「db」の検索結果

用户观察到某个力量/趋势/行为过度亢盛需要引入制衡时; 当系统出现"越用力越糟糕"的过冲现象时; 当需要设计自我调节机制防止系统走向极端时; 当用户说"物极必反"或"用力过猛反而坏事"时。 不适用于: 需要持续单向推进不需要制衡的场景(如创业初期的全力冲刺); 问题本身就是力量不足而非亢盛的场景。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloudflare platform management via Wrangler CLI, Agents SDK (v0.13+), and Browser Rendering API. Deploy Pages, Workers, KV, R2, D1, Queues, Vectorize, Workflows, Hyperdrive. Build stateful AI agents with the full SDK stack — Agent, AIChatAgent, Think, Voice, sub-agents, fibers, HITL, scheduling, observability, Code Mode (Dynamic Worker sandboxes). Budget web scraping via cf_browser.py. Use when deploying to Cloudflare, managing CF infrastructure, configuring wrangler.toml/wrangler.jsonc, building AI agents or chat agents on Workers, adding voice, orchestrating sub-agents, or for cheap web scraping. Triggers: Cloudflare, wrangler, Pages, KV, R2, D1, Workers, Vectorize, Queues, Workflows, Hyperdrive, cf_browser, Browser Rendering, Agents SDK, Code Mode, codemode, MCP, Think, AIChatAgent, Voice agent, sub-agents, fibers, HITL, Dynamic Workers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review web design for layout quality, typography, colour usage, spacing, responsive behaviour, brand consistency, and visual hierarchy. Covers design principles evaluation and improvement recommendations. Use when reviewing a design mockup before development, assessing an implemented site for design quality, providing feedback during a design review session, evaluating brand consistency, or checking responsive behaviour across breakpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a peer review of research methodology, experimental design, and manuscript quality. Covers methodology evaluation, statistical appropriateness, reproducibility assessment, bias identification, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing a manuscript, preprint, or internal research report, evaluating a research proposal or study protocol, assessing evidence quality behind a claim, or reviewing a thesis chapter or dissertation section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the memex session-init ritual at the start of a fresh session: load the bias-log, read the persistent-self trail in order, run the verification scoreboard, and surface the next slice from the docs. Use at the very start of any session that operates on the memex repo, when reconstructing context before doing work, or when an interrupted session needs to re-orient. NOT the `memex init` CLI command (which initializes the store/db) — this is the reconstruct-context ritual.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and maintain a product or project backlog with prioritized items, acceptance criteria, and estimates. Covers user story writing, MoSCoW prioritization, backlog grooming, item splitting, and status tracking. Use when starting a new project and converting scope into actionable items, during ongoing grooming before sprint planning, re-prioritizing after stakeholder feedback or scope changes, or splitting oversized items into implementable pieces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide a person in developing active listening skills. AI coaches receptive mindset preparation, full-presence attending, reflective paraphrasing, clarifying questioning, synthesis of understanding, and integration of insights into communication practice. Use when a person wants to improve communication, when someone keeps misunderstanding others or feels misunderstood, when preparing for a difficult conversation such as a feedback session or conflict resolution, or when a person notices they talk more than they listen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI systematic knowledge acquisition from unfamiliar territory — deliberate model-building with feedback loops. Maps spaced repetition principles to AI reasoning: survey the territory, hypothesize structure, explore with probes, integrate findings, verify understanding, and consolidate for future retrieval. Use when encountering an unfamiliar codebase or domain, when a user asks about a topic requiring genuine investigation rather than recall, when multiple conflicting sources require building a coherent model, or when preparing to teach a topic and deep understanding is required first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evolve an existing agent definition by refining its persona in-place or creating an advanced variant. Covers assessing the current agent against best practices, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes to skills, tools, capabilities, and limitations, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when an agent's skills list is outdated, user feedback reveals capability gaps, tool requirements have changed, an advanced variant is needed alongside the original, or the agent's scope needs sharpening after real-world use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and compare levitation mechanisms for a given application through a structured trade study. Covers magnetic (passive diamagnetic, active feedback, superconducting), acoustic (standing wave, phased array), aerodynamic (hovercraft, air bearings, Coanda effect), and electrostatic (Coulomb suspension, ion traps) mechanisms. Use when selecting the most appropriate levitation approach for transport, sample handling, display, bearings, or precision measurement applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evolve an existing skill by refining its content in-place or creating an advanced variant. Covers assessing the current skill, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when a skill's procedure steps are outdated, user feedback reveals gaps, a skill needs a complexity upgrade, an advanced variant is needed alongside the original, or related skills are added and cross-references are stale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evolve an existing team composition by refining its structure in-place or creating a specialized variant. Covers assessing the current team against template and coordination patterns, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (adjust members, change coordination pattern, split/merge teams), applying changes to the team file and CONFIG block, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when a team's member roster is outdated, coordination pattern no longer fits, user feedback reveals workflow gaps, a specialized variant is needed alongside the original, or agents have been added or removed from the library affecting team composition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and manage pull requests using GitHub CLI. Covers branch preparation, writing PR titles and descriptions, creating PRs, handling review feedback, and merge/cleanup workflows. Use when proposing changes from a feature or fix branch for review, merging completed work into the main branch, requesting code review from collaborators, or documenting the purpose and scope of a set of changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply collective intelligence coordination patterns — stigmergy, local rules, and quorum sensing — to organize distributed systems, teams, or workflows without centralized control. Covers signal design, agent autonomy boundaries, emergent behavior cultivation, and feedback loop tuning. Use when designing distributed systems without a coordination bottleneck, organizing teams that must self-coordinate, building event-driven architectures with shared state communication, or replacing fragile centralized orchestration with resilient emergent coordination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze magnetic levitation systems by applying Earnshaw's theorem to determine whether passive static levitation is possible, then identifying the appropriate circumvention mechanism (diamagnetic, superconducting, active feedback, or spin-stabilized). Use when evaluating maglev transport, magnetic bearings, superconducting levitation, diamagnetic suspension, or Levitron-type devices. Covers force balance calculations, stability analysis in all spatial and tilting modes, and Meissner effect versus flux pinning distinctions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Construct well-structured arguments using the hypothesis-argument-example triad. Covers formulating falsifiable hypotheses, building logical arguments (deductive, inductive, analogical, evidential), providing concrete examples, and steelmanning counterarguments. Use when writing or reviewing PR descriptions that propose technical changes, justifying design decisions in ADRs, constructing substantive code review feedback, or building a research argument or technical proposal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI relational calibration — reading and adapting to the specific person you are working with. Goes beyond user-intent alignment (solving the right problem) to genuine attunement (meeting the person where they are). Maps communication style, expertise depth, emotional register, and implicit preferences from conversational evidence. Use at the start of a new session, when communication feels mismatched, after receiving unexpected feedback, or when transitioning between very different users or contexts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work on bifunctional degraders and molecular glues, where potency comes from a ternary complex rather than occupancy. Use this skill to apply the property rules that govern this beyond-rule-of-five space, reason about linker length, attachment vector and E3 ligase choice, prepare inputs for ternary complex structure prediction, and interpret degradation readouts — DC50, Dmax, cooperativity, and the hook effect that makes a dose-response curve turn over. Also trigger on PROTAC, molecular glue, targeted protein degradation, E3 ligase, cereblon, VHL, ternary complex, DC50, Dmax, hook effect, cooperativity, or PROTAC-DB.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DiffDock and DiffDock-L diffusion-based molecular docking. Use for blind protein-small-molecule pose prediction from a PDB file or sequence plus SMILES/SDF/MOL2, batch docking over a CSV of complexes, virtual screening triage, sampling multiple poses per complex, and reading the confidence score correctly. Also trigger on DiffDock, DiffDock-L, inference.py, confidence_model, samples_per_complex, ESM embedding preparation for docking, or blind docking without a defined box. Not for binding affinity prediction — the confidence score ranks pose plausibility, not potency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply WIT (Writing Is Thinking) as a human–LLM collaborative scientific reasoning skill for scientific question formulation, finding-driven research planning, next-experiment selection, Results or Discussion review, claim–evidence and reviewer stress tests, manuscript logic audits, deadline closure, and researcher growth. Use when the user invokes WIT or asks for these question-driven scientific reasoning workflows; do not use for generic copyediting, summarization, or literature search alone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial, security-first review of a pull request from an EXTERNAL or untrusted contributor — a fork PR, a first-time or unknown author, anyone without write access — before a maintainer merges it. Use this whenever you're reviewing, triaging, or deciding whether to merge a PR opened against tbh-meter by someone outside the maintainer team: 'review PR #123', 'someone opened a PR — is it safe to merge?', 'check this contributor's changes', 'can we take this fork PR?', 'is this contribution legit?'. This is supply-chain DEFENSE, not ordinary code review: every merged PR auto-updates onto every user's machine and ships a memory-reading .exe plus an unsandboxed Electron app, so the author and the PR description are UNTRUSTED and the diff is the only evidence. It posts its verdict as a real GitHub review — an inline comment pinned to each problematic line (via the pulls/reviews API), not just one summary comment. NOT for your own or a fellow maintainer's branch (use self-review for that), and prefer this over the generic review flow for anything coming from outside the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

xUnit, Moq/NSubstitute, FluentAssertions, and coverlet patterns for any .NET project. Covers test structure ([Fact]/[Theory]/[InlineData]), mocking discipline, fluent assertions, integration test setup with WebApplicationFactory, and coverage measurement. Stack-agnostic — referenced by every .NET plugin in the marketplace. Use this skill to: - Write clear, maintainable unit tests with xUnit [Fact] and [Theory]. - Mock dependencies with Moq or NSubstitute without overusing mocks. - Write expressive assertions with FluentAssertions. - Measure coverage with coverlet and enforce a minimum threshold. Do NOT use this skill for: - ASP.NET Core-specific integration tests (WebApplicationFactory, HttpClient — those are in aspnet-core-plugin:aspnet-conventions). - EF Core in-memory or SQL Server LocalDB test patterns (aspnet-core-plugin:efcore-patterns). - C# language idioms — see csharp-foundation:csharp-conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JUnit 5, Mockito, AssertJ, and Testcontainers patterns for any JVM project. Covers test structure, parameterised tests, mocking discipline, fluent assertions, and integration testing with real containers. Stack-agnostic — referenced by every Java plugin in the marketplace. Use this skill to: - Write clear, maintainable unit tests with JUnit 5. - Mock dependencies with Mockito without overusing mocks. - Write expressive assertions with AssertJ. - Spin up real infrastructure (DBs, message brokers) with Testcontainers for integration tests. Do NOT use this skill for: - Spring-specific test slices (@SpringBootTest, @WebMvcTest, @DataJpaTest — those are in spring-boot-plugin skills). - Framework-specific mocking utilities (MockMvc, WebTestClient).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。