to systematically identify and document threats to a system or feature - even if they don't explicitly say "threat model".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a Yuzu pull request end to end with a static-first trust gate, isolated dynamic testing, adversarial Kimi/Codex review, a posted verdict, and head-SHA-bound re-review. Use when the user types forms such as "go PR123", "go 123", or "/go PR123"; use `--promote SHA` only after a collaborator accepts the static review of an external fork.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Qualitative quality review of game design documents — answers "is this design good, and does it follow best practices?" — across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Fans out adversarial lenses (completeness, clarity, pillar alignment, systems-math, fantasy-delivery, feasibility, scope) plus domain lenses that check it against the game-design rules, each prompted to find problems rather than validate; produces a severity-graded verdict and a two-bucket report (apply-ready fixes vs research), handed to /unikit-gd-apply or /unikit-gd-explore in one move. Scope is inferred: a named system, flow, or content type reviews that document; "all" runs a cross-document review. Use when the user wants a critique, quality judgment, or rules check of the design, e.g. "review the combat GDD", "review the onboarding flow". This is the subjective quality pass — for a mechanical consistency check (numbers, terms, IDs, references matching the registry) use /unikit-gd-verify.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Good-faith adversarial scrutiny of an idea or plan. Spawns critical skeptics across relevant lenses, pairs them with an advocate defending the idea, and synthesizes the exchange into a report. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial deliberation process for making decisions. Spawns advocate agents for each option who argue their cases before a judge (you) who renders a verdict.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prospective failure imagination for a plan, decision, or running system. Operates in two modes — **plan mode** (a plan has not yet been committed to; imagine its catastrophic failure broadly) and **scenario mode** (a specific catastrophic scenario is posed against an existing system; investigate causes against the actual code and architecture). Spawns parallel pre-mortemers in isolation across three categories of lens: standard failure classes (technical, operational, estimation, scope, adoption, dependency, team, incentive, detection, reversibility, adversarial), 0-3 ad-hoc target-specific lenses the orchestrator names when warranted, and a first-principles lens that always runs to catch what the prescribed taxonomy misses. Synthesizes into a prioritized risk register with early-warning signals. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan for multi-session, multi-agent engineering projects. Each step has a self-contained context brief so a fresh agent can execute it cold. Includes adversarial review gate, dependency graph, parallel step detection, anti-pattern catalog, and plan mutation protocol. TRIGGER when: user requests a plan, blueprint, or roadmap for a complex multi-PR task, or describes work that needs multiple sessions. DO NOT TRIGGER when: task is completable in a single PR or fewer than 3 tool calls, or user says "just do it".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing, reviewing, or architecting Rust code — systems programming, async services, CLI tooling, web backends, or any work in `.rs` files. Triggers on editing `.rs` or `Cargo.toml` files, or mentions of "Rust", "Tokio", "Axum", "cargo", "borrow checker", "lifetime", "trait object", "async Rust", "crate", "rustc", or explicit requests to "build this in Rust" / "rewrite X in Rust". For adversarial security review of Rust code see security-reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarially verifies DATA_MODEL.md property rows against cited Source files. Use after data-model-documenter when DATA_MODEL.md changed — inventories each property in added/changed catalog sections and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE. Triggers on "verify DATA_MODEL", "check catalog against source", "data model verification".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing, reviewing, or deploying Solidity smart contracts — token contracts, signature-gated claim systems, merkle-gated staking vaults, allocation modules, role-based proxies, or factory patterns. Triggers on edits to `*.sol` files, `hardhat.config.*`, `foundry.toml`, deploy scripts, or mentions of "smart contract", "Solidity", "Web3", "EVM", "Hardhat", "Foundry", "ERC20/721/1155", "merkle", "staking", or "on-chain". For security audits and adversarial review see security-engineering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when recording, tallying, or triaging stochastic review findings — the append-only JSONL ledger where Tier 2 (advisory, unevidenced) reviewer output goes instead of blocking language. Triggers on "log this finding", "ledger add", "tally the findings", "triage findings", "is this finding recurring", "retire this noise", or whenever a reviewer produces an unevidenced concern that should be measured for recurrence rather than chased. For the review itself see code-review-and-quality or skill-library-review; for verifying formal claims with deterministic evidence see adversarial-claims-reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scientific research engine v6.0 NEXUS — adversarial review (Reviewer 2), 32 quality gates, tree search, serendipity tracking, confounder harness, cross-session learning. Use for ANY scientific analysis, hypothesis testing, data validation, literature review, or task where correctness > speed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scientific research in serendipity mode. Infinite loops until discovery, rigorous tracking, adversarial review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scientific research engine with agentic tree search. Infinite loops until discovery, rigorous tracking, adversarial review, serendipity preserved.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scientific research engine for hypothesis testing, literature gap analysis, experimental validation, and data-driven discovery. Enforces adversarial review (Reviewer 2), 32 quality gates, tree search over hypotheses, confounder harness for quantitative claims, and serendipity detection. TRIGGER when: user asks to analyze scientific data, test hypotheses, validate findings, search for research gaps, design experiments, or investigate results. DO NOT TRIGGER when: pure code review, documentation writing, devops tasks, general conversation, or non-scientific data transformation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scientific research engine with adversarial review, tree search, and serendipity detection. Use when: exploring hypotheses, validating findings against literature, running computational experiments with quality gates, or hunting for unexpected discoveries. Do NOT use for simple Q&A, code editing, or non-research tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Red team security mode for OpenClaw. Runs an adversarial audit on demand or nightly — checks exposed ports, credential leaks, file permissions, suspicious processes, and OpenClaw config posture. Assigns a letter grade. Built for macOS deployments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
法外功夫 — Non-legal business skills for lawyers. Decision analysis, game theory, contract design, accounting, finance, microeconomics, law & economics, statistics, and regression analysis distilled into deep, actionable frameworks for legal practice. Each domain includes formulas with LaTeX notation, worked examples, adversarial checklists, and book-aligned structure. | 律师必备的非法律商业技能深度参考：决策分析、博弈论、合同设计、会计、金融、微观经济学、法经济学、统计分析、多元回归。每章都包含完整公式推导、worked examples、对抗清单与经典判例。当用户涉及和解谈判、合同激励、财务尽调、企业估值、损害赔偿计算、反垄断分析、统计证据评估、歧视诉讼回归分析、hold-up、效率违约、Daubert 动议等场景时触发。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-pass structural code review with adversarial personas. Input: branch diff (default), PR #123, commit, --pending. Use for 'review this PR/diff'. NOT for behavioral verification (mk:evaluate).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-LLM adversarial consensus loop — 3+ LLMs compete to find flaws in designs/specs until unanimous agreement is reached
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate autonomous AI development pipelines through your Kanban board (Asana, GitHub Projects, Linear). Manages multi-worker Claude Code dispatch, deterministic quality gates, adversarial review, per-task cost tracking, and crash-proof pipeline execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when assessing AI/ML systems for prompt injection, jailbreak vulnerabilities, model inversion risk, data poisoning exposure, or agent tool abuse. Covers MITRE ATLAS technique mapping, injection signature detection, and adversarial robustness scoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a skeptical Claude review over the current diff or branch range.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production, security-sensitive logic, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now than to debug later.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。