「view」の検索結果

Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan or design doc and is about to start coding — to catch architecture issues before implementation. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "tech review", "technical review", "plan engineering review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Locate CEconItemView::operator= in CS2 server.dll / libserver.so via IDA Pro MCP and emit a fresh, minimal-unique signature or offset for the WeaponPaints gamedata entry "CEconItemView::operator=" (symbol CEconItemView_operator=). Copy-assignment operator. Shortlist via call sites in weapon-give/refresh paths that copy an existing CEconItemView into another (this-pointer copy of definition index, seed, wear, attribute list and item ID fields — a field-by-field copy, not a memcpy). Trigger: CEconItemView_operator=, CEconItemView::operator=

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare for Anthropic-specific technical interviews covering Constitutional AI, RLHF, interpretability, scaling laws, MCP, agentic systems, and AI safety. Activate on "anthropic interview", "constitutional AI prep", "alignment interview", "safety interview", "RLHF opinion", "interpretability prep", "anthropic technical". NOT for general ML interview prep, system design interviews, coding challenges, or behavioral interview practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

コードレビューの指摘を実際のコードや対応環境と照らし合わせ、妥当性を確認します。不明点の整理、根拠を示した返答、修正ごとのテストまで進めるスキルです。

• 曖昧なレビュー指摘を整理したいとき
• 提案された変更の互換性確認
• 追加機能が使われているか調べたいとき

MCP設定を読み、承認後も取得するコードが変わり得るパッケージ参照を確認するスキル。サーバーを実行せず、npm・Python・Dockerの指定を分類します。

• MCP設定を承認前に確認したいとき
• latestタグや版の範囲指定の確認
• CIへの再現可能な設定チェックの追加

Swiftのactorで共有データへのアクセスを管理し、メモリ内キャッシュとJSONファイル保存を組み合わせて、同時アクセス時のデータ競合を避ける保存処理を設計するスキル。

• iOS・macOSアプリのローカル保存
• オフライン中心のアプリの保存層設計
• ロックによる同期処理を置き換えたいとき

予測市場や取引エージェントの処理を、規約・データ品質・秘密情報・プライバシー・取引実行の観点で点検し、問題点と必要な対策を整理するスキル。

• 取引サービスの認証を加える前の確認
• 資産情報とAPIキーの扱いの点検
• 市場データの品質と出典表示の確認

公開前の文章やコードを二つの独立したエージェントが同じ基準で審査し、両方の合格まで修正と再審査を繰り返し、上限を超えたら人へ判断を引き継ぐスキル。

• 公開前に文章の事実関係を確認したいとき
• 顧客向け文章とブランドルールの照合
• 本番配布前に独立した審査を加えたいとき

学術・技術文献を検索し、選定基準に沿って比較・統合するスキルです。検索履歴や除外理由を残し、根拠の強さと引用を確認したレビューにまとめます。

• 研究テーマの全体像を把握したいとき
• 検索手順を記録した文献レビュー
• 研究結果の矛盾や未解決課題の整理

Flutter/Dartのコードを、状態管理ライブラリごとの慣習に沿ってレビューします。画面構成や非同期処理から、性能・テスト・アクセシビリティ・安全性まで点検します。

• Flutterアプリの公開前レビュー
• 状態管理の設計を確認したいとき
• 不要な画面再構築を調べたいとき

Orchestrates a GitHub PR review loop by delegating triage and implementation to dedicated sub-agents, then repeating until actionable review items are cleared. Use when the user says “address PR review”, “triage review comments”, or “iterate until review is clean”.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs the job-search pipeline. Adds jobs from a link or pasted posting, keeps stages and dates accurate, sets follow-ups, runs a weekly review (stale applications, next actions, funnel stats), records the exact resume version sent, and drafts networking, LinkedIn, referral, recruiter-reply, follow-up, thank-you, status-check, expedite and withdrawal messages without sending them. Use when the user says "add this job to my tracker", "I applied", "log my interview", "I got rejected", "I was ghosted", "log my offer", "track my applications", "do my weekly review", "what should I follow up on", "write a thank-you note", "message this recruiter", "ask for a referral", "withdraw my application", or wants a job-search spreadsheet. Works with a Markdown/CSV tracker or Reactive Resume MCP tools. Not for resume work (resume-tailor, resume-bullet-writer, resume-content-guide), interview prep or practice (interview-prep, mock-interview), or judging, negotiating, accepting or declining an offer (offer-negotiation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Watches what customers are saying in public and in private, then does something about it. Aggregates Google, Yelp, and Facebook reviews alongside disputes, tickets, and email into themes backed by verbatim quotes; drafts a reply to every review in the owner's own voice for approval; spots customers who have gone quiet or look likely to leave; and drafts win-back offers for the ones worth keeping. With Shopify connected, order and fulfillment patterns become a sentiment signal too. Works from pasted or exported reviews when nothing is connected. Use this whenever the owner asks about reviews, ratings, reputation, complaints, or repeat business — including "what are people saying about us," "did we get any bad reviews," "how do I respond to this one-star," "our rating dropped," "which customers have gone quiet," "who hasn't ordered in a while," "how do I win them back," or "are customers happy."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create structured interview plans with competency-based questions and scorecards. Trigger with "interview plan for", "interview questions for", "how should we interview", "scorecard for", or when the user is preparing to interview candidates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "design interview processes", "create hiring pipelines", "calibrate interview loops", "generate interview questions", "design competency matrices", "analyze interviewer bias", "create scoring rubrics", "build question banks", or "optimize hiring systems". Use for designing role-specific interview loops, competency assessments, and hiring calibration systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Boot, reopen, update, or reset OpenWork PR previews. Discover script worlds; choose preview-desktop (app only), preview-den (Den only), preview-full (Den plus desktop), or preview-app-web locally, on a private Daytona URL, or on Freestyle for hands-on testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this over-engineered", "simplify review", or invokes /ponytail-review. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Daily interview-scheduling sweep for {{projectName}}. Reads {{greenhouse_pipeline}} for candidates ready to schedule and each one's interview plan, checks {{interviewer_calendars}} for panel availability, and drafts a candidate slot proposal plus a calendar invite per interviewer to {{coordinator_review_inbox}}. Never sends a proposal or invite and never makes a hiring decision; a coordinator confirms and sends everything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review an existing verdaccio/verdaccio pull request end to end — description, diff, review threads, CI, labels, changeset, release-line coverage — verify the findings, and report them; optionally fix them on the PR branch when asked. Use when given a PR number or URL to review, re-review, or "review and fix".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Repeatedly reviews using a secondary Codex agent, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says "auto review loop", "review until it passes", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get a deep critical review of research from Claude via claude-review MCP. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get a deep critical review of research from Gemini via gemini-review MCP. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get a deep critical review of research from an external reviewer backend (Codex or manual). Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。