「framing」の検索結果

Use when a systematic, scoping, or rapid review needs a reproducible pipeline: protocol framing (PICO/SPIDER/PCC), a logged search string, title/abstract and full-text screening with recorded exclusion reasons, and PRISMA flow counts, with the human as the deciding screener.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai, plus a publicly reachable reference video the user is authorized to use. Use when a user has a rough 3D white-model, clay, wireframe, blockout, previs, or animatic clip and wants a finished visual treatment that preserves its shot order, cut timing, camera framing, spatial layout, and motion directions. Distinguishes that structure-preserving job from a continuation beginning at the reference's final state. Do not use for two still endpoints (keyframe-animation), for appending and locally joining a new ending (video-extend-edit), or when still-image references must be combined with the video in one request — first/last-frame anchors conflict with video references in the shipped core, while mixed image/video references are untested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai. Generate a handheld, phone-shot UGC clip — imperfect framing, one practical light, vertical, no cinematic grading, no beauty filter. It inverts the polish every other video skill here defaults to — a UGC clip that looks like an ad has failed. Use when a user wants a video that reads as filmed by a real customer rather than by an agency, e.g. "a real-looking phone unboxing of this product", "a creator first-impression clip for TikTok", "an honest review video, nothing slick", or "make it look like a customer shot it". Do not use for a polished brand ad (see seedance-ad-creative), plain catalog footage (see seedance-product-video), a dialogue scene between people (see seedance-short-drama), or a set of cheap vertical drafts to choose from (see shorts-reels).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Defensive counterpart to federated-harbor-redteam: closes the smells that red team opens against The Federated Harbor whitepaper. Federation-specific defenses for cross-harbor primitives — mechanization commitments, scope hedges, cross-paper dependency formalization, pre-emptive analogies (CT, Macaroons, atomic swaps), and defense-in-depth framing (refuses vs prices). Use during a versioned red-vs-white round; pairs with federated-harbor-redteam. NOT for ad-hoc code review, NOT for the Anchor or Bonded papers (use whitehat-defense).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Facilitate idea generation sessions that actually produce diverse, useful options instead of degenerating into the first plausible answer. Use for product ideation, feature exploration, problem-reframing, naming, design alternatives, strategic option-generation, or any task where the failure mode is "we picked the obvious thing too fast." Covers solo and group sessions, divergence/convergence discipline, technique selection (SCAMPER, Crazy Eights, How Might We, 6-3-5 Brainwriting, Reverse Brainstorming, Worst Possible Idea, Random Stimulus), facilitation moves for handling dominant voices and groupthink, and structured convergence to a shortlist with rationale. Outputs a session artifact with options generated, evaluation, shortlist, and the rejected-but-interesting list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。