「risk assessment」の検索結果

Product Requirements Document writing - PRD templates, MoSCoW prioritization, user personas, competitive analysis, feature specs, acceptance criteria, risk assessment

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate detailed implementation plans for complex tasks. Creates comprehensive strategic plans in Markdown format with objectives, step-by-step implementation tasks using checkbox format, verification criteria, risk assessments, and alternative approaches. All plans MUST be validated using the included validation script. Use when users need thorough analysis and structured planning before implementation, when breaking down complex features into actionable steps, or when they explicitly ask for a plan, roadmap, or strategy. Strictly planning-focused with no code modifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch weather data for construction scheduling. Historical data, forecasts, and risk assessment for outdoor work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates which SaaS tools can be replaced with AI agents. Takes a list of current SaaS subscriptions with costs, assesses replacement feasibility, estimates build vs buy economics, identifies Claude+MCP alternatives, and generates a comprehensive replacement plan with priority matrix, ROI analysis, implementation timeline, and risk assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured deal assessment using MEDDIC, BANT. Risk scoring, required evidence by stage, red flag detection, coaching points.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Uses 1M context window to ingest an entire codebase and output a file-by-file migration plan. Supports JS to TS, React class to hooks, framework migrations, and more. Generates migration-plan.md with file inventory, dependency graph, migration order, file-by-file changes, estimated effort, and risk assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Uses Cowork-style multi-step analysis to process deal room documents -- contracts, financials, org charts. Outputs risk assessment, term comparison, key findings, and negotiation recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts pre-DPIA threshold screening to determine whether a full Data Protection Impact Assessment is required under GDPR Article 35. Applies the EDPB WP248rev.01 nine-criteria test, national supervisory authority blacklists, and organisational risk appetite to produce a documented screening decision. Keywords: threshold screening, DPIA trigger, pre-DPIA, WP248, Article 35(1), blacklist, screening decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements HIPAA breach notification requirements under 45 CFR §164.400-414. Covers individual notification within 60 days, HHS reporting thresholds (500+ immediate, under 500 annual), state attorney general notification, media notification for 500+ in a state, and breach risk assessment. Keywords: HIPAA breach notification, HHS reporting, OCR breach portal, individual notice, state attorney general.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements HIPAA de-identification methods under 45 CFR §164.514(a)-(b). Covers expert determination method and safe harbor method with 18 identifiers removal, re-identification risk assessment, limited dataset requirements, and data use agreements. Keywords: HIPAA de-identification, safe harbor, expert determination, 18 identifiers, limited dataset, PHI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes breach notification under HIPAA Breach Notification Rule (45 CFR 164.400-414). Covers 60-day individual notification, HHS/OCR reporting for breaches of 500+ individuals (immediate) and under 500 (annual log), state attorney general notification, media notification for 500+ in a single state, and breach risk assessment using the four-factor test. Keywords: HIPAA, breach notification, PHI, HHS, OCR, covered entity, business associate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete guide to LINDDUN privacy threat modeling methodology covering seven threat categories: Linking, Identifying, Non-repudiation, Detecting, Data Disclosure, Unawareness, and Non-compliance. Includes DFD-based analysis, threat tree catalogs, mitigation mapping to privacy design patterns, and step-by-step process.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes the GDPR Article 33 mandatory breach notification to the supervisory authority within 72 hours of becoming aware of a personal data breach. Covers required notification content, deadline calculation, risk assessment for notification threshold, and DPO involvement. Keywords: GDPR, Article 33, breach notification, 72 hours, supervisory authority, DPO, EDPB.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a GitHub issue and produce a structured implementation plan. Fetches issue details, explores the codebase, identifies affected layers (UI, BLoC, Repository, Client), and outputs a step-by-step plan with files to modify, testing strategy, and risk assessment. Works for bugs, features, and tasks. Invoke with /plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate vendors with comparison matrices, TCO analysis, risk assessment, reference check templates, and negotiation strategies

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build business cases with cost-benefit analysis, ROI calculations, risk assessment, implementation timeline, and stakeholder analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Environmental Health Scientist. Use when a task calls for Environmental Health Scientist judgment. Reasons from source–pathway–receptor chains, classical vs Berkson exposure error, and tiered biomonitoring (NHANES/BEs); runs STROBE-grade epi, IRIS/OEHHA/ATSDR risk assessment, AERMOD/CALPUFF, EPHT/EJSCREEN, and HIA while treating surrogate misclassification, mobility bias, and detection≠harm as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate email addresses for deliverability, check reputation scores, verify MX records, and assess email-sending safety. Covers deliverability checks, reputation scoring, bounce risk assessment, and bulk validation for outreach campaign preparation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix-and-Flip Analysis — purchase price, ARV, rehab budget breakdown, holding costs, selling costs, profit margin, ROI, timeline, and risk assessment with Flip Score (0-100)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Documents rollback procedures before making risky changes. Covers what's changing, verification steps, rollback procedures, and blast radius assessment. Use before database migrations, breaking API changes, infrastructure or DNS changes, large dependency upgrades, or any change where undo is not obvious.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform threat modeling for a system or feature. Use when a senior developer needs security risk assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured planning mode for AI agents working on coding and development tasks. Produces a comprehensive plan BEFORE any code is written or changed, including task decomposition, architecture decisions, risk assessment, and approval gates. Use this skill whenever the user says "/plan", "plan mode", "plan first", "think before coding", "make a plan", or asks the agent to plan before executing. Also trigger when the user describes a complex multi-step development task and would clearly benefit from structured planning before implementation — especially for tasks involving new features, refactors, migrations, infrastructure changes, or multi-file edits. When in doubt, plan. A few minutes of planning prevents hours of rework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate a startup idea with competitor analysis, market signals, and risk assessment. Be brutally honest. Use when the user wants to test if an idea is worth building.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。