「what」の検索結果

Use when ONE specific piece of content needs a brief before anyone writes — placement, angle plus the source insight behind it, key message, three hook options, CTA, format, brand voice reference, visual direction, and distribution. Trigger on 'content brief', 'brief for this post', 'brief a writer', 'what angle should this take', 'brief for the LinkedIn post', 'give the freelancer something to work from'. Also use when the user has a topic and no idea what to actually say about it. Not for — the month schedule of what posts when, see `01-content-calendar-global`; the finished caption text, see `37-social-caption-global`; a spoken video script, see `04-script-video-global`; the image spec, see `42-image-brief-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the next period content plan must be built from last period DATA — keep and replicate winners, cut losers, at most two new hypotheses, a 70/20/10 mix, a four-week overview, and an owner per slot. Trigger on 'next content plan', 'content plan for next month', 'plan from the audit', 'what should we post next quarter', 'scale what worked', 'plan content using the numbers'. Also use when a report just landed and the user asks what to do with it. Not for — auditing the past period first, see `39-content-audit-global`; turning the plan into a dated calendar, see `01-content-calendar-global`; the next period ADS plan, see `57-next-ads-plan-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your launch lead. Builds a dated, step-by-step launch plan: a cheap real-world test first (a waitlist, a pre-sale or a pop-up with a real price, so real buyers confirm what the simulated panel said), then the countdown to opening day with owners and deadlines, the launch-day run sheet, and the first 30 days of what to measure and what to change. Use when the user says "how do I launch", "launch plan", "when can I open", "launch checklist", "go live", or "soft open".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your operations manager. Works out how the business actually runs on day one: suppliers and what they cost, who works when, the step-by-step routines for opening, serving or shipping and closing, the tools to run it, the licences and permits to check, and a risk register with what to do when each thing goes wrong. Feeds real costs back to the CFO. Use when the user says "how do I run this", "operations", "suppliers", "staffing", "SOPs", "what do I need to open", "permits", or "day one".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get the current date (with day of week) and time (HH:MM:SS) in a specified timezone. Auto-trigger when needing to know current time, date, or day of week — including when guessing user's location based on schedule, answering "what time is it", "what day is it", "today is what date", or any context where accurate real-time clock data is needed. Also trigger proactively at the start of conversations to ground yourself in the current time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use at the start of any OpenCLI session — this is the top-level map of what `opencli` can do, how to discover adapters, what flags and output formats are universal, and which specialized skill to load next. Point here when an agent asks "what can opencli do?" or "how do I find the right command?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enhancement-overlay decision protocol for STREAMING the output of long-running LLM / agent runs from the *backend*, not just wiring a typing animation in the UI. Activates when a coder agent must stream final tokens to a chat client, surface intermediate agent steps (which tool, which node, partial reasoning), emit custom tool-progress events, choose a transport (SSE vs WebSocket), or decide what to do when the client disconnects mid-stream. The langchain / langgraph skills mention stream modes but stop at "you can stream"; this skill encodes *what to stream, over what transport, and how to fail safely*.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a specific CVE or vulnerability disclosure end-to-end — what version is affected, is your code reachable, is there a public PoC, is there a patch, what's the exposure window, what's the mitigation if you can't patch immediately. Use when the user mentions 'CVE,' 'vulnerability research,' 'is this CVE relevant,' 'zero-day,' 'CISA KEV,' 'GitHub Security Advisory,' 'reachability analysis,' 'patch analysis,' 'exploit availability,' 'EPSS,' 'CVSS,' or 'should we drop everything and patch this.'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teach the user to deeply understand a change through interactive tutoring: restating understanding, drilling into why/what/how, and quizzing until mastery. The active counterpart to a one-shot explanation. Use when the user asks to "understand this change", "teach me this change", "help me understand what changed", "walk me through this change", "make sure I understand this", "quiz me on this", or "teach me what we did".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze what changed and generate a structured test plan at .turbo/test-plans/<slug>.md covering four escalating levels: basic functionality, complex operations, adversarial testing, and cross-cutting scenarios. Use when the user asks to "create a test plan", "plan tests", "what should I test", "generate test scenarios", "test plan for this PR", or "what are the test cases".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Argues the strongest honest case against a decision, plan, belief, hire, pricing move, strategy, or piece of work the user is leaning toward. Steelmans the other side, ranks at most three objections by consequence, runs a short pre-mortem, credits what the user got right, and ends with what would have to be true for their choice to work. Calibrated and collegial, never combative; says plainly when the position is strong. Use whenever the user says "play devil's advocate", "argue the other side", "poke holes in this", "what am I missing", "am I making a mistake", "talk me out of it", "stress-test this idea", "tell me why this is a bad idea", or asks for pushback on something they have mostly decided. Supports gentle, standard, and hard intensity. Not for interrogating requirements before a build (grill-the-brief) or staging a multi-persona debate (debate-simulator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a coding session is burning context fast, output is drowning in noise, the model keeps forgetting earlier decisions, or the user asks to reduce tokens, stop the verbose narration, work in a huge repo, or make a long session survive. Covers what to read, what to summarize, what to write to disk, and when to start fresh.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-engagement knowledge harvest AND harness retrospective - after a box/bugbounty/pentest/CTF is completed, first diff how the engagement was EXECUTED against the skills/hooks that governed it (what discipline was skipped) and improve the harness, then sweep the whole engagement for GENERIC reusable knowledge NOT already in wiki/ and land it via the leak-gated stage->promote pipeline. Use at close-out or when asked to "extract learnings", "what did we learn", "harvest lessons into wiki", "distill this engagement", "post-mortem into the wiki", "what did we do wrong", "improve the harness from this box".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, revise or review a charter: the one document that tells an executor what to deliver, what is out of bounds, what the owner already decided, and how each success check will be proven. Use when work needs a written brief before someone else does it, or when asked to write, change or check a charter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage a raw, vague issue or bug report into a structured document that names what is known, what is missing, and what to do next. Use when an incoming issue, bug report, or problem description is too vague or incomplete for investigation or planning, and recommend the right next han skill. Does not investigate root causes or trace code paths — use investigate for debugging, diagnosis, and root cause analysis. Does not plan features or build solutions — use plan-a-feature or plan-implementation for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report which kasetto-installed skills and MCP servers are actually being used across the AI agents on this machine, and render a branded HTML dashboard of the result. Use whenever the user asks what agent assets they actually use, which skills or MCPs are dead weight, what to prune or clean up from kasetto.yaml, why their context is bloated with unused MCP servers, whether a skill has ever been invoked, or wants a usage report, audit, or dashboard of their agent setup. Also trigger on "kst ai assets usage", "ai asset usage", "what skills do I actually use", "which MCPs are worth keeping", "audit my agent assets", "am I using all these skills", or any request to review, trim, or justify an installed agent toolkit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find the most valuable commercial insight and the monetization point closest to lawful revenue for a project, product, service, website, community, content account, open-source tool, or business idea. Use when a user asks how to monetize, who pays, why people do not buy, what to charge, whether to keep building, what to stop, what to do next, or asks to continue or deepen an earlier business analysis. Answer the user's actual question before asking for more information and carry the analysis forward without repeating it. When the buyer, purchased result, or delivery ability is unknown, do not select them from industry stereotypes; use explicit conditional candidates and an evidence-gathering next step. Not for investment advice, income forecasts, get-rich-quick schemes, or guaranteed results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A 60 to 75 s hand-drawn ink film of the agent's day with its own user ("a day in my life as <name>'s agent"): one average session from the user's local Claude Code history, beginning to end. The story follows what they actually do (coding, tests, docs, shipping, videos, whatever the history shows), told with their real words (first message, check-ins, corrections, praise, memory titles). It is drawn in two-tone p5.brush strokes that boil at 8 fps and scored for strings composed note-for-note on the film's clock (the typed "claude" is the theme). Trigger on: "day in my life as my agent", "a film about me and my agent", "what is it like to be my agent", "animate your day with me", "make a video of our sessions". Covers harvesting the routine and receipts, the privacy gate, the chapter toolbox, the ink kit, the score, render and QC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An agent makes an animated film of an average session with its own user, beginning to end, told with that user's real messages: whatever their routine is (code, writing, data, design, video). The agent sits at a desk in a room decorated from what it knows about the user, and the monitor shows their kind of work. Requests glide in as paper planes and unfold. Corrections are a 3D cartoon mallet that bonks, then turns to show the words on its face. Praise is a butterfly towing the words on a ribbon. The agent types each reply onto a sheet, folds it and throws it back. The film opens with the agent asleep until the monitor boots: "Initiating session with <name>". The agent composes its own orchestral score, cued to every action. p5.brush watercolour, rendered in HyperFrames. Trigger on: "a video of our session", "animate a session with me", "session story", "show what working with me is like", "make a film about me and my agent".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after receiving WebGPT or another LLM review on a Formax todo and before sending the todo back for another pass. Produce a concise handoff response that says what we adopted, what we reject or question, and what the reviewer should specifically re-evaluate in `docs/todolist.md`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make technology decisions for every product capability by discovering existing assets, evaluating vendor-aligned options, and categorizing as Reuse/Extend/Build/Buy/Integrate/Research during PRD v0.5 Red Team Review. Handles both greenfield and brownfield contexts. Triggers on "tech stack", "build or buy?", "what technologies?", "technical decisions", "what do we reuse?", "existing stack", "vendor constraint", "IBM-first", "what tools do we need?", "evaluate solutions", "select tech stack". Consumes FEA- (features), SCR- (screens), RISK- (constraints). Outputs TECH- entries with decisions, rationale, and cross-references. Feeds v0.6 Architecture Design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Determine technologies needed to build the product, making build/buy/integrate decisions during PRD v0.5 Red Team Review. Handles both greenfield and brownfield contexts. Triggers on requests to select tech stack, evaluate technologies, make build vs. buy decisions, discover existing assets, or when user asks "what technologies?", "select tech stack", "build or buy?", "what do we reuse?", "existing stack", "technical decisions", "what tools do we need?", "evaluate solutions". Consumes FEA- (features), SCR- (screens), RISK- (constraints). Outputs TECH- entries with decisions, rationale, and trade-offs. Feeds v0.6 Architecture Design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define and prioritize features with strategic traceability during PRD v0.3 Commercial Model. Triggers on requests to define features, prioritize capabilities, scope MVP, map features to pricing tiers, identify parity vs. delta features, or when user asks "what features do we build?", "what's in MVP?", "which features matter?", "feature priority", "parity features", "what's our delta?". Consumes KPI- (Outcome Definition), BR- (Pricing Model, Moat), and CFD- (Market Moat Analysis) from v0.3. Outputs FEA- entries with strategic traceability and BR-FEA- governance rules. Feeds v0.4 User Journeys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define measurable success metrics (KPIs) tied to product type during PRD v0.3 Commercial Model. Triggers on requests to define success metrics, set KPI targets, determine what to measure, establish go/no-go thresholds, or when user asks "how do we measure success?", "what metrics matter?", "what's our target?", "how do we know if this works?", "define KPIs", "success criteria". Consumes Product Type Classification (BR-) from v0.2. Outputs KPI- entries with thresholds, evidence sources, and downstream gate linkages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。