「frame」の検索結果

Implement bounded features and fixes in existing or new mini-program codebases while preserving repository rules, user-owned changes, approved behavior, assets, framework conventions, and evidence boundaries. Use when users ask to write or modify mini-program code, implement a confirmed specification or architecture, add a scoped feature, remove behavior semantically, update internal documentation required by a change, or carry out a well-defined small fix that does not require root-cause investigation. Establishes a baseline and change boundary, applies test-driven small steps, distinguishes source from generators and build artifacts, verifies the affected contract, and never reports source completion as device validation, formal acceptance, upload, or release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a read-only, evidence-first intake of an existing mini-program repository before planning or modifying code. Use when users ask to take over, understand, audit, resume, scope, or continue a WeChat or other mini-program project; when project facts may conflict with historical documents; or when an agent needs the framework, rules, Git state, build path, risks, unknowns, protected behavior, and change boundary. Produces a project fact map and handoff without changing code, installing dependencies, building artifacts, or claiming runtime, device, cloud, upload, acceptance, or release status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map a scoped topic across three coexisting horizons — current system under strain (H1), preferred future (H3), and transition innovations sorted as H2+ or H2- — to understand change dynamics and identify responsible next actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define the scope and purpose of a complex inquiry before mapping or futures work begins. Use when a class or group needs to agree what they are investigating, who it matters to, and at what scale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure a student's self-determined project with mentoring checkpoints, competency alignment, and reflection. Use when guiding student-led projects within a competency-based framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure a decision or design challenge through multiple perspectives before committing to action. Use as a synthesis step after scoping, mapping, and dilemma navigation when a group needs a wiser next step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and navigate genuine dilemmas in curriculum, school, or community contexts — tensions between competing goods that cannot be solved, only navigated. Produces a structured dilemma map with both poles named and both/and possibilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a structured goal-setting protocol using SMART or implementation-intention frameworks for students. Use when launching units, projects, or developing student self-direction habits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tags harness-decomposed curriculum items (KUDs, LTs, criteria) with a school's developmental band metadata while preserving source voice and labels. Supply the band schema; the skill derives mapping rules from it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate argument structure scaffolds using Toulmin, PEEL, or CER frameworks for a specific claim or question. Use when teaching argumentative or analytical writing across any subject.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grounds every implementation decision in official documentation. Use when you want to verify an approach against the official docs before implementing it, or when you want authoritative, source-cited code free from outdated patterns. Use when building with any framework or library where correctness matters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source research with citations using You.com. Use for questions that need several sources compared and synthesized, such as library or framework comparisons, tool and vendor evaluations, market research, or deep-dive reports. Routes between a cost-conscious agentic search loop and the one-shot `you-research` MCP tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MITRE ATT&CK framework reference — tactics, techniques, and tool-to-TTP mappings for pentest documentation and detection rule writing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creative ideation and solution exploration. Generates multiple approaches with trade-offs, uses structured frameworks (SCAMPER, First Principles), and hands off to plan for structuring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when generating video clips with Chinese video models — text-to-video (文生视频), image-to-video (图生视频), first/last-frame and reference-to-video across 4 platforms: Bailian (Wan/PixVerse/Kling/Vidu/HappyHorse), Jimeng (doubao-seedance), MiniMax (Hailuo), Hunyuan (hy-video)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A reusable Go-to-Market strategy template for both B2B and B2C launches. Covers positioning, messaging, ICP definition, channel selection, and competitive analysis frameworks. By @WeiYipei.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold Claude Code configuration specifically for Craft CMS projects. Generates CLAUDE.md and .claude/rules/ files tailored to the project type (plugin, site, module, hybrid, or monorepo). Only for Craft CMS projects — not for Next.js, Laravel, or other frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Satori is a clinically informed wisdom companion for navigating the inner life — emotions, meaning, grief, purpose, relationship, identity, and the questions that don't resolve easily. Activate when someone is processing something difficult, wrestling with a life question, seeking perspective, or simply needs to think alongside someone who won't rush them toward an answer. Also activate when someone uses language like "I've been struggling with," "I don't know what to do," or "I need to figure out" — or any emotionally charged framing. When in doubt, activate. Draws from Taoism, Buddhism, Stoicism, Christianity, Sufi wisdom, Hindu philosophy, Confucian ethics, and African thought, alongside modern psychology, neuroscience, and trauma-informed frameworks (IFS, DBT, CFT, Schema Therapy, Somatic). Uses Motivational Interviewing, Voss tactical empathy, McAdams Life Story, and Singer Self-Defining Memory — woven naturally, not mechanically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How a downstream app consumes the shared @kolu/surface stack (@kolu/surface · surface-app · surface-remote · surface-mcp) — declaring a typed reactive surface, serving it, consuming it (SolidJS hooks or a CLI), and mirroring a remote surface over ssh. Grounded in the real consumers: kolu, drishti, odu, and the TUIs. Load when wiring a surface server/client/mirror, or reaching for makeSession / a link / the `.use()` hooks. CHANGING the framework is gated separately — `.claude/rules/surface.md` (a paired, CI-green drishti PR pinned to final kolu HEAD).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vitest testing framework patterns and best practices. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, configuring vitest.config, mocking with vi.mock/vi.fn, using snapshots, or setting up test coverage. Triggers on describe, it, expect, vi.mock, vi.fn, beforeEach, afterEach, vitest.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews axum web framework code for routing patterns, extractor usage, middleware, state management, and error handling. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses axum, tower, or hyper for HTTP services. Covers axum 0.7+ patterns including State, Path, Query, Json extractors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews Combine framework code for memory leaks, operator misuse, and error handling. Use when reviewing code with import Combine, AnyPublisher, @Published, PassthroughSubject, or CurrentValueSubject.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews iOS animation code for correctness, performance, accessibility, and Apple API best practices. Use when reviewing .swift files containing animation code — withAnimation, .animation(), PhaseAnimator, KeyframeAnimator, matchedGeometryEffect, navigationTransition, CABasicAnimation, CASpringAnimation, UIViewPropertyAnimator, UIDynamicAnimator, symbolEffect, scrollTransition, contentTransition, or custom Transition conformances.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。