Set up and use 1Password CLI (op). Use when installing the CLI, enabling desktop app integration, signing in (single or multi-account), or reading/injecting/running secrets via op.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
3,394 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Set up and use 1Password CLI (op). Use when installing the CLI, enabling desktop app integration, signing in (single or multi-account), or reading/injecting/running secrets via op.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage Linear or Jira backlogs and run bug sweeps via the Composio CLI. Bulk-fetch issues, deduplicate, relabel, reassign, and post summaries all from the shell.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement routing in Angular v20+ applications with lazy loading, functional guards, resolvers, and route parameters. Use for navigation setup, protected routes, route-based data loading, and nested routing. Triggers on route configuration, adding authentication guards, implementing lazy loading, or reading route parameters with signals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
设计脑暴 / 实现前方案校准:当用户想把已基本成立的想法、功能方向或产品问题,在写 PRD、画 mockup 或进入开发计划前,先比较方案、确认取舍、对齐 UI/视觉约束,并收敛成可执行设计 spec 时使用。 可用中文唤起:“先脑暴一下方案”“先不要写 PRD,帮我设计几种路径”“参考 brainstorming 把这个需求变成设计 spec” “实现前先讨论设计”。问题还没定义清楚时先用 ai-collaboration-calibration;已有方案要压力测试时用 grill-me; 直接写 PRD 时用 prd-architect;grill-me 返回精确设计 gap 时,本 Skill 只输出 Design Delta。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous goal loop — give it ONE goal plus how to verify it, the agent runs check→fix→check itself and comes back only with the finished result (code with audit, research with fact-check, content with critique, audit/backtest). Self-verification instead of constant supervision, with hard safety guards. Vary the loop with a verification rubric designed before it runs. Triggers — "work autonomously to the result", "don't come back until it's done", "run the loop yourself", "drive it to done".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Council — 5 independent AI perspectives + mutual critique + synthesis (adapted from karpathy/llm-council for Claude Code). For high-stakes decisions where the answer does NOT follow unambiguously from the data — go/no-go before real consequences, critiquing a methodology, choosing between competing approaches, pressure-testing a conclusion you're attached to, designing risk controls. NOT for log/data analysis (the council has no data access) and not for factual lookups. Triggers — "convene the council", "run it past the council", "go/no-go", "pressure-test this".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technical blog post writing guide. rooftopsnow.tistory.com style — Korean formal technical prose, architecture diagrams, code blocks + design intent commentary, table comparisons, checklist wrap-up. Triggers on "blog", "포스팅", "블로그", "기술 글", "tech blog".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
6-lens diagnostic slop audit — unused imports, dead private fns, duplicate signatures, abandoned TODOs, lint bypass markers, stale refs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Used by the Developer agent during Phase 8 (Implement) when building web components, pages, or UI features. Provides strict aesthetic guidelines to create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces that avoid generic 'AI slop' aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route API design/implementation tasks to the right library skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates California-compliant privilege logs for withheld or redacted discovery materials under CCP 2031.240. Use when the user mentions privilege log drafting, California privilege log, CCP 2031.240, attorney-client privilege logging, work product designation, Evid. Code 952/954, CCP 2018.030, redaction logging, meet-and-confer privilege disputes, waiver analysis, common interest doctrine, or asks for help documenting withheld documents. Also trigger on references to Hernandez v. Superior Court, Costco Wholesale, or Wellpoint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
法外功夫 — Non-legal business skills for lawyers. Decision analysis, game theory, contract design, accounting, finance, microeconomics, law & economics, statistics, and regression analysis distilled into deep, actionable frameworks for legal practice. Each domain includes formulas with LaTeX notation, worked examples, adversarial checklists, and book-aligned structure. | 律师必备的非法律商业技能深度参考:决策分析、博弈论、合同设计、会计、金融、微观经济学、法经济学、统计分析、多元回归。每章都包含完整公式推导、worked examples、对抗清单与经典判例。当用户涉及和解谈判、合同激励、财务尽调、企业估值、损害赔偿计算、反垄断分析、统计证据评估、歧视诉讼回归分析、hold-up、效率违约、Daubert 动议等场景时触发。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
YC Office Hours — product validation for a new product, feature, or side-project concept. Startup mode tests demand; Builder mode develops an unvalidated product idea. Use when the user asks whether something is worth building or has an idea whose problem/value is not yet validated. Proactively suggest when the user describes a new product idea or is exploring whether something is worth building — before any code is written. Use BEFORE a plan exists. For reviewing an existing plan, use /mk:plan-ceo-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a decision needs deep multi-source technical research with cited evidence — technology evaluation, ecosystem comparison, standards/spec fact-finding, "how do others solve X". Triggers on "research X", "deep dive on X", "evaluate X vs Y", "find best practices for X". NOT for library/API doc lookup (see mk:docs-finder); NOT for one-shot URL fetch (see mk:web-to-markdown); NOT for internal codebase discovery (see mk:scout); NOT for project-only Q&A (see mk:ask-me); NOT for comparing solution designs (see mk:brainstorming); NOT for root-cause debugging (see mk:investigate); NOT for wiki ingestion of sources (see mk:wiki-research).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Serve any markdown file or directory as a calm, book-like reader via a local HTTP server (127.0.0.1 only). Best for long-form documents — RFCs, runbooks, design docs, plan files — where comfortable in-browser reading matters. Supports Mermaid diagrams, dark/light mode, plan navigation sidebar, and keyboard shortcuts. Requires explicit start and stop lifecycle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent structured debate with anti-groupthink mechanisms — Devil's Advocate, minority opinion protection, 2-round hard cap. Use when divergent perspectives matter more than consensus (architecture decisions, design tradeoffs, contested specifications).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
On explicit /homework invocation, analyze the current and linked previous sessions, extract mistakes (찐빠), and report them via omcustom-feedback with a confirmation gate. Auto-activation on session cleanup/session-end signals is OPT-IN (default OFF) — requires an explicit project/user directive. Use when explicitly auditing recent work for harness gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Task-sized forensic analysis of Vivado synthesis and routed timing evidence for processor RTL. Use when Codex must trace a named setup or hold path, audit whole-design timing populations, compare implementation runs, map primitive, LUT, CARRY, BRAM, DSP, MUXF, register, and routed-net stages back to Chisel or generated RTL, distinguish logic from routing pressure, identify missing DCP queries, or write an evidence-backed timing report. This skill is read-only by default and stops at ranked modification directions. Use optimize-chisel-fpga-timing for RTL edits and routed A/B implementation closure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build visual territories (mood boards) for team alignment before production. Groups references into 2-4 named territories, each with palette, texture, typography feel, and 4-6 generated sample tiles, so a team can agree on a direction. Use when the user says "moodboard", "visual territories", "align the team on a look", "reference board", or needs stakeholder sign-off on aesthetic before generating final assets. Part of the Creative Production set.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when user says "simmer this", "refine this", "hone this", "iterate on this", or asks to improve a specific artifact over multiple rounds. Runs an iterative refinement loop with investigation-first judges that read the code, understand the problem, and propose evidence-based improvements. Auto-selects single judge or multi-judge board based on complexity. Works on any artifact type: documents, prompts, specs, emails, creative writing, API designs, pipelines, codebases. Supports multi-file workspace targets, runnable evaluators, and open-ended optimization (model selection, pipeline topology, prompt tuning).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial dialectic tool inspired by GAN. Alternates between Generator (creative advocate) and Discriminator (adversarial critic). Supports forced role selection (g/d), intensity modes (hard/soft), and multi-language output. Use for stress-testing ideas, business plans, code, and spec designs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the project's own domain language and prior design decisions. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when introducing a feature flag system, choosing between release flags / experiment flags / operational flags / kill switches / permission flags, designing percentage rollouts, building kill-switch + circuit-breaker patterns, structuring evaluation contexts (user IDs, plan tier, region), or building flag-cleanup discipline. Triggers: LaunchDarkly / GrowthBook / Unleash / Flagsmith / OpenFeature, percentage ramp, sticky bucketing, kill switch wired to alerting, "we still have flags from 2 years ago", flag debt, OpenFeature provider, evaluation context, default value on provider failure. NOT for A/B test statistical analysis (separate skill), traffic-split routing at the edge, build-time bundler defines, or environment-based config.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design dashboards for migrations and runtimes. Use for authority drift, verifier status, burn-down, runtime health, or pain panels. NOT for vanity analytics, ad hoc charts, or duplicate reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。