2,107 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Expert at handling file uploads and cloud storage. Covers S3, Cloudflare R2, presigned URLs, multipart uploads, and image optimization. Knows how to handle large files without blocking. Use when: file upload, S3, R2, presigned URL, multipart.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user provides multiple options and wants a specific 16-minds (MBTI) personality to make the decision in that personality's judgment style. Triggers on Japanese phrases like 「ENTJで決めて」「INFPならどっち選ぶ」「INTJとして判断して」, English equivalents like "decide as ESTJ" / "which would ENFP pick", or 16-minds commands with a `--decide` flag. Requires both a personality and 2+ options to be present or extractable from the request.
Create a construction plan for a multi-step engineering task that requires multiple PRs or a phased approach. Produces a self-contained plan file with dependency graph, review gates, and step-by-step execution instructions for coding agents. TRIGGER when: user requests a plan, blueprint, or roadmap for a complex task, or describes work that clearly needs multiple PRs. DO NOT TRIGGER when: task is completable in a single PR or fewer than 3 tool calls, user asks to modify/update an existing plan, user says "just do it", or user asks for code review/audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Busabase-backed App-in-Skill control-panel/workspace for a deal analyst to model revenue-based-financing (RBF) deals for SME businesses (retail/F&B chain stores). Use when the user invokes $kelly-revshare-simulator or /kelly-revshare-simulator, wants to model a revenue-share or merchant-cash-advance deal, project cash flow and repayment, compute a Cash-Flow Payout Multiple, effective annualized merchant cost, or compare/underwrite multiple financing scenarios. Pure deterministic math, no external calls, no real trading/payment side effects. Scenario create/edit/delete and the underwriting decision are direct writes made by the analyst, not a review/approval queue.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate reading large or multiple files to the `bulk-read` command, which sends the files to a cheaper reader model and returns only its answer. Use when a question needs the content of a file over about 350 lines or of several files at once, when a PreToolUse guard denied an unbounded read, or when the user says "bulk read", "一括読み込み", or "まとめて読んで". Do NOT use for files you are about to edit, for subtle correctness reasoning such as concurrency bugs, or for short files that fit a bounded read.
Building a Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) involves deploying and integrating multiple CTI tools into a unified system for collecting, analyzing, enriching, and disseminating threat intelligence. T
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement a task N ways in parallel and pick the best. Spawns multiple subagents in isolated worktrees, evaluates all candidates, and applies the winner. Use when asked to "best of n", "try multiple approaches", "parallel implementations", "/best-of-n", or "/bon".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Solve a hard problem by trying multiple approaches in parallel using isolated git worktrees. Each attempt runs in its own branch, and the best solution is selected. Use for complex refactors, tricky bugs, or architectural decisions where multiple strategies could work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence; Storey q-value with pi0 estimation; local FDR; independent filtering Bourgon 2010; covariate-weighted FDR via IHW Ignatiadis 2016), plus family-wise error control (Bonferroni, Holm) and the GWAS genome-wide threshold. Covers the FDR-versus-FWER choice as the discovery-versus-confirmatory distinction, the dependence assumptions behind BH (PRDS) versus BY, pi0 estimation, the independent-filtering and false-coverage-rate traps, and reproducibility ranking via IDR (Li 2011). Use when correcting p-values from genome-wide tests, choosing between BH/BY/q-value/Bonferroni, setting an FDR threshold, applying IHW or independent filtering, or interpreting q-values. For confirmatory trials with few pre-specified endpoints (closed testing, graphical/gatekeeping), see clinical-biostatistics/multiplicity-graphical.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Meta-analysis / evidence synthesis — pool effect sizes across studies (odds ratios, risk ratios, hazard ratios, mean differences, correlations, GWAS betas) with fixed- or random-effects models, quantify heterogeneity (Q, I², τ²), and build a forest plot. Use when you have results from MULTIPLE studies and need a single pooled estimate, or to synthesize evidence from a systematic review / multiple GWAS / replicated experiments. Handles the error-prone effect-size + standard-error preparation (converting OR/HR/CI, two-group means±SD, proportions, and correlations into the (effect, SE) the pooling step needs).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements missing-data sensitivity analyses for confirmatory clinical trials including MMRM under MAR (with Kenward-Roger correction), reference-based multiple imputation (J2R, CR, CIR, LMCF per Carpenter-Roger 2013), Permutt delta-adjustment / tipping-point analysis, pattern-mixture identifying restrictions (CCMV, NCMV, ACMV), and the Cro vs Bartlett variance debate. Use when handling missing primary or secondary endpoint data in regulatory submissions following NRC 2010 and ICH E9(R1).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end clinical trial analysis workflow from CDISC SDTM/ADaM loading through ICH E9(R1) estimand-driven primary analysis to CONSORT 2025 regulatory-compliant reporting. Covers data preparation, FDA 2023 marginal vs conditional logistic regression, categorical tests with Boschloo, modern HTE/subgroup methods, missing-data sensitivity (MMRM, reference-based MI, Permutt tipping point), graphical multiplicity (Bretz-Maurer), survival analysis (Cox/RMST/competing risks) when applicable, and Table 1. Use when performing a complete analysis of clinical trial data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Windows アプリ開発 (WinUI 3 / Windows App SDK) のコントロール API リファレンス。 Microsoft.UI.Xaml.Controls。Button, CheckBox, RadioButtons, ToggleSwitch, Slider, TextBox, RichEditBox, AutoSuggestBox, NumberBox, ListView, GridView, ItemsView, ItemsRepeater, TreeView, ComboBox, NavigationView, TabView, Frame, SplitView, BreadcrumbBar, ContentDialog, Flyout, CommandBar, TeachingTip, InfoBar, MediaPlayerElement, WebView2, CalendarView, DatePicker, ColorPicker, TitleBar。
NVIDIA CUDA GPU 並列コンピューティングリファレンス。 CUDA C++ / CUDA Python, kernel, nvcc, Unified Memory, CUDA Graphs, Cooperative Groups, Driver API, マルチ GPU。 PTX ISA 命令セット, state space, MMA 命令。 Blackwell チューニング, Streaming Multiprocessor, NVLink。 CUTLASS / CuTe DSL / CuTe C++ GEMM, Tensor Core, tcgen05, Operator API, nsight-compute, compute-sanitizer。
Chakra UI v3 (React コンポーネントライブラリ) リファレンス。 別名: Chakra, chakra, chakra-ui。 コンポーネント (Button, Input, Modal, Drawer, Toast, Menu, Tabs, Tooltip 等)、 レイアウト、フォーム、オーバーレイ、チャート、テーマ、レシピ、 スタイルプロップ、レスポンシブ、ダークモード、Chakra UI Pro ブロック。
MAGI System v2 — AoT 分解 + MELCHIOR/BALTHASAR/CASPAR 合議 + gabriel adversarial probe による 構造化意思決定フレームワーク。判断ポイント 2+ / 影響レイヤー 3+ / 選択肢 3+ で使用。 Use when facing complex decisions with multiple trade-offs or architectural choices.
MAGI System v2 — AoT 分解 + MELCHIOR/BALTHASAR/CASPAR 合議 + lam-harness:gabriel adversarial probe による 構造化意思決定フレームワーク。判断ポイント 2+ / 影響レイヤー 3+ / 選択肢 3+ で使用。 Use when facing complex decisions with multiple trade-offs or architectural choices.
Loads, converts, and manipulates Hi-C contact matrices in cooler format (.cool/.mcool/.scool) and Juicer .hic, using cooler (Python + CLI), hic2cool, and hictk. Covers the single-resolution mcool URI (file.mcool::/resolutions/<bp>), the load-bearing divisive-vs-multiplicative weight-naming rule (KR/VC/VC_SQRT auto-divisive vs cooler's multiplicative weight), what survives .hic<->.cool conversion (FRAG matrices and norm vectors do not), raw-vs-balanced coarsening, the .pairs upper-triangle/chromsize-order contract, and chrom-naming/bin-table provenance. Use when loading a cooler, converting .hic to .mcool, selecting a resolution, building a cooler from pairs or a matrix, coarsening/zoomifying, importing Juicer norm vectors, or debugging all-NaN balanced matrices and chr1-vs-1 empty fetches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence; Storey q-value with pi0 estimation; local FDR; independent filtering Bourgon 2010; covariate-weighted FDR via IHW Ignatiadis 2016), plus family-wise error control (Bonferroni, Holm) and the GWAS genome-wide threshold. Covers the FDR-versus-FWER choice as the discovery-versus-confirmatory distinction, the dependence assumptions behind BH (PRDS) versus BY, pi0 estimation, the independent-filtering and false-coverage-rate traps, and reproducibility ranking via IDR (Li 2011). Use when correcting p-values from genome-wide tests, choosing between BH/BY/q-value/Bonferroni, setting an FDR threshold, applying IHW or independent filtering, or interpreting q-values. For confirmatory trials with few pre-specified endpoints (closed testing, graphical/gatekeeping), see clinical-biostatistics/multiplicity-graphical.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements missing-data sensitivity analyses for confirmatory clinical trials including MMRM under MAR (with Kenward-Roger correction), reference-based multiple imputation (J2R, CR, CIR, LMCF per Carpenter-Roger 2013), Permutt delta-adjustment / tipping-point analysis, pattern-mixture identifying restrictions (CCMV, NCMV, ACMV), and the Cro vs Bartlett variance debate. Use when handling missing primary or secondary endpoint data in regulatory submissions following NRC 2010 and ICH E9(R1).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform multiple sequence alignment using MAFFT, MUSCLE5, ClustalOmega, or T-Coffee. Guides tool and algorithm selection based on dataset size, sequence divergence, and downstream application. Use when aligning three or more homologous sequences for phylogenetics, conservation analysis, or evolutionary studies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parse and analyze multiple sequence alignments using Biopython. Extract sequences, identify conserved regions, analyze gaps, work with annotations, and manipulate alignment data for downstream analysis. Use when parsing or manipulating multiple sequence alignments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route user requests to the right skill, decompose complex work into parallel subagents, and manage project phase transitions. Load when the user asks "what should I do next", "which skill should I use", "orchestrate this", "run the full workflow", "split this into parallel tasks", or when a complex request spans multiple skills. Also triggers on "coordinate agents", "parallel execution", "task decomposition", "agent workflow", "what phase am I in", or when the user gives a broad instruction that requires multiple skills in sequence. This is the project's brain — it decides what runs, when, and whether to parallelise.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。