1,125 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Extracts and structures source material (articles, transcripts, notes) into a talk summary with narrative arc, themes, metrics, and gaps. Auto-detects REX vs Concept type. Use when starting a new talk from any source material or auditing existing material before committing to a talk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enable nullable reference types in a C# project and systematically resolve all warnings. USE FOR: adopting NRTs in existing codebases, file-by-file or project-wide migration, fixing CS8602/CS8618/CS86xx warnings, annotating APIs for nullability, cleaning up null-forgiving operators, upgrading dependencies with new nullable annotations. DO NOT USE FOR: projects already fully migrated with zero warnings (unless auditing suppressions), fixing a handful of nullable warnings in code that already has NRTs enabled, suppressing warnings without fixing them, C# 7.3 or earlier projects. INVOKES: Get-NullableReadiness.ps1 scanner script.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ACTIVATION PREREQUISITE: the request or discovered target must explicitly identify C#, .NET, `.cs`, or `.csproj`; otherwise stay dormant without invoking this skill. USE FOR: locating System.DateTime.Now/UtcNow, System.IO.File/Directory, System.Environment, HttpClient, Console, or Process usage in C#; auditing C# code for hard-to-test framework dependencies; or verifying those C# calls are already abstracted. DO NOT USE FOR: any target lacking the activation prerequisite; generating wrappers (use generate-testability-wrappers); migrating code (use migrate-static-to-wrapper); or general code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scans .NET code for ~50 performance anti-patterns across async, memory, strings, collections, LINQ, regex, serialization, and I/O with tiered severity classification. Use when analyzing .NET code for optimization opportunities, reviewing hot paths, or auditing allocation-heavy patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects duplicate boilerplate, copy-paste tests, and structural maintainability issues across .NET test suites. Use when the user asks to reduce repetition, consolidate similar test methods, convert copy-paste tests to data-driven parameterized tests, suggest a better test structure, or identify refactoring opportunities. Identifies repeated construction, assertion patterns, copy-paste methods convertible to DataRow/Theory/TestCase, redundant setup/teardown, and shared infrastructure. Produces an analysis report with concrete before/after suggestions. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), reviewing test quality or anti-patterns (use test-anti-patterns), or deep mock auditing (use exp-mock-usage-analysis).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DO NOT INVOKE when the primary request explicitly asks to convert, migrate, modernize, or rewrite a legacy/old-style project to SDK style; use msbuild-modernization. Migration prompts often mention ToolsVersion, explicit Compile/Reference entries, packages.config, or Microsoft.CSharp.targets, but merely reviewing or auditing a file that contains those patterns remains in scope here. USE FOR broad review, audit, lint, or maintainability/correctness checks of project/build files, including custom targets; prioritized cross-cutting findings; discrete anti-patterns; F# ordering/FS0039; cross-platform paths; and focused Import safety verdicts. Review/audit is analysis-only unless fixes are requested. For concrete property/item defects use property-patterns/item-management; use target-authoring for implementation and extension-points for NuGet auto-import/layout discovery. Exclude non-MSBuild systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete bug bounty workflow — recon, pre-hunt learning, vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining, bypass tables, language-specific grep patterns, and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, submission checklist). Use for ANY bug bounty task — recon, hunting specific vulns, auditing source code, testing AI features, validating findings, or writing reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security audit of Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers — tool poisoning, prompt injection via tool descriptions and results, unscoped/over-privileged tools, path traversal in file tools, command injection in shell/exec tools, SSRF in fetch tools, secret leakage through tool output, missing approval gates on state-changing actions, confused-deputy and rug-pull tool redefinition, token passthrough, and unsafe stdio/HTTP transport config. Covers auditing both first-party and third-party MCP servers (Python FastMCP, Node MCP SDK) and their client configs (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, Windsurf, Zed). Use when reviewing, hardening, or hunting bugs in an MCP server, an agent's tool integrations, or a mcpServers config block. 中文触发词：MCP审计、工具投毒、提示注入、智能体安全、MCP服务器漏洞
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete bug bounty workflow — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, human-tone writing, templates by vuln class, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, always-rejected list, conditional chain table, submission checklist). Use for ANY bug bounty task — starting a new target, doing recon, hunting specific vulns, auditing source code, testing AI features, validating findings, or writing reports. 中文触发词：漏洞赏金、安全测试、渗透测试、漏洞挖掘、信息收集、子域名枚举、XSS测试、SQL注入、SSRF、安全审计、漏洞报告
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate Agent Skill design quality against official specifications and best practices. Use when reviewing, auditing, or improving SKILL.md files and skill packages. Provides multi-dimensional scoring and actionable improvement suggestions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete bug bounty workflow — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, human-tone writing, templates by vuln class, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, always-rejected list, conditional chain table, submission checklist). Use for ANY bug bounty task — starting a new target, doing recon, hunting specific vulns, auditing source code, testing AI features, validating findings, or writing reports. 中文触发词：漏洞赏金、安全测试、渗透测试、漏洞挖掘、信息收集、子域名枚举、XSS测试、SQL注入、SSRF、安全审计、漏洞报告
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when setting up, auditing, or enforcing internationalization/localization in UI codebases (React/TS, i18next or similar, JSON locales), including installing/configuring the i18n framework, replacing hard-coded strings, ensuring en-US/zh-CN coverage, mapping error codes to localized messages, and validating key parity, pluralization, and formatting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repurpose existing content into a native LinkedIn post. Take a tweet, thread, YouTube video, blog, or newsletter and rebuild it for LinkedIn: re-hook before the fold, expand to the 900 to 1300 char sweet spot, add whitespace and a CTA, move links to the first comment, run the humanizer, publish via Publora on approval. Not for writing from scratch (use linkedin-post-writer), not for auditing a draft (use linkedin-humanizer --mode audit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic audit and review by Referee 2. Two modes — "deck" reviews slide presentations for rhetoric, visual quality, and compile cleanliness; "code" performs cross-language replication and econometric audit of empirical pipelines. Use when reviewing slides, auditing code, or verifying replication.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Experimental workflow for auditing recurring feedback, telemetry, errors, and brittle delivery paths to find systemic fixes. Use for periodic or requested cross-source lookbacks, not routine single-item intake.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CRO analysis for landing pages evaluating headline clarity, CTA placement, trust signals, mobile friction, and conversion killers. Use when uploading a landing page screenshot, pasting a URL for review, requesting conversion rate optimization feedback, or auditing page effectiveness prioritized by impact. Platform: Google and Meta.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LinkedIn Ads campaign analysis for B2B marketers detecting CTR issues, audience quality problems, lead gen form friction, and budget inefficiencies. Use when pasting LinkedIn campaign exports, analyzing B2B ad performance, or auditing LinkedIn advertising spend. Platform: LinkedIn.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reddit Ads campaign analysis detecting community targeting issues, creative fatigue, bid inefficiencies, and subreddit performance problems. Use when pasting Reddit Ads data, analyzing subreddit targeting, or auditing Reddit advertising spend for B2B or B2C campaigns. Platform: Reddit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when diagnosing stale or orphaned Node.js processes launched by VCO, auditing ownership/liveness, or safely simulating cleanup without touching external Node workloads.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate trained machine learning models with the right metrics and comparison logic. Use for benchmark review, threshold selection, calibration, validation, and model comparison; not for feature engineering or leakage auditing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain trained machine learning models through feature attribution, local explanations, and behavior summaries. Use as an explicit/manual helper once a model already exists, not for training ownership, leakage auditing, or general ML strategy selection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs deep Root Cause Analysis (RCA) on NVIDIA TAO Visual ChangeNet classification experiments with image-evidence-driven investigation. Use when analyzing ChangeNet model failures, investigating poor recall / FAR / PASS-NO_PASS metrics, auditing visual inspection pipeline quality, or running an RCA report for an AOI defect-detection model. Trigger phrases include "RCA on my ChangeNet model", "why is my AOI model failing", "audit ChangeNet predictions", "investigate FAR regressions", "root cause analysis on visual-changenet".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user is doing hands-on DOCA RDMI (RDMA Initiator) programming — picking doca-rdmi vs doca-rdma for an accelerator-initiated one-sided RDMA flow, standing up a doca_rdmi_connection or doca_rdmi_poster, attaching a doca_dpa_completion or doca_verbs_cq before doca_ctx_start(), retrieving the DPA-side handle for a DPA kernel, auditing whether a doca_rdmi_* symbol is EXPERIMENTAL on this DOCA, or debugging DOCA_ERROR_* returns from RDMI calls. Trigger even when the user does not say "DOCA RDMI" or "initiator" — implicit phrasings include "my DPA kernel needs to post RDMA writes to a remote responder", "DPA kernel sees no completions", "function not found on doca_rdmi_* at link time", "DOCA_ERROR_BAD_STATE from completion attach", or "the DPA posted but the work request never arrived". Refuse and route elsewhere for two-sided or host-CPU RDMA, the DPA programming model, GPU-side RDMA initiation, or general RDMA/IB/RoCE concepts — those belong to other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。