4,129 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Revise an already accepted article, essay, paper, statement, or manuscript under strict minimal-change constraints while still satisfying reviewer comments, supervisor feedback, or requested edits. Use when the user asks for minimal edits, smallest necessary changes, preserve the current voice, keep the existing style, avoid broad rewriting, or implement requested revisions without unnecessary polishing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute a project from a folder of raw materials. Use when the user drops messages, screenshots, documents, drafts, and references into a project directory and wants Codex to identify the real goal, build a plan, do the work, drive the project to a submission-ready state, verify completion, and return a clear final summary of what was required, what was completed, and how it was done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill provides expert-level guidance for implementing VS Code WebView features. Use when creating WebView panels, implementing secure CSP policies, handling Extension-WebView communication, managing WebView state persistence, optimizing WebView performance, or debugging WebView rendering issues. Covers security best practices, message protocols, and VS Code-specific WebView patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reverse engineers ARM/AArch64 malware by identifying the architecture and instruction set state (ARM/Thumb), parsing ELF/Mach-O ARM headers, and orienting analysis around the ARM calling convention. Activates for requests to reverse ARM binaries, analyze AArch64 malware, or handle ARM/Thumb instruction-set decoding.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Defeats control-flow-flattening obfuscation by identifying the dispatcher/state- variable structure and reconstructing the original control flow so the logic becomes readable. Activates for requests to defeat control-flow flattening, deobfuscate an OLLVM-flattened function, or recover original control flow from a dispatcher loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
VST3 format adapter for Pulp — SingleComponentEffect wiring, bus arrangement negotiation, parameter / MIDI event routing, state round-trip, and the pitfalls discovered while wiring the adapter against Steinberg's SDK.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Offline time-stretch / pitch / varispeed — character modes, fine-tune presets, A/B toolkit, and the honest quality state, so an agent can pick a mode, dial it in, and ship a plugin with it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audio Unit v3 (AUAudioUnit) format adapter for Pulp — render-block wiring, parameter tree bridging, MIDI / sysex via AURenderEvent, sidechain pulls, state persistence, iOS extension surface, and the pitfalls discovered while wiring the adapter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LV2 format adapter for Pulp — the Turtle manifest the build emits by asking the module to describe itself, port indices as a saved-session wire format with one shared layout, host transport arriving as a time:Position atom on the MIDI port, the optional buf-size feature that is a hint and not a guarantee, state:interface versus control ports, and the real-time rules run() has to keep.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain Pulp's installed design-time agent capability manifest and public-surface ledger. Use when adding, removing, renaming, or materially changing public audio, MIDI, signal, timebase, or sequence APIs; registering a new algorithm for generators; changing capability support or deprecation state; or repairing agent-capabilities freshness, schema, fingerprint, tombstone, or installed-SDK tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Professional Flutter: widget composition, state management, platform channels, and performance. Use when writing, reviewing, or structuring Flutter apps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
fMRI data analysis — preprocessing, GLM modeling, and group-level inference for task and resting-state studies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage energy, not just time: map your ultradian rhythms, align tasks to energy states, and design recovery. Use when time management alone isn't fixing fatigue or afternoon slumps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Engineer the full context a model sees — system prompts, retrieved knowledge, tool definitions, state, and history as one designed artifact. Use when moving beyond prompt tweaks to systematic context design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writing biosketches that build reviewer confidence — personal statement, contributions, and honest positioning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build streaming AI user interfaces with AI SDK patterns — message rendering, tool-call displays, loading states, and optimistic updates. Use when creating chat UIs that stream model output and show agent activity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Playwright-first strategy for shared DB + shared test accounts. Use when E2E tests collide in QA/staging, need safe parallelism, or require deterministic cleanup without touching baseline data. Covers per-test ownership, namespacing, ID-based teardown, serial shared-state suites, and optional stale-data janitor jobs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews YUP audio plugin code for YUP-specific correctness issues: AudioProcessor lifecycle, AudioParameterBuilder and AudioParameterHandle usage, editor gestures, AudioBusLayout handling, CLAP/VST3 wrapper contracts, state recall, and MIDI safety. Use when the user asks to review a YUP plugin, check a processBlock, audit parameter smoothing, or asks "is this YUP code safe?". Trigger when you see yup::AudioProcessor, yup_audio_plugin, AudioParameterBuilder, AudioParameterHandle, AudioProcessorEditor, or createPluginProcessor in the code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews JUCE audio plugin code for JUCE-specific correctness issues: thread safety, APVTS parameter patterns, MessageManager usage, ValueTree, and MIDI handling. Use when the user asks to review a JUCE plugin, check a processBlock, audit parameter handling, or asks "is this JUCE code safe?". Trigger on phrases like "review my JUCE plugin", "check my AudioProcessor", "is this APVTS usage correct?", or when you see AudioProcessor, AudioProcessorEditor, or AudioProcessorValueTreeState in the code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implementation guide for common DSP algorithms. Use when the user asks "implement a lowpass filter", "how do I write a compressor", "reverb algorithm", "FFT convolution", "pitch shifter", or "oscillator with no aliasing". Trigger on phrases like "biquad filter", "state variable filter", "feedback delay network", "phase vocoder", "overlap-add", "PolyBLEP", or any request to implement a specific DSP processing block.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit an existing Lamport-style hierarchical mathematical proof forward for validity and whether its hierarchy, scope, dependencies, side conditions, and proof constructs discharge the stated theorem. Use when the central question concerns a top-down proof with numbered levels, subproofs, ASSUME/PROVE, SUFFICES, PICK, CASE, DEFINE, Q.E.D., or prose equivalents. For an ordinary proof that first needs source-preserving hierarchy, use convert-lamport; for conclusion-first AND/OR obligation reconstruction, use reverse-lamport. Do not use to generate or replace a proof, or to audit Lean, Coq, Isabelle, or other proof-assistant source.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit an existing mathematical, logical, algorithmic, or technical proof from its stated conclusion backward as a bounded AND/OR graph of exact obligations. Use to reconstruct conclusion dependencies, determine whether a proof-supplied route establishes the conclusion, or expose hidden assumptions, unmet side conditions, cycles, overly strong steps, or silent route switches. For a source-mapped Lamport rendering use convert-lamport, and for forward hierarchy, construct, and scope conformance use forward-lamport before this skill. This does not decide full theorem-level entailment by searching for a different proof; do not turn the audit into a linear reversed proof, exhaustive proof search, or replacement proof.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
N-round adversarial review pipeline for empirical research output — the chain from data to LaTeX tables to a manuscript that cites them. A Claude drafter proposes minimal diffs, a deterministic mechanical battery gates every diff from a clean state with a regression gate, a Codex reviewer files check-backed critiques, and a blind judge panel decides residual disputes. Manual-invoke ONLY: trigger when the user explicitly runs /adversarial-empirical-review or names 'adversarial-empirical-review' / 'adversarial empirical review'. Do NOT auto-trigger on generic 'review my results', 'check my tables', or manuscript-editing requests. For prose-style refinement use style-emulation instead; this skill AUDITS WHETHER THE TABLES ARE CORRECT — that each number in the tables is what the analysis code computes, reproduces from the data, and is internally consistent. It is an empirical + code review: the manuscript is read only to resolve table numbering, and prose is not examined.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Library-agnostic Flutter/Dart code review checklist covering widget best practices, state management patterns (BLoC, Riverpod, Provider, GetX, MobX, Signals), Dart idioms, performance, accessibility, security, and clean architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。