3.1万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Annotate and map the anatomy of any design. Identify visual hierarchy, spacing systems, color roles, and tension points through clinical analysis. Use when doing formal design audits, teaching design analysis, or building structured observation skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured exposure habits for building taste through relentless, intentional consumption. Not passive scrolling. Active intake across design, architecture, film, music, food, and culture. Use when building a taste practice, advising on professional development, or diagnosing why someone's design range feels narrow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Defend a design decision to skeptical stakeholders with structure and evidence. Use when presenting design work, writing design documentation, or pushing back on requests to change something.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose your taste gaps across six skill areas. Know what to practice. Use when starting a taste development program, checking progress, or identifying specific areas to improve.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a structured design review that someone can act on without follow-up questions. Use when giving async design feedback, writing portfolio case studies, or documenting design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Animation as communication. Feedback, orientation, emphasis, delight. If motion doesn't serve one of these four purposes, it shouldn't exist. Use when evaluating animation quality, designing transitions, or deciding whether motion adds or subtracts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rank multiple design solutions and explain why. Separate personal preference from quality judgment. Use when comparing design options, evaluating competing approaches, or making design decisions with clear reasoning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The 10-second design audit. Look at any design and name what's working and what's not within seconds. Trains rapid pattern recognition for hierarchy, spacing, type, and color. Use when evaluating designs quickly, giving first-impression feedback, or building perception speed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
15-minute daily taste exercises. Monday through Friday. Compound effect over time. Use when building personal practice habits, training a team's design eye, or adding structure to professional development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read a designer's taste through their typography decisions alone. Type is the fastest taste signal in any design. Use when evaluating design maturity, assessing portfolio quality, or understanding what typography reveals about design thinking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain the same design observation to a designer, a developer, and a non-technical stakeholder. Same insight, three languages. Use when working cross-functionally or presenting design decisions to mixed audiences.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Density, whitespace, rhythm, and how space communicates relationships between elements. Use when building layouts, evaluating spacing consistency, or diagnosing why a design feels cramped or empty.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break a design system into its constituent decisions and evaluate each one. Use when auditing design systems, evaluating consistency, or understanding how a product maintains quality at scale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develops an implementation plan ready for wave-orchestration to execute. Takes the user's goal or rough plan as input, mines the codebase for facts, grills the user one question at a time for the decisions, drafts the planning/ artifacts (task DAG, wave table, worker prompt template, state file), then reviews its own plan on two axes before seeking approval. Use when the user wants to turn a feature idea, master plan, or backlog into a wave-orchestration execution plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides the discovery, design, validation, and delivery of Agent Skills. Use when identifying skill gaps, creating or revising a SKILL.md, improving skill descriptions, or checking a skill against the Agent Skills specification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies bug fixes are correct and complete by tracing callers, checking imports/exports, validating path resolution, and confirming no regressions. Does the code work? Use when reviewing code changes for functional correctness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standardizes Makefile-based build and test workflows with reproducible targets. Use when creating or refining helpful build, test, and clean targets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and run reproducible benchmarks. Use when measuring performance scaling, comparing branches, or analyzing speedup metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare brands and products across social media — share of voice, sentiment, positioning, and audience overlap using Xpoz. Use when asked to "compare brands", "competitive analysis", "share of voice", "brand vs brand", or "competitive intelligence".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and rank influencers by niche, engagement, and authenticity using Xpoz. Searches Twitter, Instagram, and Reddit for active voices in any topic. Use when asked to "find influencers", "discover thought leaders", "who's talking about X", "influencer research", or "find KOLs".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run or maintain the full tdmcp repo quality-audit team: command sweeps, all package/Makefile/CI gates, security review, usability/flow review, refactor/test-gap analysis, coverage hardening, QA, and follow-up fix waves. Use whenever the user asks for a complete audit, improve repo/code quality, test all commands, find security/usability failures, refactor debt, add missing tests, re-run the audit, continue a previous quality wave, or verify the repo is ready.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Updates tdmcp docs and roadmap for newly shipped or newly merged capabilities. Use when asked to update docs, update the roadmap, reconcile release docs, document new features, sync docs with CHANGELOG/package release, refresh cookbook examples after a feature wave, re-run/continue/fix a docs-roadmap pass, or check whether docs/ROADMAP.md is current. Runs a sub-agent workflow: release audit -> roadmap/docs edit + cookbook sync -> QA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality-assure integrated tdmcp features: run the four PR gates + recipe/bridge tests, cross-boundary coherence checks (tool schema↔CLI↔docs↔registry, operator↔createable, bridge↔client), and live TouchDesigner validation (preview + post-cook error check) when the bridge is reachable. Use when validating/QA-ing/testing tdmcp tools, checking a feature actually cooks in TD, verifying CLI matches a tool, or gating a release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。