2,504 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Creates and registers hooks for the Claude Code framework. Handles pre/post tool execution, validation, memory, and session hooks. Use when new validation, safety, or automation hooks are needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates commit messages against Conventional Commits specification using programmatic validation. Replaces the git-conventional-commit-messages text file with a tool that provides instant feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and build runnable iOS UI mockups in SwiftUI, including UI direction, multiple visual or interaction variants, realistic sample data, state switching, Xcode Previews, and Simulator validation. Use when the user wants to explore what an iOS screen should look like, compare SwiftUI UI ideas, create a clickable native prototype, validate an app flow before production implementation, or asks for a SwiftUI mock, iOS mockup, native prototype, 画面モック, UI案, SwiftUIで動くモック, or 実際に触れるiOSモック.
5つの専門エージェントがディスカッション型で競合のビジネスモデル・機能・価格・弱点を網羅的に分析し、 差別化ポイントと参入戦略を導出するスキル。 エージェント同士が対話・批判し合いながら調査し、ca-data-critic がライブモデレーターとして矛盾を検出・収束を判定する。 Phase 1 で競合プロファイル・レビュー・機能をディスカッション型で調査し、 Phase 2 でポジショニング戦略家が統合。 Gate 1（中間合意形成）→ Gate 2（最終検証 + Independent Validation + Devil's Advocate）の2段階ゲートで品質を担保。 Use when: 競合を分析したい、差別化ポイントを見つけたい、 市場のプレイヤーを調べたい、ポジショニングを考えたい。 Triggers: "競合分析", "competitive analysis", "競合調査", "差別化", "ポジショニング", "competitor", "競合", "市場プレイヤー", "ライバル調査", "competitive landscape"
Review a data analysis for quality, correctness, and reproducibility. Covers data quality assessment, assumption checking, model validation, data leakage detection, and reproducibility verification. Use when reviewing a colleague's analysis before publication, validating an ML pipeline before production deployment, auditing a report for regulatory or business decision-making, or performing a second-analyst review in a regulated environment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage change control for validated computerized systems. Covers change request triage (emergency, standard, minor), impact assessment on validated state, revalidation scope determination, approval workflows, implementation tracking, and post-change verification. Use when a validated system requires a software upgrade, patch, or configuration change; when infrastructure changes affect validated systems; when a CAPA requires system modification; or when emergency changes need expedited approval and retrospective documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design serialization schemas using JSON Schema, Protocol Buffer definitions, or Apache Avro. Covers schema versioning, backwards compatibility, validation rules, and evolution strategies for long-lived data formats. Use when defining a new API contract or data interchange format, adding fields to an existing schema without breaking consumers, migrating between schema versions, choosing between schema systems, or documenting data validation rules for automated enforcement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Vue 3 form patterns: native v-model, vee-validate + zod (most common), VueUse helpers, defineModel for custom inputs, controlled vs uncontrolled, field arrays, multi-step wizards. Use this skill to: - Wire vee-validate with a validation schema (zod / yup). - Build custom form components with defineModel (Vue 3.4+). - Implement multi-step forms. - Handle async validation. - Integrate forms with TanStack Query mutations or Pinia actions. Do NOT use this skill for: - General SFC conventions (see vue-conventions). - State management (see vue-state-management). - Routing (see vue-routing). - Testing forms (see vue-testing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
React Server Components vs Client Components in Next.js: the boundary discipline, "use client" / "use server" directives, Server Actions, what serializes across the boundary, common pitfalls. Use this skill to: - Decide whether a component should be RSC or Client. - Push the "use client" boundary as deep as possible. - Implement Server Actions correctly (auth, validation, revalidation). - Compose RSC and Client components without breaking the model. - Pass data across the boundary safely. Do NOT use this skill for: - General Next.js conventions (see nextjs-conventions). - Specific data-fetching APIs and caching (see nextjs-data-fetching). - Routing (see nextjs-routing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TypeScript discipline for any JavaScript/TypeScript project (frontend + backend): strict mode, type design, generics, narrowing, error types, module resolution, tsconfig hygiene. Apply when the project has `tsconfig.json` and `typescript` in devDependencies. Stack-agnostic — referenced by every JS/TS framework plugin in the marketplace. Use this skill to: - Write types that catch bugs at compile time, not runtime. - Use generics, conditional types, and discriminated unions correctly. - Avoid `any`, `unknown`, and unsafe casts. - Match the project's tsconfig strictness level. - Type third-party libraries (with @types/* or declaration files). Do NOT use this skill for: - Plain JavaScript projects (no tsconfig.json). - Framework-specific type idioms (React component props, Vue defineProps, Angular signals — those live in framework plugins' own conventions skills). - tRPC/Zod runtime-validation specifics — handled by validation libs at the boundary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ASP.NET Core web framework conventions: Minimal API vs MVC controllers, Program.cs composition, DI lifetimes (Scoped/Singleton/Transient), Options pattern with IOptions<T>, middleware ordering (HTTPS redirect → routing → authentication → authorization), model binding and validation (FluentValidation / DataAnnotations), ProblemDetails error handling, structured logging with ILogger<T>, configuration layering (appsettings.json + environment variables + User Secrets), and health checks. Works alongside csharp-foundation:csharp-conventions and aspnet-core-plugin:efcore-patterns. Use this skill to: - Compose Program.cs correctly — register services, configure middleware in the right order, map endpoints. - Apply the Options pattern to avoid passing raw IConfiguration into services. - Write Minimal API endpoint groups with typed results and authorization. - Handle cross-cutting errors uniformly with ProblemDetails. - Configure structured logging and health checks for production readiness. Do NOT use this skill for: - EF Core entity configuration and migrations — see aspnet-core-plugin:efcore-patterns. - C# language idioms — see csharp-foundation:csharp-conventions. - Testing — see csharp-foundation:dotnet-testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Select, run, and report proportional Proto UI validation for a completed change. Use before review, handoff, commit, or pull request updates, and after resolving validation failures. Cover focused evidence first, then affected graph, types, docs, packaging, consumers, release, or repository checks according to risk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and manage topic-specific project workspaces for validation, investigation, PoC, comparison, or workstreams, including meeting notes in an existing project. Use for a project workspace, cost comparison workspace, or project meeting notes. Triggers on プロジェクトワークスペース, 検証フォルダ, PoC ワークスペース, トピック別作業フォルダ, プロジェクトの議事メモ. Not for ongoing customer account operations or book manuscripts.
Auto-activates when managing agent-to-agent communication for validation failures and recursive fix cycles between validation specialists and main agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrates the full law interpretation pipeline: MvT research, machine_readable generation with validation/BDD testing, and reverse validation. Invokes /law-mvt-research, /law-generate, and /law-reverse-validate sequentially. Use this skill proactively when: user wants to make a law executable, add machine_readable sections, or mentions "interpret" in the context of a Dutch law YAML file. Activate automatically when user opens a corpus YAML file without machine_readable sections and wants to make it executable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect security assessment. Covers the full attack surface: redirect_uri validation bypass (path traversal, open redirect chains, subdomain confusion, URL parsing tricks, parameter pollution, response mode switching), missing/broken state parameter CSRF, PKCE downgrade and absent-challenge attacks, implicit grant token leakage (Referer, browser history, XSS fragment theft), authorization code injection, scope escalation, client confusion attacks, mutable-claims account takeover (iss+sub confusion, email-keyed identity merging), pre-account takeover via unverified registration, OpenID Connect dynamic client registration SSRF (logo_uri, jwks_uri, sector_identifier_uri, request_uri), nonce replay, ID token validation failures, Device Code phishing flow, mobile custom URI scheme hijacking, refresh token persistence, token introspection enumeration, consent screen clickjacking, host header injection, and cross-IdP mix-up attacks. Uses KOAuth, jwt_tool, nuclei oauth templates, and manual http(action="request", ...) payloads. Every technique includes actual request payloads and verification logic. Chains from /pentester or /api-security when OAuth endpoints are discovered. Chains into /web-exploit for open redirect, XSS, and SSRF chaining. Chains into /post-exploit when full account takeover is achieved. Chains into /credential-audit when access tokens or refresh tokens are recovered.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Zod schema validation patterns for TypeScript - schema definitions, type inference, refinements, transforms, discriminated unions
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 4 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Checks every URL in the evidence data lake for HTTP liveness — catches dead links (404, 403, timeout, connection errors) before evidence is ingested into the registry. Use this skill when running the full /ev-pipeline, asked to "validate links", "check evidence URLs", "run link validation", "find dead links in the data lake", "check HTTP status of evidence sources", or "verify evidence links still work". Wraps validate_sources.py as a temporary coexistence URL-health shim.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Record, compose, publish, serve, and review short desktop validation video proofs for Pulp UX/test-harness work. Use when the user asks to "show me it working", record a validation video, prove a click/interaction, share a local proof link, attach a video to a review issue, or compare an implemented UI against source material. Covers macOS desktop capture, Remotion proof composition, attachment budgets, local/Tailscale serving, and review closure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Production-grade TypeScript reference for React & Next.js frontend development. Covers type narrowing, component Props, generic hooks, discriminated unions, as const, satisfies, Zod validation, TanStack Query, server/client boundaries, forms, state management, performance, accessibility, debugging, and code review. Use when the user works with TypeScript in React or Next.js: type errors, Props design, generics, API typing, SSR/CSR boundaries, hydration issues, form validation, state management, performance, or code review. Also use for "how should I type this?", "why does this type error happen?", or any architectural decision involving TypeScript in a frontend context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose whether an LLM classifier's validation-gate failure is GOLD-BOUND before spending on prompt revision or model changes. Use when: (1) a scoring pipeline over-predicts a label (precision low, recall high) and a prompt clarification is proposed to tighten it, (2) a pilot/validation gate fails and the fix candidates are prompt edits, (3) inter-rater agreement on the weak label was already low (κ < ~0.6). Core check: if gold POSITIVES share the exact feature the revision would exclude, no prompt can pass a gold-scored gate — recall craters while precision barely moves. Also documents the verified surgical-pilot design (single-section diff, tune/holdout split, pre-registered gate, perturbation check on untouched sections).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when authoring or reviewing frontend unit, component, or light integration tests close to UI code, including React Testing Library, Vue Test Utils, hooks/composables, props/emits, callbacks, accessible queries, user-event interactions, mocks, loading/error/empty states, and regression coverage. For layer planning, real-browser journeys, or existing validation failures, choose the matching testing or validation workflow first; Chinese triggers include component testing, Component unit testing, unit testing, lightweight integration testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a biomedical/bioengineering engineer — running a design control phase (inputs, outputs, verification, validation) for a medical device, scoring a Design FMEA and deciding whether a failure mode needs mitigation, planning a human factors/usability validation study, building a design traceability matrix, or writing a design verification or risk-mitigation report. Distinct from a regulatory-affairs-specialist (owns the submission/clearance process, not the engineering itself) and from a clinical-data-manager/biostatistician (trial data and analysis, not device design).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover and characterize regulatory elements (enhancers, promoters, silencers, insulators, super-enhancers) using ENCODE data and the cCRE catalog. Use when the user wants to find candidate regulatory elements, identify active enhancers in a tissue, map promoter states, classify chromatin states with ChromHMM, identify super-enhancers with ROSE, understand the functional validation hierarchy (CRISPR > MPRA > reporter), or characterize non-coding genomic regions. Covers the full workflow from ENCODE cCRE lookup through chromatin state segmentation to functional validation and enhancer-gene linkage. Use this skill for ANY regulatory element discovery, classification, or characterization task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。