「table」の検索結果

Mastery of AI image generation across the full spectrum: Midjourney for aesthetic perfection, Flux for prompt adherence, DALL-E 3 for concept clarity, Stable Diffusion for control, and Imagen 3 for photorealism. This skill transforms text into visual reality at the speed of thought. We've moved beyond "AI can make pictures" to "AI is the fastest concept artist, product photographer, and visual designer ever created." The skill isn't just prompting—it's understanding how each model thinks, what makes images work, and how to systematically produce exactly what you envision. The best AI image generators have internalized composition, lighting, color theory, and style—not by studying art, but by generating thousands of images and learning what works. They're visual directors who happen to work in text. Use when "AI image, generate image, Midjourney, DALL-E, Flux, Stable Diffusion, Imagen, text to image, AI art, AI photo, AI illustration, AI visual, AI graphics, generate picture, ai-image, midjourney, dall-e, flux, stable-diffusion, imagen, generation, text-to-image, visual, art" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checkable-ish surface presentation signals a reviewer notices first — duplicate/near-identical tables, leftover pipeline/template strings, too-few or LLM-looking figures, and page-padding. AUXILIARY ONLY and weak by design: a deterministic pass (tools/check_presentation.py — dup-table + pipeline-artifact) plus a fresh cross-model GROSS-cases-only semantic pass (thin-float, LLM-figure, page-padding), every above-info finding span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json). The adjudicator CAPS everything at minor (SURFACE_ONLY_SKILLS + SURFACE_PATTERNS) — these contribute at most SOFT_FLAGS, never a HARD verdict — default false_positive_risk:high. NOTE: the pure AI writing-STYLE impressions (AI-flavor prose, defensive 'not-X-but-Y' hedging, narrative-arc, jargon-stuffing, invented codenames) MOVED to the zero-verdict-weight AIS track — for those use skills/ai-style-impressions, NOT this. Emits presentation-signals.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "presentation signals", "surface check", "duplicate tables", "排版信号".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

德州扑克策略 (德州扑克策略 (Texas Hold'em) — solver/GTO 时代的无限注德州扑克竞技打法，牌手/职业视角。覆盖: (a) 理论两极 — GTO 博弈论均衡 (不可剥削的基线策略) vs Exploitative 剥削打法 (针对对手漏洞偏离均衡最大化 EV)，以及二者的实战取舍; (b) solver 时代工作流 — PioSOLVER/GTO Wizard 跑解、范围构建、节点锁定 (node-locking) 做剥削、用 HUD+数据库 (Hold'em Manager/PokerTracker/Hand2Note) 复盘找漏洞 (leak finding); (c) 牌型分层 — 现金局 (cash game) vs 锦标赛 (MTT) 的根本差异，后者叠加 ICM (独立筹码模型) 与跳台/泡沫期博弈; (d) 核心概念栈 — 范围 (range)/权益 (equity)/EV/位置 (position)/翻前开池与 3-bet/4-bet/翻后下注理论 (c-bet、极化 vs 浓缩范围、MDF 最小防守频率、阻断牌 blockers、超池下注 overbet)、SPR、底池赔率; (e) 元层 — 资金管理 (bankroll management)、桌位选择 (table selection)、方差与心态 (mental game/tilt 控制)、抽水 (rake) 与场次选择对长期赢率 (winrate, bb/100) 的影响; (f) 智识演进 — 从 Sklansky 古典手牌价值 → Janda/Tipton 博弈论 → solver 普及 → GTO Wizard 民主化求解 → AI 超人 (Libratus/Pluribus) 对人类策略的反哺。学派分歧: GTO 派 vs 剥削派、现金局 vs 锦标赛、理论自上而下 vs 牌局自下而上、solver 纯学院派 vs 实战感觉派。不含: 线下牌场运营/发牌荷官、博彩合规与赌场管理、扑克之外的牌类 (桥牌/斗地主)、纯概率赌博 (老虎机/轮盘)。) Master OS — automated mastery of 德州扑克策略 (Texas Hold'em) — solver/GTO 时代的无限注德州扑克竞技打法，牌手/职业视角。覆盖: (a) 理论两极 — GTO 博弈论均衡 (不可剥削的基线策略) vs Exploitative 剥削打法 (针对对手漏洞偏离均衡最大化 EV)，以及二者的实战取舍; (b) solver 时代工作流 — PioSOLVER/GTO Wizard 跑解、范围构建、节点锁定 (node-locking) 做剥削、用 HUD+数据库 (Hold'em Manager/PokerTracker/Hand2Note) 复盘找漏洞 (leak finding); (c) 牌型分层 — 现金局 (cash game) vs 锦标赛 (MTT) 的根本差异，后者叠加 ICM (独立筹码模型) 与跳台/泡沫期博弈; (d) 核心概念栈 — 范围 (range)/权益 (equity)/EV/位置 (position)/翻前开池与 3-bet/4-bet/翻后下注理论 (c-bet、极化 vs 浓缩范围、MDF 最小防守频率、阻断牌 blockers、超池下注 overbet)、SPR、底池赔率; (e) 元层 — 资金管理 (bankroll management)、桌位选择 (table selection)、方差与心态 (mental game/tilt 控制)、抽水 (rake) 与场次选择对长期赢率 (winrate, bb/100) 的影响; (f) 智识演进 — 从 Sklansky 古典手牌价值 → Janda/Tipton 博弈论 → solver 普及 → GTO Wizard 民主化求解 → AI 超人 (Libratus/Pluribus) 对人类策略的反哺。学派分歧: GTO 派 vs 剥削派、现金局 vs 锦标赛、理论自上而下 vs 牌局自下而上、solver 纯学院派 vs 实战感觉派。不含: 线下牌场运营/发牌荷官、博彩合规与赌场管理、扑克之外的牌类 (桥牌/斗地主)、纯概率赌博 (老虎机/轮盘)。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 德州扑克策略 (Texas Hold'em) — solver/GTO 时代的无限注德州扑克竞技打法，牌手/职业视角。覆盖: (a) 理论两极 — GTO 博弈论均衡 (不可剥削的基线策略) vs Exploitative 剥削打法 (针对对手漏洞偏离均衡最大化 EV)，以及二者的实战取舍; (b) solver 时代工作流 — PioSOLVER/GTO Wizard 跑解、范围构建、节点锁定 (node-locking) 做剥削、用 HUD+数据库 (Hold'em Manager/PokerTracker/Hand2Note) 复盘找漏洞 (leak finding); (c) 牌型分层 — 现金局 (cash game) vs 锦标赛 (MTT) 的根本差异，后者叠加 ICM (独立筹码模型) 与跳台/泡沫期博弈; (d) 核心概念栈 — 范围 (range)/权益 (equity)/EV/位置 (position)/翻前开池与 3-bet/4-bet/翻后下注理论 (c-bet、极化 vs 浓缩范围、MDF 最小防守频率、阻断牌 blockers、超池下注 overbet)、SPR、底池赔率; (e) 元层 — 资金管理 (bankroll management)、桌位选择 (table selection)、方差与心态 (mental game/tilt 控制)、抽水 (rake) 与场次选择对长期赢率 (winrate, bb/100) 的影响; (f) 智识演进 — 从 Sklansky 古典手牌价值 → Janda/Tipton 博弈论 → solver 普及 → GTO Wizard 民主化求解 → AI 超人 (Libratus/Pluribus) 对人类策略的反哺。学派分歧: GTO 派 vs 剥削派、现金局 vs 锦标赛、理论自上而下 vs 牌局自下而上、solver 纯学院派 vs 实战感觉派。不含: 线下牌场运营/发牌荷官、博彩合规与赌场管理、扑克之外的牌类 (桥牌/斗地主)、纯概率赌博 (老虎机/轮盘)。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「德州扑克」「德扑」「Texas Hold'em」「poker strategy」「扑克策略」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a user-facing changelog for the next stable release. Reads git log between the last stable tag and HEAD, categorizes changes, and outputs formatted release notes. Use before triggering a stable release. Takes the version as an optional argument (for example v0.0.6).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding or changing tuning values, items, enemies, abilities or levels - put them in the engine's data assets (ScriptableObject, Resource, DataAsset/DataTable, JSON/RON) with validation and stable IDs, keep runtime state out of shared data, inject services instead of singletons, and test data invariants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check the health of a data table/asset using Monte Carlo. Activates on "how is table X", "check health of X", "is X healthy", "status of X", "check on X table", or any health/status question about a data asset.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage pinned tags and commit SHAs for GitHub Actions security, resolving mutable tags to immutable commit references. Use when the task involves `Unpinned tag for a non-immutable Action`, `pin GitHub Action to commit SHA`, `resolve git tag to SHA`, or `GitHub Actions security hardening`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs end-stage QA on a finished figure and table set. Checks callouts, numbering, and cross-references, whether numbers in the text match the exhibits, self-contained captions and statistical notes, accessibility and production quality, and links to the SI and replication package. Values that could only be read off an image are marked for author verification rather than estimated. Use when preparing a submission. Design guidance during drafting belongs to figures and tables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Browserable is an open-source, self-hostable browser automation library built for AI agents. This skill turns Browserable into a repeatable workflow for navigation, form filling, extraction, and browser-based task execution with local control instead of a hosted black box.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage pinned tags and commit SHAs for GitHub Actions security, resolving mutable tags to immutable commit references. Use when the task involves `Unpinned tag for a non-immutable Action`, `pin GitHub Action to commit SHA`, `resolve git tag to SHA`, or `GitHub Actions security hardening`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Used when the user asks to "create a PowerPoint", "generate PPTX slides", "make a PowerPoint presentation", "build a .pptx deck", "create editable slides", "PptxGenJS", "editable presentation", "corporate deck", "slide deck for sharing", or when the output format is PPTX for any presentation task. Also triggers on "export to PowerPoint", "pitch deck PPTX", "offline presentation", or when the context implies an editable/corporate format. Generates OOXML-compliant .pptx files with PptxGenJS, precise layout, text measurement, and overlap validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create acceptable use policies for AI tools within organizations. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-acceptable-use-policy related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create acceptable use policies. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with acceptable-use-policy related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to create, edit, rebuild, or refine editable diagrams in `.drawio` / diagrams.net format, especially for academic figures such as system architecture diagrams, technical roadmaps, workflow diagrams, method pipelines, module relationship diagrams, and experiment flowcharts. Use this skill when the user wants publication-ready outputs with both an editable source file and a PNG export, or when an existing figure image needs to be rebuilt into a clean editable academic-style diagram.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to hunt in the organisation's own Microsoft Sentinel workspace — sweep the logs for IOC hits (IP, domain, hash, URL, account), hunt behavioural TTPs from MITRE ATT&CK techniques, run KQL against live data, or check which tables the workspace actually ingests. Discovers available tables first and only generates KQL for tables that verifiably exist, so hunts adapt to each environment's connectors. Commonly chained by the /*-investigation skills to answer "were we exposed?". Reads $SENTINEL_TENANT_ID, $SENTINEL_CLIENT_ID, $SENTINEL_CLIENT_SECRET, $SENTINEL_WORKSPACE_ID. Read-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

命理圆桌会——多流派命理师（盲派、子平格局派、调候派、民国新派）对同一八字命盘进行圆桌论命：多视角总评、交叉质疑、可证伪断语、逐轮记分复盘。用户提到八字、四柱、命盘分析、批命、论流年大运、盲派/格局/调候论命、"多个命理师讨论"、验证式论命时使用本 skill；即使用户只是贴出一张八字排盘求分析，也应启用（可用轻量模式）。Multi-school Chinese BaZi (Four Pillars) roundtable reading: several fortune-tellers from rival schools analyze the same natal chart, cross-examine each other, issue falsifiable predictions, and keep score. Use whenever the user asks about BaZi, Four Pillars, Chinese astrology chart reading, or destiny analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TanStack Table v8 patterns - useReactTable, column definitions, sorting, filtering, pagination, row selection, virtual scrolling, server-side data

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce the monthly "Stablecoin Pulse" 2-page PDF for a partner team (default Polaris) from Pharos API data plus X and web research, explaining why supply, chains, and pegs moved. Use at month end or when asked for a monthly stablecoin trends/pulse report; not for the daily digest or Telegram pulse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify CoinGecko identity, discover missing stablecoin chain coverage, or populate independently verified deployments only when requested. Use for `geckoId` audits and `contracts[]` work in the Pharos stablecoin registry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opt-in DI architecture using Reflex for Unity 6+. Covers container setup, scoping, injection, command pattern, update management, and class taxonomy. Use when ProjectConfig.yaml -> architecture_pattern is "di-first", or when the user asks about dependency injection, inversion of control, service architecture, or testable game code. Triggers on "set up DI", "add dependency injection", "create a service", "wire up dependencies", "make this testable", "decouple these systems", "add a command pattern", "cross-feature communication", or architecture discussions involving testability, decoupling, and service layers. Only activates when ProjectConfig.yaml -> architecture_pattern is "di-first". For simpler projects, use uw-scriptable-object-arch instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate ScriptableObject-based systems including data containers, event channels, and runtime sets. Use when creating game data (weapons, enemies, items, abilities), cross-system events, or live object tracking. Triggers on requests like "create weapon data", "add an event system", "make a runtime set", "decouple these systems", "create item database", "add a damage event", "track active enemies", "create a config SO", "add game settings data", or any task involving ScriptableObject data containers, event-driven communication, or runtime object tracking. Reads ProjectConfig.yaml -> architecture_pattern to determine SO-first vs DI-first context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Dining Room Attendant or Bartender Helper — triaging which table to bus first during a rush, sequencing a table reset, setting bar-back par levels and restock timing, writing or triaging a side-work checklist, or diagnosing why table turn time or bar throughput has slipped.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate publication-ready methods sections, figure legends, supplementary tables, and data availability statements from ENCODE analysis provenance. Implements the scientific documentation standards requiring complete metadata reporting. Use when the user needs to write methods, generate figure legends, create supplementary tables, draft data availability statements, compile tool citations, or auto-generate any publication text from their ENCODE analysis. Trigger on: methods section, figure legend, supplementary table, data availability, tool citations, publication writing, manuscript, write methods, methods draft, write up, write-up, paper writing, reproducible methods.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。