「pack」の検索結果

Builds a DRAFT data dictionary from a schema export, table definition, sample rows or a partial existing dictionary: one row per field with the name as stated, type as stated or observed, meaning quoted from the documentation supplied, owner, allowed values, and UNKNOWN wherever no source defines the field, plus a gap list for the data owner. Never infers a definition from a column name. Use when the user asks to "build a data dictionary for this table", "document these columns", "what does each field mean", "turn this schema export into a dictionary" or "fill in the field definitions from these documents". Do not use for profiling values or finding patterns in the data, use dataset-insight-pack instead; for metric definitions, use kpi-definition-sheet; for logging data defects, use data-quality-issue-log. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a cash forecast (spreadsheet, model export, pasted table or the narrative that accompanies it) and returns a DRAFT assumptions sheet: every assumption the forecast rests on, stated or implied by the figures, with its value as read, its location in the model, the cash lines it drives, its stated source or "not stated", the evidence that would test it, an owner, and one neutral challenge question, so a reviewer can work through the assumptions one by one. Use when the user asks to "list the assumptions behind this cash forecast", "what is this cash flow forecast assuming", "prepare the challenge questions for the treasury review", "pull out the drivers of the 13-week cash forecast" or "build an assumptions register for the liquidity plan". Do not use for actuals against budget by line, use budget-variance-explainer instead; do not use for the case behind a capital request, use capex-request-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes redactions of personal identifiers in pasted text or an attached document (names, contact details, identification and account numbers, dates that identify, quasi-identifiers) and returns a DRAFT redacted copy with consistent placeholder tokens plus a redaction table stating what was replaced, where and why, with a confidence level and a blank reviewer decision per row. Use when the user asks to "redact the names in this document", "de-identify this transcript before we share it", "strip personal data from these notes", "anonymise this report for publication" or "what would need redacting here". Do not use for assessing a planned processing activity, use dpia-draft-pack instead; do not use for working out what data an incident exposed, use data-incident-impact-brief instead. Never declares a document anonymised, safe to release or compliant. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts an architecture or design decision record (ADR) from the discussion notes, design review minutes, chat threads and diagram descriptions the user provides: context, decision drivers, options considered with arguments as stated, the decision as the group worded it, consequences and a review date, with every factual claim tagged evidenced, asserted or UNKNOWN so unsupported claims are marked for the author to substantiate. Use when the user asks to "write an ADR", "document the architecture decision", "record why we chose this design", "turn these design review notes into a decision record" or "draft the design decision log entry". Do not use for a business or governance decision with no technical design, use decision-memo-builder instead; for the change ticket that implements the decision, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesises a batch of customer feedback (survey answers, reviews, ticket and chat comments) into a DRAFT themed report: coded themes with record counts and shares, anonymised verbatim quotes cited to record codes, contradictions and unverified claims, and the follow-up questions to answer next. Produces no sentiment score or percentage positive as fact; ratings appear only as distributions with n. Use when the user asks to "theme this feedback", "what are customers saying", "summarise these survey answers", "analyse these reviews", "find the top complaints in these comments" or "code this voice of the customer data". Do not use for exit interviews, use exit-interview-synthesis instead; for sorting a live queue and drafting replies, use ticket-triage-pack; for project retrospectives, use lessons-learned-synthesis. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks an extracted PFD register as a process model and returns findings and unknowns only: connectivity closure, stream numbering, presence of design conditions, equipment duty text, phase and service labels, package and off-sheet scope, boundaries, operating cases, and agreement between the drawing and attached process documents, then holds at gate G2. Creates no design values. Use when the user asks to "check the process model", "verify connectivity" or "is the PFD ready for enrichment" after gate G1 and before enrichment. Do not use for extraction from the drawing, use pfd-intake-and-extraction instead; do not use to propose lines or instruments, use piping-enrichment. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes tag and number structures for the new lines and instruments in a P&ID draft according to the project's numbering procedures, checks every tag extracted from the PFD against the quoted procedure format, and lists cross-section identifier mismatches and the registry checks a human must run. Never invents a numbering convention, never alters a PFD tag and never assigns a sequence number the procedure reserves for the registry. Use when the user asks to "run the tagging and numbering section", "check the tags against the numbering procedure", "propose the tag structure for the new lines and instruments" or "list the registry checks before validation" after the process safety flags. Do not use for validating the four sections, use validation-and-review-package instead; do not use for instrument content, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive ffmpeg through the media_run tool as an argv array - remux instead of re-encode, map streams explicitly, trim at keyframes, scale and crop, extract audio and frames, and build GIFs, contact sheets and concatenations. Covers the flags this pack injects, reading a failure from its exit code and last log lines, and the version-dependent spellings to hedge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work with SuperCollider projects as files - the shape of a .scd piece, how to read and write one with sc_project, how to send the file that is on disk into the live session with sc_load, what state belongs in the session and what belongs in the file, and how to package a piece the SuperCollider way (a folder with its .scd, its SynthDefs, and a Quark-style layout) instead of inventing a format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Embedded firmware setup: STM32, ESP32, AVR, RP2040, Nordic nRF, Zephyr/RTOS, vendor SDKs, CMake/CMakePresets, VS Code/clangd, cross toolchains, flash/debug, Docker/CI. Use for MCU scaffolds, existing firmware modernization, BSPs, linker/startup files, SDK package selection, and embedded CI; prefer cpp-project-setup for host-side C++.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Turn findings into a defensible intelligence product — BLUF key judgements, standardised estimative probability language, per-claim sourcing with timestamps and archived copies, separated observation, inference and assessment,… Use when writing an intelligence report, due-diligence memo, evidence pack or executive summary, or when asked to write up an investigation so it survives challenge

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- End-to-end passive reconnaissance for a domain, website or IP — builds an asset inventory covering registration, DNS, subdomains, infrastructure, tech stack, history and ownership without sending a single packet to the target. Use when asked to research or profile a domain or website, map what an organisation runs, or investigate a suspicious site without alerting its operator

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Move or sync the hub role of an agent-plus-vault setup between computers, where an always-on desktop is the hub and laptops are satellites. Checklist with counters verified before and after, and it never migrates silently. Triggers: "/migrate", "/migrate check", "/migrate pack", "/migrate bootstrap".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Фандрайз по методике Гонки: упаковать НАШ рейз/анонс/заголовок по каталогу приёмов Gonka/Либерманов (журналистское досье, anton голосом 26.08.2026)… Триггеры: “/gonka-fundraise“, “/gonka“, “гонка фандрайз“, “фандрайз по типу гонки“, “упакуй рейз“, “упакуй раунд“, “как подать сумму“, “заголовок про деньги“, “проверь их фандрайз“, “пирамида или продукт“, “package the raise“, “fundraise like gonka“

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

按用户给出的岗位方向、意向行业或公司维护本地岗位订阅，每日检索公开招聘来源，保存岗位变化并输出简洁日报；用于持续关注招聘机会、管理订阅和回看新增岗位。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

中文求职统一入口。理解岗位发现、简历匹配、岗位比较和求职探索需求，按已明确的校招、实习或社招方向读取规则，决定必要补问、搜索策略和评估范围，复用公开招聘来源并交付候选清单或匹配 Excel；持续关注衔接岗位雷达。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户在设计促销、定价或折扣策略，需要让"省钱"感知最大化时调用此 skill。核心信号：用户在纠结"怎么呈现折扣更有吸引力""消费者会不会觉得划算""原价和折扣价该怎么标"。不适用于：纯成本核算、B2B大额复杂定价谈判、品牌溢价策略（与折扣无关）。关键触发：涉及"打折""促销""优惠""划算"等定价呈现决策的场景。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install and use the official AI Headshot Generator package, pinned by digest, for paid hosted work on the Beatra service.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding CopilotKit to an existing project or bootstrapping a new CopilotKit project from scratch. Covers framework detection, package installation, runtime wiring, provider setup, and first working chat integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when migrating a CopilotKit v1 application to v2 -- updating package imports, replacing deprecated hooks and components, switching from GraphQL runtime to AG-UI protocol runtime, and resolving breaking API changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user provides a GitHub URL and the planner needs to converge that repo plus the user's goal into a concrete project blueprint for later execution. This skill handles GitHub-input project intake, Phase 1 intent convergence, and downstream project handoff structure. It does not generate teaching material packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational guide for WordPress.org submission readiness of NV oOS standalone plugins (nvoos-docs-hub live at 0.5.3; nvoos-content-graph live at 1.0.10 in the re-submission loop; nvoos-design-system next in the pipeline — issue #6811). Covers the 18 wp.org guidelines, the Plugin Check (PCP) gate in CI and Docker, PCP finding triage, the reviewer-reply loop (findings taxonomy from the real 0.4.3 review, related-issue sweep checklist, reply-email template), packaging exclusion tri-sync, readme.txt standards, .wordpress-org listing assets, and the NV oOS Complete checkout-flow disclosure discipline (docs-hub 0.5.3, content-graph). Use when preparing a wp.org submission, responding to a reviewer email, fixing the plugin-check CI job, triaging PCP findings, or capturing listing screenshots.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Programmatically clear WP Rocket cache from a third-party plugin / theme when data changes — the public rocket_clean_* function family (rocket_clean_post, rocket_clean_files, rocket_clean_term, rocket_clean_user, rocket_clean_home, rocket_clean_minify, rocket_clean_cache_busting, rocket_clean_domain, rocket_clean_cache_dir). Critical detection rule — WP Rocket is a PAID plugin not on Packagist; always feature-detect via function_exists('rocket_clean_post') OR defined('WP_ROCKET_VERSION') before calling, since not every site has it. Never raw-unlink the cache directory or call wp_cache_flush() expecting it to clear WP Rocket — wp_cache_flush is WP object cache, WP Rocket is FILE cache. The before_*_clean_* / after_*_clean_* action lifecycle hooks fire around every clean — useful for audit logging, monitoring, custom invalidation chains. Use when integrating cache invalidation in a companion plugin, WC integration, custom data plugin. Triggers on rocket_clean_, before_rocket_clean, af...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review repository architecture using Ontoly Software Graph and MCP capabilities. Use when asked to explain architecture, module boundaries, package topology, service ownership, or architectural risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。