「evaluate」の検索結果

SkillOpt-flavored offline training loop for any SKILL.md. Treats accumulated learn-rule corrections as training trajectories, proposes bounded patches via an optimizer LLM, gates each candidate against a held-out validation set built from the user's own past corrections, and ships only candidates that demonstrably improve the score. Inspired by Microsoft SkillOpt's ReflACT pipeline (rollout → reflect → aggregate → select → update → evaluate) adapted to pro-workflow's SQLite store. Use when a skill has accumulated 8+ learn-rule rows and the user wants the skill itself to get better, not just longer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to migrate code that calls OpenAI, Gemini/Google AI, or the Anthropic API to Amazon Bedrock — a pure model/SDK rewrite. End-to-end: assesses the codebase, rewrites SDK calls, evaluates output quality against Bedrock, and delivers a ready-to-merge git branch. Also has an access-only mode for checking or enabling Bedrock model access for specific models (e.g. 'request access to Claude on Bedrock', 'which models do I turn on') with no code migration — it checks each model and walks the right access step, then stops. Not for agent runtime selection or agent migration planning (use agent-advisor), nor standalone cost estimates or infra-only migration. The full migration REQUIRES gcp-to-aws OR azure-to-aws installed alongside this skill (gcp-to-aws preferred when both are present); access-only mode needs neither.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when measuring or improving agent quality and performance — set up evaluators, online monitoring, CI/CD quality gates, observability, or cost optimization. Triggers on: "evaluate my agent", "add evaluator", "measure quality", "quality gate", "run evals", "agent too slow", "why is it slow", "reduce latency", "set up observability", "CloudWatch dashboard", "how much does my agent cost", "cost optimization", "logs not showing up", "logs missing", "spans not found", "eval failing", "eval error", "dev traces", "local traces", "agentcore dev traces", "traces to CloudWatch". Not for debugging errors or crashes — use agents-debug. Slow but correct routes here; broken routes to debug.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates, configures, and migrates workloads to AWS Lambda Managed Instances (LMI). Runs Lambda Event Functions (standard Lambda) on EC2 instances in the user's account while AWS manages provisioning, patching, scaling, routing, and load balancing. Triggers when queries mention Lambda Managed Instances, LMI, capacity providers, multi-concurrent execution environments, EC2-backed Lambda, persistent Lambda instances, PerExecutionEnvironmentMaxConcurrency, CapacityProviderConfig, cold start elimination via dedicated instances, migrating Lambda Event Functions to managed instances, or cost comparison between Lambda Event Functions and LMI with Savings Plans or Reserved Instances. Also covers long-running and asynchronous workloads and the 90-minute (5400s) function timeout for asynchronous and event-source-mapping (SQS, Kinesis, DynamoDB Streams / ESM) invocations, including how to raise the function timeout up to 90 minutes / 5400s and the related duration limits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze AWS costs, find savings, manage budgets, evaluate Savings Plans and Reserved Instances, right-size EC2/Lambda/RDS/EBS with Compute Optimizer, look up service pricing, query CUR with Athena, detect cost anomalies, scope costs to billing views, and monitor Free Tier usage. Triggers on: AWS bill, cost analysis, reduce spend, savings plan, reserved instance, right-size, budget alert, cost optimization, pricing, free tier, cost anomaly, CUR, cost audit, billing view, billing view ARN.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze HTTP security headers of web domains to identify vulnerabilities and misconfigurations. Use when you need to audit website security headers, assess header compliance, or get security recommendations for web applications. Trigger with phrases like "analyze security headers", "check HTTP headers", "audit website security headers", or "evaluate CSP and HSTS configuration".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate Abridge adoption, workflow value, and avoidable operational friction without inventing prices or vendor billing meters. Use when reviewing an Abridge rollout or renewal. Trigger with "analyze Abridge value".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate Expo skills in this repo end-to-end - trigger accuracy, generated code quality, and runtime screenshots on iOS simulator and Android emulator via Expo Go (web optional). Use when the user wants to eval an Expo skill, test that a skill produces working code, benchmark a skill with device screenshots, or verify a skill's output renders correctly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, improve, or evaluate an existing skill from workflows, prompts, SOPs, scripts. Use for migration/release/package, routing, evals/tests, install/trust checks, 优化已有 skill, 补 trigger 评测. Exclude summary/translation/docs, brainstorming, one-off prompts, copy-only edits, outline-only requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate Agent Skill design quality against official specifications and best practices. Use when reviewing, auditing, or improving SKILL.md files and skill packages. Provides multi-dimensional scoring and actionable improvement suggestions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SSTI playbook. Use when template expressions, server-side rendering, preview features, or templating engines may evaluate attacker-controlled content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expression Language injection playbook. Use when Java EL, SpEL, OGNL, or MVEL expressions may evaluate attacker-controlled input in Spring, Struts2, Confluence, or similar frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and improve interface usability using heuristic analysis. Use when the user mentions "usability audit", "users are confused", "form usability", "navigation problems", "Nielsen heuristics", "cognitive walkthrough", or "is this easy to use". Also trigger when reviewing a design for usability issues, improving form-completion rates, or evaluating information architecture and navigation. Covers Krug's laws, Nielsen's 10 heuristics, severity ratings, dark-pattern recognition, and accessibility. For visual design fixes, see refactoring-ui. For conversion-focused audits, see cro-methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI citation readiness audit as part of SEO, covering classic Google search and AI search surfaces together. Use whenever the user wants their content to rank or be cited in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, You.com, Google AI Overviews, or Google AI Mode. AI citation optimization audit scoring blog posts for major answer surfaces. Evaluates evidence-backed citability, purpose clarity, entity clarity, structured data, and AI crawler accessibility. Suggests evidence-backed explanations and a 0-100 AI Citation Readiness score. Use when user says "geo", "ai citation", "ai optimization", "citation audit", "aeo", "perplexity optimization", "chatgpt citation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI citation readiness audit as part of SEO, covering classic Google search and AI search surfaces together. Use whenever the user wants their content to rank or be cited in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, You.com, Google AI Overviews, or Google AI Mode. AI citation optimization audit scoring blog posts for major answer surfaces. Evaluates passage-level citability, Q&A formatting, entity clarity, structured data, and AI crawler accessibility. Generates citation capsules and a 0-100 AI Citation Readiness score. Use when user says "geo", "ai citation", "ai optimization", "citation audit", "aeo", "perplexity optimization", "chatgpt citation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to choose, change, or evaluate their App Store / Google Play category and subcategory — including primary vs secondary category trade-offs, chart-rank competitive analysis, category-driven discoverability, and how category choice affects featuring eligibility. Use when the user mentions "which category", "App Store category", "primary category", "secondary category", "change my category", "Health & Fitness vs Lifestyle", "Productivity vs Utilities", "rank higher in a smaller category", "category chart", "subcategory", "Play Store category", or "should I switch categories". For full ASO health beyond category, see aso-audit. For competitor analysis within the chosen category, see competitor-analysis. For chart movements within categories, see market-movers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to discover, evaluate, or prioritize App Store keywords. Also use when the user mentions "keyword research", "find keywords", "search volume", "keyword difficulty", "keyword ideas", or "what keywords should I target". For implementing keywords into metadata, see metadata-optimization. For auditing current keyword performance, see aso-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to design, optimize, or evaluate App Store screenshots and preview videos. Also use when the user mentions "screenshots", "app preview", "product page design", "screenshot design", "creative assets", or "what should my screenshots show". For A/B testing screenshots, see ab-test-store-listing. For full ASO audit, see aso-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets price, structures packages and tiers, and designs the monetization surfaces that carry them — upgrade paths, paywalls, and offer construction. Use this to set or change pricing, design or restructure tiers, choose a pricing metric, build an offer, design upgrade prompts and paywalls, or evaluate whether a pricing change is safe to make.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds reach through other people's audiences — co-marketing partnerships, creator and influencer programs, and community building. Use this to find and evaluate partners, structure a joint campaign or creator deal, plan a community strategy, or decide whether a partnership is worth the coordination cost.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes, structures, and evaluates social posts end to end — hooks, body, formatting for how each platform renders, and a quality check before publishing. Use this to draft a post, rewrite one that underperformed, turn a longer piece into social content, sharpen an opening, or judge whether a draft is worth publishing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Owns legal, contracts, intellectual property, regulatory compliance, privacy, security governance, enterprise risk, and audit readiness. Use this to review a contract or commitment, assess regulatory or privacy exposure, evaluate an IP or licensing question, judge the risk in a business decision, prepare for an audit or certification, or when a plan may create obligations the business cannot meet. Also use to decide whether a risk should be accepted, mitigated, or refused.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs the physical and hybrid workplace — space planning, leases, health and safety, office services, and the operational side of where people work. Use this to plan space, evaluate a lease or office move, set up a hybrid workplace, handle facilities incidents, or decide what office services are worth funding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。