3,174 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when comparing prompt changes against a fixed evaluation set: record actual model settings, required checks, missing results, judge limitations and case-level regression evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate agent behavior with versioned cases and explicit verifiers. Use when comparing agent or prompt changes, reproducing failures, or running agent regression tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates deep links to the Arize UI for traces, spans, sessions, datasets, labeling queues, evaluators, and annotation configs. Produces clickable URLs for sharing Arize resources with team members. Use when the user wants to link to or open a trace, span, session, dataset, evaluator, or annotation config in the Arize UI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate FX carry trade opportunities by combining spot rates, forward points, interest rate differentials, volatility surface analysis, and historical price trends. Use when analyzing carry trades, comparing FX forward curves, assessing carry-to-vol ratios, or evaluating currency pair opportunities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a publication-grade 8-part deep-dive series on a single company (~120k words total): cognitive reset / moat / profit engine / hidden assets / era variable (e.g. AI) / financials Buffett-style / management / valuation+redlines. The core IP is NOT writing but REVISING — a strict fact-check checklist catches pseudo-precision (probability-weighted expectations, third-party MAU discrepancies, linear extrapolation), absolute language, and cross-article number inconsistencies that most finance long-forms violate. Each piece stands alone but shares one valuation/management/price framework. Use when the user wants textbook-level depth on one company for public publishing (a single research report or earnings note is NOT this — use investment-research / earnings-review instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates and selects Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) products based on organizational requirements including feed integration capability, STIX/TAXII support, workflow automation, analyst interface, and total cost of ownership. Use when conducting a TIP procurement, migrating between TIP solutions, or assessing whether the current TIP meets program maturity requirements. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, MISP, OpenCTI, Anomali, EclecticIQ, or TIP procurement decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in Langfuse - the open-source LLM observability platform. Covers tracing, prompt management, evaluation, datasets, and integration with LangChain, LlamaIndex, and OpenAI. Essential for debugging, monitoring, and improving LLM applications in production. Use when: langfuse, llm observability, llm tracing, prompt management, llm evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when scientists need help with research problem selection, project ideation, troubleshooting stuck projects, or strategic scientific decisions. Use this skill when users ask to pitch a new research idea, work through a project problem, evaluate project risks, plan research strategy, navigate decision trees, or get help choosing what scientific problem to work on. Typical requests include "I have an idea for a project", "I'm stuck on my research", "help me evaluate this project", "what should I work on", or "I need strategic advice about my research".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a thorough pre-implementation discussion before making significant changes. Use when the user wants to discuss, plan, or evaluate a change before implementing it — especially when they say words like 'discuss', 'evaluate', 'plan', or 'let's talk about'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EU MDR 2017/745 compliance specialist for medical device classification, technical documentation, clinical evidence, and post-market surveillance. Covers Annex VIII classification rules, Annex II/III technical files, Annex XIV clinical evaluation, Art. 86 PSUR schedules, and EUDAMED integration. Use when classifying a medical device under MDR, building or gap-checking a technical file, planning clinical evaluation or PMS/PSUR cadence, or preparing for notified body review (e.g., 'what class is my device under MDR', 'review my PSUR schedule').
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Router/index for the 2 finance skills bundled in this plugin: financial-analyst (ratio analysis, DCF valuation, budget variance, rolling forecasts) and saas-metrics-coach (ARR/MRR, churn, CAC/LTV, NRR, quick ratio). Use when a finance request doesn't obviously match one skill and you need to pick the right one (e.g., 'analyze these financials', 'how healthy are my SaaS metrics').
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to design a RAG pipeline, choose a chunking strategy or embedding model, pick a vector database, or evaluate retrieval quality (precision@k, recall@k, NDCG). Examples: 'design a RAG system for our docs', 'what chunk size should I use for this corpus', 'evaluate my retriever against ground truth'. NOT for general LLM cost tuning (use llm-cost-optimizer) or agent loops over retrieval (use agenthub).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "design system architecture", "evaluate microservices vs monolith", "create architecture diagrams", "analyze dependencies", "choose a database", "plan for scalability", "make technical decisions", or "review system design". Use for architecture decision records (ADRs), tech stack evaluation, system design reviews, dependency analysis, and generating architecture diagrams in Mermaid, PlantUML, or ASCII format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
World-class senior data scientist skill specialising in statistical modeling, experiment design, causal inference, and predictive analytics. Covers A/B testing (sample sizing, two-proportion z-tests, Bonferroni correction), difference-in-differences, feature engineering pipelines (Scikit-learn, XGBoost), cross-validated model evaluation (AUC-ROC, AUC-PR, SHAP), and MLflow experiment tracking — using Python (NumPy, Pandas, Scikit-learn), R, and SQL. Use when designing or analysing controlled experiments, building and evaluating classification or regression models, performing causal analysis on observational data, engineering features for structured tabular datasets, or translating statistical findings into data-driven business decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
M&A strategy for acquiring companies or being acquired. Due diligence, valuation, integration, and deal structure. Use when evaluating acquisitions, preparing for acquisition, M&A due diligence, integration planning, or deal negotiation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy. Use when assessing technical debt, scaling engineering teams, evaluating technologies, making architecture decisions, establishing engineering metrics, or when user mentions CTO, tech debt, technical debt, team scaling, architecture decisions, technology evaluation, engineering metrics, DORA metrics, or technology strategy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover Google Cloud resource telemetry and effective Org Policies, evaluate brownfield workloads against sovereign data boundary and compliance standards (EU Data Boundary with Support, FedRAMP Moderate/High, DoD IL4/IL5, ITAR, CJIS, US/EU Regional Data Boundaries), and recommend the optimal Assured Workloads Framework. Use when asked to: "assess my environment for compliance", "which Assured Workloads framework should I use?", "check if my folder is ready for EU sovereignty", "evaluate compliance posture for folders/123 or projects/xyz", or "discover compliance gaps before deployment". Do NOT use for live mutating policy deployments, generating deep audit reports via Cloud Audit Manager, generating remediation scripts, or authoring custom Assured Workloads frameworks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author, validate, test, and deploy YARA-L 2.0 detection rules and evaluate end-to-end detection coverage gaps in Google SecOps. Use when writing new detection rules, tuning existing rules, validating syntax, testing logic against historical telemetry, or evaluating detection coverage against threat intelligence blogs, CVE disclosures, and Threat Detection Opportunities (TDOs) using synthetic UDM events and long-running coverage analysis. Don't use for alert triage (use secops-triage), deep forensic event reconstruction on infected hosts (use secops-investigate), or case management operations (use secops-cases).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to manage Google Cloud Workload Manager evaluations, rules, scanned resources, and validation results by using public client libraries and the REST API. Use when you need to inspect workload best-practice rules, create and run evaluations for Google Cloud general best practices, SAP, SQL Server, or custom organizational rules, review violations, export results to BigQuery, or automate Workload Manager through client libraries because no service-specific public CLI or MCP server is available. Don't use for general Google Compute Engine instance management, VPC configuration, or standard IAM auditing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates Google Cloud workloads for cost efficiency and FinOps alignment using the Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework Cost Optimization pillar. Use when the user asks to analyze Google Cloud spend, reduce cloud bills, rightsize resources (for example, Compute, GKE, Storage, Databases), evaluate discount options (for example, CUDs, SUDs, Spot VMs), or eliminate idle capacity. Do not use for standalone product pricing lookups or non-cost architecture design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automates the end-to-end detection engineering workflow in Google SecOps using MCP tools. Use when fetching threat intelligence from blogs, generating Threat Detection Opportunities (TDOs), simulating attacker behavior with synthetic UDM events, evaluating rule coverage, and deploying gap-closing rules. Don't use for standalone YARA-L 2.0 rule authoring/tuning (use secops-detection-engineering), threat hunting, or SOC investigation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides workflows to optimize BigQuery environments (capacity planning, editions), storage assets (partitioning, clustering, storage lifecycles, billing models), and SQL queries. Use when optimizing cost, modeling Edition migrations, rightsizing reservations, evaluating logical vs. physical storage, designing table partitioning/clustering, generating table DDL, migrating unpartitioned tables, managing partition expiration, optimizing individual SQL queries, or evaluating acceleration structures (search indexes, materialized views, BI Engine). Do not use for raw usage reporting (use bigquery-observability), query execution plan analysis, error troubleshooting, or diagnosing why a specific job was slow (use bigquery-troubleshooting).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Measures and improves the quality of AI models and agents on Google Cloud using the Eval Quality Flywheel methodology. Use when generating synthetic user scenarios, evaluating an agent or model, building an eval dataset, picking or writing evaluation metrics, analyzing failures, comparing results before and after a fix, or when guidance is needed on Agent Platform eval methodology — including dataset schema, LLM-as-judge scoring, and common failure causes. For fine-tuning, use agent-platform-tuning. For general production deployment, use agent-platform-deploy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。