本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

evaluating-threat-intelligence-platforms

Evaluates and selects Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) products based on organizational requirements including feed integration capability, STIX/TAXII support, workflow automation, analyst interface, and total cost of ownership. Use when conducting a TIP procurement, migrating between TIP solutions, or assessing whether the current TIP meets program maturity requirements. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, MISP, OpenCTI, Anomali, EclecticIQ, or TIP procurement decisions.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md7.3 KB
  • LICENSE11.0 KB
  • references/api-reference.md2.7 KB
  • scripts/agent.py9.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Evaluating Threat Intelligence Platforms

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Conducting a formal RFP or vendor evaluation for a TIP solution
  • Assessing whether the current TIP (e.g., MISP) needs to be replaced or augmented as the CTI program scales
  • Establishing evaluation criteria aligned to organizational maturity and budget

Do not use this skill for evaluating feed quality independently of the TIP — feed evaluation is a separate workflow focused on data quality rather than platform capabilities.

Prerequisites

  • Documented CTI program requirements: team size, feed sources, integration targets, use cases
  • Budget range and procurement timeline
  • Technical staff who will administer the platform (Python/API experience for open-source TIPs)
  • List of current and planned integrations (SIEM, SOAR, EDR, firewalls)

Workflow

Step 1: Define Evaluation Criteria

Structure requirements into mandatory (M) and desired (D) categories:

Core TIP Functions:

  • M: STIX 2.1 import/export with TAXII 2.1 server
  • M: REST API for automated IOC ingestion and export
  • M: Indicator deduplication and TTL management
  • M: TLP classification enforcement
  • D: Built-in MITRE ATT&CK integration and technique tagging
  • D: Graph visualization of indicator relationships
  • D: Workflow automation for analyst triage

Integrations:

  • M: SIEM integration (Splunk, Sentinel, QRadar) via syslog, API, or native connector
  • M: EDR integration for IOC push (CrowdStrike, Defender, SentinelOne)
  • D: SOAR integration (XSOAR, Splunk SOAR) for playbook triggers
  • D: Ticketing system (ServiceNow, Jira) for intelligence task tracking

Operational:

  • M: Role-based access control with TLP-aware data segregation
  • M: Audit logging for all analyst actions
  • D: Multi-tenancy for MSSP use cases

Step 2: Evaluate Major TIP Options

MISP (Open Source):

  • Cost: Free (self-hosted infrastructure cost only)
  • Strengths: Largest community, 250+ modules, extensive ISAC usage, STIX 2.0 native
  • Weaknesses: Requires dedicated admin, limited visualization, UI dated
  • Best for: Budget-constrained teams with technical staff; government/ISAC sharing programs

OpenCTI (Open Source):

  • Cost: Free (self-hosted); paid SaaS at ~$3,000–$15,000/year
  • Strengths: Native STIX 2.1, graph visualization, ATT&CK integration, modern API
  • Weaknesses: Resource-intensive deployment (Elasticsearch, MinIO required)
  • Best for: Teams wanting open source with modern UX; SOC/CTI integration focus

ThreatConnect (Commercial):

  • Cost: $50,000–$500,000/year depending on scale
  • Strengths: End-to-end CTI lifecycle, playbook automation, TC Exchange marketplace, analyst workflow
  • Weaknesses: High cost; complex implementation; best value at larger scale
  • Best for: Mature enterprise CTI programs; MSSPs; red team/blue team integration

Anomali ThreatStream (Commercial):

  • Cost: $30,000–$200,000/year
  • Strengths: Strong feed aggregation, Splunk-native integration, extensive pre-built connectors
  • Weaknesses: Graph visualization weaker than OpenCTI; UI refresh lagging
  • Best for: Splunk-heavy environments; teams prioritizing feed volume over analysis workflows

EclecticIQ Platform (Commercial):

  • Cost: $40,000–$300,000/year
  • Strengths: STIX 2.1 native, collaborative intelligence workbench, strong European customer base
  • Weaknesses: Smaller partner ecosystem than ThreatConnect
  • Best for: Teams with MITRE ATT&CK-centric workflows; EMEA-focused organizations

Step 3: Conduct Proof of Concept

Request 30-day PoC from finalists. Test:

  1. Feed onboarding: Can your top 5 feeds be ingested within 4 hours?
  2. SIEM integration: Can enriched IOCs push to your SIEM in <5 minutes?
  3. ATT&CK mapping: Can analysts tag indicators with ATT&CK techniques efficiently?
  4. Report generation: Can the platform produce a tactical IOC bulletin with one click?
  5. API performance: Can the REST API handle 10,000 indicator queries per day?

Step 4: Score and Select

Use weighted scoring matrix (weight each criterion by organizational priority):

Criterion                 Weight   Vendor A   Vendor B
STIX 2.1 compliance       20%      95         85
SIEM integration          25%      90         70
ATT&CK mapping            15%      85         95
Cost (inverse)            20%      60         90
UI/analyst experience     10%      80         75
Vendor support quality    10%      85         80
TOTAL                     100%     82.0       81.5

Step 5: Implementation and Onboarding Planning

Plan 90-day implementation:

  • Week 1–2: Infrastructure deployment (cloud or on-prem)
  • Week 3–4: Feed onboarding and deduplication tuning
  • Week 5–6: SIEM/SOAR integration and testing
  • Week 7–8: Analyst workflow configuration and training
  • Week 9–12: Operational validation and go-live

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
TIPThreat Intelligence Platform — software for collecting, processing, analyzing, and disseminating cyber threat intelligence
TAXII ServerComponent of a TIP that serves STIX bundles to consuming systems on request
TC ExchangeThreatConnect's commercial marketplace for pre-built feed integrations and app connectors
Multi-tenancyTIP capability to serve multiple organizational units or customers with isolated data environments
DeduplicationProcess of identifying and merging duplicate indicators within a TIP to reduce analyst noise

Tools & Systems

  • MISP: Open-source TIP used by 6,000+ organizations; strongest ISAC/government community integration
  • OpenCTI: Modern open-source TIP with native STIX 2.1 and graph-based analysis
  • ThreatConnect: Enterprise commercial TIP with lifecycle management and SOAR playbook integration
  • Anomali ThreatStream: Commercial TIP with strong Splunk ecosystem integration
  • EclecticIQ: Commercial TIP with ATT&CK-centric workflow design

Common Pitfalls

  • Selecting TIP before defining requirements: Technology selection before use case definition leads to expensive mismatches.
  • Underestimating administration burden: MISP and OpenCTI require dedicated admin time (minimum 0.25 FTE); budget accordingly.
  • Ignoring data migration costs: Moving historical intelligence from one TIP to another is costly and often impractical for legacy systems.
  • Not testing SIEM integration in PoC: TIP value depends heavily on downstream integration quality; always test SIEM/SOAR connectivity during evaluation.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Extract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Take over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3 to identify GenericAll, WriteDACL, and WriteOwner abuse paths

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Perform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

mukul975 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する