4,740 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me". Run BEFORE /build when a feature idea is fuzzy and a PRD doesn't yet exist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当用户纠结文案该写长还是写短时调用。适用于：规划广告/邮件/着陆页篇幅、 别人说"没人看长文案"时需要决策依据、产品复杂不知道该写多少。 核心信号：用户在问"文案写多长合适""会不会太长了"。 不适用于：已有明确篇幅要求、纯社交媒体短文案。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a premortem on any plan, launch, product, hire, strategy, or decision. Imagines it failed 6 months from now, works backward to find every reason why, then produces a revised plan. Triggers include "premortem this", "premortem my", "what could kill this", "stress test this plan", "find the blind spots", "poke holes in this", "where will this break", "am I missing anything", "what could go wrong", "future-proof this", "devil's advocate this".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating or updating a pull request in this repository — how to fill in each section of the PR template with concise, reviewer-friendly content, including the behavior-change table.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build explainability tools for AI decisions. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-explainability-tool related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze build vs buy decisions for AI solutions. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-build-vs-buy related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build audit trails for AI decision-making. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-audit-trail related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Efficiently extract and convert the contents of any local file—such as PDF, DOCX, DOC, ODT, RTF, XLSX, XLS, or HTML—into clean, well-formatted markdown saved to disk. Use this skill whenever the user requests to parse, read, or extract information from a file on their computer, including phrases like “parse this PDF”, “convert this document”, “read this file”, “extract text from”, or when a local file path (not a URL) is provided. This skill offers advanced options like generating AI-powered summaries and answering questions based on the file's content. Prefer this tool over `scrape` when handling local files to deliver precise, structured outputs for downstream tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for code generation, feature work, bug fixes, refactoring, and code review when a change creates or reshapes a multi-step flow, state lifecycle, side-effect or decision ownership, cross-unit composition, or boundary contract. Also use it when an existing structural problem makes those elements hard to trace or verify. Structural change is optional. Mechanical edits, throwaway experiments, and coherent local changes stay with their current owner and focused verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate architecture and module boundaries for volatility-based decomposition using Juval Lowy's framework (from "Righting Software", building on Parnas 1972). Use when reviewing module splits, service boundaries, new abstractions, or any decomposition decision. Trigger on phrases like "where should this boundary be", "how to split this", "module boundaries", "encapsulate change", "volatility", or references to Lowy, Parnas, or "Righting Software". Complements /hickey (interleaved concerns) with a different lens (change encapsulation).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a concise, evidence-backed implementation plan and save it to .agents/plans/Plan.md. Use when the user asks to plan a feature or task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when ending or pausing a Claude Code session whose work must continue in a fresh session — user says "create a handoff", "write a handoff", "I'm ending this session", "prepare for a fresh session", "hand this off", or "/handoff" — or when starting a session in a project that already contains a HANDOFF.md at the root ("resume", "pick up where we left off", "continue from the handoff"). Also relevant when a session shows degradation symptoms — Claude contradicted an earlier decision, re-explored something already established, hallucinated file contents, or the user says the session "feels off", "is getting confused", or "context is running low".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master coordinator for the founder. Filters noise, owns cross-functional processes, enforces consistency, routes decisions, and positions outputs for impact so the founder can think clearly. Doesn't own any function owns the space between all of them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes structured recovery from a ransomware incident following NIST and CISA frameworks, including environment isolation, forensic evidence preservation, clean infrastructure rebuild, prioritized system restoration from verified backups, credential reset, and validation against re-infection. Covers Active Directory recovery, database restoration, and application stack rebuild in dependency order. Activates for requests involving ransomware recovery, post-encryption restoration, or disaster recovery from ransomware.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a pull request or contribution deeply, explain it tutorial-style for a maintainer, and produce a polished report artifact such as HTML or Markdown. Use when asked to analyze a PR, explain a contributor's design decisions, compare it with similar systems, or prepare a merge recommendation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply behavioral science and mental models to revenue (cuan) decisions, prioritized using a psychological leverage and feasibility scoring system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Market Research Specialist. Use to analyze target markets, ICP segments, demand patterns, competitive terrain, and strategic whitespace for founder decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs financial ratio analysis, DCF valuation, budget variance analysis, and rolling forecast construction for strategic decision-making. Use when analyzing financial statements, building valuation models, assessing budget variances, or constructing financial projections and forecasts. Also applicable when users mention financial modeling, cash flow analysis, company valuation, financial projections, or spreadsheet analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, audit, and improve analytics tracking systems that produce reliable, decision-ready data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sets up a complete per-client workspace in Cowork with isolated context, preferences, deliverable templates, running notes, decision log, and automatic status reporting. For consultants, agencies, and professional services. Useful when onboarding a new client, during engagement kickoffs, for organizing existing client relationships, and when multiple clients need isolated context. Use when the user says "set up a client", "new client project", "client system", "client context", "client workspace", or "onboard a client".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
See the difference between Chat and Cowork with a live side-by-side comparison for understanding why Cowork is built differently. Use when evaluating AI tools, for comparing chat versus agent capabilities, during an AI tool decision, when switching from ChatGPT or Claude Chat, or when the user says "what is different about cowork", "cowork vs chat", "why not just use chatgpt", "show me the difference", "compare chat and cowork", or "why should I use cowork instead of chat".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gathers information from multiple sources in parallel, compares what they say, flags where they agree or conflict, and delivers a clean synthesis with a confidence rating for each finding. Useful for making evidence-backed decisions, when evaluating competing claims, during due diligence on a vendor or market, and for building research briefs before strategy sessions. Use when the user says "research this", "synthesize multiple sources", "compare sources", "research report", "what does the evidence say", "gather information on", or "deep dive into".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。