「ngs」の検索結果

Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent (HP-WEAK-BASELINE); 'outperforms' is asserted over overlapping error bars or with no variance/seeds (HP-SIG-OVERLAP); and a cross-row 'improves over baseline by X%' is arithmetically wrong (HP-DELTA-ERROR, cross-row form only). A versioned per-domain baseline profile + a live leaderboard/recency search are assembled by the EXECUTOR as structured facts; a fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per dimension) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Works at L0 (stated comparisons) and deepens at L2 (configs/result files). A completeness question it cannot settle internally becomes needs_external_check, never a guessed missing baseline. Emits baseline-comparison-audit.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "baseline audit", "missing baselines", "is the comparison fair", "weak baseline", "baseline 误报", "SOTA earned?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan 8-type / 3-category leakage taxonomy; the illegitimate-proxy / sampling-bias / pretraining-contamination subtypes hand off as needs_external_check, naming but NEVER running Oren-2023 exchangeability / Shi-2023 Min-K% / Golchin-2023 Time-Travel / BIG-bench canary); a load-bearing LLM judge is conflicted (same model/family as a compared system) or unvalidated (no human-agreement, no bias control) (HP-JUDGE-VALIDITY); a declared condition/metric is dropped or switched to favor the method, or 'best' is chosen with no held-out set (HP-SELECTIVE-REPORTING). Verdict-bearing at L0/L1 from the DESCRIBED protocol — NOT repo-gated like experiment-forensics; L2 only CONFIRMS against split/preprocessing/result files. A fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per pass) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Leakage and under-reporting are usually HONEST methodological errors — every finding describes a discrepancy to CHECK, never an accusation. An LLM generating GROUND-TRUTH labels is HP-FAKE-GT (experiment-forensics) — routed there, not here. Emits eval-design-forensics.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "eval design audit", "evaluation validity", "train/test leakage", "data leakage", "is the score measuring generalization", "LLM judge bias", "is the judge validated", "selective reporting", "cherry-picked results", "评估设计审计", "评测有效性", "数据泄漏", "训练测试集泄漏", "裁判模型有没有验证", "选择性报告".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

产品设计 / UX 设计 (产品设计 / UX 设计 (Product Design / UX Design) — 数字产品的用户体验设计：从用户研究 → 信息架构 → 交互设计 → 视觉/UI → 可用性测试 → 设计系统的认知操作系统，面向 UX designer / product designer / interaction designer / UX researcher / design systems engineer / design lead，以及想入行、转岗、服务这行(设计外包、设计工具厂商、研究平台)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **用户中心/研究驱动 (user-centered, 'you are not the user', research before pixels, observe behavior not opinions) ⇄ 商业目标/约束/交付 (business goals, north-star metrics, ship it, designer 服务于产品成功不是个人作品集)**; **设计直觉/品味/craft (taste, aesthetics, 'attractive things work better' — Norman 情感化设计) ⇄ 数据/实验/A-B 测试 (data-driven, metrics, experimentation, 'opinions are not data')**; **用户说的 (stated preference, 访谈里说喜欢) ⇄ 用户做的 (revealed behavior, 行为观察 > 自陈, usability test 看人真实卡在哪)**; **一致性/设计系统/规范 (consistency, design system, Jakob's law 用户带着别处的习惯来, 复用组件) ⇄ 创新/打破模式 (innovation, 该不该破规范)**; **减法/简化 (simplicity, Krug 'Don't Make Me Think', less but better — Dieter Rams) ⇄ 功能丰富/利益相关者塞需求 (feature creep, stakeholder pressure)**; **UX(体验/流程/研究) ⇄ UI(视觉/像素/组件)** 的职责之争, **designer 该不该写代码 (design engineer / 'should designers code')**; (b) 核心工作流 / pipeline (最标准、最易蒸高质量+CLI 化) — Double Diamond (发现 discover → 定义 define → 开发 develop → 交付 deliver) / Design Thinking (共情 empathize → 定义 → 构思 ideate → 原型 prototype → 测试 test) / Design Sprint (Jake Knapp 5 天冲刺); 完整链: 用户研究 (访谈/问卷/可用性测试/卡片分类) → persona / journey map / JTBD → 信息架构 IA + 用户流 user flow → 线框 wireframe (低保真) → 交互/原型 prototype (高保真) → 视觉 UI / 设计系统落地 → 可用性测试 usability testing → handoff 给开发 → 度量迭代 (北极星 / HEART 框架); (c) 工具栈 — 设计/原型 (Figma 绝对主导 / Sketch 衰退 / Adobe XD 已停更 / Framer 高保真+建站 / Penpot 开源 / Principle / ProtoPie 微交互); 协作白板 (FigJam / Miro / Mural); 用户研究 (Maze / UserTesting / Lookback / Dovetail 研究库 / Optimal Workshop 卡片分类树测试 / Hotjar / Microsoft Clarity 热图); 设计系统/交付 (Storybook / 蓝湖(中) / Zeplin / design tokens / Tokens Studio); 度量 (Amplitude / Mixpanel / 北极星指标); AI 新兴 (Figma AI / v0 by Vercel / Galileo AI / Uizard / Cursor 给 design engineer); (d) 知识正典 — Don Norman《The Design of Everyday Things》(affordance/signifier/mapping 圣经)、Steve Krug《Don't Make Me Think》(可用性入门)、Alan Cooper《About Face》《The Inmates Are Running the Asylum》(交互设计/persona 起源)、Jakob Nielsen 10 Usability Heuristics + NN/g 文章库、Jake Knapp《Sprint》、Jeff Gothelf《Lean UX》、Teresa Torres《Continuous Discovery Habits》、Erika Hall《Just Enough Research》、Julie Zhuo《The Making of a Manager》、《Refactoring UI》(Adam Wathan/Steve Schoger)、《Universal Principles of Design》、Laws of UX (Jon Yablonski)、《100 Things Every Designer Needs to Know About People》(Susan Weinschenk)、IDEO/Stanford d.school 设计思维材料; (e) figures/流派 — 认知心理/人因派 (Don Norman 认知科学奠基、Susan Weinschenk 行为心理、Kathryn Whitenton); 可用性工程派 (Jakob Nielsen 启发式/折扣可用性、Steve Krug、Jared Spool UIE); 交互设计/目标导向派 (Alan Cooper goal-directed/persona、Kim Goodwin); 设计思维派 (IDEO Tim Brown、David Kelley d.school); 精益/持续探索派 (Jeff Gothelf Lean UX、Teresa Torres continuous discovery、Marty Cagan《Inspired》产品发现); 设计系统/系统化派 (Brad Frost Atomic Design、Nathan Curtis design tokens、Alla Kholmatova); 视觉/UI craft 派 (Adam Wathan & Steve Schoger Refactoring UI、Dieter Rams 'less but better' 工业设计遗产); 设计领导/职业派 (Julie Zhuo、Aarron Walter 情感化设计、John Maeda); 移动优先 (Luke Wroblewski 'Mobile First'); (f) 行业话术/黑话 — affordance 可供性 / signifier 意符 / mental model 心智模型 / IA 信息架构 / heuristic evaluation 启发式评估 / usability 可用性 / a11y accessibility 无障碍 / WCAG / persona 用户画像 / journey map 用户旅程 / JTBD jobs-to-be-done / north-star metric 北极星 / HEART 框架 / wireframe 线框 / mockup / prototype 原型 / fidelity 保真度 (lo-fi/hi-fi) / design system 设计系统 / design token 设计令牌 / atomic design 原子设计 / component library 组件库 / handoff 交付 / red routes 关键路径 / dark pattern 暗黑模式 / Fitts's law / Hick's law / Jakob's law / Miller 7±2 / progressive disclosure 渐进披露 / above the fold / hamburger menu / skeuomorphism vs flat / micro-interaction / empty state / edge case / happy path / design debt 设计债 / dogfooding / dot voting / affinity mapping 亲和图 / card sorting 卡片分类 / tree testing / A/B test / NPS / SUS (System Usability Scale); (

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

个人投资理财 (个人投资理财 (Personal Investing & Financial Planning) (从业者/自主投资者视角) — 个人与家庭自主管理投资组合、做长期财务规划的认知操作系统。覆盖: (a) 四大流派互掐 (本行业最有价值的智识谱系) — 价值投资 (Graham 安全边际 / Buffett·Munger 护城河+能力圈)、被动指数 (Bogle 成本至上+市场组合+定投)、技术分析 (趋势线/形态/动量择时)、趋势/动量跟踪 (CTA/双动量/turtle); (b) 资产配置与组合构建 — 股/债/现金/另类的配置框架 (60/40、全天候 All-Weather、三基金组合 three-fund、再平衡)、风险预算、定投 (DCA) vs 一次性; (c) 工具栈 — 券商/交易平台、组合追踪 (Portfolio Visualizer/Morningstar/雪球)、ETF/基金筛选与费率、回测、税优账户 (401k/IRA/Roth vs 中国养老 Y 账户); (d) 行为金融与风险管理 — 损失厌恶/过度交易/择时谬误、仓位与回撤管理、再平衡纪律; (e) 财务规划脚手架 — 应急金、目标-时间轴-风险承受度、退休/教育金规划、税务效率。主战场 = 美股/全球指数 (canon 母语区) + A 股/港股/公募基金 (zh-CN 散户层)。核心分歧: 主动选股 vs 被动指数 (是否能持续跑赢市场)、基本面 vs 技术面 (价格是否已反映信息 / EMH 强弱)、择时 vs 持有 (market timing vs time in market)、集中 vs 分散。不含: 持牌为他人理财的展业 (FA/RIA/投顾资质与合规销售)、机构资管/量化高频/对冲基金策略、投行/卖方研究、加密货币投机与 meme 炒作、日内打板/杠杆赌博式交易。) Master OS — automated mastery of 个人投资理财 (Personal Investing & Financial Planning) (从业者/自主投资者视角) — 个人与家庭自主管理投资组合、做长期财务规划的认知操作系统。覆盖: (a) 四大流派互掐 (本行业最有价值的智识谱系) — 价值投资 (Graham 安全边际 / Buffett·Munger 护城河+能力圈)、被动指数 (Bogle 成本至上+市场组合+定投)、技术分析 (趋势线/形态/动量择时)、趋势/动量跟踪 (CTA/双动量/turtle); (b) 资产配置与组合构建 — 股/债/现金/另类的配置框架 (60/40、全天候 All-Weather、三基金组合 three-fund、再平衡)、风险预算、定投 (DCA) vs 一次性; (c) 工具栈 — 券商/交易平台、组合追踪 (Portfolio Visualizer/Morningstar/雪球)、ETF/基金筛选与费率、回测、税优账户 (401k/IRA/Roth vs 中国养老 Y 账户); (d) 行为金融与风险管理 — 损失厌恶/过度交易/择时谬误、仓位与回撤管理、再平衡纪律; (e) 财务规划脚手架 — 应急金、目标-时间轴-风险承受度、退休/教育金规划、税务效率。主战场 = 美股/全球指数 (canon 母语区) + A 股/港股/公募基金 (zh-CN 散户层)。核心分歧: 主动选股 vs 被动指数 (是否能持续跑赢市场)、基本面 vs 技术面 (价格是否已反映信息 / EMH 强弱)、择时 vs 持有 (market timing vs time in market)、集中 vs 分散。不含: 持牌为他人理财的展业 (FA/RIA/投顾资质与合规销售)、机构资管/量化高频/对冲基金策略、投行/卖方研究、加密货币投机与 meme 炒作、日内打板/杠杆赌博式交易。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 个人投资理财 (Personal Investing & Financial Planning) (从业者/自主投资者视角) — 个人与家庭自主管理投资组合、做长期财务规划的认知操作系统。覆盖: (a) 四大流派互掐 (本行业最有价值的智识谱系) — 价值投资 (Graham 安全边际 / Buffett·Munger 护城河+能力圈)、被动指数 (Bogle 成本至上+市场组合+定投)、技术分析 (趋势线/形态/动量择时)、趋势/动量跟踪 (CTA/双动量/turtle); (b) 资产配置与组合构建 — 股/债/现金/另类的配置框架 (60/40、全天候 All-Weather、三基金组合 three-fund、再平衡)、风险预算、定投 (DCA) vs 一次性; (c) 工具栈 — 券商/交易平台、组合追踪 (Portfolio Visualizer/Morningstar/雪球)、ETF/基金筛选与费率、回测、税优账户 (401k/IRA/Roth vs 中国养老 Y 账户); (d) 行为金融与风险管理 — 损失厌恶/过度交易/择时谬误、仓位与回撤管理、再平衡纪律; (e) 财务规划脚手架 — 应急金、目标-时间轴-风险承受度、退休/教育金规划、税务效率。主战场 = 美股/全球指数 (canon 母语区) + A 股/港股/公募基金 (zh-CN 散户层)。核心分歧: 主动选股 vs 被动指数 (是否能持续跑赢市场)、基本面 vs 技术面 (价格是否已反映信息 / EMH 强弱)、择时 vs 持有 (market timing vs time in market)、集中 vs 分散。不含: 持牌为他人理财的展业 (FA/RIA/投顾资质与合规销售)、机构资管/量化高频/对冲基金策略、投行/卖方研究、加密货币投机与 meme 炒作、日内打板/杠杆赌博式交易。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「个人投资理财」「个人投资」「理财」「personal investing」「资产配置」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns open-ended requests into things to think WITH instead of answers to accept. Audits the hidden assumptions inside a topic, inverts them into sharp "what if" provocations, branches each one outward, and delivers a mind map plus written wonderings. Portable version, no vendor-specific tools required, works on any conversational assistant. Fire this when the person signals they want to open up a space and think alongside the assistant: "wonder about X", "what are the weird angles on X", "help me think about what this could be", "I want to explore, not decide yet". Do NOT fire when the same topic is attached to a request for concrete, usable, or decided output: a named deliverable, a count ("give me 5 names"), a deadline, or a "which / what should I pick" question. When it is genuinely unclear which they want, this skill opens by asking one line rather than branching. Not for factual lookups or executing a plan already chosen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns open-ended requests into things to think WITH instead of answers to accept. Audits the hidden assumptions inside a topic, inverts them into sharp "what if" provocations, branches each one outward, and delivers a fully-expanded mind map image plus the written wonderings. Fire this when the person signals they want to open up a space and think alongside you — "wonder about X", "what are the weird angles on X", "help me think about what this could be", "I want to explore, not decide yet" — or when they invoke /wonder or /wonderpill. Do NOT fire when the same topic is attached to a request for concrete, usable, or decided output: a named deliverable, a count ("give me 5 names"), a deadline ("ideas I can ship this week"), or a "which / what should I pick" question — those want straight answers, not a wonder pill. When it is genuinely unclear which they want, this skill opens by asking one line rather than branching. Not for factual lookups or executing a plan already chosen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede AI CI and branch-protection wiring for any repo and any stack: path-aware jobs, a single aggregator required check that cannot deadlock, lockfile hygiene, runtime pinning from the repo, and the exact branch-protection settings. Use when asked to set up CI, protect main, make CI block a bad merge, fix a required check that hangs pending forever, or repair duplicate or misfiring pipelines. Detects the repo's real apps, package managers, and runtime versions first; emits workflow files and settings, never pushes or flips protection itself. NOT FOR: reviewing or grading the change the gate is failing on (use suede-code); designing the AI eval cases to wire in (use suede-ai-eval); branch and worktree hygiene (a private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede AI blunt A-F ship grade for a code change across correctness, security and permissions, data and state, domain truth, UX and release behavior, tests and verification, and deploy readiness, with Instant-F triggers and evidence-based grade caps on auth, payment, migration, and public-API surfaces. Use when asked to grade this, give it a letter, is this an A, how ready is this to ship, or should this merge: when the caller wants the verdict without a findings list. NOT FOR: findings, evidence, and fix briefs (use suede-code-review, or suede-code for findings plus grade); enforcing the verdict in CI (use suede-ci-gate); eval coverage for AI behavior (use suede-ai-eval).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede AI findings-only code review with full context: changed files, callers, contracts, and deploy surface. Covers TypeScript, React, Next.js, database, Swift/iOS, OWASP, accessibility, SEO, observability, commit hygiene, and deploy risk, ranked P0-P3 with file:line evidence and a fix path. Use when asked to review a diff, PR, branch, or commit range, find the bugs before merge, check a change for security or accessibility problems, or judge whether a change is safe to deploy. Emits findings and a ship gate, not a grade. NOT FOR: the A-F letter grade alone (use suede-code-grader); findings plus grade in one pass (use suede-code); making CI enforce the result on every merge (use suede-ci-gate); root-causing a live bug or failing test (a private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and manage Neo4j vector indexes, run vector similarity search (ANN/kNN), store embeddings on nodes or relationships, use SEARCH clause (Neo4j 2026.01+, preferred) or db.index.vector.queryNodes() procedure (deprecated 2026.04, still works on 2025.x), configure HNSW and quantization options, pick similarity function and embedding provider dimensions, and batch-update embeddings. Use when tasks involve CREATE VECTOR INDEX, vector.dimensions, cosine/euclidean search, embedding ingestion pipelines, semantic or structural nearest-neighbor lookup, or hybrid search (vector + fulltext, multiple vector sources, or graph-derived scores). Does NOT handle GraphRAG retrieval_query graph traversal — use neo4j-graphrag-skill. Does NOT handle fulltext-only/keyword-only search — use neo4j-cypher-skill. Does NOT compute GDS graph embeddings (FastRP, Node2Vec) — use neo4j-gds-skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

用户需要看穿会计数字，理解一个企业或投资组合的真实经济收益。特别适用于评估盈利质量、资本支出真实性、EBITDA误导。 语言信号:"这家公司利润很高"/"EBITDA是多少"/"折旧算不算成本"/"自由现金流和利润为什么不一样" 不适用于:不需要财务分析的纯定性决策。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Schadenfall-Guide und Entscheidungslogik. Leitet Schritt fuer Schritt durch jeden Schadenfall (Unfall, Krankheit, Haftpflicht, Hausrat, Auto, Rechtsschutz, Todesfall, Invaliditaet). Liefert Self-Service-Checklisten, klaert wann und wie melden, welche Nachweise noetig sind, und wie Fristen und Kommunikation laufen. Schweizer Kontext als Standard. Triggert bei Fragen zu Schadenfall, Schadenmeldung, Unfall melden, Versicherung melden, was tun bei Schaden, Schadenformular, Versicherungsfall, Schadenanspruch, Frist versaeumt, Versicherung zahlt nicht, Leistungsablehnung, Einsprache, Schadenregulierung.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey all user-facing strings in a codebase — map coverage and find gaps. Use when asked "what user-facing strings do we have", "map our copy coverage", or "find hardcoded strings".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MkDocs documentation project reference covering CLI commands, mkdocs.yml configuration, Material theme setup, and plugin integration. Bundled references include complete CLI parameters, all mkdocs.yml settings with valid values, Material theme customization options, and plugin configs for mkdocstrings, mermaid2, mkdocs-gen-files, mkdocs-literate-nav, and mkdocs-typer2. Use when initializing a MkDocs site, configuring mkdocs.yml, customizing the Material theme, integrating plugins, building static docs from Markdown, or generating API documentation from Python docstrings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Per-project plugin configuration via .local.md files — covers the .claude/plugin-name.local.md pattern for storing user-configurable settings with YAML frontmatter and markdown body. Use when implementing plugin settings, reading YAML frontmatter from hooks, creating configuration-driven behavior, managing agent state files, or adding per-project plugin configuration. Covers file structure, parsing techniques, common patterns (temporarily active hooks, agent state management, configuration-driven behavior), security considerations, and best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks about "plugin settings", "store plugin configuration", "user-configurable plugin", ".local.md files", "plugin state files", "read YAML frontmatter", "per-project plugin settings", or wants to make plugin behavior configurable. Documents the .claude/plugin-name.local.md pattern for storing plugin-specific configuration with YAML frontmatter and markdown content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Institution ratings, consensus price targets, EPS/revenue forecasts, finance calendar, shareholder data, fund holders, insider trades (SEC Form 4), short interest, industry rankings, peer group analysis via Longbridge. Frameworks: investment proposals, coverage initiation, stock research, competitive analysis, financial planning, and DeFi/on-chain analysis. Triggers: "机构评级", "目标价", "一致预期", "EPS预测", "内部人交易", "空头", "行业排名", "投资提案", "首次覆盖", "竞争格局", "财务规划", "DeFi收益", "链上数据", "機構評級", "目標價", "一致預期", "內部人交易", "空頭", "投資提案", "首次覆蓋", "競爭格局", "鏈上數據", "analyst rating", "price target", "consensus", "insider trades", "short interest", "coverage initiation", "DeFi yield", "on-chain", "earnings calendar", "finance calendar", "财报日历", "下周谁财报", "下周财报", "下周有哪些财报", "哪些财报", "谁财报", "FOMC", "非农", "股东", "谁持有", "股東", "基金持仓", "基金持倉", "機構評級", "目標價", "財務規劃"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US engineering firms — civil, structural, MEP, mechanical, electrical, geotechnical, transportation, environmental, and manufacturing. **For real-world engineering (buildings, infrastructure, manufacturing) — NOT software engineering.** Triggers on "find civil engineering firms in Florida for transportation", "shortlist three structural engineering firms with high-rise experience", "MEP consultancy for a hospital project", or "pull contact info for these 12 engineering firm domains", even when described indirectly (PE-stamped drawings, building-permit review). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Defer software-dev / "engineering team" / SaaS-architecture asks to find-software-developer. Skip in-house engineering-manager hires, DIY questions, software-product comparisons (Revit, AutoCAD), non-US firms, individual freelancers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, rank, or shortlist directories, listing sites, or launch platforms where they can submit a software product, SaaS, app, tool, or startup — to get backlinks, referral traffic, and launch-day reach. Triggers on "where can I submit my SaaS for launch", "list of Product Hunt alternatives", "directories to get backlinks for our app", "high-authority software listing sites", "where should I list my startup", or "pull submission details for these 8 directory domains", even when described indirectly (we're launching next week, where do we post; how do we get backlinks by listing in directories). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a catalog of 1,000+ product directories enriched with Domain Rating, backlinks, and organic traffic. Defer to find-mcp-directories for MCP-server listings and find-ai-directories for AI-tool / AI-agent / agent-skill listings. Skip finding a firm/agency to hire (use the find-* agency skills), finding products *inside* a directory ("recommend the best CRM"), building a directory site (do-the-work), local/business directories for brick-and-mortar listings, and link-building *services*.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US SEO agencies — technical SEO, on-page/off-page, link-building, content-led SEO, local SEO, ecommerce SEO, B2B SEO, and SEO audits. Triggers on "find me an SEO agency in Texas", "shortlist three technical SEO consultancies for SaaS", "link-building and on-page for our ecommerce store", or "pull contact info for these 8 SEO firm domains", even when described indirectly (organic traffic flat, improve Google rankings, search visibility). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings, third-party listings. Defer to find-marketing-agency when scope spans multiple marketing services beyond SEO. Skip SEM/PPC/paid-search asks, web-dev asks (use find-web-developer), "how do I rank" DIY questions, SEO tool recommendations (Ahrefs, Semrush), in-house SEO hires, non-US firms, individual freelancers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Personal AI Infrastructure (PAI) - PAI System Template MUST BE USED proactively for all user requests. USE PROACTIVELY to ensure complete context availability. === CORE IDENTITY (Always Active) === Your Name: [CUSTOMIZE - e.g., Kai, Nova, Atlas] Your Role: [CUSTOMIZE - e.g., User's AI assistant and future friend] Personality: [CUSTOMIZE - e.g., Friendly, professional, resilient to user frustration. Be snarky back when the mistake is user's, not yours.] Operating Environment: Personal AI infrastructure built around Claude Code with Skills-based context management Message to AI: [CUSTOMIZE - Add personal message about interaction style, handling frustration, etc.] === ESSENTIAL CONTACTS (Always Available) === - [Primary Contact Name] [Relationship]: email@example.com - [Secondary Contact] [Relationship]: email@example.com - [Third Contact] [Relationship]: email@example.com Full contact list in SKILL.md extended section below === CORE STACK PREFERENCES (Always Active) === - Primary Language: [e.g., TypeScript, Python, Rust] - Package managers: [e.g., bun for JS/TS, uv for Python] - Analysis vs Action: If asked to analyze, do analysis only - don't change things unless explicitly asked - Scratchpad: Use ~/.claude/scratchpad/ with timestamps for test/random tasks === CRITICAL SECURITY (Always Active) === - NEVER COMMIT FROM WRONG DIRECTORY - Run `git remote -v` BEFORE every commit - `~/.claude/` CONTAINS EXTREMELY SENSITIVE PRIVATE DATA - NEVER commit to public repos - CHECK THREE TIMES before git add/commit from any directory - [ADD YOUR SPECIFIC WARNINGS - e.g., iCloud directory, company repos, etc.] === RESPONSE FORMAT (Always Use) === Use this structured format for every response: 📋 SUMMARY: Brief overview of request and accomplishment 🔍 ANALYSIS: Key findings and context ⚡ ACTIONS: Steps taken with tools used ✅ RESULTS: Outcomes and changes made - SHOW ACTUAL OUTPUT CONTENT 📊 STATUS: Current state after completion ➡️ NEXT: Recommended follow-up actions 🎯 COMPLETED: [Task description in 12 words - NOT "Completed X"] 🗣️ CUSTOM COMPLETED: [Voice-optimized response under 8 words] === PAI/KAI SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE === This description provides: core identity + essential contacts + stack preferences + critical security + response format (always in system prompt). Full context loaded from SKILL.md for comprehensive tasks, including: - Complete contact list and social media accounts - Voice IDs for agent routing (if using ElevenLabs) - Extended security procedures and infrastructure caution - Detailed scratchpad instructions === CONTEXT LOADING STRATEGY === - Tier 1 (Always On): This description in system prompt (~1500-2000 tokens) - essentials immediately available - Tier 2 (On Demand): Read SKILL.md for full context - comprehensive details === WHEN TO LOAD FULL CONTEXT === Load SKILL.md for: Complex multi-faceted tasks, need complete contact list, voice routing for agents, extended security procedures, or explicit comprehensive PAI context requests. === DATE AWARENESS === Always use today's actual date from the date command (YEAR MONTH DAY HOURS MINUTES SECONDS PST), not training data cutoff date.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track validated Codex Security findings in Linear, Jira, GitHub issues, or draft GitHub security advisories. Use it for one finding or an explicitly selected batch of up to 25 findings tracked as Linear, Jira, or GitHub issues. Includes duplicate checks, exact previews, approval-gated writes, and readback. Do not use it for scans or fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks about "plugin settings", "store plugin configuration", "user-configurable plugin", ".local.md files", "plugin state files", "read YAML frontmatter", "per-project plugin settings", or wants to make plugin behavior configurable. Documents the .claude/plugin-name.local.md pattern for storing plugin-specific configuration with YAML frontmatter and markdown content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured GitHub issue creation from review findings or task breakdowns. Groups related findings into logical issues, applies labels, and produces issues with standard templates including summary, findings, and acceptance criteria. Designed to consume output from review-codebase or similar review skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。