「manuscript」の検索結果

Use when running and reporting the statistical analysis for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — measurement validity, common-method bias, the right estimator (HLM, SEM, panel, experiments), endogeneity, and robustness. Executes and reports the analysis; it does not design the study (amj-methods) or frame the contribution (amj-contribution-framing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the research design and method are the bottleneck for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — matching design (archival, survey, experiment, multi-method, field) and level of analysis to the theoretical question. Designs the study; it does not run the estimation or validity checks (amj-data-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when scoping or sanity-checking a research question for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — fit, theory-drivenness, and feasibility. Decides whether the idea can earn a theoretical contribution; it does not build the theory itself (use amj-theory-development) or position the literature (amj-literature-positioning).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when revising an AAAI manuscript for broad-AI-audience fit, a first-page contribution statement legible to non-specialist Phase-1 reviewers, two-column readability, concise novelty claims, reproducibility-checklist alignment, hedged limitations and ethics, and policy-aware framing of AI-system and capability claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal or invited full review via the Manuscript Central portal — proposal-vs-invited-review route, deadlines, formatting, CV, and anonymity. Final checks; it does not draft content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when articulating and differentiating the theoretical contribution of an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — showing precisely what is NEW versus prior theory and why it matters. Frames the contribution; it does NOT build the theory (amr-theory-development) or check its internal logic (amr-data-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when turning results into an explicit theoretical contribution for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — the "what new theory do we learn?" statement and the discussion section. Frames the contribution and implications; it does not build the original theory (amj-theory-development) or run the analysis (amj-data-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building or cleaning the tables and figures for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — correlation tables, regression/SEM/HLM result tables, the theoretical-model figure, and interaction plots in AOM house style. Finalizes exhibits; it does not run the analysis (amj-data-analysis) or frame the contribution (amj-contribution-framing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Three modes for CS-conference papers (CVPR/ICCV/ECCV vision, ACL/EMNLP/NAACL NLP, ICLR/NeurIPS/ICML/AAAI ML). DIRECT-EDIT mode (common): the user describes a change in Chinese or English and the manuscript (LaTeX or Markdown) is edited directly through a CS-venue writing toolkit with author sign-off (use for 改这段 / 把中文想法写成 latex / polish / de-AI / translate / compress a passage). REVIEW mode (occasional, pre-submission): harden the paper through an adversarial courtroom review engine (N holistic domain reviewers / contestability routing / two-sided trial / three-way verdict / clerk-converged multi-round loop) with consensus-gated, author-signed revisions (use for review / critique / 审稿 / 评审 / mock-review). AUTO mode (unattended, opt-in via /goal): run the review-revise loop toward a verifiable goal, applying safe fixes under a drift-bounded policy and queueing risky ones. Resolves all inputs at runtime, no hardcoded paths. Not a from-scratch drafter (use ml-paper-writing) and not an official-venue rebuttal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Constructs and validates polygenic risk scores using LDpred2-auto, SBayesRC, MegaPRS, PRS-CS, PROSPER, MUSSEL, BridgePRS, JointPRS, PRSmix, or PGS Catalog Calculator with ancestry-aware reference panels (HapMap3, UKB-LD), ancestry-conditional calibration, and PRS-RS reporting standards. Use when computing PRS for cohorts, applying absolute-risk transformation, assessing cross-ancestry portability (Martin 2017 / Ding 2023 continuous ancestry), or auditing PRS manuscripts against the 22-item PRS-RS reviewer checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clean up translation-ese and AI-writing tics in Korean prose so it reads like a person wrote it — content (facts, numbers, proper nouns, quotes) stays 100% unchanged, only style and rhythm are touched. Single-pass, done in this session. Triggers — AI 티 없애줘, 번역투 고쳐줘, 한글 자연스럽게 윤문해줘, sounds like a machine translation, remove AI tells from this Korean text, make this Korean read naturally. Not for: marketing copy generation (write it clean the first time — see rules/korean-writing-quality.md), English text, plain spell-check (see korean-spell-check), or book-length manuscripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft, audit, or minimally revise English- or Chinese-language academic prose to reduce formulaic, vacuous, mechanically repetitive, or process-leaking language while preserving claims, evidence strength, logical relations, manuscript-wide terminology identity, document-level pattern variation, and scholarly register. Use for papers, abstracts, grants, cover letters, and reviewer responses when the user asks to de-AI, humanize, audit AI-like phrasing, or rewrite text without changing meaning. English is primary; Chinese is supported. Not for detector evasion, policy circumvention, pure translation, non-academic copy, or adding facts, citations, examples, or author experiences that the source does not contain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and revise academic papers with a senior-reviewer workflow. Use when an AI research/coding agent needs to work on an existing paper draft, PDF, LaTeX project, Word document, markdown manuscript, rejected paper, or paper idea that already has a concrete direction, and produce: paper maps, weakness audits, insight/novelty checks, reviewer objections, claim-experiment matrices, theory/proof checks, experiment plans, statistics/reproducibility audits, figure/table audits, ethics/compliance checks, revision plans, detailed section edits, or final submission checklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the full PaperOrchestra (Song et al., 2026, arXiv:2604.05018) five-agent pipeline to turn unstructured research materials (idea, experimental log, LaTeX template, conference guidelines, optional figures) into a submission-ready LaTeX manuscript and compiled PDF. TRIGGER when the user asks to "write a paper from my experiments", "turn this idea and these results into a paper", "generate a conference submission", "run paper-orchestra on X", or otherwise wants the end-to-end paper-writing pipeline. Coordinates the outline-agent, plotting-agent, literature-review-agent, section-writing-agent, and content-refinement-agent skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end academic paper writing workflow. Takes a research repository and produces a publication-ready LaTeX manuscript for top ML/AI conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM). Covers repo understanding, structure planning, section drafting, citation management, anti-AI polishing, and conference formatting. Triggers on "write paper", "draft paper", "scholar writing", "paper writing workflow".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a review workspace has manuscript text and needs a traceable claim ledger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, draft, audit, globally revise, format, and verify a formal mathematical-modeling paper after the Standard evidence gate passes. Use for the sole S7/S8 formal manuscript path, not for legacy micro-unit scaffolds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help authors learn from exemplary ICLR, ICML, and NeurIPS papers through source-linked manuscript comparisons, concrete writing and experiment suggestions, and guided reflection. Use for research storytelling, contribution framing, paper comparison, figure planning, or research retrospectives. Not an acceptance predictor or a routine grammar/citation formatter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured peer review of manuscripts and grants. 7-stage evaluation: initial assessment, section review, statistical rigor, reproducibility, figure integrity, ethics, writing. Covers CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA and report structure. For evidence quality see scientific-critical-thinking; scoring see scholar-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read, decompose, and analyze IEEE-style papers using routed technical-reading workflows. Use when extracting problem setting, object-method-condition logic, contributions, method pipeline, equations, datasets, baselines, metrics, ablations, limitations, replication details, citation role, related-work positioning, implementation notes, or reviewer-style assessment from a paper, PDF, abstract, or manuscript excerpt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, audit, and strengthen experimental validation for IEEE manuscripts using routed claim-evidence checks. Use when planning experiments, selecting baselines, designing ablations, choosing metrics, checking fairness, adding robustness tests, explaining results, analyzing complexity, building claim-to-evidence matrices, or responding to reviewer concerns about insufficient experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize, organize, and normalize messy research materials into an IEEE-ready writing brief before manuscript drafting. Use when Codex needs to process a folder or collection of experiment logs, code files, AI chat exports, idea notes, literature summaries, related-work notes, copied introduction excerpts, Zotero-derived paper summaries, tables, figures, or scattered Markdown/text records and convert them into structured inputs for ieee-writing, ieee-experiment, ieee-citation, ieee-reviewer, or ieee-response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Polish, translate, diagnose, and restructure technical manuscript text into IEEE-style academic English using routed failure-mode guidance. Use for IEEE abstracts, introductions, related work, methods, experiments, conclusions, figure captions, rebuttals, Chinese-to-English technical writing, AI-like or template-like academic prose, and engineering prose that needs clearer problem logic, contribution framing, method rationale, evidence discipline, natural author voice, or reviewer-ready wording.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft, restructure, and diagnose IEEE-style technical manuscript sections using a routed static/dynamic workflow. Use for IEEE conference, journal, Transactions, Letters, or magazine papers when writing titles, abstracts, introductions, related work, methods, experiments, conclusions, contribution statements, section outlines, or Chinese-to-English engineering paper drafts in AI, computer science, communications, control, signal processing, electrical/electronic engineering, power, robotics, circuits, and applied systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。