1,296 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Daily meeting preparation system that checks your calendar each morning, deeply researches external attendees (LinkedIn, company info, GitHub, past notes), and sends you personalized briefs via email (1 per person). Use when you want automated preparation for upcoming meetings with context about each person you're meeting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a complete marketing campaign brief from a launch goal, ICP, and product context. Pure reasoning skill. Outputs channel plan, messaging angles, content types, timeline, and success metrics. Designed for seed/Series A founders and small GTM teams who aren't professional marketers but need to run focused campaigns. No scripts — pure reasoning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a Scenario output must be checked and improved rather than accepted first roll: iterating a generation until it matches the brief, fixing a batch that came back off-brief, retrying failed shots methodically, wiring an automated generate, review, revise loop, or deciding whether to re-prompt, swap references, inpaint, post-process, or change model. Keywords: refine, iterate, critique, review loop, QA, self-correction, verify, acceptance criteria, retry, drift.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clarify a new customer brief, desired outcome, constraints and evidence gaps. Use for kickoff or a first meeting; do not repeat discovery already supplied.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-publish QA framework for content. Brief adherence, voice consistency, fact accuracy, structure and clarity, AI-content audit, SEO and AEO compliance, internal linking and schema validation, QA at scale via sampling, the QA workflow, and the discipline that distinguishes catch-problems QA from checkbox QA. Triggers on editorial QA, content review, pre-publish review, content audit, content QA process, AI-content audit, hallucination check, content sampling, programmatic QA, voice consistency check, brief adherence check. Also triggers when a content team is shipping sloppy work, when AI-co-authored content is reaching publish unaudited, when a QA process burns reviewers out, or when a programmatic SEO set needs sampling discipline. On a voice consistency check, this skill owns checking a draft against an existing voice system at the publish gate; use `brand-voice` when the voice system itself needs defining or documenting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize overnight activity into a daily actionable briefing
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured intelligence dossiers on companies, people, markets, or domains, with source triangulation and fact/inference discipline. Use when preparing a deal-prep dossier, executive briefing, or due-diligence overview.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize raw user research (interviews, surveys, tickets) into themed findings and decision-ready briefs. Use when synthesizing user interviews, building a findings brief, or communicating research to stakeholders.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate one-page meeting briefings from structured input (attendees, prior context, decisions needed). Use before customer calls, board meetings, or 1:1s to prepare a pre-read or briefing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Part 12 continuous improvement loop into a quarterly brief for leadership. "produce the quarterly improvement brief"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft content in brand voice through a gated pipeline: blogs, ads, emails. Brief only → content-brief. "write a blog post about X"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Panel health assessment, firm exit management, coverage gap analysis, and panel refresh brief for in-house legal ops teams. Produce an annual Panel Health Report synthesising scorecard data, billing compliance, and step-out patterns into per-firm recommendations — Retain, Watch, Improvement Plan, or Exit Review. Produce a firm exit pack: formal exit notice with active matter transition plan, plus an internal exit record. Identify practice area, geographic, or tier gaps and produce a structured Coverage Gap Report with remediation options. Produce a Panel Refresh Brief as a scoped input to the RFP process. Trigger on: 'review our panel', 'annual panel review', 'is our panel working', 'which firms should we exit', 'write the exit notice', 'coverage gap', 'we don't have anyone for restructuring', 'refresh the panel', 'panel rationalisation', 'too many firms', 'step-out problem', 'do we have the right firms'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare structured briefings for meetings with legal relevance and track resulting action items. Use when preparing for contract negotiations, board meetings, compliance reviews, or any meeting where legal context, background research, or action tracking is needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare a lawyer for an adversarial proceeding the way Neal Katyal's "Harvey" prepared him for the SCOTUS tariffs argument: profile the tribunal from their prior opinions and questions, predict the specific questions you will face, map narrow "escape routes" each judge can walk through without abandoning prior commitments, and spar adversarially until only the strongest answers survive. The model is the sparring partner. The human still wins the case. Use when: preparing for oral argument, appellate argument, motion hearing, evidentiary hearing, deposition (taking or defending), arbitration, mediation, or any proceeding where a known decision-maker will fire questions at you in real time. Also useful for stress-testing a brief before filing. Proactively suggest when: the user mentions an upcoming hearing/argument with named judges or arbitrators, drafts a brief and wants it pressure-tested, asks "what will Justice X / Judge Y ask me," or talks about preparing for a specific bench.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply elite legal writing techniques drawn from Justice Kagan, Boies & Olson, and other top advocates to any legal document — briefs, submissions, letters, opinions, memos, or persuasive correspondence. This skill covers both prose craft (clarity, examples, parallel construction, voice, quoting) and architectural strategy (argument sequencing, framing, openings, endings). Use this skill whenever the user asks you to draft, edit, or improve legal writing and wants it to be genuinely persuasive — not just correct. Also trigger when the user mentions 'make it more persuasive', 'sharpen this', 'strengthen the argument', 'rewrite this section', 'punch it up', 'legal writing', 'draft a brief', 'draft a submission', 'write like a top advocate', or asks you to improve the rhetoric, flow, or force of any legal document. This skill complements the larissa-legal-voice skill (which handles tone and personal voice) by adding the persuasive technique layer on top.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Outside counsel guidelines (OCGs) — drafting, review, gap analysis, and targeted updates for in-house legal teams. Build new OCGs calibrated to maturity level (light, standard, comprehensive), review existing OCGs against 15-component best practice framework, add or update specific sections (AI policy, AFA terms, D&I, rate review), and produce GC briefing notes for internal buy-in. Trigger on: 'draft billing guidelines', 'outside counsel guidelines', 'OCG', 'billing expectations', 'review our guidelines', 'update the AI clause', 'what should our billing guidelines cover', 'we don't have billing guidelines', 'firms aren't following our guidelines', 'rate review terms', 'GC briefing on billing guidelines', 'AFA policy', 'block billing', 'prohibited fees', 'staffing expectations for outside counsel'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Collaboration platform configuration methodology for legal matter sites. Site architecture, workflow identification, dashboard design, data quality governance, and user adoption for SharePoint, Teams, and equivalent platforms. M365 is the reference implementation — outputs are platform-agnostic enough to brief IT or build simple automations without becoming a Power Automate manual. Use when setting up a matter site, identifying workflows to automate, designing reporting dashboards, managing platform data quality, or driving user adoption. Trigger on: 'set up the matter site', 'configure SharePoint', 'build a dashboard', 'what should we automate', 'brief IT on this workflow', 'nobody is using the platform', 'data quality is poor', 'set up Teams channel', 'matter site structure', 'alerts and notifications', 'user training', 'platform governance', 'status dashboard', 'what workflows can we automate', 'matter site template'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a risk-matched whitebox or the approved production game for its target runtime. Turn GAME_DESIGN, and ART_DIRECTION when production begins, into a minimal BUILD_BRIEF and a runnable candidate that can be iterated with replayable evidence. Use for prototype the riskiest design question, implement the approved game design, or turn this design into a running game. 游戏构建执行。先按最大风险做白盒，或在正式生产时把批准后的 GAME_DESIGN 与 ART_DIRECTION 压缩成最小 BUILD_BRIEF，在目标运行环境中实现可运行候选并用可回放证据迭代。用于验证高风险设计问题、构建游戏原型或实现批准方案。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design game concepts from a novel. From SOURCE_BIBLE and PRODUCT_BRIEF, compare meaningful alternatives on the dimensions still unlocked, then select a playable direction using hard vetoes and explicit trade-offs. Use for what game should this novel become, compare game concepts, choose a game direction for this book, decide whether this novel should become an interactive story. 小说游戏概念设计。根据 SOURCE_BIBLE 与 PRODUCT_BRIEF 比较未锁定维度上的有效替代方案，用硬否决和关键取舍选择可玩方向。用于判断小说适合做成什么游戏、该不该做成互动叙事、比较游戏方案等需求。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a project-based learning brief with a driving question, milestones, and assessment criteria. Use when planning PBL units, inquiry projects, or extended investigations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ambient fleet-health check that surfaces anything worth attention (default), or an on-demand priority brief - the 3 things to focus on, why now, and what moved (var=brief)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
已有功能的需求变更闭环（门禁式七步）。触发硬条件：要改的功能已经实现并跑起来了。当用户说"改需求""需求变更""调整交互""改功能""重构流程"，或改动容易散到多个文件、碰到鉴权/存储/配置/权限、需要可靠验证 + 回滚方案时使用。流程：锁 scope 写 change brief → 从代码确认当前行为（不靠记忆和假设）→ 影响面与风险评估 + 回滚计划 → 提出新设计等用户批准（**未获批准绝不动代码**）→ 小而局部的 diff → 跑固定回归清单 → 更新文档和决策日志。产出：change brief + 代码 diff + 回归记录 + decision log。不适用于：全新功能从零做（走 issue-pool → page-solution-design（有界面时）→ backend-logic-design（有规则需讨论时）→ prd-test-writer）、只改视觉样式不动任何逻辑（按已有界面直接调整）、新想法还没定要不要做（先用 issue-pool 入池）、写 PRD/测试用例（用 prd-test-writer）、提交推送发版（用 git-push）。注意：本 skill 的七步流程通用于任何项目，但 scripts/impact_scan.sh 与 references/chrome-extension-regression-example.md 是 Chrome 扩展示例；通用回归使用 references/regression-checklist.md，按项目实际选择检查。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build an influencer marketing strategy — finding influencers, briefing, contracts, deliverables, performance tracking, micro vs macro strategy, outreach, and FTC compliance. Use when the user says "influencer marketing", "influencer strategy", "work with influencers", "influencer outreach", "influencer brief", "find influencers", "micro influencer", "macro influencer", "nano influencer", "creator marketing", "brand ambassador", "influencer campaign", "influencer collaboration", "seed influencers", "gifting influencers", "paid influencer", "influencer ROI", or wants to use influencers or creators to grow the brand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a User Generated Content (UGC) strategy — getting customers to create content, review generation, UGC briefs for creators, social campaigns, contest mechanics, legal rights management, and repurposing UGC in paid ads. Use when the user says "UGC", "user generated content", "get customers to create content", "customer content", "UGC ads", "UGC creators", "organic UGC", "UGC strategy", "how do we get customers to post about us", "brand hashtag", "UGC brief", "influencer UGC", "UGC for ads", "customer photos and videos", or wants to use real customer content to build trust and reduce content production costs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。