「research」の検索結果

Gathers information from multiple sources in parallel, compares what they say, flags where they agree or conflict, and delivers a clean synthesis with a confidence rating for each finding. Useful for making evidence-backed decisions, when evaluating competing claims, during due diligence on a vendor or market, and for building research briefs before strategy sessions. Use when the user says "research this", "synthesize multiple sources", "compare sources", "research report", "what does the evidence say", "gather information on", or "deep dive into".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Радар фундаментальных публикаций про автономных AI-агентов в блогах AI-лабораторий и продуктовых команд (Anthropic, Claude, OpenAI, Cursor, LangChain, Amp, Cognition). Собирает ленты и HTML-индексы за окно дат, отсеивает продуктовые анонсы и релизы моделей, оставляет глубокие посты про архитектуру агентов: память и контекст, long-running циклы, self-improvement, оркестрация, экономика прогона, эвалы, риски длинных горизонтов. Отдаёт дайджест со ссылками, сутью каждого поста и тем, что забрать в свою работу. Use when (используй когда): пользователь хочет узнать, что нового вышло в блогах про AI-агентов, собрать дайджест за неделю или период, отследить исследования про агентную память. Триггерится на: "радар", "дайджест", "что нового в блогах", "публикации про агентов", "agent research", "что вышло за неделю", "блог Anthropic", "cursor blog", "langchain blog", "long-running agents", "research digest". Do NOT use for (не для): корпоративные вики и трекеры; arXiv; доставка сообщений.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform triangulated cognitive research combining SQLite memory, GitHub 10k+ stars patterns, and ToT DAG benchmarking before critical architectural decisions. Automatically triggers subagent research escalation when confidence is low (<0.70). Keywords: research, benchmark, github, memory, triangulation, grounding, best-practices, escalation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert legal research agent for finding and scraping expungement data state by state. Knows authoritative sources, URL patterns, Firecrawl configuration, and 2026 legal landscape. Activate on "find expungement data", "scrape state laws", "legal research", "court URLs", "statute sources", "Clean Slate laws", "automatic expungement research". NOT for interpreting laws (use national-expungement-expert), building UI, or legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a detailed Buy/Sell/Hold equity research report for Indian stock market (NSE/BSE listed companies). Use this skill whenever the user asks for a stock analysis, equity research, investment recommendation, target price, fundamental analysis, technical analysis, or buy/sell/hold opinion on any Indian company or stock. Triggers on phrases like "analyse [stock]", "should I buy [stock]", "research report for [company]", "target price for [stock]", "is [stock] a good buy", "NSE/BSE stock analysis", etc. Always use this skill for any Indian equity research request — even if the user just names a stock ticker or company and asks "what do you think?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses a research paper outline (.qmd file) against structured criteria from Kosuke Imai's empirical research guide. Evaluates the abstract and section outline for: research question clarity, stated contributions, hypotheses and testable implications, data description, planned results and inferential approach, and robustness checks. Detects causal papers from the abstract and conditionally assesses identification strategy only when causal framing is present. Produces a structured markdown report with PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL assessments and actionable suggestions. Use when asked to assess, evaluate, review, or check a paper outline, abstract-and-outline, or research plan in a .qmd file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chart a too-big effort as a shared map of decision tickets on the Gaia headquarters issue tracker, then resolve them one at a time until the way to the destination is clear. Use when someone says: "this is too big for one session", "chart a map", "wayfinder map", "plan this effort", "what do we need to decide first", "open a wayfinder", "work the map", "what's on the frontier", or /wayfinder. Covers any gaia-research org repo — gaia-skill-tree, gaia-research, gaia-skill-heaven and beyond — but every map and every ticket lives on ONE tracker: gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree. This is cartography (planning an effort as decisions), NOT triage of an existing backlog — for that use /gaia-triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end plan → implement → review pipeline that takes one triaged Gaia issue to a merged-ready PR, with Kill Criteria on the issue and zero follow-up debt. Use when someone says: "resolve this issue", "take #N end-to-end", "work the P0 queue", "fix and ship this issue", "run the resolver", "close out this issue properly", or /gaia-issue-resolver. Works any gaia-research org repo — gaia-skill-tree, gaia-research, gaia-skill-heaven — while the issue itself lives on the headquarters tracker, gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree. Assumes the issue is already triaged and carries a P0–P4 label; if it does not, run /gaia-triage first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AutoResearchClaw 23 阶段自主研究管线的中文技能。自动设置、交互式配置、执行监控和故障诊断。当用户提到 ResearchClaw、自主研究、论文生成、研究管线时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop research proposals with solicitation alignment, reviewer-focused logic, evidence-bounded preliminary results, milestones, risks, and compelling figures. Use for federal, foundation, equipment, partnership, or internal research proposals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a literature review. Use when the user says "literature review", "lit review", "review the literature", "summarize prior research", "what does the research say about", "synthesize research on", "background section", "related work section", "what has been studied on this topic", or needs to systematically identify, synthesize, and critically evaluate existing research on a topic - even if they don't explicitly say "literature review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write or refine a research hypothesis. Use when the user says "write a hypothesis", "frame my hypothesis", "is my hypothesis testable", "null and alternative hypothesis", "research hypothesis", "refine my hypothesis", "hypothesis statement", "H0 and H1", "operationalize my hypothesis", "turn my research question into a hypothesis", or needs to convert a research question or intuition into a falsifiable, testable hypothesis with clear variables and predictions - even if they don't explicitly say "hypothesis".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or refine the Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) and personas using the Jobs-to-be-Done framework (Clayton Christensen / Bob Moesta). Use when the user asks for ICP research, persona development, "who are our customers", buyer personas, audience research, "build our ICP", target customer definition, or wants to update persona docs. JTBD interview questions, three job dimensions (functional/emotional/social), and the Four Forces of Progress are wired into every persona. Writes to knowledge/icp/personas.md so all other skills get smarter. For the individual buyer persona rather than the segment, see customer-persona. For sourcing real customer language, see customer-research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a detailed buyer persona or customer profile. Use when the user says "write a persona", "build a buyer persona", "customer persona for [product]", "who is our target customer", "ICP document", "ideal customer profile", "define our buyer", "who are we building this for", "customer profile", "audience profile", or wants to create a documented, research-backed profile of who buys the product and why. For sourcing the real research behind a persona, see customer-research. For segment and firmographic definition, see icp-research. For writing it into the knowledge base, see brand-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query Google NotebookLM notebooks for source-grounded, citation-backed answers from user-uploaded documents. Manages notebook library, handles Google authentication, and supports smart discovery. Works standalone via /blog notebooklm or internally from blog-write and blog-researcher for source-grounded research context. Falls back gracefully when not configured. Use when user says "notebooklm", "notebook", "query notebook", "ask notebook", "notebook research", "source grounded research", "document query", "notebook library".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a researched long-form article from a topic prompt via an orchestrated pipeline - research agent (first-person sources, working-definition gate), narrative-architecture outline, writer/cold-reviewer loop with an explicit ACCEPT/REVISE verdict contract, then a catalog-deslop pass with a regression gate. The orchestrator dispatches subagents only; the writer never judges its own draft. Use when the user says "article factory", "write an article about X", "run the article pipeline", or asks for a researched long-form piece produced end-to-end. For essays and micro posts in the user's own voice without a research stage, use the prose skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs autonomous keep/discard experiments on a codebase to optimize a single metric for a fixed duration, in the style of karpathy/autoresearch. Use when the user says "autoresearch" (optionally with a focus, e.g. "autoresearch the optimizer"), asks to run experiments on a repo overnight, to hill-climb or optimize a metric autonomously, or points at a repo with a karpathy-style program.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a timeframe-bounded research dossier by decomposing a topic into year orchestrators and month-level research passes that each write one condensed paragraph plus sources directly into a target file. Use when the user asks for a dossier, timeline, chronology, release history, or month-by-month research bounded by specific years or months. Not for timeless explainers or single-document summaries with no temporal scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when users need to search academic papers, download research documents, extract citations, or gather scholarly information. Triggers include: requests to "find papers on", "search research about", "download academic articles", "get citations for", or any request involving academic databases like arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, or Google Scholar. Also use for literature reviews, bibliography generation, and research discovery. Requires OpenClawCLI installation from clawhub.ai.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research process for comparing frontier harnesses (Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, autoresearch, Prime Agent) with the original/upstream implementation and performing GAP analysis before feature implementation. Triggered by "research" ("리서치"), "gap", "frontier", "harness", "case study" ("사례 조사"), "pattern exploration" ("패턴 탐색"), "comparative analysis" ("비교 분석") keywords.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pure API reference for reddapi.dev - authentication, all endpoints (vector search, semantic search, trends, subreddit lookup), request parameters, response schemas, and error codes, with no research-workflow framing. Use when the user wants raw endpoint documentation, is debugging a reddapi.dev integration, needs exact request/response field names, or asks for 'reddapi API reference', 'reddapi.dev endpoints', or 'reddapi error codes'. For guided research workflows and query playbooks, see reddit-research. For B2B lead scoring, see reddit-leads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Research] Use when deeply researching top sources from web-research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web search, content extraction, crawling, and deep research via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill whenever the user wants to search the web, find articles, research a topic, look something up online, extract content from a URL, grab text from a webpage, crawl documentation, download a site's pages, discover URLs on a domain, or conduct in-depth research with citations. Also use when they say "fetch this page", "pull the content from", "get the page at https://", "find me articles about", or reference extracting data from external websites. This provides LLM-optimized web search, content extraction, site crawling, URL discovery, and AI-powered deep research — capabilities beyond what agents can do natively. Do NOT trigger for local file operations, git commands, deployments, or code editing tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。