「prose」の検索結果

Detects 55 AI writing patterns and rewrites text in five voice profiles so it reads like a specific human wrote it, with an optional 0-100 AI-tell score. Use when text sounds AI-generated or like a chatbot, when preparing a blog post, README, or LinkedIn post for publication, when auditing prose for AI tells, or when editing a Markdown file in place. Triggers on phrases like "humanize this", "make this sound less AI", "make this sound human", "remove AI tells", "does this read like ChatGPT", and "rewrite so it does not sound AI-generated". Pure Markdown, zero dependencies, no network calls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn vague or partially formed AI, computer-science, data-driven, and engineering-method research directions into evidence-grounded, falsifiable, paper-ready Research Idea Briefs through heuristic questioning, staged confirmation, literature positioning, novelty attack, and method-figure planning. Use when the user needs to clarify a research idea, formalize inputs/outputs/objectives/constraints, frame background and motivation, select 3-5 anchor papers, identify a defensible gap, derive 2-3 contributions, stress-test novelty, or design an input-to-output method framework and core-paper figure. Also trigger on requests such as 明确科研 idea、启发式梳理 idea、互动追问科研问题、梳理论文创新点、定义研究任务、找对标论文、把研究方向变成论文方案、画方法框架图. Do not use as the primary workflow for running experiments, exhaustive systematic reviews, drafting full manuscript sections, or polishing finished prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a complete, publication-grade research paper on a specific topic — produces 200+ real citations, 4–8 publication-grade figures, and 7 sections of substantive prose compiled to PDF in one pass. No skeleton stage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an agent is asked to draft, rewrite, edit, review, polish, copyedit, simplify, humanize, or create written prose, including creative writing, essays, posts, scripts, speeches, emails, documentation, product copy, and other style-sensitive text. Apply George Orwell's six rules and ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English as a plain-English discipline while preserving the user's intended meaning, audience, tone, and explicit constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write and ship a blog post for your project that reads like a human wrote it and pulls SEO traffic to your site. Use when a contributor wants to draft, edit, or publish a blog post, add a post to the site, write about the project for search/traction, or make an existing draft sound less like AI. Enforces the house voice (no em dashes), picks a non-cannibalizing angle, uses ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English for technical prose, wires the post into your site, and runs the humanizer pass before shipping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diátaxis-driven documentation for AI coding agents: write, improve, or audit tutorials, how-tos, reference, explanation, and developer docs (README, CONTRIBUTING, ADRs). Detects the docs stack; gates on the outline before writing prose; verifies every claim against the code before it ships. Triggers on "absolute docs", "write docs", "write a tutorial", "write a README", "document this", "improve this doc", "audit our docs".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refine a Stage2 ICML rebuttal draft into polished, reviewer-facing prose in the author's style; preserve factual grounding, optionally prepend a courteous opening phrase, and normalize tables/code/formulas into Markdown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Condense rebuttal prose into fewer words without changing the original meaning. Use when a response block, paragraph, or selected passage is too long but all technical content, citations, and commitments must stay intact. Supports academic English.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refine a Stage2 ICLR rebuttal draft into polished, reviewer-facing prose in the author's style; preserve factual grounding, optionally prepend a courteous opening phrase, and normalize tables/code/formulas into Markdown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refine a Stage2 ARR (ACL Rolling Review) rebuttal draft into polished, reviewer-facing prose in the author's style; preserve factual grounding, optionally prepend a courteous opening phrase, and normalize tables/code/formulas into Markdown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refine a Stage2 NeurIPS rebuttal draft into polished, reviewer-facing prose in the author's style; preserve factual grounding, optionally prepend a courteous opening phrase, and normalize tables/code/formulas into Markdown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove AI-generated writing patterns from rebuttal prose to make it sound natural, direct, and authentically human-authored. Use when a Stage 2 refined draft or Stage 4 follow-up response reads too formulaic, robotic, or "GPT-like". Supports academic English.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Acts as a director and previs supervisor for film, video, and AI filmmaking. Turns scripts, prose, briefs, or existing image and video assets into production deliverables — subtext breakdown, beat sheet, director's book, blocking and staging, shot list with coverage, keyframe and storyboard prompts, image-to-video motion prompts, sound and dialogue plans, edit timelines, continuity bibles, and QC repair notes. Carries genre playbooks, a controlled prompt lexicon, a coded failure-diagnosis manual, and capability-first adapters for current video and image models. Optionally applies one named director's style lens — Spielberg, Hitchcock, Kubrick, Kurosawa, Scorsese, Fellini, Bergman, Tarkovsky, Wong Kar-wai, Nolan, Villeneuve, Fincher, Refn, Bi Gan, Zhang Yimou, Hou Hsiao-hsien, Park Chan-wook, Malick, Michael Mann, Coen Brothers. Use for shot planning, blocking, staging, camera movement, visual continuity, storyboard and keyframe design, prompt repair, "in the style of X" direction, and any AI video workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refresh the data tables in optimal-blog.md from master.db. Checks the data for integrity problems FIRST, then runs the generator that picks per-language winners and splices every GEN-marked table, then reconciles the surrounding prose. Use after new experiment results land, or when the optimal-blog numbers are stale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The research-domain clarification skill — find underspecified items in a thesis spec.md (prose wrong_if, universe rows without rationale, missing budget/expiry/pins, ambiguous pillars), ask the human structured questions WITH options (max 5 per round), encode the answers back into spec.md's Clarifications section, and re-evaluate checklists/thesis-quality.md after every write (Q32 bidirectional maintenance).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit any Lattice SKILL.md for language compliance — removes rationale prose, converts soft language to imperatives, adds STOP: gates on hard rules, and cuts redundant repetition. Complements skill-review (which finds behavioral gaps) by fixing phrasing that causes agents to skip or underweight instructions at runtime. Use after writing or significantly changing any skill, or when the user says 'tighten this skill', 'clean up the language', 'make this more effective', 'reduce the bloat', 'tighten the language', or 'skill tighten'. Standalone — does not call other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MiniMax presents itself as a premium AI infrastructure brand through a striking duality — bold black-pill CTAs and stark white canvas for marketing, paired with vibrant gradient product cards (orange-red, magenta-pink, purple, blue) that turn each model release into a distinctive visual identity. The system uses DM Sans across all surfaces, employs an oversized 80px hero display, anchors major actions in deep near-black pills, and layers content density via a 3-column documentation grid with sidebar nav, prose body, and TOC. Coverage spans the marketing homepage, model showcase pages, developer documentation, and platform pricing surfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create evidence-aware, interactive visual explainers as self-contained offline HTML. Use when a user asks to explain a concept, repository module, engineering tradeoff, or incident with a diagram, walkthrough, ELI5 treatment, data/request trace, failure view, or teach-back. Do not use for a plain short answer, ordinary prose rewrite, generic website implementation, or unsupported claims presented as facts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove AI-generated patterns from QA reports, bug reports, test summaries, status updates, and quality communications. Detects and rewrites robotic test-result language, template-sounding status updates, inflated severity descriptions, and generic stakeholder reports — without inventing facts. Makes QA writing sound like a real engineer wrote it. Use when: "humanize report," "rewrite QA summary," "fix test report," "make this sound human," "clean up status update." Not for: general prose, blog, or marketing-copy cleanup — use the global humanizer skill. Not for: classifying or routing CI failures — use ai-bug-triage. Related: ai-bug-triage, qa-metrics, qa-dashboard, quality-postmortem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quickly extract a typed GPU-Wiki query intent from prose. Never inspect or query a knowledge store.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strip AI writing tells from Rove's user-facing prose — README, the docs/ pages that sync to docs.rove.run, landing copy, and release notes. Use when the user says "unslop", "洗一下文案", "这读起来像 AI 写的", or after drafting any user-facing page. Adapted for this repo from cursor/plugins pstack/skills/unslop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

De-slop pass for any text. Scans for the statistical fingerprints of AI writing (negative parallelism / "not X but Y", em-dash density, rule-of-three, false ranges, puffery vocabulary, uniform cadence, hedged both-sidesing), rewrites by meaning, then re-scans until the text is clean and sits in the right register for its genre: academic article, tweet, reddit post, email, blog, docs, marketing. Use when the user says "deslopify", "deslop", "de-slop this", "remove the AI tells", "humanize this", "make this not sound like AI", or invokes /deslopify. Also use before publishing any agent-drafted prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checkable-ish surface presentation signals a reviewer notices first — duplicate/near-identical tables, leftover pipeline/template strings, too-few or LLM-looking figures, and page-padding. AUXILIARY ONLY and weak by design: a deterministic pass (tools/check_presentation.py — dup-table + pipeline-artifact) plus a fresh cross-model GROSS-cases-only semantic pass (thin-float, LLM-figure, page-padding), every above-info finding span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json). The adjudicator CAPS everything at minor (SURFACE_ONLY_SKILLS + SURFACE_PATTERNS) — these contribute at most SOFT_FLAGS, never a HARD verdict — default false_positive_risk:high. NOTE: the pure AI writing-STYLE impressions (AI-flavor prose, defensive 'not-X-but-Y' hedging, narrative-arc, jargon-stuffing, invented codenames) MOVED to the zero-verdict-weight AIS track — for those use skills/ai-style-impressions, NOT this. Emits presentation-signals.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "presentation signals", "surface check", "duplicate tables", "排版信号".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

影视编剧 (Scriptwriting / Screenwriting) — 为电影 / 电视 / 流媒体剧集写戏剧蓝本的从业者认知操作系统: 决定「讲什么故事、人物是谁为何转变、场景如何被戏剧化、主题为何重要」的学科 —— 区别于导演 (调度 / 视觉实现)、制片 (融资 / 排期)、小说 (无格式 / 场景 / 视觉动作约束)。覆盖 (a) 故事与结构理论 (亚里士多德《诗学》情节 / 人物 / 思想 + 突转 peripeteia / 发现 anagnorisis + 净化 catharsis; Syd Field 范式 / 三幕 / 情节点; Freytag 金字塔; Egri 前提; McKee《故事》掌控性理念 / 鸿沟 / 价值正负转变 / 激励事件 / 渐进式复杂化; Truby《故事剖析》22 步 + 道德论证; Vogler/Campbell 英雄之旅; Blake Snyder《救猫咪》15 拍节拍表; Dan Harmon 故事环; John Yorke 五幕《进入森林》; Frank Daniel 八序列法; 起承转合东亚戏剧结构), (b) 人物 (想要 vs 需要 / 外在目标 vs 内在缺失, 人物弧光 正 / 负 / 平, flaw-wound-ghost 创伤背景, 主动 vs 被动主角的能动性, Egri 三维人物 生理 / 社会 / 心理, 反派是主角的镜子, 群像与关系网, 人物在压力下的选择中显形), (c) 对白 (潜台词 subtext, 对白即动作与冲突而非信息, 避免太直白 on the nose, 人物独特声口, 信息植入 exposition, Mamet/Sorkin 意图-阻碍式对白, 展示而非告知, 中文剧台词工艺), (d) 场景与序列工艺 (场景是有目标 / 冲突 / 转折的微型故事, 场景价值充能与转折点, 晚进早出, 八序列法, set piece, 转场, 场景头 / 动作行 / 括号提示 格式工艺), (e) 主题与前提 (掌控性理念 / 前提, 主题是被戏剧化的论证而非说教, 道德论证 Truby, 主题统一性, 这到底在讲什么), (f) 类型 (类型惯例是对观众的承诺, Snyder 10 类故事, 颠覆 vs 尊重套路, 类型片 vs 文艺片, 中国类型 主旋律 / 古装 / 年代 / 悬疑 / 甜宠 / 都市 / 军旅 / 历史正剧), (g) 格式与工业流程 (好莱坞剧本格式与 Final Draft, logline 一句话故事, treatment 故事大纲, 节拍表, 分场 / 分集大纲, spec 原创剧本 vs 委托, pitch, coverage, 美剧编剧室与 showrunner 制; 中国 大纲→人物小传→分集大纲→剧本, 长剧集 40 集结构, 网络电影 / 网大, 分账剧, 平台定制剧, 微短剧竖屏短剧), (h) 改稿与开发 (写作就是改写, 改稿 / 润色 / 推倒重写, 处理意见 / 改稿意见, 片方与平台 notes, 杀死你的宝贝, 围读, 开发地狱), (i) 改编 (IP改编 小说 / 漫画 / 游戏改编, 忠于精神而非字句, 压缩, 中国网文 IP 热), (j) 中国影视编剧产业现实 (审查 / 广电总局约束, 备案 / 立项, 平台定制剧 爱优腾芒, 分账, 编剧维权 署名权 / 欠薪 / 枪手, 注水剧, 流量 + 大IP 资本逻辑 vs 原创工艺, 导演中心制 vs 编剧话语权), (k) 编剧职业与工艺生涯 (spec vs 委托, 编剧 vs 编审 / 策划, 单兵 vs 编剧室, 在开发链条中的位置, WGA 与署名仲裁规范, 入行, 中国编剧地位与权益)。跨 电影 / 美剧流媒体 / 中国电影与长剧集。不含 导演 / 摄影 / 制片 / 融资 / 表演 / 电影理论批评为终点 / 泛小说写作 / 纪录片 / 新闻 —— 本 skill 是「戏剧化编剧」工艺: 故事 / 人物 / 场景 / 对白 / 主题 / 结构 / 格式 与围绕它们的产业流程。 (Scriptwriting / Screenwriting for film & TV (影视编剧) — the cognitive operating system of practitioners who write the dramatic blueprint of films, television, and streaming series: the discipline of deciding WHAT story is told, WHO the characters are and why they change, HOW the scenes are dramatized, and WHY it matters thematically — distinct from directing (staging/visual realization), producing (financing/scheduling), and prose fiction (which has no format/scene/visual-action constraints). Covers (a) story & structure theory (Aristotle's Poetics — plot/character/thought + reversal peripeteia/recognition anagnorisis + catharsis; Syd Field's paradigm/three-act/plot points; Freytag's pyramid; Lajos Egri's premise; Robert McKee's Story — controlling idea/the gap/value charge/inciting incident/progressive complications; John Truby's 22 steps & moral argument; Christopher Vogler/Joseph Campbell hero's journey; Blake Snyder's Save the Cat 15-beat sheet; Dan Harmon's story circle; John Yorke's 5-act Into the Woods; Frank Daniel's 8-sequence method; 起承转合 East-Asian dramatic structure), (b) character (want vs need/external goal vs internal lack, character arc positive/negative/flat, 人物弧光, flaw-wound-ghost backstory, agency active vs passive protagonist, Egri's 3-dimensional character physiology/sociology/psychology, antagonist as the protagonist's mirror, ensemble & relationship webs, character revealed through choice under pressure), (c) dialogue (subtext 潜台词, dialogue as action & conflict not information, 'on the nose' avoidance, distinct character voice, exposition handling, Mamet/Sorkin intention-obstacle dialogue, show-don't-tell, 台词 craft in Chinese drama), (d) scene & sequence craft (scene as a mini-story with goal/conflict/turn, scene value charge & turning point, enter-late-leave-early, the 8-sequence method, set pieces, transitions, slug line/action line/parenthetical format craft), (e) theme & premise (controlling idea/premise/前提, theme as dramatized argument not message, moral argument Truby, thematic unity, 'what is this really about'), (f) genre (genre conventions as audience promise, Snyder's 10 story types, subverting vs honoring tropes, 类型片 vs 文艺片, Chinese genres 主旋律/古装/年代/悬疑/甜宠/都市/军旅/历史正剧), (g) format & industry process (Holly

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。